A combined experimental and modelling approach to aortic valve viscoelasticity in tensile deformation
- 450 Downloads
The quasi-static mechanical behaviour of the aortic valve (AV) is highly non-linear and anisotropic in nature and reflects the complex collagen fibre kinematics in response to applied loading. However, little is known about the viscoelastic behaviour of the AV. The aim of this study was to investigate porcine AV tissue under uniaxial tensile deformation, in order to establish the directional dependence of its viscoelastic behaviour. Rate dependency associated with different mechanical properties was investigated, and a new viscoelastic model incorporating rate effects developed, based on the Kelvin-Voigt model. Even at low applied loads, experimental results showed rate dependency in the stress–strain response, and also hysteresis and dissipation effects. Furthermore, corresponding values of each parameter depended on the loading direction. The model successfully predicted the experimental data and indicated a ‘shear-thinning’ behaviour. By extrapolating the experimental data to that at physiological strain rates, the model predicts viscous damping coefficients of 8.3 MPa s and 3.9 MPa s, in circumferential and radial directions, respectively. This implies that the native AV offers minimal resistance to internal shear forces induced by blood flow, a potentially critical design feature for substitute implants. These data suggest that the mechanical behaviour of the AV cannot be thoroughly characterised by elastic deformation and fibre recruitment assumptions alone.
KeywordsAortic Valve Collagen Fibre Viscoelastic Behaviour Circumferential Direction Viscoelastic Model
AAB is funded by a studentship from the UK Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). Research was also supported by a Discipline Bridging Initiative (DBI) grant from the EPSRC and Medical Research Council (MRC).
- 2.Brewer RJ, Mentzer RM, Deck JD, Ritter RC, Trefil JS, Nolan SP. An in vivo study of the dimensional changes of the aortic valve leaflets during the cardiac cycle. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1977;74:645–50.Google Scholar
- 9.De Hart J. Fluid-structure interaction in the aortic heart valve. Ph.D. thesis. 2002; Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.Google Scholar
- 18.Chong M, Missirlis YF. Aortic valve mechanics part II: a stress analysis of the porcine aortic valve leaflets in diastole. Biomat Med Dev Art Org. 1978;6:225–44.Google Scholar
- 20.Ratcliffe A, Mow VC. Articular cartilage. In: Comper WD, editor. Extracellular matrix, vol. 1. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1996. p. 268–72.Google Scholar
- 21.Brody S, Pandit A. Microarchitectural characterization of the aortic heart valve. In: Hasirci N, Hasirci V, editors. Biomaterials: from molecules to engineered tissues. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2004. p. 167–86.Google Scholar
- 22.Talman EA, Boughner DR. Internal shear properties of fresh porcine aortic valve cusps: Implications for normal valve function. J Heart Valve Dis. 1996;5:152–9.Google Scholar
- 25.Leeson-Dietrich J, Boughner D, Vesely I. Porcine pulmonary and aortic valves: a comparison of their tensile viscoelastic properties at physiological strain rates. J Heart Valve Dis. 1995;4:88–94.Google Scholar
- 26.Love ER. Linear superposition in visco-elasticity and theories of delayed effects. Austral J Phys. 1952;9:1–12.Google Scholar
- 29.Fung YC. Biomechanics: mechanical properties of living tissue. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag New York Inc.; 1993.Google Scholar