Materials characterization and histological analysis of explanted polypropylene, PTFE, and PET hernia meshes from an individual patient
- 449 Downloads
During its tenure in vivo, synthetic mesh materials are exposed to foreign body responses, which can alter physicochemical properties of the material. Three different synthetic meshes comprised of polypropylene, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) materials were explanted from a single patient providing an opportunity to compare physicochemical changes between three different mesh materials in the same host. Results from infrared spectroscopy demonstrated significant oxidation in polypropylene mesh while ePTFE and PET showed slight chemical changes that may be caused by adherent scar tissue. Differential scanning calorimetry results showed a significant decrease in the heat of enthalpy and melt temperature in the polypropylene mesh while the ePTFE and PET showed little change. The presence of giant cells and plasma cells surrounding the ePTFE and PET were indicative of an active foreign body response. Scanning electron micrographs and photo micrographs displayed tissue entrapment and distortion of all three mesh materials.
KeywordsPolypropylene ePTFE PET FT-IR DSC Histology
- 1.Everhart JE, editors. Digestive diseases in the united states: epidemiology and impact. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office 2004. National Institute of Health Publication No. 94-1447.Google Scholar
- 2.Flegal KM, Carroll M, Ogden C, Curtin L. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults: 1999–2008. JAMA. 2010;303(3):235–1.Google Scholar
- 3.Iqbal Y. Controversies in inguinal hernia repair. Outpatient Surg Mag. 2000;1(8). http://www.outpatientsurgery.net/issues/2000/08/controversies-in-inguinal-hernia-repair.
- 4.Neumayer l, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W. Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1819–7.Google Scholar
- 5.Cozad M., Ramshaw BR, Grant DN, Bachman SL, Grant DA, Grant SA. Materials characterization of explanted polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate, and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene composites: spectral and thermal analysis. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2010;49B:455–2.Google Scholar
- 6.Costello CR, Bachman SL, Ramshaw BR, Grant SA. Materials characterization of explanted heavyweight polypropylene hernia meshes. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2007;83B:44–9.Google Scholar
- 8.Laurikainen EH, Valpas A, Kivela A, Kalliola T, Rinne K, Takala T, Nilsson CG. Retropubic compared with transobturator tape placement in treatment of urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:4–11.Google Scholar
- 10.U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Urogynecologic Surgical Mesh Implants. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/UroGynSurgicalMesh/default.htm. Accessed 1 April 2012.
- 12.Mihaly J, Sterkel S, Ortner H, Kocsis L, Hajba L, Furdyga E, Mink J. FTIR and FT-Raman spectroscopic study on polymer based high pressure digestion vessels. Croat Chem Acta. 2006;79:497–501.Google Scholar
- 13.Ratner B, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE, editors. Biomaterials science. London: Elsevier Academic Press; 1996. p. 243–4.Google Scholar