Crosslinking of gelatin-based drug carriers by genipin induces changes in drug kinetic profiles in vitro

  • Goutam Thakur
  • Analava Mitra
  • Dérick RousseauEmail author
  • Amit Basak
  • Siddik Sarkar
  • Kunal Pal


Hydrogels are extensively studied as carrier matrices for the controlled release of bioactive molecules. The aim of this study was to design gelatin-based hydrogels crosslinked with genipin and study the impact of crosslinking temperature (5, 15 or 25°C) on gel strength, microstructure, cytocompatibility, swelling and drug release. Gels crosslinked at 25°C exhibited the highest Flory–Rehner crosslink density, lowest swelling ratio and the slowest release of indomethacin (Idn, model anti-inflammatory drug). Diffusional exponents (n) indicated non-Fickian swelling kinetics while drug transport was anomalous. Hydrogel biocompatibility, in vitro cell viability, cell cycle experiments with AH-927 and HaCaT cell lines indicated normal cell proliferation without any effect on cell cycle. Overall, these results substantiated the use of genipin-crosslinked hydrogels as a viable carrier matrix for drug release applications.


Gelatin Drug Release HaCaT Cell Genipin Whiteness Index 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Funding from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) is acknowledged. Author Thakur acknowledges Sutapa Mukherjee, Joydip Kundu, Pallab Dutta, Shubhadeep Banerjee and Sanat Dey of Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur and Muhammad Ali Naqvi, Renuka Gupta, Roomana Aafaqi of Ryerson University for their technical assistance. He is also thankful to Dr. Mahitosh Mandal for access to cell culture facilities.


  1. 1.
    Pal K, Banthia AK, Majumdar DK. Preparation and characterization of polyvinyl alcohol–gelatin hydrogel membranes for biomedical applications. AAPS Pharm Sci Technol. 2007;8:E142–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Madhumathi K, Shalumon KT, Divya Rani VV, Tamura H, Furuike T, Selvamurugan N, Nair SV, Jayakumar R. Wet chemical synthesis of chitosan hydrogel–hydroxyapatite composite membranes for tissue engineering applications. Int J Biol Macromol. 2009;45:12–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim UJ, Park J, Li C, Jin HJ, Valluzzi R, Kaplan DL. Structure and properties of silk hydrogels. Biomacromolecules. 2004;5:786–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berger J, Reist M, Mayer JM, Felt O, Peppas NA, Gurny R. Structure and interactions in covalently and ionically crosslinked chitosan hydrogels for biomedical applications. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2004;57:19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bigi A, Cojazzi G, Panzavolta S, Rubini K, Roveri N. Mechanical and thermal properties of gelatin films at different degrees of glutaraldehyde crosslinking. Biomaterials. 2001;22:763–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nickerson MT, Farnworth R, Wagar E, Hodge SM, Rousseau D, Paulson AT. Some physical and microstructural properties of genipin-crosslinked gelatin–maltodextrin hydrogels. Int J Biol Macromol. 2006;38:40–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jin J, Song M, Hourston DJ. Novel chitosan-based films cross-linked by genipin with improved physical properties. Biomacromolecules. 2004;5:162–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liang HC, Chang WH, Lin KJ, Sung HW. Genipin-crosslinked gelatin microspheres as a drug carrier for intramuscular administration: in vitro and in vivo studies. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;65A:271–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Muzzarelli RAA. Genipin-crosslinked chitosan hydrogels as biomedical and pharmaceutical aids. Carbohydr Polym. 2009;77:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gupta P, Vermani K, Garg S. Hydrogels from controlled release to pH-responsive drug delivery. Drug Discov Today. 2002;7:569–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chiono V, Pulieri E, Vozzi G, Ciardelli G, Ahluwalia A, Giusti P. Genipin-crosslinked chitosan/gelatin blends for biomedical applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19:889–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Young S, Wong M, Tabata Y, Mikos AG. Gelatin as a delivery vehicle for the controlled release of bioactive molecules. J Control Release. 2005;109:256–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yao CH, Liu BS, Chang CJ, Hsu SH, Chen YS. Preparation of networks of gelatin and genipin as degradable biomaterials. Mater Chem Phys. 2004;83:204–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Briones V, Aguilera VJM, Brown C. Effect of surface topography on color and gloss of chocolate samples. J Food Eng. 2006;77:776–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Silva SS, Motta A, Rodrigues MT, Pinheiro AFM, Gomes ME, Mano JF, Reis RL, Migliaresi C. Novel genipin cross-linked chitosan-silk fibroin sponges for cartilage engineering strategies. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9:2764–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yuan Y, Chesnutt BM, Utturkar G, Haggard WO, Yang Y, Ong JL, Bumgardner JD. The effect of cross-linking of chitosan microspheres with genipin on protein release. Carbohydr Polym. 2007;68:561–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mi FL. Synthesis and characterization of a novel chitosan–gelatin bioconjugate with fluorescence emission. Biomacromolecules. 2005;6:975–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen H, Ouyang W, Lawuyi B, Prakash S. Genipin cross-linked alginate-chitosan microcapsules: membrane characterization and optimization of cross-linking reaction. Biomacromolecules. 2006;7:2091–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sungthongjeen S, Sriamornsak P, Puttipipatkhachorn S. Design and evaluation of floating multilayer coated tablets based on gas formation. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2008;69:255–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brannon-Peppas L, Peppas NA. Equilibrium swelling behaviour of dilute ionic hydrogels in electrolytic solutions. J Control Release. 1991;16:319–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sen M, Yakar A, Güven O. Determination of average molecular weight between cross-links (Mc) from swelling behaviors of diprotic acid-containing hydrogels. Polymer. 1999;40:2969–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sen M, Güven O. Prediction of the swelling behaviour of amphiphilic hydrogels and the determination of average molecular weight between crosslinks. Comput Theor Polym Sci. 2000;11:475–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peppas NA, Bures P, Leobandung W, Ichikawa H. Hydrogels in pharmaceutical formulations. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2000;50:27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ofner CM III, Bubnis WA. Chemical and swelling evaluations of amino group crosslinking in gelatin and modified gelatin matrices. Pharm Res. 1996;13:1821–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rajvaidya S, Bajpai R, Bajpai AK. Effect of gamma irradiation on the interpenetrating networks of gelatin and polyacrylonitrile: aspect of crosslinking using microhardness and crosslink density measurements. J Appl Polym Sci. 2006;101:2581–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Çaykara T, Kantoğlu Ö. Thermal behavior and network structure of poly(N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone-crotonic acid) hydrogels prepared by radiation-induced polymerization. Polym Adv Technol. 2004;15:134–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ritger P, Peppas N. A simple equation for description of solute release II. Fickian and anomalous release from swellable devices. J Control Release. 1987;5:37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ritger P, Peppas N. A simple equation for description of solute release I. Fickian and non-Fickian release from non-swellable devices in the form of slabs, spheres, cylinders or discs. J Control Release. 1987;5:23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Costa P, Lobo JMS. Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2001;13:123–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lara MG, Bentley MVLB, Collett JH. In vitro drug release mechanism and drug loading studies of cubic phase gels. Int J Pharm. 2005;293:241–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Method. 1983;65:55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Touyama R, Takeda Y, Inoue K, Kawamura I, Yatsuzuka M, Ikumoto T, Shingu T, Yokoi T, Inouye H. Studies on the blue pigments produced from genipin and methylamine I. Structures of the brownish-red pigments, intermediates leading to the blue pigments. Chem Pharm Bull. 1994;42:668–73.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sell SA, Francis MP, Garg K, McClure MJ, Simpson DG, Bowlin GL. Cross-linking methods of electrospun fibrinogen scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Biomed Mater. 2008;3:045001–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sung HW, Huang RN, Huan LLH, Tsai CC, Chiu CT. Feasibility study of a natural crosslinking reagent for biological tissue fixation. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;42:560–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chen HM, Wei OY, Bisi LY, Martoni C, Prakash S. Reaction of chitosan with genipin and its fluorogenic attributes for potential microcapsule membrane characterization. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005;75:917–27.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chatterjee S, Bohidar HB. Effect of cationic size on gelation temperature and properties of gelatin hydrogels. Int J Biol Macromol. 2005;35:81–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Liu H, Ge Z, Wang Y, Toh SL, Sutthikhum V, Goh JCH. Modification of sericin-free silk fibers for ligament tissue engineering application. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007;82:129–38.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yung CW, Wu LQ, Tullman JA, Payne GF, Bentley WE, Barbari TA. Transglutaminase crosslinked gelatin as a tissue engineering scaffold. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007;83:1039–46.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wang XH, Li DP, Wang WJ, Feng QL, Cui FZ, Xu YX, Song XH, van der Werf M. Crosslinked collagen/chitosan matrix for artificial livers. Biomaterials. 2003;24:3213–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Martínez-Ruvalcaba A, Sánchez-Díaz JC, Becerra F, Cruz-Barba LE, González-Álvarez A. Swelling characterization and drug delivery kinetics of polyacrylamide-co-itaconic acid/chitosan hydrogels. Express Polym Lett. 2009;3:25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lee PI. Kinetics of drug release from hydrogel matrices. J Control Release. 1985;2:277–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhang Y, Chu CC. The effect of molecular weight of biodegradable hydrogel components on indomethacin release from dextran and poly(DL)lactic acid based hydrogels. J Bioact Compat Polym. 2002;17:65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Morimoto K, Nagayasu A, Fukanoki S, Morisaka K, Hyon SH, Ikada Y. Evaluation of poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel as a sustained-release vehicle for rectal administration. Pharm Res. 1989;6:338–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kallinteri P, Antimisiaris SG. Solubility of drugs in the presence of gelatin: effect of drug lipophilicity and degree of ionization. Int J Pharm. 2001;221:219–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ng KW, Hutmacher DW, Schantz MD, Ng CS, Too HP, Lim TC, Phan TT, Teoh SH. Evaluation of ultra-thin poly(caprolactone) films for tissue-engineered skin. Tissue Eng. 2001;7:441–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Dash BC, Mandal BB, Kundu SC. Silk gland sericin protein membranes: fabrication and characterization for potential biotechnological applications. J Biotechnol. 2009;144:321–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kenchington AW, Ward AG. The titration curve of gelatin. Biochem J. 1954;58:202–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Goutam Thakur
    • 1
  • Analava Mitra
    • 1
  • Dérick Rousseau
    • 2
    Email author
  • Amit Basak
    • 3
  • Siddik Sarkar
    • 1
  • Kunal Pal
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Medical Science and TechnologyIndian Institute of Technology KharagpurKharagpurIndia
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry and BiologyRyerson UniversityTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Department of ChemistryIndian Institute of Technology KharagpurKharagpurIndia
  4. 4.Department of Biotechnology and Medical EngineeringNational Institute of Technology RourkelaRourkelaIndia

Personalised recommendations