Reaction kinetics of dual setting α-tricalcium phosphate cements

  • Katrin HurleEmail author
  • Theresa Christel
  • Uwe Gbureck
  • Claus Moseke
  • Juergen Neubauer
  • Friedlinde Goetz-Neunhoeffer
Biomaterials Synthesis and Characterization Original Research
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Biomaterials Synthesis and Characterization


Addition of ductile polymers to calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite (CDHA)—forming bone cements based on α-tricalcium phosphate (α-TCP) is a promising approach to improve the mechanical performance of α-TCP cements and extend their application to load-bearing defects, which is else impeded by the brittleness of the hardened cement. One suitable polymer is poly-(2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate) (p-HEMA), which forms during cement setting by radical polymerisation of the monomer. In this study the hydration kinetics and the mechanical performance of α-TCP cements modified with addition of different HEMA concentrations (0–50 wt% in the cement liquid) was investigated by quantitative in situ XRD and four-point bending tests. Morphology of CDHA crystals was monitored by scanning electron microscopy. The hydration of α-TCP to CDHA was increasingly impeded and the visible crystal size of CDHA increasingly reduced with increasing HEMA concentration. Modification of the cements by adding 50 wt% HEMA to the cement liquid changed the brittle performance of the hardened cement to a pseudoplastic behaviour, reduced the flexural modulus and increased the work of fracture, while lower HEMA concentrations had no significant effect on these parameters. In such a composite, the extent of CDHA formation was considerably reduced (34.0 ± 1.8 wt% CDHA with 50 % HEMA compared to 54.1 ± 2.4 wt% CDHA in the reference formed after 48 h), while the general reaction kinetics were not changed. In conclusion, while the extent of CDHA formation was decreased, the mechanical properties were noticeably improved by addition of HEMA. Hence, α-TCP/HEMA composites might be suitable for application in some load-bearing defects and have adequate properties for mechanical treatment after implantation, like insertion of screws.


HEMA Cement Paste Flexural Modulus Mass Attenuation Coefficient Monetite 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Dorozhkin SV. Calcium orthophosphate cements for biomedical application. J Mater Sci. 2008;43(9):3028–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gbureck U, Spatz K, Thull R, Barralet JE. Rheological enhancement of mechanically activated alpha-tricalcium phosphate cements. J Biomed Mater Res Part B. 2005;73B:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Canal C, Ginebra MP. Fibre-reinforced calcium phosphate cements: a review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011;4:1658–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moreau JL, Weir MD, Xu HHK. Self-setting collagen-calcium phosphate bone cement: mechanical and cellular properties. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;91A(2):605–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schneiders W, Reinstorf A, Biewener A, Serra A, Grass R, Kinscher M, Heineck J, Rehberg S, Zwipp H, Rammelt S. In vivo effects of modification of hydroxyapatite/collagen composites with and without chondroitin sulphate on bone remodeling in the sheep tibia. J Orthop Res. 2009;27(1):15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wu TY, Zhou ZB, He ZW, Ren WP, Yu XW, Huang Y. Reinforcement of a new calcium phosphate cement with RGD-chitosan-fiber. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2014;102:68–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xu HHK, Simon CG. Fast setting calcium phosphate-chitosan scaffold: mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Biomaterials. 2005;26:1337–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    dos Santos LA, Carrodeguas RG, Boschi AO, de Arruda ACF. Fiber-enriched double-setting calcium phosphate bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2003;65A(2):244–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    dos Santos LA, Carrodeguas RG, Boschi AO, de Arruda ACF. Dual-setting calcium phosphate cement modified with ammonium polyacrylate. Artif Organs. 2003;27(5):412–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang J, Liu CS, Liu YF, Zhang S. Double-network interpenetrating bone cement via in situ hybridization protocol. Adv Funct Mater. 2010;20(22):3997–4011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Christel T, Kuhlmann M, Vorndran E, Groll J, Gbureck U. Dual setting alpha-tricalcium phosphate cements. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2013;24(3):573–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ginebra MP, Fernandez E, Driessens FCM, Planell JA. Modeling of the hydrolysis of α-tricalcium phosphate. J Am Ceram Soc. 1999;82(10):2808–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gbureck U, Grolms O, Barralet JE, Grover LM, Thull R. Mechanical activation and cement formation of beta-tricalcium phosphate. Biomaterials. 2003;24:4123–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jansen D, Stabler Ch, Goetz-Neunhoeffer F, Dittrich S, Neubauer J. Does Ordinary Portland Cement contain amorphous phase? A quantitative study using an external standard method. Powder Diffr. 2011;26:31–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mathew M, Schroeder LW, Dickens B, Brown WE. The crystal structure of α-Ca3(PO4)2. Acta Crystallogr B. 1977;33:1325–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sudarsanan K, Young RA. Significant precision in crystal structural details: Holly Springs hydroxyapatite. Acta Crystallogr Sect B. 1969;25:1534–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ectors D, Goetz-Neunhoeffer F, Neubauer J. A generalized geometric approach to anisotropic peak broadening due to domain morphology. J Appl Crystallogr. 2015;48:189–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    International Union for Crystallography, Prince E. International Tables for Crystallography, Volume C. Mathematical Physical and Chemical Tables. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 2004.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wojdyr M. Fityk: a general-purpose peak fitting program. J Appl Crystallogr. 2010;43:1126–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hurle K, Neubauer J, Bohner M, Doebelin N, Goetz-Neunhoeffer F. Effect of amorphous phases during the hydraulic conversion of α-TCP into calcium deficient hydroxyapatite. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(9):3931–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Psycharis V, Kalamakis N, Boukos N, Trapalis C, Bourlinos A, Karakasides M. Chemical and X-ray diffraction peak broadening analysis, electron microscopy and ir studies of biological apatites. Mater Sci Forum. 2001;378–381:759–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hayakawa T, Mochizuki C, Hara H, Fukushima T, Yang F, Shen H, Wang S, Sato M. Influence of apatite crystallinity in porous PLGA/apatite composite scaffold on cortical bone response. J Hard Tissue Biol. 2009;18(1):7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Momma K, Izumi F. VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and mophology data. J Appl Crystallogr. 2011;44:1272–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katrin Hurle
    • 1
    Email author
  • Theresa Christel
    • 2
  • Uwe Gbureck
    • 2
  • Claus Moseke
    • 2
  • Juergen Neubauer
    • 1
  • Friedlinde Goetz-Neunhoeffer
    • 1
  1. 1.GeoZentrum Nordbayern – MineralogyFriedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-NurembergErlangenGermany
  2. 2.Department for Functional Materials in Medicine and DentistryUniversity of WürzburgWürzburgGermany

Personalised recommendations