Mechanical properties of human enamel as a function of age and location in the tooth
Abstract
Aging and the related changes in mechanical behavior of hard tissues of the human body are becoming increasingly important. In this study the influence of aging on the mechanical behavior of human enamel was evaluated using 3rd molars from young (18 ≤ age ≤ 30 years) and old (55 ≤ age) patients. The hardness and elastic modulus were quantified using nanoindentation as a function of distance from the Dentin–Enamel Junction (DEJ) and within three different regions of the crown (i.e. cervical, cuspal and inter-cuspal enamel). Results of the evaluation showed that the elastic modulus and hardness increased with distance from the DEJ in all three regions examined, regardless of patient age. The largest increases with distance from the DEJ occurred within the cervical region of the old enamel. Overall, the results showed that there were no age-dependent differences in properties of enamel near the DEJ. However, near the tooth’s surface, both the hardness (p < 0.025) and elastic modulus (p < 0.0001) were significantly greater in the old enamel. At the surface of the tooth the average elastic modulus of “old” enamel was nearly 20% greater than that of enamel from the young patients.
Keywords
Elastic Modulus Fracture Toughness Property Distribution Absolute Distance Human EnamelNotes
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge that the investigation was made possible by support from the National Science Foundation (Award #: BES 0521467).
References
- 1.A. R. TEN CATE, in “Oral Histology: Development, Structure, and Function”, 5th ed., (Mosby-Year Book, Saint Louis, 1998)Google Scholar
- 2.E. D. EANES, J. Dent. Res. 58 (1979) 829Google Scholar
- 3.D. F. WEBER, J. Morphol. 141 (1973) 479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.A. Boyde, in “Handbook of Microscopic Anatomy”, (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1989) p. 309Google Scholar
- 5.G. WILLEMS, J. P. CELIS, P. LAMBRECHTS, M. BRAEM and G. VANHERLE, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 27 (1993) 747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.N. MEREDITH, M. SHERRIFF, D. J. SETCHELL and S. A. SWANSON, Arch. Oral. Biol. 41 (1996) 539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.H. H. XU, D. T. SMITH, S. JAHANMIR, E. ROMBERG, J. R. KELLY, V. P. THOMPSON and E. D. REKOW, J. Dent. Res. 77 (1998) 472Google Scholar
- 8.S. HABELITZ, S. J. MARSHALL, G. W MARSHALL Jr. and M. BALOOCH, Arch. Oral. Biol. 46 (2001) 173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.A. B. MANN and M. E. DICKINSON, Monogr. Oral. Sci. 19 (2006) 105Google Scholar
- 10.M. STAINES, W. H. ROBINSON and J. A. A. HOOD, J. Mat. Sci. 16 (1981) 2551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.G. BALOOCH, G. W. MARSHALL, S. J. MARSHALL, O. L. WARREN, S. A. ASIF and M. BALOOCH, J. Biomech. 37 (2004) 1223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.J. GE, F. Z. CUI, X. M. WANG and H. L. FENG, Biomaterials 26 (2005) 3333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.J. L. CUY, A. B. MANN, K. J. LIVI, M. F. TEAFORD and T. P. WEIHS, Arch. Oral. Biol. 47 (2002) 281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.A. BRALY, L. A. DARNELL, A. B. MANN, M. F. TEAFORD and T. P. Weihs. Arch. Oral. Biol. 52 (2007) 856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.E. K. MAHONEY, R. ROHANIZADEH, F. S. ISMAIL, N. M. KILPATRICK and M. V. SWAIN, Biomaterials 25 (2004) 5091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.E. MAHONEY, F. S. ISMAIL, N. KILPATRICK and M. SWAIN, Eur. J. Oral. Sci. 112 (2004) 497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.M. BALOOCH, S. G. DEMOS, J. H. KINNEY, G. W. MARSHALL, G. BALOOCH and S. J. MARSHALL, J. Mater. Sci: Mater. Med. 12 (2001) 507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.J. H. KINNEY, R. K. NALLA, J. A. POPLE, T. M. BREUNIG and R. O. RITCHIE, Biomaterials 26 (2005) 3363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.A. E. PORTER, R. K. NALLA, A. MINOR, J. R. JINSCHEK, C. KISIELOWSKI, V. RADMILOVIC, J. H. KINNEY, A. P. TOMSIA and R. O. RITCHIE, Biomaterials 26 (2005) 7650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.P. SENAWONGSE, M. OTSUKI, J. TAGAMI and I. MJOR, Arch. Oral. Biol. 51 (2006) 457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.D. AROLA and R. K. REPROGEL, Biomaterials. 26 (2005) 4051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.D. BAJAJ, N. SUNDARAM, A. NAZARI and D. AROLA, Biomaterials 27 (2006) 2507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.C. ROBINSON, J. KIRKHAM, S. J. BROOKES and R. C. SHORE, in “Dental Enamel: Formation to Destruction” (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1995) p.167Google Scholar
- 24.A. BERTACCI, S. CHERSONI, C.L. DAVIDSON and C. PRATI, Eur. J. Oral. Sci. 115 (2007) 169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.S. HABELITZ, G. W. MARSHALL Jr., M. BALOOCH and S. J. MARSHALL, J. Biomech. 35 (2002) 995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.W. C. OLIVER and G. M. PHARR, J. Mater. Res. 7 (1992) 1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.R. C. SHORE, C. ROBINSON and J. KIRKHAM, in “Dental Enamel: Formation to Destruction”, (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1995) 151Google Scholar
- 28.T. ICHIJO, Y. YAMASHITA and T. TERASHIMA, Bull. Tokyo. Med. Dent. Univ. 39 (1992) 71Google Scholar
- 29.T. ICHIJO, Y. YAMASHITA and T. TERASHIMA, Bull. Tokyo. Med. Dent. Univ. 40 (1993) 135Google Scholar
- 30.K. S. LESTER and A. BOYDE, Adv. Dent. Res. 1 (1986) 181Google Scholar
- 31.R. J. LYNCH and J. M. TEN CATE, Caries. Res. 40 (2006) 38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.R. HASSAN, A. A. CAPUTO and R. F. BUNSHAH, J. Dent. Res. 60 (1981) 820Google Scholar
- 33.L. H. HE and M. V. SWAIN, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 81 (2007) 484Google Scholar
- 34.L. H. HE, N. FUJISAWA and M. V. SWAIN, Biomaterials 27 (2006) 4388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.S. N. WHITE, W. LUO, M. L. PAINE, H. FONG, M. SARIKAYA and M. L. SNEAD, J. Dent. Res. 80 (2001) 321Google Scholar
- 36.J. B. QUINN and G. D. QUINN, J. Mater. Sci. 32 (1997) 4331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.J. ZHOU and L. L. HSIUNG, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 81 (2007) 66Google Scholar