Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine

, Volume 20, Issue 12, pp 2527–2540 | Cite as

Preparation, characterization and in vitro biological study of biomimetic three-dimensional gelatin–montmorillonite/cellulose scaffold for tissue engineering

  • Ahmed A. Haroun
  • Amira Gamal-Eldeen
  • David R. K. Harding
Article

Abstract

This work focused on studying the effect of blending gelatin (Gel) with Cellulose (Cel), in the presence of montmorillonite (MMT), on the swelling behavior, in vitro degradation and surface morphology. Additionally, the effect of the prepared biocomposites on the characteristics of the human osteosarcoma cells (Saos-2), including proliferation, scaffold/cells interactions, apoptosis and their potential of the cells to induce osteogenesis and differentiation was evaluated. The crosslinked biocomposites with glutaraldehyde (GA) or N,N-methylene-bisacrylamide (MBA) was prepared via an intercalation process and freeze-drying technique. Properties including SEM morphology, X-ray diffraction characterization and in vitro biodegradation were investigated. The successful generation of 3-D biomimetic porous scaffolds incorporating Saos-2 cells indicated their potential for de novo bone formation that exploits cell–matrix interactions. In vitro studies revealed that the scaffolds containing 12 and 6% MMT crosslinked by 5 and 0.5% GA seem to be the two most efficient and effective biodegradable scaffolds, which promoted Saos-2 cells proliferation, migration, expansion, adhesion, penetration, spreading, and differentiation, respectively. MMT improved cytocompatibility between the osteoblasts and the biocomposite. In vitro analysis indicated good biocompatibility of the scaffold and presents the scaffold as a new potential candidate as suitable biohybrid material for tissue engineering.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Dr. A. A. Haroun would like to thank laboratories of Prof. D. R. K. Harding and Prof. G. Jameson at College of Sciences, Palmerston North, Massey University, New Zealand for support and generous assistance toward carrying out some of the necessary investigations in this work, during his scientific visit. Also, this work was supported by Center of Excellence for Advanced Sciences, National, Research Center, Cairo, Egypt.

References

  1. 1.
    Zheng JP, Wang CZ, Yao KD. Preparation of biomimetic three-dimensional gelatin/montmorillonite-chitosan scaffold for tissue engineering. React Funct Polym. 2007;67:780–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dasdia T, Bazzaco L, Dolfine E. Organ culture in 3-dimensional matrix. In vitro model for evaluating biological compliance of synthetic meshes for abdominal wall repair. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;43:204–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grande DA, Halberstadt C, Manji R. Evaluation of matrix scaffolds for tissue engineering of articular cartilage grafts. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;34:211–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nagahama H, Kashiki T, Tamura H. Preparation of biodegradable chitin/gelatin membranes with GlcNAc for tissue engineering applications. Carbohydrate Polymers 2008; online, http://www.sciencedirect.com.
  5. 5.
    Lee SB, Kim YH, Lee YM. Study of gelatin-containing artificial skin V: fabrication of gelatin scaffolds using a salt-leaching method. Biomaterials. 2005;26:1961–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Muzzarelli RA. Biochemical significance of exopenous chitins and chitosans in animals and patients. Carbohydr Polym. 1993;20:7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Choi YS, Hong SR, Nam YS. Study on gelatin-containing artificial skin I: preparation and characteristics of novel gelatin-alginate sponge. Biomaterials. 1999;20:409–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martucci JF, Ruseckaite RA, Vazquez A. Creep of glutaraldehyde-crosslinked gelatin films. Mater Sci Eng A. 2006;435:681–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Achet D, He XW. Determination of the renaturation level in gelatin films. Polymer. 1995;36:787–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Arvanitoyannis IS, Nakayama A, Aiba S. Chitosan and gelatin based edible films: state diagrams, mechanical and permeation properties. Carbohydr Polym. 1998;37:371–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Awad H, Erickson G, Guilak F. Biomaterials for cartilage tissue engineering. In: Lewandrowski KU, Wise D, Trantolo D, Gresser J, Yaszemski M, Altobelli D, editors. Tissue engineering and biodegradable equivalents: scientific and clinical applications. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc; 2002. p. 267–99.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xia W, Lu W, Cao Y. Tissue engineering of cartilage with the use of chitosan–gelatin complex scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater. 2004;71B:373–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huang Y, Onyeri S, Madihally SV. In vitro characterization of chitosan–gelatin scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2005;26:7616–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Couderc H, Delbreilh L, Saiter JM. Relaxation in poly(ethylene terphthalate glycol)/montmorillonite nanocomposites studied by dielectric methods. J Non-Cryst Solids. 2007;353:4334–8.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zheng JP, Li P, Yao KD. Preparation and characterization of gelatin/montmorillonite nanocomposite. J Mater Sci Lett. 2002;21:779–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ito M, Nagai K. Evaluation of degradation on nylon-6 and nylon-6/montmorillonite nanocomposite by color measurement. J Appl Polym Sci. 2008;108:3487–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fan J, Chen G, Zongneng QI. SEM study of a polystyrene/clay nanocomposite. J Appl Polym Sci. 2002;83:66–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kawasumi M, Hasegawa N, Okada A. Preparation and mechanical properties of polypropylene-clay hybrids. Macromolecules. 1997;30:6333–8.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Agag T, Koga T, Takeichi T. Studies on thermal and mechanical properties of polyimide-clay nanocomposites. Polymer. 2001;42:3399–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gang Z, Kun F, Pingsheng H. Study on bulk intercalation polymerization of PMMA/montmorillonite intercalated nanocomposite by dynamic torsional vibration method. J Mater Sci Lett. 2002;21:761–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kojima Y, Usuki A, Kamigaito O. Mechanical properties of nylon 6-clay hybrid. J Mater Res. 1993;8:1185.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    John MJ, Thomas S. Biofibers and biocomposites review. Carbohydr Polym. 2008;71:343–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Czaja KW, David J, Brown RM. The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications review. Biomacromolecules. 2007;8:1–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Coradin T, Bah S, Livage J. Gelatin/silicate interactions: from nanoparticles to composite gels. J Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces. 2004;35:53–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chao GT, Qian ZY, Wei YQ. Synthesis, characterization, and hydrolytic degradation behavior of a novel biodegradable pH-sensitive hydrogel based on polycaprolactone, methacrylic acid and poly(ethylene glycol). J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2008;85:36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kenawy E, El-Newehy M, Ottenbrite RM. A new degradable hydroxamate linkage for pH-controlled drug delivery. Biomacromolecules. 2007;8:196–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Giuliano M, Lauricella M, Tesoriere EG. Induction of apoptosis in human retinoblastoma cells by topoisomerase inhibitors invest ophthalmol. Vis Sci. 1998;39:1300–11.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hansen MB, Nielsen SE, Berg K. Re-examination and further development of a precise and rapid dye method for measuring cell growth/cell kill. J Immunol Methods. 1989;119:203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gohel A, Mccarthy M, Gronowicz G. Estrogen prevents glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis in osteoblasts in vivo and in vitro. Endocrinology. 1999;140:5339–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Smith PK, Krohn R, Klenk DC. Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal Biochem. 1985;150:76–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Boyan BD, Schwartz Z, Swain LD. Localization of 1, 25-(OH)2D3-responsive alkaline phosphatase in osteoblast-like cells and growth cartilage cells in culture. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:11879–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gerhäuser C, Klimo K, Frank N. Mechanism-based in vitro screening of potential cancer chemopreventive agents. Mutat Res. 2003;523:163–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mikos AG, Lyman MD, Langer R. Wetting of poly(l-lactic acid) and poly(dl-lactic-co-glycolic acid) foams for tissue culture. Biomaterials. 1994;15:55–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gao J, Niklason L, Langer R. Surface hydrolysis of poly(glycolic acid) meshes increases the seeding density of vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;42:417–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Burugapalli K, Bhatia D, Choudhary V. Interpenetrating polymer networks based on poly(acrylic acid) and gelatin. I: swelling and thermal behaviour. J Appl Polym Sci. 2001;82:217–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nickerson MT, Paulson AT, Rousseau D. Some physical properties of crosslinked gelatin-moltdextrin hydrogels. Food Hydrocolloid. 2007;20:1072–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Matsuda S, Iwata H, Ikada Y. Bioadhesion of gelatin films crosslinked with glutaraldehyde. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;45:20–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zheng JP, Xi LF, Yao KD. Correlation between reaction environment and intercalation effect in the synthesis of gelatin-montmorillonite hybrid nanocomposite. J Mater Sci Lett. 2003;22:1179–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zheng JP, Li P, Yao KD. Preparation and characterization of gelatin-montmorillonite nanocomposite. J Mater Sci Lett. 2002;21:770–81.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lin FH, Yao CH, Sun JS, Liu HC, Huang CW. Biological effects and cytotoxicity of the composite composed by tricalcium phosphate and glutaraldehyde crosslinked gelatin. Biomaterials. 1998;19:905–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jonsson ZO. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen: more than a clamp for DNA polymerases. Bioassay. 1997;19:967–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kamali N, McCulloch G, Limeback H. Direct flow cytometric quantification of alkaline phosphatase activity in rat bone marrow stromal cells. Hisrochem Cytochem. 1992;40:1059–65.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahmed A. Haroun
    • 1
  • Amira Gamal-Eldeen
    • 2
  • David R. K. Harding
    • 3
  1. 1.Chemical Industries Research DivisionCenter of Excellency for Advanced Sciences, National Research Centre, DokkiCairoEgypt
  2. 2.Cancer Biology LaboratoryCenter of Excellency for Advanced Sciences, National Research Centre, DokkiCairoEgypt
  3. 3.College of ScienceInstitute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey UniversityPalmerston NorthNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations