Fabrication and characters of a corneal endothelial cells scaffold based on chitosan

  • Ye Liang
  • Wanshun Liu
  • Baoqin Han
  • Chaozhong Yang
  • Qun Ma
  • Weiwei Zhao
  • Mi Rong
  • Hui Li


A novel chitosan-based membrane that made of hydroxyethyl chitosan, gelatin and chondroitin sulfate was used as a carrier of corneal endothelial cells. The characteristics of the blend membrane including transparency, equilibrium water content, ion and glucose permeability were determined. The results showed that the optical transparency of the membrane was as good as the natural human cornea. The water content of this scaffold was 81.32% which was remarkably close to the native cornea. The membrane had a good ion permeability and its glucose permeability was even higher than natural human cornea. The cultured rabbit corneal endothelial cells formed a monolayer on the membrane. The results demonstrated that the membrane was suitable for corneal endothelial cells to attach and grow on it. In addition, the membranes in vivo could be degraded steadily with less inflammation and showed a good histocompatibility. These results demonstrated that the hydroxyethyl chitosan-chondroitin sulfate-gelatin blend membrane can potentially be used as a carrier for corneal endothelial cell transplantation.


  1. 1.
    Gao XS, Liu WS, Han BQ, Wei XJ, Yang CZ. Preparation and properties of a chitosan-based carrier of corneal endothelial cells. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19:3611–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ide T, Nishida K, Yamato M, Sumide T, Utsumi M, Nozaki T, et al. Structural characterization of bioengineered human corneal endothelial cell sheets fabricated on temperature responsive culture dishes. Biomaterials. 2006;27:607–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yang J, Yamato M, Shimizu T, Sekine H, Ohashia K, Kanzaki M, et al. Reconstruction of functional tissues with cell sheet engineering. Biomaterials. 2007;28:5033–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dobbins KRB, Price FWJ, Whitson WE. Trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty in the Midwestern United States. Cornea. 2000;19:813–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu W, Cao YL. Application of scaffold materials in tissue reconstruction in immunocompetent mammals: our experience and future requirements. Biomaterials. 2007;28:5078–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aboalchamat B, Engelmanna K, Böhnke M, Eggli P, Bednarz J. Morphological and functional analysis of immortalized human corneal endothelial cells after transplantation. Exp Eye Res. 1999;69(5):547–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lloyd AW, Faragher RGA, Denyer SP. Ocular biomaterials and implants. Biomaterials. 2001;22:769–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mohay J, Lange TM, Soltau JB, Wood TO, McLaughlin BJ. Transplantation of corneal endothelial cells using a cell carrier device. Cornea. 1994;13(2):173–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Orwin EJ, Hubel A. In vitro culture characteristics of corneal epithelial, endothelial and keratocyte cells in a native collagen matrix. Tissue Eng. 2000;6(4):307–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mimura T, Yamagami S, Yokoo S, Usui T, Tanaka K, Hattori S, et al. Cultured human corneal endothelial cell transplantation with a collagen sheet in a rabbit model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2992–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hadlock T, Singh S, Vacanti JP, Mclaughlin BJ. Ocular cell monolayers cultured on biodegradable substrates. Tissue Eng. 1999;5(3):187–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ma DHK, Chen JK, Zhang F, Lin KY, Yao JY, Yu JS. Regulation of corneal angiogenesis in limbal stem cell deficiency. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2006;25:563–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Engelmanna K, Drexler D, Bo¨hnke M. Transplantation of adult human or porcine corneal endothelial cells onto human recipients in vitro. Cornea. 1999;18(2):199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ishino Y, Sano Y, Nakamura T, Connon CJ, Rigby H, Fullwood NJ, et al. Amniotic membrane as a carrier for cultivated human corneal endothelial cell transplantation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:800–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nimni ME, Cheung D, Strates B, Kodama M, Sheikh K. Chemically modified collagen: a natural biomaterial for tissue replacement. J Biomed Mater Res. 1987;21:741–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Friess W. Collagen-biomaterial for drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 1998;45:113–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Berger J, Reist M, Mayer JM, Felt O, Peppas NA, Gurny R. Structure and interactions in covalently and ionically crosslinked chitosan hydrogels for biomedical applications. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2004;57:19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rafat M, Li FF, Fagerholm P, Lagali NS, Watsky MA, Griffith M, et al. PEG-stabilized carbodiimide crosslinked collagen–chitosan hydrogels for corneal tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2008;29:3960–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shirosaki Y, Okayama T, Tsuru K, Hayakawa S, Osaka A. Synthesis and cytocompatibility of porous chitosan–silicate hybrids for tissue engineering scaffold application. J Chem Eng. 2008;137:122–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mori T, Okumura M, Matsuura M, Ueno K, Tokura S, Minami YS, et al. Effects of chitin and its derivatives on the proliferation and cytokine production of fibroblasts in vitro. Biomaterials. 1997;18:947–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pangburn SH, Trescony PV, Heller J. Lysozyme degradation of partially deacetylated chitin, its films and hydrogels. Biomaterials. 1982;3:105–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Suh JKF, Matthew HWT. Application of chitosan-based polysaccharide biomaterials in cartilage tissue engineering: a review. Biomaterials. 2000;21(24):2589–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chen JS, Li QH, Xu JT, Huang YX, Ding Y, Deng HW, et al. Study on biocompatibility of complexes of collagen–chitosan–sodium hyaluronate and cornea. Artif Organs. 2005;29:104–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sung HJ, Meredith C, Johnson C, Galis ZS. The effect of scaffold degradation rate on three-dimensional cell growth and angiogenesis. Biomaterials. 2004;25:5735–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Laschke MW, Haufel JM, Thorlacius H, Menger MD. New experimental approach to study host tissue response to surgical mesh materials in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005;74:696–704.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang SL, Liu WS, Han BQ, Yang LL. Study on a hydroxypropyl chitosan–gelatin based scaffold for corneal stroma tissue engineering. Appl Surf Sci. 2009;255:8701–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Miller GL. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem. 1959;31:426–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Telse R, Sigrid K. In vitro permeation studies comparing bovine nasal mucosa, porcine cornea and artificial membrane: androstenedione in microemulsions and their components. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2004;58:137–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    McCarey BE, Schmidt FH. Modeling glucose distribution in the cornea. Curr Eye Res. 1990;9:1025–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chirila TV. An overview of the development of artificial corneas with porous skirts and the use of PHEMA for such an application. Biomaterials. 2001;22:3311–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Li CX, Siedlecki CA. Effects of surface wettability and contact time on protein adhesion to biomaterial surfaces. Biomaterials. 2007;28:3273–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vijayasekaran S, Fitton JH, Hicks CR, Chirila TV, Crawford GJ, Constable IJ. Cell viability and inflammatory response in hydrogel sponges implanted in the rabbit cornea. Biomaterials. 1998;19:2255–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ye Liang
    • 1
  • Wanshun Liu
    • 1
  • Baoqin Han
    • 1
  • Chaozhong Yang
    • 2
  • Qun Ma
    • 1
  • Weiwei Zhao
    • 1
  • Mi Rong
    • 1
  • Hui Li
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Marine Life SciencesOcean University of ChinaQingdaoChina
  2. 2.Dongfang Hospital of OphthalmologyQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations