A combined experimental and modelling approach to aortic valve viscoelasticity in tensile deformation

  • Afshin Anssari-Benam
  • Dan L. Bader
  • Hazel R. C. Screen


The quasi-static mechanical behaviour of the aortic valve (AV) is highly non-linear and anisotropic in nature and reflects the complex collagen fibre kinematics in response to applied loading. However, little is known about the viscoelastic behaviour of the AV. The aim of this study was to investigate porcine AV tissue under uniaxial tensile deformation, in order to establish the directional dependence of its viscoelastic behaviour. Rate dependency associated with different mechanical properties was investigated, and a new viscoelastic model incorporating rate effects developed, based on the Kelvin-Voigt model. Even at low applied loads, experimental results showed rate dependency in the stress–strain response, and also hysteresis and dissipation effects. Furthermore, corresponding values of each parameter depended on the loading direction. The model successfully predicted the experimental data and indicated a ‘shear-thinning’ behaviour. By extrapolating the experimental data to that at physiological strain rates, the model predicts viscous damping coefficients of 8.3 MPa s and 3.9 MPa s, in circumferential and radial directions, respectively. This implies that the native AV offers minimal resistance to internal shear forces induced by blood flow, a potentially critical design feature for substitute implants. These data suggest that the mechanical behaviour of the AV cannot be thoroughly characterised by elastic deformation and fibre recruitment assumptions alone.


Aortic Valve Collagen Fibre Viscoelastic Behaviour Circumferential Direction Viscoelastic Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



AAB is funded by a studentship from the UK Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). Research was also supported by a Discipline Bridging Initiative (DBI) grant from the EPSRC and Medical Research Council (MRC).


  1. 1.
    Stella JA, Sacks MS. On the biaxial mechanical properties of the layers of the aortic valve leaflet. J Biomech Eng. 2007;129:757–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brewer RJ, Mentzer RM, Deck JD, Ritter RC, Trefil JS, Nolan SP. An in vivo study of the dimensional changes of the aortic valve leaflets during the cardiac cycle. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1977;74:645–50.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Billiar KL, Sacks MS. Biaxial mechanical properties of the natural and glutaraldehyde treated aortic valve cusp—part I: experimental results. J Biomech Eng. 2000;122:23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Merrymanm WD, Youn I, Lukoff HD, Krueger PM, Guilak F, Hopkins RA, Sacks MS. Correlation between heart valve interstitial cell stiffness and transvalvular pressure: implications for collagen biosynthesis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;290:H224–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yacoub MH, Cohn LH. Novel approaches to cardiac valve repair: from structure to function: part I. Circulation. 2004;109:942–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vesely I. Heart valve tissue engineering. Circ Res. 2005;97:743–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schoen FJ, Levy RJ. Calcification of tissue heart valve substitute: progress toward understanding and prevention. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:1072–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics 2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;121:e46–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Hart J. Fluid-structure interaction in the aortic heart valve. Ph.D. thesis. 2002; Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schoen FJ, Levy RJ. Tissue heart valves: current challenges and future research perspectives. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;47:439–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jamieson WR. Modern cardiac valve devices-bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses: state of the art. J Cardiac Surg. 1993;8:89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schoen FJ, Levy RJ, Piehler HR. Pathological considerations in replacement cardiac valves. Cardiovasc Pathol. 1992;1:29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sauren AAHJ, Van Hout MC, Van Steenhoven AA, Veldpaus FE, Janssen JD. The mechanical properties of porcine aortic valve tissues. J Biomech. 1983;16:327–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mavrilas D, Missirlis Y. An approach to the optimization of preparation of bioprosthetic heart valves. J Biomech. 1991;24:331–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vesely I. The role of elastin in aortic valve mechanics. J Biomech. 1998;31:115–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Christie GW, Barratt-Boyes BG. Biaxial mechanical properties of explanted aortic allograft leaflets. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:S160–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Billiar KL, Sacks MS. Biaxial mechanical properties of the natural and glutaraldehyde treated aortic valve cusp—part II: a structural constitutive model. J Biomech Eng. 2000;122:327–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chong M, Missirlis YF. Aortic valve mechanics part II: a stress analysis of the porcine aortic valve leaflets in diastole. Biomat Med Dev Art Org. 1978;6:225–44.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stella JA, Liao J, Sacks MS. Time dependent biaxial mechanical behaviour of the aortic heart valve leaflet. J Biomech. 2007;40:3169–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ratcliffe A, Mow VC. Articular cartilage. In: Comper WD, editor. Extracellular matrix, vol. 1. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1996. p. 268–72.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brody S, Pandit A. Microarchitectural characterization of the aortic heart valve. In: Hasirci N, Hasirci V, editors. Biomaterials: from molecules to engineered tissues. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2004. p. 167–86.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Talman EA, Boughner DR. Internal shear properties of fresh porcine aortic valve cusps: Implications for normal valve function. J Heart Valve Dis. 1996;5:152–9.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sacks MS, Merryman WD, Schmidt DE. On the biomechanics of heart valve function. J Biomech. 2009;42:1804–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liao J, Yang L, Grashow J, Sacks MS. The relation between collagen fibril kinematics and mechanical properties in the mitral valve anterior leaflet. J Biomech Eng. 2007;129:78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Leeson-Dietrich J, Boughner D, Vesely I. Porcine pulmonary and aortic valves: a comparison of their tensile viscoelastic properties at physiological strain rates. J Heart Valve Dis. 1995;4:88–94.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Love ER. Linear superposition in visco-elasticity and theories of delayed effects. Austral J Phys. 1952;9:1–12.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Drapaca CS, Tenti G, Rohlf K, Sivaloganathan S. A quasi-linear viscoelastic constitutive equation for the brain: application to hydrocephalus. J Elast. 2006;85:65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pioletti DP, Rakotomanana LR, Benvenuti JF, Leyvraz PF. Viscoelastic constitutive law in large deformations: application to human knee ligaments and tendons. J Biomech. 1998;31:753–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fung YC. Biomechanics: mechanical properties of living tissue. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag New York Inc.; 1993.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li J, Luo XY, Kuang ZB. A nonlinear anisotropic model for porcine aortic heart valves. J Biomech. 2001;34:1279–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Screen HRC, Lee DA, Bader DL, Shelton JC. An investigation into the effects of the hierarchical structure of tendon fascicles on micromechanical properties. Proc Insts Mech Engrs Part H: J Eng Med. 2004;218:109–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Anssari-Benam A, Viola G, Korakianitis T. Thermodynamic effects of linear dissipative small deformations. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2010;100:941–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Teng Z, Tang D, Zheng J, Woodard PK, Hoffman AH. An experimental study on the ultimate strength of the adventitia and media of human atherosclerotic carotid arteries in circumferential and axial directions. J Biomech. 2009;42:2535–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lanir Y. Constitutive equations for fibrous connective tissues. J Biomech. 1983;16:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rousseau EPM, Sauren AAHJ, Van Hout MC, Van Steenhoven AA. Elastic and viscoelastic material behaviour of fresh and glutaraldehyde-treated porcine aortic valve tissue. J Biomech. 1983;16:339–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Doehring TC, Carew EO, Vesely I. The effect of strain rate on the viscoelastic response of aortic valve tissue: a direct-fit approach. Ann Biomed Eng. 2004;32:223–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Afshin Anssari-Benam
    • 1
  • Dan L. Bader
    • 1
  • Hazel R. C. Screen
    • 1
  1. 1.Medical Engineering DivisionSchool of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary, University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations