Ion release by endodontic grade glass-ionomer cement

  • Beata Czarnecka
  • Honorata Limanowska-Shaw
  • Richard Hatton
  • John W. Nicholson
Article

Abstract

Cylindrical specimens (6 mm high × 4 mm diameter) of the endodontic grade glass-ionomer (Ketac Endo) were exposed to various media for 1 week, after which changes in their mass, pH of storage medium, and ion release were determined. In water, this cement was shown to release reasonable amounts of sodium, aluminium and silicon, together with smaller amounts of calcium and phosphorus, as well as taking up 2.41% by mass of water. A comparison with the restorative grade materials (Ketac Molar, ex 3M ESPE and Fuji IX, ex GC) showed both ion release and water uptake to be greater. All three cements shifted pH from 7 to around 6 with no significant differences between them.

Other storage media were found to alter the pattern of ion release. Lactic acid caused an increase, whereas both saturated calcium hydroxide and 0.6% sodium hypochlorite, caused decreases. This suppression of ion-release may be significant clinically. Aluminium is the most potentially hazardous of the ions involved but amounts released were low compared with levels previously reported to show biological damage.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    T.R. PITT FORD, The restoration of teeth. (Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1985).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. J. ANUSAVICE, Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials, (Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1996).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. WEIGER, T. HEUCHERT, R. HAHN AND C. LOST, Endodont. {&} Dent. Traumatol. 11 (1995) 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. K. MICKEL, P. SHARMA AND S. CHOGLE, J. Endodont. 29(2003) 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. D. WILSON AND B. E. KENT, J. Appl. Chem. Biotechnol. 21(1971) 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. G. HILL AND A. D. WILSONHILL RG, Glass Technol. 29 (1988) 150.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. MATSUYA, T. MAEDA AND M. OHTA, J. Dent. Res. 75 (1996) 1920.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. A. WASSON AND J. W. NICHOLSON, Br. Polym. J. 23 (1990) 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. D. WILSON, D. M. GROFFMAN AND A. T. KUHN, Biomaterials 6 (1985) 431.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. FORSTEN, Scand. J. Dent. Res. 98 (1991) 179.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. M. H. VERBEECK, E. A. P. DE MAEYER, L. A. M. MARKS, R. J. G. DE MOOR, A. M. J. C. DE WITTE, AND L. M. TRMPENEERS, Biomaterials 19 (1998) 509.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. CZARNECKA, H. LMAINOWSKA-SHAW AND J. W. NICHOLSON, Biomaterials 23 (2002) 2783.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. CRISP, B. LEWIS AND A.D. WILSON, J. Dent. 8 (1980) 68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. W. NICHOLSON. B. CZARNECKA AND H. LIMANOWSKA-SHAW. Biomaterials 20 (1999) 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. W. NICHOLSON AND M. A. AMIRI, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 9 (1998) 549.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. J. ATKINSON AND S. WITT, Characteristics of bone, In: D. C. SMITH and D. F. WILLAIMS (Eds), Biocompatibility of dental materials, (Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press, 1985).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    U. MEYER, D. H. SZULCZEWSKI, K. MOLLER, H. EIDE AND D. B. JONES, Cells & Materials 3 (1993) 129.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    U. MEYER, D. H. SZULCZEWSKI, R. H. BARCKHAUS, M. ATKINSON AND D. B. JONES. Biomaterials 14(1993) 917.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. H. CARTER, P. SLOAN, I. M. BROOK AND P. V. HATTON. Biomaterials 18 (1997) 459.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    P. V. HATTON AND I. M. BROOK, Micron Microsc. Acta 23 (1992) 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    K. H. W. LAU, A. YOO AND S. P. WANS, Molec Cell. Biochem. 105 (1993) 93.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beata Czarnecka
    • 1
  • Honorata Limanowska-Shaw
    • 1
  • Richard Hatton
    • 2
  • John W. Nicholson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biomaterials and Experimental DentistryUniversity of Medical Sciences in PoznanPoland
  2. 2.Medway School of ScienceUniversity of GreenwichChathamUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations