Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine

, Volume 21, Issue 11, pp 3019–3027 | Cite as

Osteoclastic cell behaviors affected by the α-tricalcium phosphate based bone cements

  • Sun-Ae Oh
  • Gil-Su Lee
  • Jeong-Hui Park
  • Hae-Won Kim


Calcium phosphate cements (CPCs) have recently gained great interest as injectable bone substitutes for use in dentistry and orthopedics. α-tricalcium phosphate (α-TCP) is a popularly used precursor powder for CPCs. When mixed with appropriate content of liquid and kept under aqueous conditions, α-TCP dissolves to form a calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite and then hardens to cement. In this study, α-TCP based cement (CP) and its composite cement with chitosan (Ch-CP) were prepared and the osteoclastic responses to the cements and their elution products were evaluated. Preliminary evaluation of the cements revealed that the CP and Ch-CP hardened within ~10 min at an appropriate powder-to-liquid ratio (PL) of 3.0. In addition, CP and Ch-CP were transformed into an apatite phase following immersion in a saline solution. Moreover, the osteoblastic cells were viable on the cements for up to 10 days. Mouse-derived bone marrow cells were isolated and activated with osteoclastic differentiation medium, and the effects of the CP and Ch-CP substrates and their ionic eluants on the osteoclastic activity were investigated. Osteoclastic cells were viable for up to 14 days on both types of cements, maintaining a higher cell growth level than the control culture dish. Multi-nucleated osteoclastic cells that were tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)-positive were clearly observed when cultured on the cement substrates as well as treated with the cement eluants. The TRAP activity was found to be significantly higher in cells influenced by the cement substrates and their eluants with respect to the control culture dish (Ch-CP > CP ≫ control). Overall, the osteoclastic differentiation was highly stimulated by the α-TCP based experimental cements in terms of both the substrate interaction and their elution products.


  1. 1.
    Brown WE, Chow LC. A new calcium phosphate setting cement. J Dent Res. 1983;62:672.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gruninger SE, Siew C, Chow LC, O’Young A, Ts’Ao NK, Brown WE. Evaluation of the biocompatibility of a new calcium phosphate setting cement. J Dent Res. 1986;63:200.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bohner M. Reactivity of calcium phosphate cements. J Mater Chem. 2007;17:3980–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wei X, Ugurlu O, Akinc M. Hydrolysis of a-tricalcium phosphate in simulated body fluid and dehydration behavior during the drying process. J Am Ceram Soc. 2007;90(8):2315–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Durucan C, Brown PW. α-tricalcium phosphate hydrolysis to hydroxyapatite at the near physiological temperature. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2000;11:365–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li Y, Zhang X, de Groot K. Hydrolysis and phase transition of alpha-tricalcium phosphate. Biomaterials. 1997;18(10):737–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miyamoto Y, Ishikawa K, Takechi M, Toh T, Yuasa T, Nagayama M, Suzuki K. Basic properties of calcium phosphate cement containing atelocollagen in its liquid or powder phases. Biomaterials. 1998;19:707–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miyazaki K, Horibe T, Antonucci JM, Takagi S, Chow LC. Polymeric calcium phosphate cements: analysis of reaction products and properties. Dent Mater. 1993;9:41–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mickiewicz RA, Mayes AM, Knaack D. Polymer-calcium phosphate cement composites for bone substitutes. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;61:581–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cherng A, Takagi S, Chow LC. Effects of hxydroxypropyl methylcellulose and other gelling agents on the handling properties of calcium phosphate cement. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;35:273–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fujishiro Y, Takahashi K, Saito T. Preparation and compressive strength of a-tricalcium phosphate/gelatin gel composite cement. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;54:525–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khairoun I, Driessens FCM, Boltong MG, Planell JA, Wenz R. Addition of cohesion promotors to calcium phosphate cements. Biomaterials. 1999;20:393–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xu HHK, Simon CG. Fast setting calcium phosphate–chitosan scaffold:mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Biomaterials. 2005;26:1337–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xu HHK, Quinn JB, Takagi S, Chow LC. Synergistic reinforcement of in situ hardening calcium phosphate composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2004;25:1029–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moreau Jennifer L, Xu Hockin HK. Mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and differentiation on an injectable calcium phosphate–chitosan composite scaffold. Biomaterials. 2009;30:2675–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sashiwa H, Aiba S. Chemically modified chitin and chitosan as biomaterials. Prog Polym Sci. 2004;29:887–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kumar R, Muzzarelli RA, Muzzarelli C, Sashiwa H, Domb AJ. Chitosan chemistry and pharmaceutical perspectives. Chem Rev. 2004;104:6017–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xia Z, Grover LM, Huang Y, Adamopoulos IE, Gbureck U, Triffitt JT, Shelton RM, Barralet JE. In vitro biodegradation of three brushite calcium phosphate cements by a macrophage cell-line. Biomaterials. 2006;27:4557–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schillingl AF, Linhart W, Filke S, Gebauer M, Schinke T, Rueger JM, Amling M. Resorbability of bone substitute biomaterials by human osteoclasts. Biomaterials. 2004;25:3963–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Monchau F, Lefevre A, Descamps M, Belquin-myrdycz A, Laffargue P, Hildebrand HF. In vitro studies of human and rat osteoclast activity on hydroxyapatite, beta-tricalcium phosphate, calcium carbonate. Biomol Eng. 2002;19(2–6):143–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ferniindez E, Ginebra MP, Boltong MG, Driessens FCM, Ginebra J, De Maeyer EAP, Verbeeck RMH, Planell JA. Kinetic study of the setting reaction of a calcium phosphate bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res. 1996;32:367–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    dos Santos LA, Carrodeguas RG, Boschi AO, de Arruda ACF. Dual-setting calcium phosphate cement modified with ammonium poly-acrylate. Artif Organs. 2003;27(5):412–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sun-Ae Oh
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gil-Su Lee
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jeong-Hui Park
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hae-Won Kim
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Nanobiomedical Science and WCU Research Center, Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering LabDankook University Graduate SchoolCheonanSouth Korea
  2. 2.Institute of Tissue Regeneration Engineering (ITREN)Dankook UniversityCheonanSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of Biomaterials Science, School of DentistryDankook UniversityCheonanSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations