Advertisement

Synthesis and characterization of magnesium doped ZnO nanostructures: methane (CH4) detection

  • Majeed GuL
  • Muhammad Amin
  • Murrawat Abbas
  • Syed Zafar Ilyas
  • Nazar Abbas ShahEmail author
Article
  • 33 Downloads

Abstract

Synthesis of magnesium doped zinc oxide nanostructures has been carried out by vapor transport method and characterization of the samples have been performed regarding methane (CH4) gas sensing in addition to their structural, morphological, chemical composition and optical properties. The un-doped and magnesium doped zinc oxide nanostructures were synthesized on silicon substrates at 900 °C through vapor liquid solid mechanism. Powder X-ray diffraction study confirmed the growth of material exhibiting crystalline wurtzite (hexagonal) structure. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that morphology of grown material is in the form of nanorods and nanobelts with average diameter and thickness of 12.66 ± 3.72 µm and 1.88 ± 0.70 µm, respectively. Energy dispersive X-ray analysis was used to examine the stoichiometry of the samples. Optical characterizations were carried out by photoluminescence, diffused reflectance spectroscopy, voltage dependent photo-current response and Time dependent photocurrent response. A significant change in energy bandgap has been observed after Mg incorporation in ZnO. For doped ZnO samples, the observed value of band gap is 3.32 eV which is higher than that for undoped ZnO (3.18 eV).The nanostructures were tested for UV and gas sensing properties based on the change in resistance in UV light when exposed to CH4 gas. The gas sensing response was recorded for temperature ranging from 50 to 200 °C for 400 ppm concentration of methane gas. The sensing response of Mg-doped ZnO nanobelts was found as high as 54%. The Mg-doped ZnO nanobelts showed significant, stable and enhanced sensing properties (54%) towards 400 ppm of CH4 gas at optimal temperature of 200 °C. The observations revealed that Mg doping in ZnO nanostructures would help to improve the CH4 and UV sensing of these materials.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Higher education commission (HEC) Pakistan is acknowledged for financial support through Project No. 9294/NRPU/R&D/HEC/2017. The authors would also be thankful to COMSATS University Islamabad for necessary funds through project.

References

  1. 1.
    Q. Qi et al., Humidity sensing properties of KCl-doped ZnO nanofibers with super-rapid response and recovery. Sens. Actuators B 137(2), 649–655 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Ivanov et al., Development of high sensitivity ethanol gas sensors based on Pt-doped SnO2 surfaces. Sens. Actuators B 99(2), 201–206 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Vander Wal et al., Metal-oxide nanostructure and gas-sensing performance. Sens. Actuators B 138(1), 113–119 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. Röck, N. Barsan, U. Weimar, Electronic nose: current status and future trends. Chem. Rev. 108(2), 705–725 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    X. Zhou et al., Humidity detection by nanostructured ZnO: a wireless quartz crystal microbalance investigation. Sens. Actuators A 135(1), 209–214 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H.-K. Hong et al., Portable electronic nose system with gas sensor array and artificial neural network. Sens. Actuators B 66(1), 49–52 (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Madkour, Y.K. Abdel-Monem, F. Al, Sagheer, Controlled synthesis of NiO and Co3O4 nanoparticles from different coordinated precursors: impact of precursor’s geometry on the nanoparticles characteristics. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 55(50), 12733–12741 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Gedanken, Y. Mastai, Sonochemistry and other novel methods developed for the synthesis of nanoparticles. Chem. Nanomater. 10, 113–169 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.T. Tan et al., Blueshift of optical band gap in ZnO thin films grown by metal-organic chemical-vapor deposition. J. Appl. Phys. 98(1), 013505 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S.N. Das et al., ZnO single nanowire-based UV detectors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97(2), 022103 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Mondal et al., Zinc oxide nano-platelets for effective methane gas-sensing applications. Chin. J. Phys. 51(5), 994–1005 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Amin et al., Effects of Mg doping on optical and CO gas sensing properties of sensitive ZnO nanobelts. CrystEngComm 16(27), 6080–6088 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    L.-J. Bie et al., Nanopillar ZnO gas sensor for hydrogen and ethanol. Sens. Actuators B 126(2), 604–608 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Kumar et al., Pd/ZnO nanorods based sensor for highly selective detection of extremely low concentration hydrogen. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 236 (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    B. Lei et al., Tuning electronic properties of In2O3 nanowires by doping control. Appl. Phys. A 79(3), 439–442 (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Y.K. Abdel-Monem, S.M. Emam, H.M. Okda, Solid state thermal decomposition synthesis of CuO nanoparticles from coordinated pyrazolopyridine as novel precursors. J. Mater. Sci. 28(3), 2923–2934 (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Maity et al., Synthesis and characterization of ZnO nano/microfibers thin films by catalyst free solution route. Phys. E 25(4), 605–612 (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    H.M. Xiong et al., Sonochemical synthesis of highly luminescent zinc oxide nanoparticles doped with magnesium (II). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48(15), 2727–2731 (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Singh et al., Synthesis, band-gap tuning, structural and optical investigations of Mg doped ZnO nanowires. CrystEngComm 14(18), 5898–5904 (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    N. Wang, Y. Cai, R. Zhang, Growth of nanowires. Mater. Sci. Eng. 60(1), 1–51 (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    H.J. Fan et al., Vapour-transport-deposition growth of ZnO nanostructures: switch between c-axial wires and a-axial belts by indium doping. Nanotechnology 17(11), S231 (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Hafeez et al., Catalyst solubility and self-doping in ZnS nanostructures. J. Appl. Phys. 111(2), 024313 (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    J.-H. Park et al., Ultrawide ZnO nanosheets. J. Mater. Chem. 14(1), 35–36 (2004)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Z.L. Wang, X. Kong, J. Zuo, Induced growth of asymmetric nanocantilever arrays on polar surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91(18), 185502 (2003)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    H. Pan et al., Electroluminescence and field emission of Mg-doped ZnO tetrapods. Nanotechnology 17(20), 5096 (2006)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Y. Zhang et al., Symmetric and asymmetric growth of ZnO hierarchical nanostructures: nanocombs and their optical properties. Nanotechnology 17(8), 1916 (2006)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Y.K. Abdel-Monem, Efficient nanophotocatalyt of hydrothermally synthesized anatase TiO2 nanoparticles from its analogue metal coordinated precursor. J. Mater. Sci. 27(6), 5723–5728 (2016)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A.K. Zak et al., Starch-stabilized synthesis of ZnO nanopowders at low temperature and optical properties study. Adv. Powder Technol. 24(3), 618–624 (2013)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    M. Nagasawa, S. Shionoya, Second class exciton structure in stannic oxide. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 30(1), 158–167 (1971)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    E. Burstein, Anomalous optical absorption limit in InSb. Phys. Rev. 93(3), 632 (1954)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Q. Dong-Jiang et al., Characterizations of cubic ZnMgO films grown on Si (111) at low substrate temperature. Chin. Phys. Lett. 20(4), 582 (2003)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    K.-S. Ahn et al., Enhanced photoelectrochemical responses of ZnO films through Ga and N codoping. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91(23), 231909 (2007)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    J.L. Musfeldt, Handbook of applied solid state spectroscopy edited by DR Vij (Kurukshetra University, India). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129(10), 3028–3028Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    H.-C. Hsu et al., Band gap engineering and stimulated emission of ZnMgO nanowires. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89(1), 013101 (2006)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    U. Manzoor, D.K. Kim, Synthesis and enhancement of ultraviolet emission by post-thermal treatment of unique zinc oxide comb-shaped dendritic nanostructures. Script. Mater. 54(5), 807–811 (2006)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Y. Zhang et al., Brush-like hierarchical ZnO nanostructures: synthesis, photoluminescence and gas sensor properties. J. Phys. Chem. C 113(9), 3430–3435 (2009)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    A.A. Ibrahim et al., Growth and properties of Ag-doped ZnO nanoflowers for highly sensitive phenyl hydrazine chemical sensor application. Talanta 93, 257–263 (2012)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    N. Han et al., Evaluating the doping effect of Fe, Ti and Sn on gas sensing property of ZnO. Sens. Actuators B 147(2), 525–530 (2010)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    G. Dar et al., Ce-doped ZnO nanorods for the detection of hazardous chemical. Sens. Actuators B 173, 72–78 (2012)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Y. Wang et al., Mesostructured SnO2 as sensing material for gas sensors. Solid State Elect. 48(5), 627–632 (2004)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    W.-F. Chung et al., Environment-dependent thermal instability of sol-gel derived amorphous indium-gallium-zinc-oxide thin film transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98(15), 152109 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Majeed GuL
    • 1
    • 2
  • Muhammad Amin
    • 2
  • Murrawat Abbas
    • 3
  • Syed Zafar Ilyas
    • 1
  • Nazar Abbas Shah
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsAllama Iqbal Open UniversityIslamabadPakistan
  2. 2.Centres of Excellence in Science & Applied Technologies, H11/4IslamabadPakistan
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsRipha International UniversityIslamabadPakistan
  4. 4.Thin Films Technology Laboratory, Department of PhysicsCOMSATS University (CUI)IslamabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations