Advertisement

The preparation of heparin-like hyperbranched polyimides and their antithrombogenic, antibacterial applications

  • Qing Li
  • Jing Li
  • Guangfu Liao
  • Zushun XuEmail author
Biomaterials Synthesis and Characterization Original Research
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Biomaterials Synthesis and Characterization

Abstract

1,3,5-Tris(4-aminophenoxy) benzene (TAPOB) and 2,2-bis [4-(3,4-dicarboxyphenoxy) phenyl] propane dianhydride (BPADA) were used to synthesize an amino-terminated hyperbranched polyimide (AM-HBPI). Then, the 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine-modified hyperbranched polyimide (HBPI-MPC) was obtained through the graft modification of MPC onto AM-HBPI by Michael addition. The infrared spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy spectra showed MPC molecules were successfully grafted onto the HBPI molecules. The HBPI-MPC films exhibited slightly decreased thermal stabilities with 5% weight loss temperature in the range of of 418–483 °C in nitrogen, compared with the pure HBPI film. With the increase of MPC grafting amount, the static water contact angles decreased from average 84.0° of the pure HBPI film to average 45.0° of the HBPI-MPC film with 20% MPC. Meanwhile, the increased surface roughness of the HBPI-MPC films increased the contact areas with the platelets, enhancing their anticoagulant efficiency. The number of platelet adhesion declined and the shape of platelet changed from flat to round. The recalcification times grew from average 300 s of pure HBPI to average 551 s of the HBPI-MPC film with 20% MPC, indicating improved anticoagulant properties and biocompatibility. Bacterial adhesion test also demonstrated the number of bacterial adhesion was significantly reduced and antibacterial properties were improved. Thus, the HBPI-MPC films have great application prospects as biomedical anticoagulant materials.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2013CFB007), Hubei, China. Meanwhile, authors also acknowledge the Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for the Green Preparation and Application of Functional Materials for providing necessary facilities.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Maitz MF, Zitzmann J, Hanke J, Renneberg C, Tsurkan MV, Sperling C, et al. Adaptive release of heparin from anticoagulant hydrogels triggered by different blood coagulation factors. Biomaterials. 2017;135:53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang Y, Yu J, Wang J, Hanne NJ, Zheng C, Qian C, et al. Drug delivery: thrombin-responsive transcutaneous patch for auto-anticoagulant regulation. Adv Mater. 2017;  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201604043.
  3. 3.
    He M, Cui X, Jiang H, Huang X, Zhao W, Zhao C. Super-anticoagulant heparin-mimicking hydrogel thin film attached substrate surfaces to improve hemocompatibility. Macromol Biosci. 2017;  https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201600281.
  4. 4.
    Amoako KA, Sundaram HS, Suhaib A, Jiang S, Cook KE. Multimodal, biomaterial-focused anticoagulation via superlow fouling zwitterionic functional groups coupled with anti‐platelet nitric oxide release. Adv Mater Interfaces. 2016;  https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201500646.
  5. 5.
    Fan W, Xu T, Zhao G, Meng S, Wan M, Bo C, et al. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles-encapsulated agarose and heparin as anticoagulant and resisting bacterial adhesion coating for biomedical silicone. Langmuir. 2017;33:5245–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ma L, Cheng C, Nie C, He C, Deng J, Wang LR, et al. Anticoagulant sodium alginate sulfates and their mussel-inspired heparin-mimetic coatings. J Mater Chem B. 2016;4:3203–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Santerre JP, Woodhouse K, Laroche G, Labow RS. Understanding the biodegradation of polyurethanes: from classical implants to tissue engineering materials. Biomaterials. 2005;26:7457–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Losi P, Lombardi S, Briganti E, Soldani G. Luminal surface microgeometry affects platelet adhesion in small-diameter synthetic grafts. Biomaterials. 2004;25:4447–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li Q, Liao GF, Tian J, Xu ZS. Preparation of novel fluorinated copolyimide/amine functionalized sepia eumelanin nanocomposites with enhanced mechanical, thermal, and UV-shielding properties. Macromol Mater Eng. 2018;303:1700407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Seliktar D. Designing cell-compatible hydrogels for biomedical applications. Science. 2012;336:1124–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kunzmann A, Andersson B, Thurnherr T, Krug H, Scheynius A, Fadeel B. Toxicology of engineered nanomaterials: focus on biocompatibility, biodistribution and biodegradation. BBA Gen Subj. 2011;1810:361–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nakabayashi N, Iwasaki Y. Copolymers of 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC) as biomaterials. Bio Med Mater Eng. 2004;14:345–54.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hall B, Bird RR, Kojima M, Chapman D. Biomembranes as models for polymer surfaces: V. Thrombelastographic studies of polymeric lipids and polyesters. Biomaterials. 1989;10:219–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kimura T, Nakaya T, Imoto M. Synthesis and polymerization of 2-(p-methacryloyloxybenzoyl)ethyl 2’-(phthalimido)ethyl hydrogen phosphate. Macromol Chem Phys. 1976;177:1973–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ishihara K, Iwasaki Y. Biocompatible elastomers composed of segmented polyurethane and 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine polymer. Polym Advan Technol. 2010;11:626–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee H, Dellatore SM, Miller WM, Messersmith PB. Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings. Science. 2007;318:426–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ishihara K, Hanyuda H, Nakabayashi N. Synthesis of phospholipid polymers having a urethane bond in the side chain as coating material on segmented polyurethane and their platelet adhesion-resistant properties. Biomaterials. 1995;16:873–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ishihara K, Tsuji T, Kurosaki T, Nakabayashi N. Hemocompatibility on graft copolymers composed of poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) side chain and poly(n-butyl methacrylate) backbone. J Biomed Mater Res A. 1994;28:225–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li Q, Xiong H, Pang L, Zhang Y, Chen W, Xu Z, et al. Synthesis and characterization of thermally stable, hydrophobic hyperbranched polyimides derived from a novel triamine. High Perform Polym. 2015;27:426–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang Y, Shen J, Li Q, Pang L, Zhang Q, Xu Z, et al. Synthesis and characterization of novel hyperbranched polyimides/attapulgite nanocomposites. Compos Part A Appl S. 2013;55:161–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li Q, Wang Y, Zhang S, Pang L, Tong H, Li J, et al. Novel fluorinated random co-polyimide/amine-functionalized zeolite MEL50 hybrid films with enhanced thermal and low dielectric properties. J Mater Sci. 2017;52:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li Q, Liao G, Zhang S, Pang L, Tong H, Zhao W, et al. Effect of adjustable molecular chain structure and pure silica zeolite nanoparticles on thermal, mechanical, dielectric, UV-shielding and hydrophobic properties of fluorinated copolyimide composites. Appl Surf Sci. 2017;427:437–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Starr P, Agrawal CM, Bailey S. Biocompatibility of common polyimides with human endothelial cells for a cardiovascular microsensor. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016;104:406–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mian A, Newaz G, Vendra L, Rahman N, Georgiev DG, Auner G, et al. Laser bonded microjoints between titanium and polyimide for applications in medical implants. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2005;16:229–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Alfurhood JA, Bachler PR, Sumerlin BS. Hyperbranched polymers via RAFT self-condensing vinyl polymerization. Polym Chem. 2016;7:3361–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Alfurhood JA, Sun H, Bachler PR, Sumerlin BS. Hyperbranched poly(N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide) via RAFT self-condensing vinyl polymerization. Polym Chem. 2016;7:2099–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhuang Y, Deng H, Su Y, He L, Wang R, Tong G, et al. Aptamer-functionalized and backbone redox-responsive hyperbranched polymer for targeted drug delivery in cancer therapy. Biomacromolecules. 2016;17:2050–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Giussi JM, Azzaroni O, Hensel-Bielowka S, Wojnarowska Z, Knapik J, Paluch M. Synthesis, characterization and dielectric relaxation study of hyperbranched polymers with different molecular architecture. Polymer. 2016;100:227–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Frangville C, Gallois M, Li Y, Nguyen HH, Lauthde VN, Talham DR, et al. Hyperbranched polymer mediated size-controlled synthesis of gadolinium phosphate nanoparticles: colloidal properties and particle size-dependence on MRI relaxivity. Nanoscale. 2016;8:4252–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dai Y, Yu P, Zhang X, Zhuo R. Gold nanoparticles stabilized by amphiphilic hyperbranched polymers for catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol. J Catal. 2016;337:65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Heckert B, Banerjee T, Sulthana S, Naz S, Alnasser R, Thompson D, et al. Design and synthesis of new sulfur-containing hyperbranched polymer and theranostic nanomaterials for bimodal imaging and treatment of cancer. ACS Macro Lett. 2017;6:235–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chen H, Yin J. Synthesis and characterization of hyperbranched polyimides with good organosolubility and thermal properties based on a new triamine and conventional dianhydrides. J Polym Sci Pol Chem. 2002;40:3804–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jiang H, Wang XB, Li CY, Li JS, Xu FJ, Mao C, et al. Improvement of hemocompatibility of polycaprolactone film surfaces with zwitterionic polymer brushes. Langmuir. 2011;27:11575–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lu J, Feng Y, Gao B, Guo J. Grafting of a novel phosphorylcholine-containing vinyl monomer onto poly-carbonateurethane surfaces by ultraviolet radiation grafting polymerization. Macromol Res. 2012;20:693–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Liao GF, Chen J, Zeng WG, Yu CH, Yi CF, Xu ZS. Facile preparation of uniform nanocomposite spheres with loading silver nanoparticles on polystyrene-methyl acrylic acid spheres for catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol. J Phys Chem C. 2016;120:25935–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Liao GF, Li G, Zhao WZ, Pang QH, Gao HY, Xu ZS. In-situ construction of novel silver nanoparticle decorated polymeric spheres as highly active and stable catalysts for reduction of methylene blue dye. Appl Catal A. 2018;549:102–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Xiao LJ, Deng M, Zeng WG, Zhang BX, Xu ZS, Yi CF, Liao GF. Novel robust superhydrophobic coating with self-cleaning properties in air and oil based on rare earth metal oxide. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2017;56:12354–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chung TW, Liu DZ, Wang SY, Wang SS. Enhancement of the growth of human endothelial cells by surface roughness at nanometer scale. Biomaterials. 2003;24:4655–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Guangxi Key Laboratory of Chemistry and Engineering of Forest Products, School of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringGuangxi University for NationalitiesNanningChina
  2. 2.Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Organic Chemical Materials; Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for the Green Preparation and Application of Functional MaterialsHubei UniversityWuhanChina
  3. 3.School of Materials Science and Engineering, PCFM LabSun Yat-Sen UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations