Advertisement

Influence of light polymerization modes on degree of conversion and crosslink density of dental composites

  • Eduardo Moreira da Silva
  • Laiza Tatiana Poskus
  • José Guilherme Antunes Guimarães
  • Alexandre de Araújo Lima Barcellos
  • Carlos Eduardo Fellows
Article

Abstract

This study analyzed the influence of light polymerization modes on crosslink density (CD) and the degree of conversion (DC) of dental composites. A minifilled hybrid and a nanofilled dental composite were photoactivated with two light polymerization modes: Conventional—850 mW/cm2 for 20 s and Gradual—50 up to 1,000 mW/cm2 for 10 s + 1,000 mW/cm2 for 10 s. DC was determined by the use of FT-Raman-spectrometer. A softening test, using Knoop diamond indentation, was carried out at the top and bottom of 2 mm thick dental composite disks, before and after storage in 100% ethanol for 24 h, in order to represent the amount of crosslink density. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls’ multiple range test (α = 0.05). The DC was influenced by light polymerization modes, with Gradual mode presenting lower DC. On bottom surfaces, the nanofilled dental composite was more susceptible to softening by ethanol than minifilled hybrid, and gradual light polymerization of nanofilled dental composite resulted in more softening than when conventional light polymerization was used. The results suggest that nanofilled composites are capable undergoing more plasticization if applied in thick increments.

Keywords

Crosslink Density Resin Composite Filler Particle Restorative Material Polymerization Mode 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    A. PEUTZFELDT, Eur. J. Oral Sci. 105 (1997) 97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. KREJCI and F. LUTZ, J. Dent. 19 (1991) 24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. D. EICK and F. H. WELCH, Quintessence Int. 17 (1986) 103Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. SILIKAS, G. ELIADES and D. C. WATTS, Dent. Mater. 16 (2000) 292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. L. DAVDSON and A. J. FEILZER, J. Dent. 25 (1997) 435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. KORAN and R. KURSCHNER, Am. J. Dent. 11 (1998) 17Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. A. M. VENHOVEN, A. J. DE GEE and C. L. DAVIDSON, Biomaterials 14 (1993) 871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. ASMUSSEN and A. PEUTZFELDT, J. Dent. Res. 80 (2001) 1570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. ASMUSSEN and A. PEUTZFELDT, Dent. Mater. 19 (2003) 466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. MEHL, R. HICKEL and K. H. KUNZELMANN, J. Dent. 25 (1997) 321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. ASMUSSEN and A. PEUTZFELDT, Eur. J. Oral Sci. 108 (2001) 282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    I. SIDERIDOU, V. TSERKI and G. PAPANASTASIOU, Biomaterials 23 (2002) 1819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. L. FERRACANE, J. C. MITCHEM, J. R. CONDON and R. TODD, J. Dent. Res. 76 (1997) 1508Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. S. SOH and A. U. J. YAP, J. Dent. 32 (2004) 321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. ASMUSSEN, Scand. J. Dent. Res. 92 (1984) 257Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. ASMUSSEN and A. PEUTZFELDT, Eur. J. Oral Sci. 111 (2003) 277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    I. BARSZCZEWSKA-RYBAREK, M. GIBAS and M. KURCOK, Polymer 41 (2000) 3129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. AJITHKUMAR, N. K. PATEL and S. S. KANSARA, Eur. Polym. J. 36 (2000) 2387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. U. YAP, M. S. SOH, T. T. HAN and K. S. SIOW, Oper. Dent. 29 (2004) 410Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    K. D. JØRGENSEN, Scand. J. Dent. Res. 88 (1980) 557Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    I. E. RUYTER and H. ØYSAED, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 21 (1987) 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    N. EMAMI and K-JM SÖDERHOLM, Eur. J. Oral Sci. 111 (2003) 536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. L. SAKAGUCHI and H. X. BERGE, J. Dent. 26 (1998) 695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    C. RAHIOTIS, A. KAKABOURA, M. LOUKIDIS and G. VOUGIOUKLAKIS, Eur. J. Oral Sci. 112 (2004) 89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    D. C. WATTS and A. AL HINDI, Dent. Mater. 15 (1999) 39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. L. FERRACANE, Dent. Mater. 22 (2006) 211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    I. E. RUYTER and H. ØYSAED, Acta Odontol. Scand. 40 (1982) 179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. B. MITRA, D. WU and B. N. HOLMES, J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 134 (2003) 1382Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    N. SILIKAS, K. KAVVADIA, G. ELIADES and D. WATTS, Am. J. Dent. 18 (2005) 95Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    E. C. TEIXEIRA, J. L. THOMPSON, J. R. PIASCIK and J. Y. THOMPSON, J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 17 (2005) 172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    C. SPLIETH, O. BERNHARDT, A. HEINRICH, H. BERNHARDT and G. MEYER, Quintessence Int. 34 (2003) 497Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    M. SVANBERG, I. A. MJOR and D. ORSTAVIK, J. Dent. Res. 69 (1990) 861Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    R. B. PRICE, T. DERAND, M. SEDAROUS, P. ANDREOU and R. W. LONEY, J. Esthet. Dent. 12 (2000) 320CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eduardo Moreira da Silva
    • 1
    • 2
  • Laiza Tatiana Poskus
    • 1
    • 2
  • José Guilherme Antunes Guimarães
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alexandre de Araújo Lima Barcellos
    • 1
    • 2
  • Carlos Eduardo Fellows
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of DentistryFederal Fluminense UniversityNiteroiBrazil
  2. 2.Universidade Federal Fluminense/Faculdade de OdontologiaNiteroiBrazil
  3. 3.Institute of PhysicsFederal Fluminense UniversityNiteroiBrazil

Personalised recommendations