Bone ingrowth potential of electron beam and selective laser melting produced trabecular-like implant surfaces with and without a biomimetic coating

  • J. E. BiemondEmail author
  • G. Hannink
  • N. Verdonschot
  • P. Buma


The bone ingrowth potential of trabecular-like implant surfaces produced by either selective laser melting (SLM) or electron beam melting (EBM), with or without a biomimetic calciumphosphate coating, was examined in goats. For histological analysis and histomorphometry of bone ingrowth depth and bone implant contact specimens were implanted in the femoral condyle of goats. For mechanical push out tests to analyse mechanical implant fixation specimens were implanted in the iliac crest. The follow up periods were 4 (7 goats) and 15 weeks (7 goats). Both the SLM and EBM produced trabecular-like structures showed a variable bone ingrowth after 4 weeks. After 15 weeks good bone ingrowth was found in both implant types. Irrespective to the follow up period, and the presence of a coating, no histological differences in tissue reaction around SLM and EBM produced specimens was found. Histological no coating was detected at 4 and 15 weeks follow up. At both follow up periods the mechanical push out strength at the bone implant interface was significantly lower for the coated SLM specimens compared to the uncoated SLM specimens. The expected better ingrowth characteristics and mechanical fixation strength induced by the coating were not found. The lower mechanical strength of the coated specimens produced by SLM is a remarkable result, which might be influenced by the gross morphology of the specimens or the coating characteristics, indicating that further research is necessary.


Selective Laser Melting Bone Ingrowth Lateral Collateral Ligament Electron Beam Melting Selective Laser Melting Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Basarir K, Erdemli B, Can A, Erdemli E, Zeyrek T. Osseointegration in arthroplasty: can simvastatin promote bone response to implants? Int Orthop. 2009;33(3):855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials. 2005;26(27):5474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaplan FS, Lee WC, Keaveny TM. Forms and functions of bone. p. 127. In: Simon SP, editor. Orthopedic basic science. Columbus: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons; 1994.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Keaveny TM, Morgan EF, Niebur GL, Yeh OC. Biomechanics of trabecular bone. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2001;3:307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bobyn JD, Stackpool GJ, Hacking SA, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81(5):907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Murr LE, Quinones SA, Gaytan SM, Lopez MI, Rodela A, Martinez EY, Hernandez DH, Martinez E, Medina F, Wicker RB. Microstructure and mechanical behavior of Ti-6Al-4V produced by rapid-layer manufacturing, for biomedical applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2009;2(1):20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fukuda A, Takemoto M, Saito T, Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Pattanayak DK, Matsushita T, Sasaki K, Nishida N, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Osteoinduction of porous Ti implants with a channel structure fabricated by selective laser melting. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(5):2327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Noort Van. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater. 2012;28(1):3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Biemond JE, Hannink G, Verdonschot N, Buma P. The effect of E-beam engineerder surface structures on attachment, proliferation and differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomed Mater Eng. 2011;21(5–6):271–9.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Biemond JE, Eufrasio TS, Hannink G, Verdonschot N, Buma P. Assessment of bone ingrowth potential of biomimetic hydroxyapatite and brushite coated porous E-beam structures. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2011;22(4):917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Warnke PH, Douglas T, Wollny P, Sherry E, Steiner M, Galonska S, Becker ST, Springer IN, Wiltfang J, Sivananthan S. Rapid prototyping: porous titanium alloy scaffolds produced by selective laser melting for bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2009;15(2):115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pattanayak DK, Fukuda A, Matsushita T, Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S, Sasaki K, Nishida N, Nakamura T, Kokubo T. Bioactive Ti metal analogous to human cancellous bone: fabrication by selective laser melting and chemical treatments. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(3):1398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Habibovic P, Barrère F, van Blitterswijk CA, de Groot K, Layrolle P. Biomimetic hydroxyapatite coating on metal implants. J Am Ceram Soc. 2002;85(3):517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heinl P, Rottmair A, Körner C, Singer R. Cellular titanium by selective electron beam melting. Adv Eng Mater. 2007;9(5):360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heinl P, Muller L, Korner C, Singer RF, Muller FA. Cellular Ti-6Al-4V structures with interconnected macro porosity for bone implants fabricated by selective electron beam melting. Acta Biomater. 2008;4(5):1536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Facchini L, Magalini E, Robotti P, Molinari A. Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V produced by electron beam melting of pre-alloyed powders. Rapid Prototyp J. 2009;15(3):171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Facchini L, Magalini E, Robotti P, Molinari A, Hoges S, Wissenbach K. Ductility of a Ti-6Al-4V alloy produced by selective laser melting of prealloyed powders. Rapid Prototyp J. 2010;16(6):450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mullen L, Stamp RC, Fox P, Jones E, Ngo C, Sutcliffe CJ. Selective laser melting: a unit cell approach for the manufacture of porous, titanium, bone in-growth constructs, suitable for orthopedic applications. II. Randomized structures. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010;92(1):178.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Redepenning J, Schlessinger T, Burnham S, Lippiello L, Miyano J. Characterization of electrolytically prepared brushite and hydroxyapatite coatings on orthopedic alloys. J Biomed Mater Res. 1996;30(3):287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schouten C, Meijer GJ, van den Beucken JJ, Spauwen PH, Jansen JA. A novel implantation model for evaluation of bone healing response to dental implants: the goat iliac crest. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(4):414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dhert WJ, Verheyen CC, Braak LH, de Wijn JR, Klein CP, de Groot K, Rozing PM. A finite element analysis of the push-out test: influence of test conditions. J Biomed Mater Res. 1992;26(1):119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Levine BR, Sporer S, Poggie RA, Della Valle CJ, Jacobs JJ. Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery. Biomaterials. 2006;27(27):4671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sembrano JN, Cheng EY. Acetabular cage survival and analysis of factors related to failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(7):1657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Unger AS, Lewis RJ, Gruen T. Evaluation of a porous tantalum uncemented acetabular cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results of 60 hips. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(8):1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barrere F, van der Valk CM, Meijer G, Dalmeijer RA, de Groot K, Layrolle P. Osteointegration of biomimetic apatite coating applied onto dense and porous metal implants in femurs of goats. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2003;67(1):655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tsukeoka T, Suzuki M, Ohtsuki C, Tsuneizumi Y, Miyagi J, Sugino A, Inoue T, Michihiro R, Moriya H. Enhanced fixation of implants by bone ingrowth to titanium fiber mesh: effect of incorporation of hydroxyapatite powder. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005;75(1):168.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yang GL, He FM, Hu JA, Wang XX, Zhao SF. Biomechanical comparison of biomimetically and electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite-coated porous titanium implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68(2):420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. E. Biemond
    • 1
    Email author
  • G. Hannink
    • 1
    • 2
  • N. Verdonschot
    • 1
    • 3
  • P. Buma
    • 1
  1. 1.Orthopaedic Research LaboratoryRadboud University Nijmegen Medical CentreNijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Operating RoomsRadboud University Nijmegen Medical CentreNijmegenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Laboratory for Biomechanical EngineeringUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations