Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 5–32 | Cite as

Middle Grade Teachers’ Learning through Students’ Engagement with Modeling Tasks*

  • Helen M. DoerrEmail author
  • Lyn D. English


We report on how two middle-grade teachers supported their students’ mathematical reasoning within the context of a novel modeling task in data analysis. We examine how the task features supported the development of teachers’ knowledge as their students engaged with the task. Analyses of the teachers’ practices suggest that the task features enabled teachers: (a) to develop new understandings of the mathematical content and the ways in which student ideas develop and are represented; (b) to adopt new roles in their interactions with the students, including a focus on listening and observing, and on asking questions for understanding and clarification; and (c) to engage in forms of interpretative listening that shifted the role of evaluation from the teacher to the student.

Key words

teacher development teacher learning modeling task features middle grades 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baroody A. J., Cibulskis M., Lai M., Li X. (2004). Comments on the use of learning trajectories in curriculum development and research. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 6(2):227–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett A., Desforges C. (1988). Matching classroom tasks to students’ attainments. Elementary School Journal 88:221–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borko H., Mayfield V., Marion S., Flexer R., Cumbo K. (1997). Teachers’ developing ideas and practices about mathematics performance assessment: Successes, stumbling blocks, and implications for professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education 13:259–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chazan D., Ball D. L. (1999). Beyond being told not to tell. For the Learning of Mathematics 19(2):2–10Google Scholar
  5. Crespo S. (2000). Seeing more than right and wrong answers: Prospective teachers’ interpretations of students’ mathematical work. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 3:155–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis B. (1996). Teaching mathematics: Toward a sound alternative. Garland, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis B. (1997). Listening for differences: An evolving conception of mathematics teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 28(3):355–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doerr H. M., English L. D. (2003). A modeling perspective on students’ mathematical reasoning about data. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 34(2):110–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doyle W. (1988). Work in mathematics classes: The context of students’ thinking during instruction. Educational Psychologist 23:167–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. English L. D., Doerr H. M. (2003). Perspective-taking in middle-school mathematical modeling: A teacher case study. In: Pateman N., Dougherty B., Zilliox J. (eds). Proceedings of the twenty-seventh conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education. Center for Research and Development Group, University of Hawai’i, Honolulu HI, pp. 357–364Google Scholar
  11. Even R. (1990). Subject matter knowledge for teaching and the case of functions. Educational Studies in Mathematics 21(6):521–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Even R., Tirosh D. (1995). Subject-matter knowledge and knowledge about students as sources of teacher presentations of the subject-matter. Educational Studies in Mathematics 29(1):1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fennema E., Carpenter T. P., Franke M. L., Levi L., Jacobs V. R., Empson S. B. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children’s thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 27:403–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldsmith L., Schifter D. (1997). Understanding teachers in transition: Characteristics of a model for developing teachers. In: Fennema E., Nelson B. S. (eds). Mathematics teachers in transition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 19–54Google Scholar
  15. Heid M. K., Blume G. W., Zbiek R. M., Edwards B. S. (1999). Factors that influence teachers learning to do interviews to understand students’ mathematical understandings. Educational Studies in Mathematics 37:223–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Henningsen M., Stein M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 28(5):524–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kennedy M. (1998). Education reform and subject matter knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35(3):249–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lampert M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. Yale University Press, New Haven,CTGoogle Scholar
  19. Lesh R., Hoover M., Hole B., Kelly A., Post T. (2000). Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers. In: Lesh R. A., Kelly A. (eds). Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 591–646Google Scholar
  20. Lesh R.A., Cramer K., Doerr H.M., Post T., Zawojewski J.S. (2003). Model development sequences. In: Lesh R. A., Doerr H. M. (eds). Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, teaching and learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 35–58Google Scholar
  21. Lloyd G. M., Wilson M. R. (1998). Supporting innovation: The impact of a teacher’s conceptions of functions on his implementation of a reform curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 29(3):248–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Author, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  23. Nicol C. (1999). Learning to teach mathematics: Questioning, listening and responding. Educational Studies in Mathematics 37(1):45–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sherin M. G. (2002). When teaching becomes learning. Cognition and Instruction 20(2):119–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shulman L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher 15(2):4–14Google Scholar
  26. Smith J. P. (1996). Efficacy and teaching mathematics by telling: A challenge for reform. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 27(4):387–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Strauss A., Corbin J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks CAGoogle Scholar
  28. Stein M. K., Grover B. W., Henningsen M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Education Research Journal 33:455–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Swafford J. O., Jones G. A., Thornton C. A., Stump S. L., Miller D. R. (1999). The impact on instructional practice of a teacher change model. Journal of Research and Development in Education 32(2):69–82Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsSyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA
  2. 2.School of Mathematics, Science, and Technology EducationQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations