Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine

, Volume 17, Issue 12, pp 1297–1303

Biocompatibility and Biodegradation of novel PHB porous substrates with controlled multi-pore size by emulsion templates method



PHB porous substrates were prepared based on the mono-membrane fabricated by emulsion templates method. The key factors of the method affecting the pore size and porosity of the PHB porous substrates were studied. The surface of PHB porous substrates were investigated by scanning electron microscope (SEM), which showed the even pore size and regular arranged pore. The transect of the PHB porous substrates prepared using the templates method was good. Moreover, the effects of variation of surfactant content (P%) and water content (R) on the pore size and porosity of PHB films were discussed. Preliminary studies showed that when P% is less than 20%, the pore size made by emulsion templates ranged from 5 μm to 30 μm with the value of P increasing. As P% is up to 20%. It was interesting to see that the porous substrates had muti-pore size distribution, i.e., median pore sizes were about 5 μm and inside the wall of pore, there existed numerous micro-pores size can be controlled from 100 nm to 500 nm only by adjusting the parameter R of the microemulsion. The cell-compatibility was evaluated via Chinese Hamster Lung (CHL) fibroblast cultivation in vitro. The Cells were cultured on both the mono-pore size membrane prepared by emulsion templates and the multi-pore size membrane prepared by microemulsion templates. It can be seen that the cells cultured on multi-pore size membrane stretched their morphology and proliferated better than that of mono-pore size membrane. These results indicated that the multi-pore size membrane had better cell-compatibility and was more suitable for tissue engineering. The degradation experiment indicated that the degradation of PHB porous substrates were accelerated by enzyme in vitro and the porous configuration was favorable to its degradation.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    B. WOJCIAK-STOTHARD, A. CURTIS, W. MONAGHAN, K. MACDONALD and C. WILKISION, Cell Res. 223 (1996) 426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. G. FLEMMING, C. J. MURPHY, G. A. ABRAMS, S. L. GOODMAN and P. F. NEALEY, Biomaterials 20 (1999) 573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. G. MIKOS, A. J. THORSEN, L. A. CZERWONKA, Y. BAO, R. LANGER, D. N. WINSLOW and J. P. VACANTI, Polymer. 35 (1994) 1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. LO, M. S. PONTICICLLO and K. W. LEONG, Tissue Eng. 1 (1995) 15.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. G. MIKOS, G. SARAKINOS, S. M. LEITE, J. P. VACANTI and R. LANGER, Biomaterials 14 (1993) 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. R. VIETH, in “Diffusion in and though polymers: principles and applications” (Munchen, arl Hanser Verlag. 1991) .Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. SITTINGER, D. REITZEL, M. DAUNER, H. HIERLEMANN, C. HAMMER, E. KASTENBANER and H. PLANCK, J. Biomed. Mater. Res: Appl Biomater. 33 (1996) 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. A. DAWES and P. J. SENIOR, “Energy Reserve Polymers: Microorganism. In Advances in Microbid Physiology” (London, 1973) Vol. 10, 203.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. J. HOCKING and R. H. MARCHESSAULT, Macromolecules 36 (1996) 2472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. NEBE, C. FORSTER, H. POMMERENKE, G. HULDA, D. BEHREND and V. BERNEWSKI, Biomaterials 22 (2001) 2425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    X. S. YANG, K. ZHAO and G. Q. CHEN, Biomaterials 23 (2002) 1391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. ABE and Y. DOI, Macromolecular Reports 29 (1992) 229.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. P. COLIN and A. SAGHIR, Advanced Drug Delivery Review 18 (1996) 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. SAGHIR, W. P. COLIN and J. N. LIDIA, Polymer. 23 (1992) 117.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. N. BASPIST and J. B. ZIEGLER, “Method of Making Absorbable Surgical Sutures From Poly(Hydroxyacid) .” E.P No. 46334 (1982) .Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. J. HOCKING and R. H. MARCHESSAULT. in “Chemistry and Technology of Biodegradable Polymers” edited by G. J. L. Griffin (Chapman and Hall, London, 1994) Ch. 4, p. 48.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. P. VACANTI, J. E. MAYER and R. LANGER, Ann. Thorac. Surg. 60 (1995) 513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. HAZARI, C. LJUNGBERG and G. TERENGHI, British Journal of Plastic Surgery 52 (1999) 653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. HAZARI, C. LJUNGBERG and C. GREEN. Journal of Hand Surgery-British and European Volume 3 (1999) 291.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    V. DOYLE, R. PEARSON and D. LEE, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 7 (1996) 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    C. DOYLE, E. T. TANNER and W. BONFIELD, Biomaterials 12 (1991) 841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    N. R. BOEREE, J. DOVE and J. J. COOPER, Biomaterials 14 (1993) 793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    L. J. R. FOSTER and B. J. TIGHE, Biomaterials 16 (1995) 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Materials Science and Chemical EngineeringTianjin University of Science and TechnologyTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations