Advertisement

Improvement of anti-washout property of calcium phosphate cement by addition of konjac glucomannan and guar gum

  • Guowen Qian
  • Xingmei Li
  • Fupo He
  • Jiandong Ye
Biomaterials Synthesis and Characterization Original Research
  • 14 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Biomaterials Synthesis and Characterization

Abstracts

The inferior anti-washout property of injectable calcium phosphate cement (CPC) limits its wider application in clinic. In this study, the improvement of anti-washout performance of CPC by addition of konjac glucomannan or guar gum, which was dissolved in the CPC liquid, was first studied. The influence of KGM/GG blend with different mass ratios on the anti-washout property, compressive strength and in vitro cytocompatibility of CPC was estimated. The results revealed that small amount of KGM or GG could obviously enhance the anti-washout property of CPC. Moreover, the washout resistance efficiency of KGM/GG blend was better than KGM or GG alone. The addition of KGM/GG blend slightly shortened the final setting time of CPC. Although the introduction of KGM/GG blend reduced the compressive strength of CPC, the compressive strength still reached or surpassed that of human cancellous bone. The best KGM/GG mass ratio was 5:5, which was most efficient at not only reducing CPC disintegration, but also increasing compressive strength. The addition of KGM/GG blend obviously promoted the cells proliferation on the CPC. In short, the CPC modified by KGM/GG blend exhibited excellent anti-washout property, appropriate setting time, adequate compressive strength, and good cytocompatibility, and has the potential to be used in bone defect repair.

The addition of KGM/GG blend significantly improved the anti-washout property of CPC. The best KGM/GG mass ratio was 5:5, which was most efficient in reducing the CPC disintegration.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 51672087, the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou City of China under Grant No. 201508020017, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Brown WE, Chow LC. A new calcium phosphate, water-setting cement. Cements research progress. Wester Westerville, OH: American Ceramic Society; 1986. pp. 352–79.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fernández E, Gil FJ, Ginebra MP, Driessens FCM, Planell JA, Best SM. Calcium phosphate bone cements for clinical applications, Part I. Solution chemistry. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1999;10:169–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fernández E, Gil FJ, Ginebra MP, Driessens FCM, Planell JA, Best SM. Calcium phosphate bone cements for clinical applications. Part II: Precipitate formation during setting reactions. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1999;10:177–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang XH, Ma JB, Wang YN, He BL. Bone repair in radii and tibias of rabbits with phosphorylated chitosan reinforced calcium phosphate cements. Biomaterials. 2002;23:4167–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guo DG, Xu KW, Zhao XY, Han Y. Development of a strontium-containing hydroxyapatite bone cement. Biomaterials. 2005;26:4073–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang XP, Ye JD, Wang YJ, Wu XP, Bai B. Control of crystallinity of hydrated products in a calcium phosphate bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2007;81A:781–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Qi XP, Ye JD, Wang YJ. Improved injectability and in vitro degradation of a calcium phosphate cement containing poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres. Acta Biomater. 2008;4:1837–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li XM, He FP, Ye JD. Preparation, characterization and in vitro cell performance of anti-washout calcium phosphate cement modified by sodium polyacrylate. RSC Adv. 2017;7:32842–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang XP, Chen L, Xiang H, Ye JD. Influence of anti-washout agents on the rheological properties and injectability of a calcium phosphate cement. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater. 2007;81B:410–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu JQ, Li JY, Ye JD, He FP. Setting behavior, mechanical property and biocompatibility of anti-washout wollastonite/calcium phosphate composite cement. Ceram Int. 2016;42:13670–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu JQ, Li JY, Ye JD. Properties and cytocompatibility of anti-washout calcium phosphate cement by introducing locust bean gum. J Mater Sci Technol. 2016;32:1021–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen FP, Song ZY, Liu CS. Fast setting and anti-washout injectable calcium–magnesium phosphate cement for minimally invasive treatment of bone defects. J Mater Chem B. 2015;3:9173–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cherng A, Takagi S, Chow LC. Effects of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and other gelling agents on the handling properties of calcium phosphate cement. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;35:273–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ishikawa K, Miyamoto Y, Kon M, Nagayama M, Asaoka K. Non-decay type fast-setting calcium phosphate cement: composite with sodium alginate. Biomaterials. 1995;16:527–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    El-Fiqi A, Kim JH, Perez RA, Kim HW. Novel bioactive nanocomposite cement formulations with potential properties: incorporation of the nanoparticle form of mesoporous bioactive glass into calcium phosphate cements. J Mater Chem B. 2015;7:1321–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huang L, Takahashi R, Kobayashi S, Kawase T, Nishinari K. Gelation behavior of native and acetylated konjac glucomannan. Biomacromolecules. 2002;3:1296–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yoshimura M, Takaya T, Nishinari K. Rheological studies on mixtures of corn starch and konjac-glucomannan. Carbohyd Polym. 1997;35:71–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nishinari K, Williams PA, Phillips GO. Review of the physico-chemical characteristics and properties of konjac mannan. Food Hydrocoll. 1992;6:199–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maekaji K. Determination of acidic component of konjac mannan. Agric Biol Chem. 1978;42:177–8.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang FS, Shen YD, Ren T, Wang L, Su Y. Synthesis of 2-alkenyl-3-butoxypropyl guar gum with enhanced rheological properties. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017;97:317–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vijayendran BR, Bone T. Absolute molecular weight and molecular weight distribution of guar by size exclusion chromatography and low-angle laser light scattering. Carbohyd Polym. 1984;4:299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang XP, Ye JD, Wang YJ. Hydration mechanism of a novel PCCP + DCPA cement system. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19:813–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kokubo T, Takadama H. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity. Biomaterials. 2006;27:2907–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Barralet JE, Gaunt T, Wright AJ, Gibson IR, Knowles JC. Effect of porosity reduction by compaction on compressive strength and microstructure of calcium phosphate cement. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;63:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bose S, Darsell J, Kintner M, Hosick H, Bandyopadhyay A. Pore size and pore volume effects on alumina and TCP ceramic scaffolds. Mat Sci Eng C-Mater. 2003;23:479–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen ZT, Ni SY, Han SG, Crawford R, Lu S, Wei F, Chang J, Wu CT, Xiao Y. Nanoporous microstructures mediate osteogenesis by modulating the osteo-immune response of macrophages. Nanoscale. 2017;9:706–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Langer R, Tirrell DA. Designing materials for biology and medicine. Nature. 2004;428:487–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lotz JC, Gehart TN, Hayes WC. Mechanical properties of trabecular bone from the proximal femur: a quantitative CT study. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1990;14:107–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nie HR, Shen XX, Zhou ZH, Jiang QS, Chen YW, Xie A, Wang Y, Han CC. Electrospinning and characterization of konjac glucomannan/chitosan nanofibrous scaffolds favoring the growth of bone mesenchymal stem cells. Carbohyd Polym. 2011;85:681–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kundu S, Das A, Basu A, Ghosh D, Datta P, Mukherjee A. Carboxymethyl guar gum synthesis in homogeneous phase and macroporous 3D scaffolds design for tissue engineering. Carbohyd Polym. 2018;191:71–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tiwari A, Grailer JJ, Pilla S, Steeber DA, Gong SQ. Biodegradable hydrogels based on novel photopolymerizable guar gum–methacrylate macromonomers for in situ fabrication of tissue engineering scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2009;5:441–3452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Materials Science and EngineeringSouth China University of TechnologyGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and ReconstructionSouth China University of TechnologyGuangzhouChina
  3. 3.School of Electromechanical EngineeringGuangdong University of TechnologyGuangzhouChina
  4. 4.Key Laboratory of Biomedical Materials and Engineering of the Ministry of EducationSouth China University of TechnologyGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations