Advertisement

Joint immobilization inhibits spontaneous hyaline cartilage regeneration induced by a novel double-network gel implantation

  • Kazunobu Arakaki
  • Nobuto Kitamura
  • Takayuki Kurokawa
  • Shin Onodera
  • Fuminori Kanaya
  • Jian-Ping Gong
  • Kazunori YasudaEmail author
Article

Abstract

We have recently discovered that spontaneous hyaline cartilage regeneration can be induced in an osteochondral defect in the rabbit, when we implant a novel double-network (DN) gel plug at the bottom of the defect. To clarify whether joint immobilization inhibits the spontaneous hyaline cartilage regeneration, we conducted this study with 20 rabbits. At 4 or 12 weeks after surgery, the defect in the mobile knees was filled with a sufficient volume of the hyaline cartilage tissue rich in proteoglycan and type-2 collagen, while no cartilage tissues were observed in the defect in the immobilized knees. Type-2 collagen, Aggrecan, and SOX9 mRNAs were expressed only in the mobile knees at each period. This study demonstrated that joint immobilization significantly inhibits the spontaneous hyaline cartilage regeneration induced by the DN gel implantation. This fact suggested that the mechanical environment is one of the significant factors to induce this phenomenon.

Keywords

Cartilage Tissue Chondrogenic Differentiation Hyaline Cartilage Osteochondral Defect Cartilage Regeneration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan, and from Takeda Science Foundation, Japan.

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they had no conflicts of interests in their authorship and publication of the contribution.

References

  1. 1.
    Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L. Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:889–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buckwalter JA. Articular cartilage injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;402:21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gong JP, Katsuyama Y, Kurokawa T, Osada Y. Double-network hydrogels with extremely high mechanical strength. Adv Mater. 2003;15:1155–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yasuda K, Kitamura N, Gong JP, Arakaki K, Kwon HJ, Onodera S, Chen YM, Kurokawa T, Kanaya F, Ohmiya Y, Osada Y. A novel double-network hydrogel induces spontaneous articular cartilage regeneration in vivo in a large osteochondral defect. Macromol Biosci. 2009;9:307–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kwon HJ, Yasuda K, Ohmiya Y, Honma K, Chen YM, Gong JP. In vitro differentiation of chondrogenic ATDC5 cells is enhanced by culturing on synthetic hydrogels with various charge densities. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:494–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ogawa M, Kitamura N, Arakaki K, Onodera S, Kurokawa T, Gong JP, Tanaka Y, Takakura Y, Yasuda K. A negatively charged PAMPS gel component plays a significant role in the in vivo spontaneous cartilage regeneration induced by implantation of PAMPS/PDMAAm double-network gel. In: Proceedings of 56th annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. 2010; New Orleans, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Salter RB, Simmonds DF, Malcolm BW, Rumble EJ, MacMichael D, Clements ND. The biological effect of continuous passive motion on the healing of full-thickness defects in articular cartilage. An experimental investigation in the rabbit. J Bone Joint Surg. [American volume]. 1980;62A:1232–51.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ragan PM, Chin VI, Hung HH, Masuda K, Thonar EJ, Arner EC, Grodzinsky AJ, Sandy JD. Chondrocyte extracellular matrix synthesis and turnover are influenced by static compression in a new alginate disk culture system. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2000;383:256–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smith RL, Carter DR, Schurman DJ. Pressure and shear differentially alter human articular chondrocyte metabolism: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;427 Suppl:S89–95. Review.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kurz B, Jin M, Patwari P, Cheng DM, Lark MW, Grodzinsky AJ. Biosynthetic response and mechanical properties of articular cartilage after injurious compression. J Orthop Res. 2001;19:1140–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Buschmann MD, Gluzband YA, Grodzinsky AJ, Hunziker EB. Mechanical compression modulates matrix biosynthesis in chondrocyte/agarose culture. J Cell Sci. 1995;108:1497–508.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nakajima M, Wakitani S, Harada Y, Tanigami A, Tomita N. In vivo mechanical condition plays an important role for appearance of cartilage tissue in ES cell transplanted joint. J Orthop Res. 2008;26:10–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huang CY, Hagar KL, Frost LE, Sun Y, Cheung HS. Effects of cyclic compressive loading on chondrogenesis of rabbit bone-marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2004;22:313–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Elder SH, Goldstein SA, Kimura JH, Soslowsky LJ, Spengler DM. Chondrocyte differentiation is modulated by frequency and duration of cyclic compressive loading. Ann Biomed Eng. 2001;29:476–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huang M, Furukawa H, Tanaka Y, Nakajima T, Osada Y, Gong JP. Importance of entanglement between first and second components in high-strength double network gels. Macromolecules. 2007;40:6658–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Azuma C, Yasuda K, Tanabe Y, Taniguro H, Kanaya F, Nakayama A, Chen YM, Gong JP, Osada Y. Biodegradation of high-toughness double network hydrogels as potential materials for artificial cartilage. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007;81:373–80.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yasuda K, Gong JP, Katsuyama Y, Nakayama A, Tanabe Y, Kondo E, Ueno M, Osada Y. Biomechanical properties of high-toughness double network hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2005;26:4468–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bray RC, Shrive NG, Frank CB, Chimich DD. The early effects of joint immobilization on medial collateral ligament healing in an ACL-deficient knee: a gross anatomic and biomechanical investigation in the adult rabbit model. J Orthop Res. 1992;10:157–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wayne JS, McDowell CL, Shields KJ, Tuan RS. In vivo response of polylactic acid-alginate scaffolds and bone marrow-derived cells for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. 2005;11:953–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jurvelin J, Kiviranta I, Tammi M, Helminen JH. Softening of canine articular cartilage after immobilization of the knee joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;207:246–52.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Haapala J, Arokoski JP, Hyttinen MM, Lammi M, Tammi M, Kovanen V, Helminen HJ, Kiviranta I. Remobilization does not fully restore immobilization induced articular cartilage atrophy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;362:218–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Haapala J, Lammi MJ, Inkinen R, Parkkinen JJ, Agren UM, Arokoski J, Kiviranta I, Helminen HJ, Tammi MI. Coordinated regulation of hyaluronan and aggrecan content in the articular cartilage of immobilized and exercised dogs. J Rheumatol. 1996;23:1586–93.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Behrens F, Kraft EL, TRJr Oegema. Biochemical changes in articular cartilage after joint immobilization by casting or external fixation. J Orthop Res. 1989;7:335–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Müller FJ, Setton LA, Manicourt DH, Mow VC, Howell DS, Pita JC. Centrifugal and biochemical comparison of proteoglycan aggregates from articular cartilage in experimental joint disuse and joint instability. J Orthop Res. 1994;12:498–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Plumb MS, Aspden RM. The response of elderly human articular cartilage to mechanical stimuli in vitro. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2005;13:1084–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Leipzig ND, Athanasiou KA. Static compression of single chondrocytes catabolically modifies single-cell gene expression. Biophys J. 2008;94:2412–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ahsan T, Sah RL. Biomechanics of integrative cartilage repair. Osteoarthr Cartil. 1999;7:29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Qiu YS, Shahgaldi BF, Revell WJ, Heatley FW. Observations of subchondral plate advancement during osteochondral repair: a histomorphometric and mechanical study in the rabbit femoral condyle. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2003;11:810–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shapiro F, Koide S, Glimcher MJ. Cell origin and differentiation in the repair of full-thickness defects of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:532–53.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Angele P, Yoo JU, Smith C, Mansour J, Jepsen KJ, Nerlich M, Johnstone B. Cyclic hydrostatic pressure enhances the chondrogenic phenotype of human mesenchymal progenitor cells differentiated in vitro. J Orthop Res. 2003;21:451–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell. 2006;126:677–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Holland TA, Bodde EW, Baggett LS, Tabata Y, Mikos AG, Jansen JA. Osteochondral repair in the rabbit model utilizing bilayered, degradable oligo (poly(ethylene glycol) fumarate) hydrogel scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005;75:156–67.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gotterbarm T, Richter W, Jung M, Berardi VS, Mainil-Varlet P, Yamashita T, Breusch SJ. An in vivo study of a growth-factor enhanced, cell free, two-layered collagen-tricalcium phosphate in deep osteochondral defects. Biomaterials. 2006;27:3387–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fukuda A, Kato K, Hasegawa M, Hirata H, Sudo A, Okazaki K, Tsuta K, Shikinami Y, Uchida A. Enhanced repair of large osteochondral defects using a combination of artificial cartilage and basic fibroblast growth factor. Biomaterials. 2005;26:4301–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tanabe Y, Yasuda K, Azuma C, Taniguro H, Onodera S, Suzuki A, Chen YM, Gong JP, Osada Y. Biological responses of novel high-toughness double network hydrogels in muscle and the subcutaneous tissues. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19:1379–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kazunobu Arakaki
    • 1
    • 3
  • Nobuto Kitamura
    • 1
  • Takayuki Kurokawa
    • 2
  • Shin Onodera
    • 1
  • Fuminori Kanaya
    • 3
  • Jian-Ping Gong
    • 2
  • Kazunori Yasuda
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Sports Medicine and Joint Reconstruction SurgeryHokkaido University School of MedicineSapporoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of ScienceHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of the RyukyusOkinawaJapan

Personalised recommendations