Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Restoration of mandibular bone defects with demineralized bone matrix combined with three-dimensional cultured bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in minipig models

  • Clinical Applications of Biomaterials
  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mandibular defects, caused by congenital, pathological or iatrogenic insults, can significantly affect patient quality of life. The reconstruction of mandible has recently gained the interest of clinical and tissue engineering researchers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of three-dimensional (3-D) cultured autologous grafts prepared using bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) combined with demineralized bone matrix (DBM) scaffolds for the restoration of mandibular defects. Cylindrical defects were created in the mandibular body of minipigs and filled with 3D-cultured BMSCs/DBM autografts, 2D-cultured BMSCs/DBM autografts, DBM material (without cells), or were left unfilled (blank). Using computed tomographic (CT) imaging and histological staining, we found that treatment of mandibular defects using 3-D cultured BMSCs/DBM autografts offered improvements in bone formation over both 2-D cultured autografts and cell-free DBM scaffolds. We found increased osteoid formation in 3D and 2D cultures, with more osteogenic cells present in the 3D constructs. We suggest that 3-D cultured homograft BMSCs combined with DBM scaffolds represents a new strategy for bone reconstruction, with potential future clinical applicability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Salgado AJ, Oliveira JT, Pedro AJ, Reis RL. Adult stem cells in bone and cartilage tissue engineering. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2006;1:345–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhattacharjee P, Kundu B, Naskar D, Kim HW, Maiti TK, Bhattacharya D. et al. Silk scaffolds in bone tissue engineering: an overview. Acta Biomater. 2017;63:1–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ciuluvica R, Gradinaru S, Popescu M, Piticescu RM, Cergan R. Computer tomograph (CT) imaging of mandibular anatomical substrate in animal model restored with nanostructured hydroxyapatite compounds. J Med Life. 2015;8:99–102.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. No YJ, Li JJ, Zreiqat H. Doped calcium silicate ceramics: a new class of candidates for synthetic bone substitutes. Materials (Basel). 2017;10:2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu Y, Li C, Zhou T, Su Y, He X, Fan X, et al. Treatment of aseptic necrosis of the lunate bone (Kienbock disease) using a nickel-titanium memory alloy arthrodesis concentrator: a series of 24 cases. Med (Baltim). 2015;94:e1760.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen B, Lin H, Wang J, Zhao Y, Wang B, Zhao W, et al. Homogeneous osteogenesis and bone regeneration by demineralized bone matrix loading with collagen-targeting bone morphogenetic protein-2. Biomaterials. 2007;28:1027–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Huber E, Pobloth AM, Bormann N, Kolarczik N, Schmidt-Bleek K, Schell H, et al. Demineralized bone matrix as a carrier for bone morphogenetic protein-2: burst release combined with long-term binding and osteoinductive activity evaluated in vitro and in vivo. Tissue Eng Part A. 2017.

  8. Jiang XR, Yang HY, Zhang XX, Lin GD, Meng YC, Zhang PX, et al. Repair of bone defects with prefabricated vascularized bone grafts and double-labeled bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in a rat model. Sci Rep. 2017;7:39431.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hsiao HY, Yang SR, Brey EM, Chu IM, Cheng MH. Hydrogel delivery of mesenchymal stem cell-expressing bone morphogenetic protein-2 enhances bone defect repair. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016;4:e838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Han S, Zhao Y, Xiao Z, Han J, Chen B, Chen L, et al. The three-dimensional collagen scaffold improves the stemness of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. J Genet Genom. 2012;39:633–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Antebi B, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Lu Z, Chen XD, Ling J. Stromal-cell-derived extracellular matrix promotes the proliferation and retains the osteogenic differentiation capacity of mesenchymal stem cells on three-dimensional scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2015;21:171–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Green JA, Yamada KM. Three-dimensional microenvironments modulate fibroblast signaling responses. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2007;59:1293–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamada KM, Cukierman E. Modeling tissue morphogenesis and cancer in 3D. Cell. 2007;130:601–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Opiela J, Lipinski D, Romanek J, Juzwa W, Bochenek M, Wilczek P. MMP-2, TIMP-2, TAZ and MEF2a transcript expression in osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of porcine mesenchymal stem cells. Ann Anim Sci. 2016;16:369–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bosch P, Pratt SL, Stice SL. Isolation, characterization, gene modification, and nuclear reprogramming of porcine mesenchymal stem cells. Biol Reprod. 2006;74:46–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D, et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006;8:315–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schouten CC, Hartman EH, Spauwen PH, Jansen JA. DBM induced ectopic bone formation in the rat: the importance of surface area. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2005;16:149–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yamaguchi Y, Ohno J, Sato A, Kido H, Fukushima T. Mesenchymal stem cell spheroids exhibit enhanced in-vitro and in-vivo osteoregenerative potential. BMC Biotechnol. 2014;14:105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bueno EM, Glowacki J. Cell-free and cell-based approaches for bone regeneration. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2009;5:685–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Caplan AI, Dennis JE. Mesenchymal stem cells as trophic mediators. J Cell Biochem. 2006;98:1076–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gruskin E, Doll BA, Futrell FW, Schmitz JP, Hollinger JO. Demineralized bone matrix in bone repair: history and use. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64:1063–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dinopoulos HT, Giannoudis PV. Safety and efficacy of use of demineralised bone matrix in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2006;5:847–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao Y, Lin H, Zhang J, Chen B, Sun W, Wang X, et al. Crosslinked three-dimensional demineralized bone matrix for the adipose-derived stromal cell proliferation and differentiation. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15:13–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Katz JM, Nataraj C, Jaw R, Deigl E, Bursac P. Demineralized bone matrix as an osteoinductive biomaterial and in vitro predictors of its biological potential. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;89:127–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mosekilde L, Kragstrup J, Richards A. Compressive strength, ash weight, and volume of vertebral trabecular bone in experimental fluorosis in pigs. Calcif Tissue Int. 1987;40:318–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Aerssens J, Boonen S, Lowet G, Dequeker J. Interspecies differences in bone composition, density, and quality: potential implications for in vivo bone research. Endocrinology. 1998;139:663–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Thorwarth M, Schultze-Mosgau S, Kessler P, Wiltfang J, Schlegel KA. Bone regeneration in osseous defects using a resorbable nanoparticular hydroxyapatite. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:1626–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC1000800, 2016YFC1000806, 2016YFC1101500, 2017YFA0104700), National Research Institute for Family Planning (2016GJZ06), the National Science Foundation of China (81601084), Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA04020000). We thank Rebecca Jackson, PhD, from Liwen Bianji, Edanz Group China (www.liwenbianji.cn/ac), for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Juli Pan or Jianwu Dai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, Y., Lu, C., Chen, B. et al. Restoration of mandibular bone defects with demineralized bone matrix combined with three-dimensional cultured bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in minipig models. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 29, 147 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-018-6152-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-018-6152-3

Navigation