Release of diclofenac sodium from polylactide-co-glycolide 80/20 rods
- 116 Downloads
- 13 Citations
Abstract
Due to inflammatory reactions complicating bioabsorbable devices, the aim of this study was to develop and characterize bioabsorbable implants with anti-inflammatory drug releasing properties. Polylactide-co- glycolide (PLGA) 80/20 was compounded with diclofenac sodium (DS) to produce rods. Thermal properties were analyzed using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Inherent viscosity (ηinh) was measured to evaluate the drug effect on the extrude polymer. Drug release measurements were performed using UV-spectrophotometer. Five parallel samples from each type of rods were examined, first at 6 hour intervals, then on daily basis, and later twice a week. DS was released in 110 days from thinner rods and in 150 days from thicker rods. Drug release comprised a starting peak, slow release phase, then a high release phase, and a burst release phase. DSC analysis showed that DS containing rods had crystallinity in their structure. In conclusions, it is feasible to combine PLGA 80/20 and DS by using melt extrusion. Released DS concentrations reached local therapeutic levels, but the release profile was complex and therapeutic levels were not reached all the time.
Keywords
Differential Scanning Calorimetry Drug Release UHMWPE Drug Content Inherent ViscosityPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.O. BöSTMAN and H. PIHLAJAMÄKI, Biomaterials 21 (2000) 2615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.O. BöSTMAN and H. PIHLAJAMäKI, Clin. Orthop. 371 (2000) 216.Google Scholar
- 3.A. SOEKANTO, Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 65 (1994) 27.Google Scholar
- 4.A. SOEKANTO, K. OHYA and H. OGURA, Calcif. Tissue Int. 54 (1994) 290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.G. I. IM, B. C. KWON and K. B. LEE, Biomaterials 25 (2004) 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.K. PAVELKA, Z. PELISKOVÁ and H. STEHLIKOVÁ, Clin. Drug. Invest. 16 (1998) 421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.M. TUNCAY, S. CALIS, H. S. KAS, M. T. ERCAN, I. PEKSOY and A. A. HINCAL, Int. J. Pharm. 195 (2000) 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.M. VEIRANTO, E. SUOKAS, N. ASHAMMAKHI and P. TöRMäLä, in Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Biomedical Science and Technology BIOMED 2003, Northern Cyprus, October 2003, edited by N. Hasirci (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004) Chapter 15.Google Scholar
- 9.P. A. TODD and E. M. SORKIN, Drugs 35 (1988) 244.Google Scholar
- 10.V. A. SKOUTAKIS, C. A. CARTER, T. R. MICKLE, V. H. SMITH, C. R. ARKIN, J. ALISSANDRATOS and D. E. PETTY, Drug Intell. Clin. Pharm. 22 (1988) 850.Google Scholar
- 11.N. J. MAMOUZELOS, C. S. PROIKAKIS, P. A. TARANTILI and A. G. ANDREOPOULOS, J. Biomater. Appl. 16 (2002) 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.J. M. WRIGHT, C. M. A. J. 167 (2002) 1131. Review.Google Scholar
- 13.B. CRYER and M. FELDMAN, Am. J. Med. 104 (1998) 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.M. HORNOF, W. WEYENBERG, A. LUDWIG and A. BERNKOP-SCHÜRCH, J. Control. Release 89 (2003) 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.J. HELLER, in “Medical Applications of Controlled Release Volume 1” edited by R. S. Langer and D. L. Wise (CRC Press, 1984) p. 69.Google Scholar
- 16.J. HELLER, Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst. 1 (1989) 39.Google Scholar