Advertisement

Suturable regenerated silk fibroin scaffold reinforced with 3D-printed polycaprolactone mesh: biomechanical performance and subcutaneous implantation

  • Ibrahim Fatih CengizEmail author
  • Helder Pereira
  • João Espregueira-Mendes
  • Il Keun Kwon
  • Rui L. Reis
  • Joaquim Miguel Oliveira
TISSUE ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTS AND CELL SUBSTRATES Original Research
  • 133 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Tissue Engineering Constructs and Cell Substrates

Abstract

The menisci have crucial roles in the knee, chondroprotection being the primary. Meniscus repair or substitution is favored in the clinical management of the meniscus lesions with given indications. The outstanding challenges with the meniscal scaffolds include the required biomechanical behavior and features. Suturability is one of the prerequisites for both implantation and implant survival. Therefore, we proposed herein a novel highly interconnected suturable porous scaffolds from regenerated silk fibroin that is reinforced with 3D-printed polycaprolactone (PCL) mesh in the middle, on the transverse plane to enhance the suture-holding capacity. Results showed that the reinforcement of the silk fibroin scaffolds with the PCL mesh increased the suture retention strength up to 400%, with a decrease in the mean porosity and an increase in crystallinity from 51.9 to 55.6%. The wet compression modulus values were significantly different for silk fibroin, and silk fibroin + PCL mesh by being 0.16 ± 0.02, and 0.40 ± 0.06 MPa, respectively. Both scaffolds had excellent interconnectivity (>99%), and a high water uptake feature (>500%). The tissue’s infiltration and formation of new blood vessels were assessed by means of performing an in vivo subcutaneous implantation of the silk fibroin + PCL mesh scaffolds that were seeded with primary human meniscocytes or stem cells. Regarding suturability and in vivo biocompatibility, the findings of this study indicate that the silk fibroin + PCL mesh scaffolds are suitable for further studies to be carried out for meniscus tissue engineering applications such as the studies involving orthotopic meniscal models and fabrication of patient-specific implants.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article is a result of the project FROnTHERA (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000023), supported by Norte Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). This study was also supported by the FP7 Marie Curie Initial Training Network “MultiScaleHuman: Multi-scale Biological Modalities for Physiological Human Articulation” (Contract number MRTN-CT-2011-289897). The authors thank Dr. Fatima Raquel Maia, Dr. Raphael F. Canadas, Dr. Alain da Silva Morais, Dr. Sandra Pina, Dr. Isabel B. Leonor, and Ms. Teresa Oliveira for their support. I. F. Cengiz thanks the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) for the Ph.D. scholarship (SFRH/BD/99555/2014). J. M. Oliveira also thanks the FCT for the funds provided under the program Investigador FCT 2015 (IF/01285/2015). The funding sources had no role in the study design, the data collection, analysis, interpretation, or the preparation and submission of this work for publication.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Cengiz IF, Pereira H, Silva-Correia J, Ripoll PL, Espregueira-Mendes J, Kaz R, et al. Meniscal lesions: from basic science to clinical management in footballers. In: van Dijk CN, Neyret P, Cohen M, Della Villa S, Pereira H, Oliveira M, editors. Injuries and health problems in football. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2017. p. 145–63. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783662539231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pereira H, Caridade S, Frias A, Silva-Correia J, Pereira D, Cengiz I, et al. Biomechanical and cellular segmental characterization of human meniscus: building the basis for Tissue Engineering therapies. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2014;22:1271–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cengiz IF, Pereira H, de Girolamo L, Cucchiarini M, Espregueira-Mendes J, Reis RL, et al. Orthopaedic regenerative tissue engineering en route to the holy grail: disequilibrium between the demand and the supply in the operating room. J Exp Orthop. 2018;5:14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cengiz IF, Pereira H, Espregueira-Mendes J, Oliveira JM, Reis RL. Treatments of meniscus lesions of the knee: current concepts and future perspectives. Regener Eng Transl Med. 2017;3:32–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cengiz IF, Silva-Correia J, Pereira H, Espregueira-Mendes J, Oliveira JM, Reis RL. Basics of the meniscus. In: Oliveira M, Reis RL, editors. Regenerative strategies for the treatment of knee joint disabilities. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2017. p. 237–47. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319447834.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pereira H, Cengiz IF, Silva-Correia J, Cucciarini M, Gelber PE, Espregueira-Mendes J, et al. Histology-ultrastructure-biology. In: Hulet C, Pereira H, Peretti G, Denti M, editors. Surgery of the meniscus. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2016. p. 23–33. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783662491867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pereira H, Cengiz IF, Silva-Correia J, Oliveira JM, Reis RL, Espregueira-Mendes J. The role of arthroscopy in the treatment of degenerative meniscus tear. In: Randelli P, Dejour D, van Dijk CN, Denti M, Seil R, editors. Arthroscopy. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2016. p. 107–17. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783662493748.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pereira H, Cengiz IF, Silva-Correia J, Ripoll PL, Varatojo R, Oliveira JM, et al. Meniscal repair: indications, techniques, and outcome. In: Randelli P, Dejour D, van Dijk CN, Denti M, Seil R, editors. Arthroscopy. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2016. p. 125–42. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783662493748.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cengiz IF, Silva-Correia J, Pereira H, Espregueira-Mendes J, Oliveira JM, Reis RL. Advanced regenerative strategies for human knee meniscus. In: Oliveira M, Reis RL, editors. Regenerative strategies for the treatment of knee joint disabilities. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2017. p. 271–85. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319447834.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pereira H, Cengiz IF, Silva-Correia J, Oliveira JM, Reis RL, Espregueira-Mendes J. Human meniscus: from biology to tissue engineering strategies. In: Doral MN, Karlsson J, editors. Sports injuries: prevention, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation. Berlin, Gemany: Springer; 2015. p. 1–16. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783642365683#otherversion=9783642365706.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gruchenberg K, Ignatius A, Friemert B, von Lübken F, Skaer N, Gellynck K, et al. In vivo performance of a novel silk fibroin scaffold for partial meniscal replacement in a sheep model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:2218–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mandal BB, Park S-H, Gil ES, Kaplan DL. Multilayered silk scaffolds for meniscus tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2011;32:639–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stein SEC, von Luebken F, Warnecke D, Gentilini C, Skaer N, Walker R, et al. The challenge of implant integration in partial meniscal replacement: an experimental study on a silk fibroin scaffold in sheep. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5160-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baek J, Sovani S, Choi W, Jin S, Grogan SP, D’Lima DD. Meniscal tissue engineering using aligned collagen fibrous scaffolds: comparison of different human cell sources. Tissue Eng Part A. 2018;24:81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heo J, Koh RH, Shim W, Kim HD, Yim H-G, Hwang NS. Riboflavin-induced photo-crosslinking of collagen hydrogel and its application in meniscus tissue engineering. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2016;6:148–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zitnay JL, Reese SP, Tran G, Farhang N, Bowles RD, Weiss JA. Fabrication of dense anisotropic collagen scaffolds using biaxial compression. Acta Biomater. 2018;65:76–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bodin A, Concaro S, Brittberg M, Gatenholm P. Bacterial cellulose as a potential meniscus implant. Journal of Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2007;1:406–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Martínez H, Brackmann C, Enejder A, Gatenholm P. Mechanical stimulation of fibroblasts in micro‐channeled bacterial cellulose scaffolds enhances production of oriented collagen fibers. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2012;100:948–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baker BM, Nathan AS, Huffman GR, Mauck RL. Tissue engineering with meniscus cells derived from surgical debris. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2009;17:336–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee CH, Rodeo SA, Fortier LA, Lu C, Erisken C, Mao JJ. Protein-releasing polymeric scaffolds induce fibrochondrocytic differentiation of endogenous cells for knee meniscus regeneration in sheep. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:266ra171–266ra171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang Z-Z, Jiang D, Ding J-X, Wang S-J, Zhang L, Zhang J-Y, et al. Role of scaffold mean pore size in meniscus regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2016;43:314–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang Z-Z, Wang S-J, Zhang J-Y, Jiang W-B, Huang A-B, Qi Y-S, et al. 3D-Printed Poly (ε-caprolactone) scaffold augmented with mesenchymal stem cells for total meniscal substitution: A 12-and 24-week animal study in a rabbit model. