Advertisement

Changes in surface characteristics of dental resin composites after polishing

  • Mi-Sook Choi
  • Yong-Keun LeeEmail author
  • Bum-Soon Lim
  • Sang-Hoon Rhee
  • Hyeong-Cheol Yang
Article

Abstract

The objectives of this study were (1) to determine in vitro changes in surface roughness and color of dental resin composites after application of three finishing and polishing systems; (2) to evaluate the difference in color stability after immersion in a dye solution after polishing; and (3) to evaluate the effects of surface condition, especially roughness, on measured color depending on the color measuring geometries of specular component excluded (SCE) and specular component included (SCI). Color and surface roughness (Ra) of resin composites of four brands of A2 shade and one brand of Yellow Enamel shade were measured after polymerization, after polishing with Enhance (Dentsply), Sof-Lex (3M ESPE), or Super-Snap (Shofu) composite finishing and polishing systems. Color was also measured after immersion in 2% methylene blue solution. Color was measured according to the CIELAB color scale. Color changes (ΔE*ab) after polishing/staining and by the measuring geometry were calculated by the equation; ΔE*ab = [(ΔL*)2 + (Δa*)2 + (Δb*)2]1/2. Ra value was measured with a surface roughness tester. ΔE*ab and ΔL* values after polishing and after staining varied among polishing systems when measured with SCE geometry. Composites polished with Super-Snap and Sof-Lex systems showed higher ΔE*ab and ΔL* values than those polished with Enhance polishing system with SCE geometry. ΔE*ab and ΔL* values between specimens with different surface conditions measured with SCE geometry were significantly higher than those with SCI (p < 0.01). Changes in Ra value after polishing was insignificant in most cases.

Keywords

Surface Roughness Methylene Blue Surface Condition Resin Composite Color Measuring 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. R. JEFFERIES, Dent. Clin. North. Am. 42(1998) 613.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. B. JONIOT, G. L. GREGOIRE, A. M. AUTER and Y. M. ROQUES, Oper. Dent. 25(2000) 311.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. R. JEFFERIES, W. W. BARKEMEIER and A. J. GWINNETT, J. Esthet. Dent. 49(1992) 181.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. VAN NOORT and L. G. DAVIS, Br. Dent. J. 157(1984) 360.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. SHINTANI, N. SATOU, H. HAYASHIHARA and T. INOUE, Dent. Mater. 1(1985) 225.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. M. MONTES-G and R. A. DRAUGHN, ibid. 2(1986) 193.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. van GROENINGEN, W. JONGEBLOED and J. ARENDS, ibid. 2(1986) 225.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. J. DE GEE, E. HARKEL-HAGENAAR and C. L. DAVIDSON, J. Prosthet. Dent. 52(1984) 626.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. H. DOUGLAS, R. G. CRAIG and C. L. DAVISON, J. Dent. Res. 61(1982) 41.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. SATOU, A. M. KHAN, I. MATSUMAE, J. SATOU and H. SHINTANI, Dent. Mater. 5(1989) 384.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Z. A. KHOKHAR, M. E. RAZZOOG and P. YAMAN, Quintessence Int. 22(1991) 733.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. H. CHUNG, Dent. Mater. 10(1994) 325.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    ASTM, in “ASTM E805-81. Standard Practice for Identification of Instrumental Methods of Color or Color-Difference Measurement of Materials” (ASTM, Philadelphia, 1981, reapproved in 1987).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. B. JUDD and G. WYSZECKI, in “Color in Business, Science and Industry” (Mosby, New York, 1975).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. WYSZECKI and W. S. STILES, in “Color Science; Concepts and Materials, Quantitative Data and Formulas” (Wiley, New York, 1967).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Y. K. LEE, B. S. LIM and C. W. KIM,J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 63(2002) 657.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    ISO/CIE, in “ISO/CIE 10527(E), CIE standard Colorimetric Obsevers” (ISO/CIE, Geneve, 1991).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    I. E. RUYTER, K. NILNER and B. MOLLER, Dent. Mater. 3(1987) 246.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. W. VAN DIJKEN and I. E. RUTTER, Acta. Odontol. Scand. 45(1987) 337.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. H. L. TJAN and C. A. CHAN,J. Prosthet. Dent. 61(1989) 138.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. TOLEDANO, F. J. D. TORRE and R. OSORIO,Am. J. Dent. 7(1994) 328.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. O. HONDRUM and R. FERNANDDEZ Jr.,Oper. Dent. 22(1997) 30.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. U. J. YAP, K. W. LYE and C. W. SAU,ibid. 22(1997) 260.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. OBREGON, R. J. GOODKIND and W. B. SCHWABACHER,J. Prosthet. Dent. 46(1981) 330.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    S. K. NAYAR, K. IKEUCHI and T. KANADE,IEEE Tarns. Pattern. Ansl. Machine. Intel. 13(1991) 611.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    W. B. STANFORD, P. L. FAN, W. T. WONZNAK and J. W. STANFORD,J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 110(1985) 211.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    H. LU, L. B. ROEDER and J. M. POWERS,J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 15(2003) 297.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Z. A. KHOKHAR, M. E. RAZZOOG and P. YAMAN,Quintess Int. 22(1991) 377.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    C. M. UM and I. E. RUYTER,ibid. 22(1991) 377.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    C. N. RAPTIS, J. M. POWERS, P. L. FAN and R. YU,J. Oral. Rehabil. 9(1982) 367.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    K. C. CHAN, J. L. FULLER and A. A. HORMATI,J. Prosthet. Dent. 43(1980) 544.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    G. IAcZETTI, J. O. BURGESS, D. GARDINER and A. RIPPS,Oper. Dent. 25(2000) 520.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    K. K. CHOI, J. L. FERRANCANE, T. J. HILTON and D. CHARLTON,J. Esthet. Dent. 12(2000) 216.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mi-Sook Choi
    • 1
  • Yong-Keun Lee
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bum-Soon Lim
    • 1
  • Sang-Hoon Rhee
    • 1
  • Hyeong-Cheol Yang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Dental Biomaterials Science, College of Dentistry and Intellectual Biointerface Engineering CenterSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations