Advertisement

β-Tricalcium-phosphate stimulates the differentiation of dental follicle cells

  • Sandra Viale-Bouroncle
  • Brigitte Bey
  • Torsten E. Reichert
  • Gottfried Schmalz
  • Christian MorsczeckEmail author
Article

Abstract

The use of dental progenitor cells is a straightforward strategy for regenerative dentistry. For example a cell based therapy with dental follicle cells (DFCs) could be a novel therapeutic strategy for the regeneration of oral tissues in the future. For the regeneration of large bone defects for example dental progenitor cells have to be combined with bone substitutes as scaffolds. This study therefore investigated cell attachment (scanning electron microscopy), cell vitality/proliferation (WST-1 assay) and cell differentiation (under in vitro conditions) of human DFCs on synthetic β-tricalcium phosphate (TCP). DFCs showed considerable cell attachment and proliferation on TCP. Moreover, TCP stimulates osteogenic differentiation in comparison to DFCs with a standard protocol. Here, for example, the osteoblast marker bone sialoprotein (BSP) was highly expressed on TCP, but almost absent in differentiated DFCs without TCP. In conclusion, our study shows that TCP is an excellent scaffold for DFCs for oral tissue regeneration.

Keywords

Osteogenic Differentiation Bone Substitute Tooth Germ Cell Culture Dish Dental Follicle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Diekwisch TG. The developmental biology of cementum. Int J Dev Biol. 2001;45(5–6):695–706.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ten Cate AR. The development of the periodontium—a largely ectomesenchymally derived unit. Periodontol 2000. 1997;13:9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morsczeck C, Gotz W, Schierholz J, Zeilhofer F, Kuhn U, Mohl C, et al. Isolation of precursor cells (PCs) from human dental follicle of wisdom teeth. Matrix Biol. 2005;24(2):155–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kemoun P, Laurencin-Dalicieux S, Rue J, Farges JC, Gennero I, Conte-Auriol F, et al. Human dental follicle cells acquire cementoblast features under stimulation by BMP-2/-7 and enamel matrix derivatives (EMD) in vitro. Cell Tissue Res. 2007;329(2):283–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luan X, Ito Y, Dangaria S, Diekwisch TG. Dental follicle progenitor cell heterogeneity in the developing mouse periodontium. Stem Cells Dev. 2006;15(4):595–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Handa K, Saito M, Tsunoda A, Yamauchi M, Hattori S, Sato S, et al. Progenitor cells from dental follicle are able to form cementum matrix in vivo. Connect Tissue Res. 2002;43(2–3):406–8.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Handa K, Saito M, Yamauchi M, Kiyono T, Sato S, Teranaka T, et al. Cementum matrix formation in vivo by cultured dental follicle cells. Bone. 2002;31(5):606–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morsczeck C, Moehl C, Gotz W, Heredia A, Schaffer TE, Eckstein N, et al. In vitro differentiation of human dental follicle cells with dexamethasone and insulin. Cell Biol Int. 2005;29(7):567–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gronthos S, Mankani M, Brahim J, Robey PG, Shi S. Postnatal human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97(25):13625–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zuolin J, Hong Q, Jiali T. Dental follicle cells combined with beta-tricalcium phosphate ceramic: a novel available therapeutic strategy to restore periodontal defects. Med Hypotheses. 2010;75(6):669–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kasaj A, Willershausen B, Reichert C, Gortan-Kasaj A, Zafiropoulos G-G, Schmidt M. Human periodontal fibroblast response to a nanostructured hydroxyapatite bone replacement graft in vitro. Arch Oral Biol. 2008;53(7):683–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang Y-F, Cheng X-R, Chen Y, Shi B, Chen X-H, Xu D-X, et al. Three-dimensional nanohydroxyapatite/chitosan scaffolds as potential tissue engineered periodontal tissue. J Biomater Appl. 2007;21(4):333–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Abe S, Yamaguchi S, Watanabe A, Hamada K, Amagasa T. Hard tissue regeneration capacity of apical pulp derived cells (APDCs) from human tooth with immature apex. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;371(1):90–3. Juni 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Luan X, Dangaria S, Ito Y, Walker CG, Jin T, Schmidt MK, et al. Neural crest lineage segregation: a blueprint for periodontal regeneration. J Dent Res. 2009;88(9):781–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Honda MJ, Imaizumi M, Suzuki H, Ohshima S, Tsuchiya S, Satomura K. Stem cells isolated from human dental follicles have osteogenic potential. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109(1):149–54. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Honda MJ, Imaizumi M, Tsuchiya S, Morsczeck C. Dental follicle stem cells and tissue engineering. J Oral Sci. 2010;52(4):541–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morsczeck C, Völlner F, Saugspier M, Brandl C, Reichert TE, Driemel O, et al. Comparison of human dental follicle cells (DFCs) and stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED) after neural differentiation in vitro. Clin Oral Investig. 2010;14(4):433–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Horch H-H, Sader R, Pautke C, Neff A, Deppe H, Kolk A. Synthetic, pure-phase beta-tricalcium phosphate ceramic granules (cerasorb) for bone regeneration in the reconstructive surgery of the jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;35(8):708–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Naujoks C, Langenbach F, Berr K, Depprich R, Kübler N, Meyer U, et al. Biocompatibility of osteogenic predifferentiated human cord blood stem cells with biomaterials and the influence of the biomaterial on the process of differentiation. J Biomater Appl. 2011;25(5):497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marino G, Rosso F, Cafiero G, Tortora C, Moraci M, Barbarisi M, et al. Beta-tricalcium phosphate 3D scaffold promote alone osteogenic differentiation of human adipose stem cells: in vitro study. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21(1):353–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Seebach C, Schultheiss J, Wilhelm K, Frank J, Henrich D. Comparison of six bone-graft substitutes regarding to cell seeding efficiency, metabolism and growth behaviour of human mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) in vitro. Injury. 2010;41(7):914–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Arnold U, Lindenhayn K, Perka C. In vitro-cultivation of human periosteum derived cells in bioresorbable polymer-TCP-composites. Biomaterials. 2002;23(11):2303–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stiehler M, Bünger C, Baatrup A, Lind M, Kassem M, Mygind T. Effect of dynamic 3-D culture on proliferation, distribution, and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;89(1):96–107.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra Viale-Bouroncle
    • 1
  • Brigitte Bey
    • 1
  • Torsten E. Reichert
    • 2
  • Gottfried Schmalz
    • 1
  • Christian Morsczeck
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Operative Dentistry and PeriodontologyUniversity of RegensburgRegensburgGermany
  2. 2.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryUniversity of RegensburgRegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations