Thermosensitive behavior in cell culture media and cytocompatibility of a novel copolymer: poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-butylacrylate)

  • Natalia Y. Becerra
  • Betty L. López
  • Luz M. Restrepo
Article

Abstract

Cell sheet technology is a promising step forward in tissue engineering. Cell sheets are usually generated using Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) hydrogels due to their swelling change around the lower critical solution temperature (LCST). Nevertheless, LCST can be affected by cell culture medium components and therefore it is necessary to ensure that the polymer preserves its thermosensitivity under these conditions. We propose a novel thermosensitive crosslinked-copolymer: Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-butylacrylate). This copolymer is shown to be cytocompatible and thermosensitive under cell culture medium conditions, and besides, it can be synthesized inexpensively. Thermosensitivity was investigated by determining the LCST with differential scanning calorimetry and swelling/ratio measurements. Cytocompatibility and capacity to deliver cell sheets were studied employing 3T3 and human oral epithelial cells. In conclusion, we obtained a thermosensitive copolymer that allows cell sheet formation/detachment by using a simple and low-cost polymerization method. Furthermore, crosslinking allows easy manipulation of cell sheets growing on the copolymer for potential in situ applications.

References

  1. 1.
    Dusek K. Responsive gels: volume transitions I. In Sigitov VB editor. Advances in polymer science, vol 109. Heidelberg: Springer; 1993.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dimitrov I, et al. Thermosensitive water-soluble copolymers with doubly responsive reversibly interacting entities. Prog Polym Sci. 2007;32(11):1275–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ding Y, Ye X, Zhang G. Can coil-to-globule transition of a single chain be treated as a phase transition? J Phys Chem B. 2008;112(29):8496–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kimhi O, Bianco-Peled H. Microcalorimetry study of the interactions between poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) microgels and amino acids. Langmuir. 2002;18(22):8587–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elbert DL. Liquid–liquid two-phase systems for the production of porous hydrogels and hydrogel microspheres for biomedical applications: a tutorial review. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(1):31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wuo J-Y, et al. Evaluating proteins release from, and their interactions with, thermosensitive poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) hydrogels. J Control Release. 2005;102(2):361–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Serra L, Doménech J, Peppas NA. Engineering design and molecular dynamics of mucoadhesive drug delivery systems as targeting agents. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2009;71(3):519–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wood KM, Stone GM, Peppas NA. Wheat germ agglutinin functionalized complexation hydrogels for oral insulin delivery. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9(4):1293–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    da Silva RMP, Mano JF, Reis RL. Smart thermoresponsive coatings and surfaces for tissue engineering: switching cell-material boundaries. Trends Biotechnol. 2007;25(12):577–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nishida K, et al. Corneal reconstruction with tissue-engineered cell sheets composed of autologous oral mucosal epithelium. N Engl J Med. 2005;351(12):1187–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Inomata H, et al. Effect of additives on phase transition of N-isopropylacrylamide gels. Langmuir. 1992;8(2):687–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kawasaki H, et al. Saccharide-induced volume phase transition of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) gels. J Phys Chem. 1996;100(40):16282–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ihanamäki T, Pelliniemi LJ, Vuorio E. Collagens and collagen-related matrix components in the human and mouse eye. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2004;23(4):403–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Becerra N, Restrepo LM, López BL. Synthesis and characterization of a biocompatible copolymer to be used as cell culture support. Macromol Symp. 2007;258(1):30–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Calandrelli L, et al. Development and performance analysis of PCL/silica nanocomposites for bone regeneration. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21(11):2923–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee W-F, Yeh Y-C. Studies on preparation and properties of NIPAAm/hydrophobic monomer copolymeric hydrogels. Eur Polymer J. 2005;41(10):2488–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rao SS, Winter J. Adhesion molecule-modified biomaterials for neural tissue engineering. Front Neuroeng. 2009;2. doi:10.3389/neuro.16.006.2009.
  18. 18.
    Sachlos E, Czernuszka JT. Making tissue engineering scaffolds work. Review: the application of solid freeform fabrication technology to the production of tissue engineering scaffolds. Eur Cell Mater. 2003;5:29–39.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tessmar JK, Göpferich AM. Matrices and scaffolds for protein delivery in tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2007;59(4–5):274–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Antonietti M, Hentze HP. Synthesis of sponge-like polymer dispersions via polymerization of bicontinuous microemulsions. Colloid Polym Sci. 1996;274(7):696–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Raj WRP, Sasthav M, Cheung HM. Polymerization of microstructured aqueous systems formed using methyl methacrylate and potassium undecenoate. Langmuir. 1992;8(8):1931–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hennink WE, van Nostrum CF. Novel crosslinking methods to design hydrogels. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64:223–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rzaev ZMO, Dinçer S, Pişkin E. Functional copolymers of N-isopropylacrylamide for bioengineering applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2007;32(5):534–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhu D, et al. Effect of adamantyl methacrylate on the thermal and mechanical properties of thermosensitive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) hydrogels. J Appl Polym Sci. 2012;124(1):155–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Haraguchi Y, et al. Scaffold-free tissue engineering using cell sheet technology. RSC Adv. 2012;2(6):2184–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yang X, Lee HY, Kim J-C. Effect of hydrophobic comonomer content on assembling of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) and thermal properties. J Appl Polym Sci. 2011;120(4):2346–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brannon-Peppas L, Peppas NA. Equilibrium swelling behavior of pH-sensitive hydrogels. Chem Eng Sci. 1991;46(3):715–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Volden S, et al. Interactions between bovine serum albumin and Langmuir films composed of charged and uncharged poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) block copolymers. Colloids Surf B. 2012;98:50–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rezwan K, et al. Bovine serum albumin adsorption onto colloidal Al2O3 particles: a new model based on zeta potential and UV–Vis measurements. Langmuir. 2004;20(23):10055–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Freshney RI. Culture of animal cells: manual of basic technique. 6th ed. New York: Wiley; 2006.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Eeckman F, Amighi K, Moës AJ. Effect of some physiological and non-physiological compounds on the phase transition temperature of thermoresponsive polymers intended for oral controlled-drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2001;222(2):259–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Krušić MK, Filipović J. Copolymer hydrogels based on N-isopropylacrylamide and itaconic acid. Polymer. 2006;47(1):148–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lee W-F, Lin Y-H. Swelling behavior and drug release of NIPAAm/PEGMEA copolymeric hydrogels with different crosslinkers. J Mater Sci. 2006;41(22):7333–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chuang W-J, Chiu W-Y, Tai H-J. Thermally crosslinkable poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) copolymers: synthesis and characterization of temperature-responsive hydrogel. Mater Chem Phys. 2012;134(2–3):1208–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Varghese V, et al. In vitro cytocompatibility evaluation of a thermoresponsive NIPAAm-MMA copolymeric surface using L929 cells. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21(5):1631–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natalia Y. Becerra
    • 1
    • 2
  • Betty L. López
    • 1
  • Luz M. Restrepo
    • 2
  1. 1.Grupo Ciencia de los Materiales, Sede de Investigación Universitaria (SIU)Universidad de AntioquiaMedellínColombia
  2. 2.Grupo Ingeniería de Tejidos y Terapias celulares, Facultad de Medicina CarerraUniversidad de AntioquiaMedellínColombia

Personalised recommendations