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45:1497–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gunja NJ, Athanasiou KA. Additive and synergistic effects of bFGF and hypoxia on leporine meniscus cell-seeded PLLA scaffolds. J Tissue Eng Regener Med. 2010;4:115–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gunja NJ, Uthamanthil RK, Athanasiou KA. Effects of TGF-β1 and hydrostatic pressure on meniscus cell-seeded scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2009;30:565–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kwak HS, Nam J, Lee Jh, Kim HJ, Yoo JJ. Meniscal repair in vivo using human chondrocyte‐seeded PLGA mesh scaffold pretreated with platelet‐rich plasma. J Tissue Eng Regener Med. 2017;11:471–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kremer A, Ribitsch I, Reboredo J, Dürr J, Egerbacher M, Jenner F, et al. Three-dimensional coculture of meniscal cells and mesenchymal stem cells in collagen type I hydrogel on a small intestinal matrix—a pilot study toward equine meniscus tissue engineering. Tissue Engineering Part A. 2017;23:390–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sarem M, Moztarzadeh F, Mozafari M, Shastri VP. Optimization strategies on the structural modeling of gelatin/chitosan scaffolds to mimic human meniscus tissue. Mater Sci Eng: C. 2013;33:4777–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ghodbane SA, Brzezinski A, Patel JM, Pfaff WH, Marzano KN, Gatt CJ, et al. Partial meniscus replacement with a collagen-hyaluronan infused 3D printed polymeric scaffold. Tissue Eng. 2018;25:379–89.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Patel JM, Ghodbane SA, Brzezinski A, Gatt CJ Jr, Dunn MG. Tissue-engineered total meniscus replacement with a fiber-reinforced scaffold in a 2-year ovine model. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46:1844–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gao S, Chen M, Wang P, Li Y, Yuan Z, Guo W, et al. An electrospun fiber reinforced scaffold promotes total meniscus regeneration in rabbit meniscectomy model. Acta Biomater. 2018;73:127–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yuan Z, Liu S, Hao C, Guo W, Gao S, Wang M, et al. AMECM/DCB scaffold prompts successful total meniscus reconstruction in a rabbit total meniscectomy model. Biomaterials. 2016;111:13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pillai MM, Gopinathan J, Senthil Kumar R, Sathish Kumar G, Shanthakumari S, Sahanand KS, et al. Tissue engineering of human knee meniscus using functionalized and reinforced silk‐polyvinyl alcohol composite three‐dimensional scaffolds: understanding the in vitro and in vivo behavior. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2018;106:1722–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cengiz I, Pitikakis M, Cesario L, Parascandolo P, Vosilla L, Viano G, et al. Building the basis for patient-specific meniscal scaffolds: from human knee MRI to fabrication of 3D printed scaffolds. Bioprinting. 2016;1:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cengiz IF, Pereira H, Pitikakis M, Espregueira-Mendes J, Oliveira JM, Reis RL. Building the basis for patient-specific meniscal scaffolds. In: Gobbi A, Espregueira-Mendes J, Lane JG, Karahan M, editors. Bio-orthopaedics. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2017. p. 411–8. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783662541807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Koh L-D, Cheng Y, Teng C-P, Khin Y-W, Loh X-J, Tee S-Y, et al. Structures, mechanical properties and applications of silk fibroin materials. Prog Polym Sci. 2015;46:86–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kundu B, Rajkhowa R, Kundu SC, Wang X. Silk fibroin biomaterials for tissue regenerations. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65:457–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rockwood DN, Preda RC, Yücel T, Wang X, Lovett ML, Kaplan DL. Materials fabrication from Bombyx mori silk fibroin. Nat Protoc. 2011;6:1612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cheng G, Davoudi Z, Xing X, Yu X, Cheng X, Li Z, et al. Advanced silk fibroin biomaterials for cartilage regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2018;4:2704–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ribeiro VP, da Silva Morais A, Maia FR, Canadas RF, Costa JB, Oliveira AL, et al. Combinatory approach for developing silk fibroin scaffolds for cartilage regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2018;72:167–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tellado SF, Chiera S, Bonani W, Poh PS, Migliaresi C, Motta A, et al. Heparin functionalization increases retention of TGF-β2 and GDF5 on biphasic silk fibroin scaffolds for tendon/ligament-to-bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2018;72:150–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Woodruff MA, Hutmacher DW. The return of a forgotten polymer—polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Prog Polym Sci. 2010;35:1217–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Oner T, Cengiz I, Pitikakis M, Cesario L, Parascandolo P, Vosilla L, et al. 3D segmentation of intervertebral discs: from concept to the fabrication of patient-specific scaffolds. Journal of 3D Print Med. 2017;1:91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cengiz IF, Oliveira JM, Reis RL. Micro-computed tomography characterization of tissue engineering scaffolds: effects of pixel size and rotation step. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2017;28:129.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cengiz IF, Oliveira JM, Reis RL. Micro-CT–a digital 3D microstructural voyage into scaffolds: a systematic review of the reported methods and results. Biomater Res. 2018;22:26.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-018-0136-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yan L-P, Oliveira JM, Oliveira AL, Caridade SG, Mano JF, Reis RL. Macro/microporous silk fibroin scaffolds with potential for articular cartilage and meniscus tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater. 2012;8:289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Horan RL, Antle K, Collette AL, Wang Y, Huang J, Moreau JE, et al. In vitro degradation of silk fibroin. Biomaterials. 2005;26:3385–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Li M, Ogiso M, Minoura N. Enzymatic degradation behavior of porous silk fibroin sheets. Biomaterials. 2003;24:357–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lu Q, Zhang B, Li M, Zuo B, Kaplan DL, Huang Y, et al. Degradation mechanism and control of silk fibroin. Biomacromolecules. 2011;12:1080–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bankhead P, Loughrey MB, Fernández JA, Dombrowski Y, McArt DG, Dunne PD, et al. QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:16878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Cengiz IF, Pereira H, Pêgo JM, Sousa N, Espregueira‐Mendes J, Oliveira JM, et al. Segmental and regional quantification of 3D cellular density of human meniscus from osteoarthritic knee. J Tissue Eng Regener Med. 2017;11:1844–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ellis PD. The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge University Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Fogh J, Giovanella BC, editors. Nude mouse in experimental and clinical research. Academic Press, Inc.; 1978.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rolstad B. The athymic nude rat: an animal experimental model to reveal novel aspects of innate immune responses? Immunological Rev. 2001;184:136–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Morris AH, Stamer D, Kyriakides T, editors. The host response to naturally-derived extracellular matrix biomaterials. Seminars in immunology. Elsevier; 2017.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Thurber AE, Omenetto FG, Kaplan DL. In vivo bioresponses to silk proteins. Biomaterials. 2015;71:145–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Eymard F, Chevalier X. Inflammation of the infrapatellar fat pad. Joint Bone Spine. 2016;83:389–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Gallagher J, Tierney P, Murray P, O’Brien M. The infrapatellar fat pad: anatomy and clinical correlations. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005;13:268–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Macchi V, Porzionato A, Sarasin G, Petrelli L, Guidolin D, Rossato M, et al. The infrapatellar adipose body: a histotopographic study. Cells Tissues Organs. 2016;201:220–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Caplan AI. Adult mesenchymal stem cells for tissue engineering versus regenerative medicine. J Cell Physiol. 2007;213:341–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Karp JM, Teo GSL. Mesenchymal stem cell homing: the devil is in the details. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;4:206–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Moore E, Suresh V, Ying G, West J. M0 and M2 macrophages enhance vascularization of tissue engineering scaffolds. Regener Eng Transl Med. 2018;4:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ibrahim Fatih Cengiz
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Helder Pereira
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • João Espregueira-Mendes
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
  • Il Keun Kwon
    • 8
  • Rui L. Reis
    • 1
    • 2
    • 9
  • Joaquim Miguel Oliveira
    • 1
    • 2
    • 9
  1. 1.3B’s Research Group, I3Bs – Research Institute on Biomaterials, Biodegradables and BiomimeticsUniversity of Minho, Headquarters of the European Institute of Excellence on Tissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineBarco, GuimarãesPortugal
  2. 2.ICVS/3B’s – PT Government Associate LaboratoryBraga/GuimarãesPortugal
  3. 3.Ripoll y De Prado Sports Clinic: Murcia-Madrid FIFA Medical Centre of ExcellenceMadridSpain
  4. 4.Orthopedic Department Centro Hospitalar Póvoa de VarzimVila do CondePortugal
  5. 5.Clínica do Dragão, Espregueira-Mendes Sports Centre – FIFA Medical Centre of ExcellencePortoPortugal
  6. 6.Dom Henrique Research CentrePortoPortugal
  7. 7.Orthopedic DepartmentUniversity of MinhoBragaPortugal
  8. 8.Department of Dental Materials, School of DentistryKyung Hee UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  9. 9.The Discoveries Centre for Regenerative and Precision MedicineHeadquarters at University of MinhoBarco,GuimarãesPortugal

Personalised recommendations