Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 197–221 | Cite as

A Framework for Analysis of Teachers’ Geometric Content Knowledge and Geometric Knowledge for Teaching

  • Mohan Chinnappan
  • Michael J. Lawson


Current reform-driven mathematics documents stress the need for teachers to provide learning environments in which students will be challenged to engage with mathematics concepts and extend their understandings in meaningful ways (e.g., National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2000, Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The Council). The type of rich learning contexts that are envisaged by such reforms are predicated on a number of factors, not the least of which is the quality of teachers’ experience and knowledge in the domain of mathematics. Although the study of teacher knowledge has received considerable attention, there is less information about the teachers’ content knowledge that impacts on classroom practice. Ball (2000, Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 241–247) suggested that teachers’ need to ‘deconstruct’ their content knowledge into more visible forms that would help children make connections with their previous understandings and experiences. The documenting of teachers’ content knowledge for teaching has received little attention in debates about teacher knowledge. In particular, there is limited information about how we might go about systematically characterising the key dimensions of quality of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching and connections among these dimensions. In this paper we describe a framework for describing and analysing the quality of teachers’ content knowledge for teaching in one area within the domain of geometry. An example of use of this framework is then developed for the case of two teachers’ knowledge of the concept ‘square’.


framework for geometric knowledge mapping geometric knowledge mathematics teacher knowledge for teaching teacher education teachers’ knowledge deconstruction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, J.R. 2000Cognitive psychology and its implications5Worth PublishersNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball, D.L. 2000Bridging practices: Intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching learning to teachJournal of Teacher Education51241247Google Scholar
  3. Ball, D.L., Lubienski, S.T., Mewborn, D.S. 2001Research on teaching mathematics: The unresolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledgeRichardson, V. eds. Handbook of research on teachingAmerican Educational Research AssociationWashington433456Google Scholar
  4. Beissner, K.L., Jonassen, D.H. & Grabowski, B.L. (1993). Using and selecting graphic techniques to acquire structural knowledge. ERIC Document No. ED362151Google Scholar
  5. Board of Studies2002K-10 Mathematics SyllabusDepartment of Education and TrainingSydneyGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruner, J.S. 1966Toward a theory of instructionNortonNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Chinnappan, M. 1998aSchemas and mental models in geometry problem solvingEducational Studies in Mathematics36201217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chinnappan, M. 1998bThe accessing of geometry schemas by high school studentsMathematics Education Research Journal102745Google Scholar
  9. Clark, C., Peterson, P.L. 1986Teachers’ thought processesWittrock, M.C. eds. Handbook of research on teachingMacmillanNew York255297Google Scholar
  10. Coleman, E. (1993). Inducing a shift from intuitive to scientific knowledge with inquiry training. In M. Polson (Ed.), Proceedings of the fifteenth annual conference of the Cognitive Society (pp. 347–352). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Feiman-Nemser, S. 1990Teacher preparation: Structural and conceptual alternativesHouston, W.R.Haberman, M.Sikula, J. eds. Handbook of research on teacher educationMacmillanNew York212233Google Scholar
  12. Gray, E., Pinto, M., Pitta, D., Tall, D. 1999Knowledge construction and divergent thinking in elementary and advanced mathematicsEducational Studies in Mathematics38111133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grossman, P.L. 1995Teachers’ knowledgeAnderson, L.W. eds. International encyclopaedia of teaching and teacher educationElsevier Science Ltd2 Kidlington Oxford, UK2024Google Scholar
  14. Jonassen, D.H., Beissner, K., Yacci, M.A. 1993Structural knowledge: Techniques for conveying, assessing, and acquiring structural knowledgeLawrence ErlbaumHillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  15. Knapp, M.S. 1997Between systemic reforms and the maths and science classroom: the dynamics of innovation, implementation, and professional learningReview of Educational Research67227266Google Scholar
  16. Laturno, J. (1994). The validity of concept maps as a research tool in remedial mathematics. In D. Kirshner (Ed.), Proceedings of the sixteenth annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 60–66). Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University.Google Scholar
  17. Lawson, M.J. (1994). Concept mapping. In T. Husén & T.N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1026–1031). Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  18. Lawson, M.J., Chinnappan, M. 1994Generative activity during geometry problem solving: Comparison of the performance of high-achieving and low-achieving studentsCognition and Instruction126193Google Scholar
  19. Leinhardt, G. 1987The development of an expert explanation: An analysis of a sequence of subtraction lessonsCognition and Instruction4225282Google Scholar
  20. Markman, K.M., Mintzes, J.J., Jones, M.G. 1994The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: Further evidence of validityJournal of Research in Science Teaching3191101Google Scholar
  21. Mayer, R.E. 1975Information processing variables in learning to solve problemsReview of Research in Education45525541Google Scholar
  22. McKeown, M., Beck, I. 1990The assessment and characterisation of young learners knowledge of a topic in historyAmerican Educational Research Journal27688726Google Scholar
  23. Munby, H., Russell, T., Martin, A.K. 2001Teachers’ knowledge and how it developsRichardson, V. eds. Handbook of research on teachingAmerican Educational Research AssociationWashington, DC877904Google Scholar
  24. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.1989Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematicsThe CouncilReston, VAGoogle Scholar
  25. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.2000Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematicsThe CouncilReston, VAGoogle Scholar
  26. Novak, J. 1990Concept mapping: A useful device for science educationJournal of Research in Science Education27937949Google Scholar
  27. Novak, J., Gowin, D.B. 1984Learning how to learnCambridge University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Novick, L.R., Hurley, S.M. 2001To matrix, network or hierarchy: That is the questionCognitive Psychology42158216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Perkins, D.N., Simmons, R. 1988Patterns of misunderstanding: An integrative model for science, math and programmingReview of Educational Research58303326Google Scholar
  30. Robinson, N., Even, R. & Tirosh, D. (1992). Connectedness in teaching algebra: A novice-expert contrast. In W. Geeslin & K. Graham (Eds), Proceedings of the psychology of mathematics education conference, PME-XVI (pp. 258–265). Durham, New Hampshire: PME.Google Scholar
  31. Schoenfeld, A.H. 1988When good teaching leads to bad results: The disasters of ‘well taught’ mathematics classesEducational Psychologist23145166Google Scholar
  32. Schoenfeld, A.H. 1992Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematicsDouglas, Grouws A. eds. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learningMacmillanNew York334370Google Scholar
  33. Shavelson, R.J., Lang, H. & Lewin, B. (1993). On concept maps as potential ‘authentic’ assessments in science: Indirect approaches to knowledge representation of high school science. ERIC Document, No. ED367691.Google Scholar
  34. Shulman, L.S. 1986Paradigms and research programs in the study of teachingWittrock, M.C. eds. Handbook on research in teachingMacMillanNew York336Google Scholar
  35. Vinner, S., Dreyfus, T. 1989Images and definitions for the concept of functionJournal for Research for Mathematics Education20356366Google Scholar
  36. Watson, K.L., Lawson, M.J. 1995Improving access to knowledge: The effect of strategy training for question answering in high school geographyBritish Journal of Educational Psychology6597111Google Scholar
  37. Williams, C.G. 1998Using concept maps to assess conceptual knowledge of functionJournal for Research in Mathematics Education29414421Google Scholar
  38. Wittrock, M.C. 1990Generative processes of comprehensionEducational Psychologist24345376Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia
  2. 2.Flinders UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations