Wear of crosslinked polyethylene under different tribological conditions
- 260 Downloads
Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) wear debris has been shown to be a major cause of long term failure of total joint replacements. Recently, crosslinking has been extensively introduced to reduce the wear of UHMWPE. In this study the wear of non-crosslinked and crosslinked UHMWPE were compared under a range of conditions.
The materials examined were UHMWPE GUR 1050, non-crosslinked, moderately crosslinked—5MRad, and highly crosslinked—10MRad. The wear was examined on a multidirectional pin on plate rig. The effect of counterface roughness on wear under different kinematics was examined.
The results from the different counterface conditions showed that highly crosslinked UHMWPE had significantly lower wear against both smooth and scratched counterfaces. However the reduction in wear for crosslinked polyethylene was less for scratched counterfaces. The second part of the study showed that all the UHMWPE's produced lower wear rates under lower multidirectionality because of reduced cross shear frictional forces and work. These findings are relevant to the consideration of the use of crosslinked polyethylene in the knee, where the kinematics have lower levels of cross shear and in the hip and knee against roughened metallic counterfaces.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.T. P. SCHMALZRIED, M. JASTY and W. H. HARRIS, J. Bone Jt. Surg. 74-A, (1992) 849.Google Scholar
- 2.T. R. GREEN, J. FISHER, J. B. MATTHEWS, M. STONE and E. INGHAM, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. (Appl Biomats). 53 (2000) 490.Google Scholar
- 3.H. C. AMSTUTZ, P. CAMPBELL, N. KOSSOVSKY and I. C. CLARKE, Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 276 (1992) 7.Google Scholar
- 4.H. MCKELLOP, F. W. SHEN, W. DIMAIO and J. G. LANCASTER, Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 369 (1999) 73.Google Scholar
- 5.O. K. MURTAGOLU, C. R. BRAGDON, D. O. O'CONNOR, H. SKEHAN, J. DELANEY, M. JASTY and W. H. HARRIS, In Proceedings of 46th Annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. (2000) p.566.Google Scholar
- 6.M. M. ENDO, J. L. TIPPER, D. C. BARTON, M. H. STONE, E. INGHAM and J. FISHER, Proc. Instn. Mech. Eng. 216H (2002) 111.Google Scholar
- 7.O. R. MURATOGLU, C. R. BRAGDON, D. O. O'CONNOR, M. JASTY and W. H. HARRIS, J. Arthroplasty, 16 (2001) 149.Google Scholar
- 8.M. M. ENDO, P. S. M. BARBOUR, D. C. BARTON, J. FISHER, J. L. TIPPER, E. INGHAM and M. STONE, Biomed. Mater. Eng. 11 (2001) 23.Google Scholar
- 9.P. S. M. BARBOUR, M. H. STONE, J. FISHER (1999). In: DTI CAM Project, Accelerated test methods to predict the durability of materials and surface treatments employed for total hip replacements. Task 3.7. (1999).Google Scholar
- 10.J. FISHER, Cur. Ortho. 8 (1994) 164.Google Scholar
- 12.P. S. M. BARBOUR, M. H. STONE and J. FISHER, Proc. Instn. Mech. Eng. 213H (1999) 455.Google Scholar
- 13.D. BENNETT, J. F. ORR, D. E. BEVERLAND and R. BAKER, Proc. Instn. Mech. Eng. 216H (2002) 393.Google Scholar
- 14.H. M. J. MCEWEN, Ph.D thesis, University of Leeds (2002).Google Scholar
- 15.C. M. POOLEY and D. TABOR, Proc. Royal Soc. Lon. A. 329 (1972) 251.Google Scholar
- 16.A. WANG, D. C. SUN, S. S. YAU, B. EDWARDS, M. SOKOL, A. ESSNER, V. K. POLINENI, C. STARK and J. H. DUMBLETON, Wear. 203–204 (1997) 230.Google Scholar
- 17.H. MINAKAWA, M. H. STONE, B. M. WROBLEWSKI, J. G. LANCASTER, E. INGHAM, J. FISHER, J. Bone Jt. Surg. 80-B (1998) 894.Google Scholar