In vitro bioactivity of sol–gel-derived hydroxyapatite particulate nanofiber modified titanium

  • Madhab Prasad Bajgai
  • Daman Chandra Parajuli
  • Soo-Jin Park
  • Kong Hee Chu
  • Hyung-Sub Kang
  • Hak Yong KimEmail author


A chemically-etched titanium surface was modified by electrospinning a sol–gel-derived hydroxyapatite (HAp) that was subjected to calcination within the temperature range of 200–1400°C in the normative atmospheric condition. After heat treatment, crystal structures of the filmed titanium oxide and HAp on the titanium’s surface were identified using wide-angle X-ray diffraction. A highly porous layer of HAp was found to have formed on the oxidized titanium surfaces. The surfaces of three different samples; (1) electrospun HAp, (2) HAp calcined at 600°C, and (3) HAp calcined at 800°C, were investigated for their ability to foster promotion, proliferation, and differentiation of human osteoblasts (HOB) (in the 9th passage) in vitro up to 6 days. Among the three samples, cells cultured on the HAp calcined at 800°C titanium surfaces displayed the best results with regard to adhesion, growth, and proliferation of HOB. This novel method for fabrication of titanium substrates would provide a promising improvement for titanium-based medical devices over the current standards, which lack such substrates. These titanium substrates explicitly provide enhanced HOB proliferation in terms of both desired surface properties and their produced bulk quantity.


Contact Angle Calcination Temperature Titanium Surface Tricalcium Phosphate Calcium Acetate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This research was supported by the Korean Research Foundation (KRF2007-211-D00032, Korean Government Project No. 10028211), Grant Funded by the Korean Government (MOEHRD), and Regional Research Centers Program of the Korean Ministry of Educational and Human Resources Development through the Center for Healthcare Technology Development, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju 562-756, Republic of Korea.


  1. 1.
    Hala ZC, Rolfe H. Titanium substrata composition influences osteoblastic phenotype: in vitro study. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;47:360–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Garcia-Alonso MC, Saldana L, Vallés G, Gonzalez-Carrasco JL, González-Cabrero J, Martínez ME, et al. In vitro corrosion behaviour and osteoblast response of thermally oxidized Ti6Al4V alloy. Biomaterials. 2003;24:19–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bidez MW, Misch CE. Force transfer in implant dentistry: basic concepts and principles. J Oral Implantol. 1992;18:264–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Im KH, Lee SB, Kim KM, Lee YK. Improvement of bonding strength to titanium surface by sol–gel derived hybrid coating of hydroxyapatite and titania by sol–gel process. Surf Coat Technol. 2007;202:1135–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Michael MC. Dental implant materials: commercially pure titanium and titanium alloys. J Prosthodont. 1999;l8:40–3.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fujibayashi S, Masashi N, Kim HM, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Osteoinduction of porous bioactive titanium metal. Biomaterials. 2004;25:443–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kasemo B, Lausmaa J. Biomaterial and implant surface: a surface science approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988;3:247–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xuanyong L, Paul KC, Chuanxian D. Surface modification of titanium, titanium alloys, and related materials for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. 2004;47:49–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Okumura M, Ohgushi H, Dohi Y, Katuda T, Tamai S, Koerten HK, et al. Osteoblastic phenotype expression on the surface of hydroxyapatite ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;37:122–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang C, Wang JX, Feng H, Lu B, Zhang X. Repairing segmental bone defects with living porous ceramic cylinders: an experimental study in dog femora. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;55:28–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li JP, Habibovica P, Doelc M, Wilsonb CE, Wijna JR, Clemens AV, et al. Bone ingrowth in porous titanium implants produced by 3D fiber deposition. Biomaterials. 2007;28:2810–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kumta PN, Sfeir C, Lee DH, Olton D, Choi D. Nanostructured calcium phosphates for biomedical applications: novel synthesis and characterization. Acta Biomater. 2005;1:65–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Larsson C, Emanulesson L, Thomsen P, Ericson LE. Bone response to surface modified titanium implants—studies on the tissue response after 1 year to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1997;8:721–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Feng B, Weng J, Yang BC, Qu SX, Zhang XD. Characterization of surface oxide films on titanium and adhesion of osteoblast. Biomaterials. 2003;24:4663–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Groessner-Schreiber B, Tuan RS. Enhanced extracellular matrix production an mineralization by osteoblasts cultured on titanium surfaces in vitro. J Cell Sci. 1992;101:209–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barbara DB, Thomas WH, David DD, Zvi S. Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response. Biomaterials. 1996;17:137–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bajgai MP, Aryal S, Bhattarai SR, Remant Bahadur KC, Kim KW, Kim HY. Poly (ε-caprolactone) grafted dextran biodegradable electrospun matrix: a novel scaffold for tissue engineering. J Appl Polym Sci. 2008;108:1447–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aryal S, Bajgai MP, Khil MS, Kang HS, Kim HY. Biomimetic hydroxyapatite particulate nanofiber modified silicon: in vitro bioactivity. J Biomed Mater Res. 2009;88A:384–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hanawa T, Kamiura Y, Yamamoto S, Kohgo T, Amemiya A, Ukai H, et al. Early bone formation around calcium-ion-implanted titanium inserted into rat tibia. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;36:131–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li D, Ferguson SJ, Beutler T, Cochran DL, Sittig C, Hirt HP, et al. Biomechanical comparison of the sandblasted and acid etched and the machined and acid-etched titanium surface for dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;60:325–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Frayssinet P, Tourenne F, Rouquet N, Conte P, Delga C, Bonel G. Comparative biological properties of HA plasma-sprayed coatings with different crystallinities. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1994;5:11–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cheung HS, McCarty DJ. Mitogenesis induced by calcium-containing crystals: role of intracellular dissolution. Exp Cell Res. 1985;157:63–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pattanayak DK, Divya P, Upadhyay S, Prasad RC, Rao BT, Rama Mohan TR. Synthesis and evaluation of hydroxyapatite ceramics. Trends Biomater Artif Organs. 2005;18:87–92.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chen W, McCarthy TJ. Layer-by-layer deposition: a tool for polymer surface modification. Macromolecules. 1997;30:78–86.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stevens N, Priest CI, Sedev R, Ralston J. Wettability of photoresponsive titanium dioxide surfaces. Langmuir. 2003;19:3272–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vihola H, Laukkanen A, Valtola L, Tenhu H, Hirvonen J. Cytotoxicity of thermosensitive polymers poly(N-isopropylacrylamide), poly(N-vinylcaprolactam) and amphiphilically modified poly-(N-vinylcaprolactam). Biomaterials. 2005;26:3055–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Groot K, Geesink R, Klein C, Serekian P. Plasma-sprayed coatings of hydroxyl apatite. J Biomed Mater Res. 1987;21:1375–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Madhab Prasad Bajgai
    • 1
  • Daman Chandra Parajuli
    • 1
  • Soo-Jin Park
    • 2
  • Kong Hee Chu
    • 3
    • 5
  • Hyung-Sub Kang
    • 4
  • Hak Yong Kim
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Bionanosystem EngineeringChonbuk National UniversityJeonjuRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Center for Healthcare Technology DevelopmentChonbuk National UniversityJeonjuRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Clean and science Co., LtdSamsung Dong, Kangnam Ku, SeoulRepublic of Korea
  4. 4.College of Veterinary MedicineChonbuk National UniversityJeonjuRepublic of Korea
  5. 5.Department of Textile EngineeringChonbuk National UniversityJeonjuRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations