Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics

, Volume 29, Issue 21, pp 18581–18592 | Cite as

Temperature-dependent structural and magnetic properties of R2MMnO6 double perovskites (R = Dy, Gd; M = Ni, Co)

  • S. A. Ivanov
  • M. S. Andersson
  • J. Cedervall
  • E. Lewin
  • M. Sahlberg
  • G. V. Bazuev
  • P. Nordblad
  • R. Mathieu
Open Access
Article
  • 222 Downloads

Abstract

The structural and magnetic properties of the Dy2CoMnO6, Dy2NiMnO6 and Gd2CoMnO6 double perovskites are investigated using X-ray powder diffraction and squid magnetometry. The materials adopt an orthorhombic structure (space ground Pnma) with disordered Co(Ni)/Mn cations, and exhibit ferrimagnetic transitions near TC ~ 85, 95, and 115 K respectively. TC was found to monotonously depend on the orthorhombic distortion (a − c)/(a + c) of the compounds. The crystal structure of the compounds was investigated as a function of temperature (16–1100 K range), evidencing changes in the BO6 octahedron near TC. The magnetic entropy changes are estimated for comparison of the magnetocaloric properties to those from literature.

1 Introduction

The A2BʹB″O6 double perovskites (A: rare earth; and B″: magnetic cations such as Mn, Fe, Co, or Ni) display cross-correlated structural, electronic and magnetic properties owing to the strong coupling of spin, charge, orbital and lattice degrees of freedom in these materials [1, 2, 3, 4]. As a result, these transition metal oxides exhibit rich electronic phase diagrams, suggesting novel functionalities and industrial relevance. For example, some of these double perovskites display magnetoresistive [5] or magnetoelectric properties [6], making them relevant for spintronic applications [7]. Recently, also magnetocaloric properties of these materials have become of interest [8, 9, 10]. Large magnetic entropy changes have indeed been observed near room temperature in some manganites at their ferromagnetic phase transition and at lower temperatures down to liquid helium temperatures, in materials with specific interplay of 4f and 3d magnetic moments [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19]. Several studies show that the change of magnetic entropy near room temperature in La1−xAxMnO3 (A = Ca, Sr, Ba) is close to, or in some cases even higher than that of pure gadolinium [18, 20, 21, 22, 23]. The Curie temperature and other magnetic properties of these manganese oxides result from a complex interplay of various factors such as Mn3+/Mn4+ cation ratio, the average A-site cation radius and size mismatch, the oxygen stoichiometry, charge ordering etc. [24, 25, 26]. In Gd2CoMnO6, entropy changes related both to the ferrimagnetic ordering of Co/Mn cations near 110 K and at lower temperatures (T ~ 10 K) due to the presence of large Gd magnetic moments and their coupling to the 3d moments were recently reported [11, 12, 27, 28].

In recent years, rare earth double perovskites R2MMnO6 (M being Ni or Co) have attracted widespread attention due to their rich physical properties, showing a complicated interplay between electric and magnetic properties [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 28, 29, 30, 31]. However, in contrast to the extensively investigated La2CoMnO6 compound, less consideration has been given to other perovskite manganites such as R2MMnO6 (R = Dy and Gd) [32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38]. In the R2CoMnO6 family, a change in the size of the rare-earth ion can induce significant alterations in the Co–O–Mn bond angle and bond length, which significantly modifies the superexchange interaction and consequently affects their electronic and magnetic ground states [3, 4, 8]. Among the rare earth elements, Gd and Dy are interesting as A-cation due to their large magnetic moment [28, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35]. A few studies have attempted to correlate the changes in structure with the variations in the nature of magnetic ordering in these compounds [1, 2, 4, 8]. However, no systematic investigation of the evolution of the crystal structure from high temperatures to low temperatures through the magnetic phase transitions have been reported. The symmetry of the crystal structure of these perovskites has been a matter of discussion in several investigations [2, 4, 39, 40, 41, 42]. Two different space groups have been proposed: orthorhombic Pnma and monoclinic P21/n. This disagreement about the proper space group of these systems calls for further investigations of the entire family, including ordered and disordered models.

This investigation concerns structural and magnetic properties of the double perovskites Dy2CoMnO6, Dy2NiMnO6 and Gd2CoMnO6. The novelty of this study is a detailed structural characterization over a wide temperature range, 16–1100 K, correlated with the magnetic transitions and the evolution of the magnetic properties from 200 K down to 10 K.

2 Experimental

2.1 Synthesis

The samples of R2MMnO6 (R = Dy or Gd, M = Co or Ni) were obtained by the solid-phase reaction method from the simple oxides Dy2O3, Gd2O3, Co3O4, NiO and Mn2O3, which had purities greater than 99.95% of the main substance. Stoichiometric mixtures of reagent-grade precursor materials were first weighed, thoroughly mixed and ball milled for several hours, pressed under the pressure of 3000 kg/cm2, and sintered in air at temperatures 950, 1100, 1250 and 1350 °C in electrical furnace with intermediate grinding after each 12 h, until the X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) showed the expected patterns without impurity lines. The overall duration of sintering was 48 h. Upon the final annealing, the specimens were cooled inside the furnace to room temperature. The mixtures were weighed before and after heat treatment to determine possible cation losses due to evaporation. In all cases, the weight difference was negligible (< 0.01%). Leaching with warm dilute nitric acid was used to eliminate small amount of unreacted dysprosium oxide.

2.2 X-ray powder diffraction

The phase purity of the powder samples was checked from XRPD patterns obtained with a D-5000 diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation. The ceramic samples were crushed into powder in an agate mortar and suspended in ethanol. A Si substrate was covered with several drops of the resulting suspension, leaving randomly oriented crystallites after drying. The room temperature XRPD data for Rietveld analysis were collected on Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer (Ge-monochromatized Cu Kα1 radiation, Bragg–Brentano geometry, a Lynx-eye position sensitive detector, DIFFRACT plus software) in the 2θ range 10–152° with a step size of 0.02° (counting time was 15 s per step). The slit system was selected to ensure that the X-ray beam was completely within the sample for all 2θ angles. The X-ray diffraction measurements at variable temperature in the temperature range 16–1073 K were carried out using the same setup and an Anton Paar XRK 900 chamber (300–1073 K) or an Oxford Phenix cryostat (16–300 K). The temperature dependent measurements were performed using a 2θ-range of 20–90° with a step size of 0.017°. The duration of diffraction scan at fixed temperature was around 12 h. Structural refinements were performed using the Rietveld method as implemented in the FULLPROF software suite [43]. The difference between the high and low temperature setups was taken into account using a normalization of the lattice parameters to the room temperature values adding a reference material NIST SRM 660b LaB6.

2.3 Chemical composition

The chemical composition of the prepared ceramic samples was analyzed by energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) using a Philips Epsilon3 spectrometer. The analyses confirm the presence of the constituent elements (Dy(Gd), Ni(Co), Mn). For each sample, the composition was derived from the average of five consecutive measurements (see Table 1).

Table 1

Cation concentrations estimated from EDS analysis compared to nominal ones (weight percentages)

R2MMnO6

R

Exp. (wt%)

Theo. (wt%)

Actual formula

Dy2NiMnO6

Dy

74.01 (4)

74.09

Dy1.98(1)Ni1.01(1)Mn1.01(1)O6

Ni

13.42 (4)

13.38

Mn

12.57 (4)

12.53

Dy2CoMnO6

Dy

73.97 (4)

74.05

Dy1.99(1)Co1.01(1)Mn1.00(1)O6

Co

13.48 (5)

13.43

Mn

12.55 (4)

12.52

Gd2CoMnO6

Gd

73.45 (4)

73.41

Gd2.01(1)Co1.00(1)Mn0.99(1)O6

Co

13.69 (5)

13.76

Mn

12.86 (4)

12.83

2.4 XPS

Photoelectron spectroscopy was conducted using an Ulvac-Phi Quantera II spectrometer, which employs monochromatic Al Kα radiation (1486.7 eV). For the present experiments the analysis spot was set to a diameter of 100 µm, and an electron take-off angle of 45° was used. The energy scale was calibrated against reference samples of Au, Ag and Cu, according to ISO 15472 standard [44]. Measurements were conducted on solid pieces of the perovskites directly from synthesis. To remove adsorbed surface contaminants (but not affect the sample), and increase the sample signal, a presputter step was employed using a 200 eV Ar+ ionbeam for 0.2 min. As the samples are electrically insulating, they were measured under constant charge neutralization with an electron flood gun and low energy (10 eV) Ar+ ions, as described in reference [45]. This procedure guarantees stable measurement conditions, but not an exact binding energy—a charge reference is needed. However, due to the presputter step the commonly used charge reference adventious carbon could not be used, instead all spectra have been adjusted using O 1s at 530.0 eV as charge reference. Core level spectra for all elements in the samples were collected for all samples.

2.5 Magnetization

Temperature and magnetic field dependent magnetization was measured using a Quantum Design MPMS SQUID magnetometer. The temperature dependent magnetization was recorded using zero field cooled, MZFC(T), and field cooled, MFC(T), protocols in the temperature interval 10 and 200 K and at two different magnetic fields: H = 0.8 kA/m and H = 800 kA/m. Magnetization as a function of applied magnetic field was measured between ± 4000 kA/m at a few selected temperatures.

3 Results

According to the elemental analyses the cation composition of the samples are quite close to the expected ratios and permit to conclude that the sample stoichiometry is the nominal. However, a minute deficit on the A-site may possibly be discerned in the case of the Dy samples (Table 1). The crystallographic characterization of the samples was performed by X-ray powder diffraction analysis at room temperature. Figure 1a–c shows the XRPD patterns of the Gd2CoMnO6 (GCMO), Dy2CoMnO6 (DCMO) and Dy2NiMnO6 (DNMO) powders measured at 295 K. The Rietveld analyses of these diffractograms were conducted using the FULLPROF software considering the different combinations of valence states for the B-cations (M2+/Mn4+ and M3+/Mn3+; M = Co, Ni) using orthorhombic (Pnma) and monoclinic (P21/n) structure models. The orthorhombic unit cell with a ~  √2ap, b ~ 2ap and c ~ √2ap was successfully applied for the indexation of the XRPD pattern and the Pnma space group was found to best describe the crystal structure of the samples. The lattice parameters of the tested compounds are in reasonable agreement with those reported earlier in [31, 34, 36, 37, 38] and theoretically calculated by the SPuDS program [46]. There is, however, some disagreement with the cell parameters reported in Ref [38]. This difference in lattice parameters could be explained by different sample preparation methods.

Fig. 1

Room temperature XRPD patterns of a Dy2NiMnO6, b Dy2CoMnO6, and c Gd2CoMnO6, Observed (black dots) and calculated (red solid line) intensities, and their difference (blue line at the bottom) are plotted. The blue tick marks indicate the positions of the allowed Bragg reflections. The insets show the low-angle region in more details. (Color figure online)

The R cations have coordination number 8 instead of 12 in these compounds. The reduced coordination number of the A-type cations is due to large octahedral tilting which implies that some nearest neighbor anions fall outside of the first coordination sphere about the A-cation. It has been proposed [47] that any anion more than 3.00 Å away from the A-cation of double perovskites may be considered to be outside the coordination sphere.

The temperature dependence of the lattice parameters is shown in Figs. 2, 3, and 4. An anomaly in the temperature dependence of the lattice parameters can be discerned in all samples around TC (~ 100 K), in spite of relatively large temperature steps in between points. Below TC, the lattice parameters are weakly temperature dependent. At high temperatures, a normal thermal expansion of the lattice parameters is observed and no phase transformations were found in any of the investigated compounds. In the orthorhombic unit cell there are the three crystallographically independent bond lengths (B‒O1(4c), B‒O2(8d) and B‒O2(8d)) and two bond angles (B‒O1‒B, B‒O2‒B) bond angles. The temperature dependencies of the B‒O bond lengths and B‒O‒B bond angles are presented in Fig. 5. There are abrupt changes in both the bond lengths and the bond angles for all samples near TC. The temperature dependence of the first B‒O2 bond exhibits an inverse behavior as compared to the other B‒O2 bond. The B‒O2‒B bond angles are larger as compared to the B‒O1‒B angles for all compositions and temperatures, but both values are substantially smaller than 180°. According to the Goodenough-Kanamori rules [48, 49], this indicates moderately strong ferro- or antiferromagnetic interaction between the magnetic moments of the metal cations. In the case of orthorhombic Pnma structure a cooperative rotation of the BO6 octahedra remarkably reduces the B‒O‒B bond angle from 180°. Ordering of Co2+ and Mn4+ cations on the other hand leads to monoclinic P21/n structure and strong 180°-superexchange interactions giving rise to high magnetic transition temperatures.

Fig. 2

ac Temperature dependence of the lattice parameters for Dy2NiMnO6 extracted from the XRPD patterns. The temperature evolution of the (161) reflection is shown in (d)

Fig. 3

ac Temperature dependence of the lattice parameters for Dy2CoMnO6 extracted from the XRPD patterns. The temperature evolution of the (161) reflection is shown in d

Fig. 4

ac Temperature dependence of the lattice parameters for Gd2CoMnO6 extracted from the XRPD patterns. The temperature evolution of the (161) reflection is shown in d

Fig. 5

Temperature dependence of the bond angles (left) and angles (right) of Dy2NiMnO6 (a, b), Dy2CoMnO6 (c, d), and Gd2CoMnO6 (e, f). The TC values determined from magnetization measurements are indicated with arrows

From the individual cation–anion distances, the valences of the cations were estimated via bond valence calculations [50]. The calculated values of the cation sites slightly differ from the expected valences of the cations in these compounds (see Table 2). The results suggest that the M and Mn cations exist in mixed (M2+, M3+, Mn3+, Mn4+) valences, and that the compounds may not be oxygen stoichiometric. A majority of the Ni and Mn cations existing as Ni3+ and Mn3+ in the Ni compound, and Co and Mn existing mainly as Co2+ and Mn3+ in the two Co compounds. Metal core level photoelectron spectra for all three samples are shown in Fig. 6. A comparison of the relative shifts gives some hints, but a conclusive determination of the metal valence states was not possible with the present data. An increase in the binding energy for the Mn 2p peak (Fig. 6a) for the Ni-containing sample, compared to the Co-containing samples, indicate that the average Mn valence is higher for the Ni-containing sample [51]. There is also a similar relative shift for the Dy 4d (Fig. 6d) and Dy 3d (not shown) peaks, also indicating a higher average valence for Dy in Ni-containing sample. Furthermore, a difference in the shake-up (+ 6.4 eV from main peak) of Co 2p3/2 (Fig. 6(c)) indicates a slight difference in average Co valence between samples with Dy and Gd, respectively. The Dy-containing sample has a larger shake-up peak, which is consistent with more Co2+ in the sample [51], i.e. a slightly lower average valence than the Gd-containing sample.

Table 2

Cations valences estimated from BVS calculations

R2MMnO6

R

M

Mn

Dy2NiMnO6

2.78(3)

2.73(2)

3.34(3)

Dy2CoMnO6

2.87(3)

2.31(2)

3.20(3)

Gd2CoMnO6

2.86(3)

2.35(2)

3.28(3)

Fig. 6

XPS spectra of a the three samples (Mn 2p binding energy region). b Dy2NiMnO6 (Ni 2p); c Dy2CoMnO6, and Gd2CoMnO6 (Co 2p); d the three samples (Dy 4d–Gd 4d)

Figure 7 presents data from the low magnetic field (H = 0.8 kA/m) MZFC(T) and MFC(T) measurements (a–c) and high field (H = 800 kA/m) MFC(T) measurements (d–f). The temperature dependence of the magnetization suggests a ferrimagnetic arrangement of the 3d magnetic moments of the compounds. From the low field measurements the transition temperature TC was estimated for the three samples; TC = 95 K for Dy2NiMnO6, TC = 85 K for Dy2CoMnO6, and TC = 115 K for Gd2CoMnO6. These transition temperatures agree well with what has earlier been reported in the literature; Dy2NiMnO6 93 K and 97 K [32, 52], Dy2CoMnO6 85 K and 90 K [22, 28], and Gd2CoMnO6 ∼ 112 K and 117 K [11, 28]. For Dy2NiMnO6 and Gd2CoMnO6 a decrease in magnetization is seen below 50 K indicating that the RE moments couple antiferromagnetically to the spontaneous moment of the magnetically ordered 3d ions. In Fig. 8, which shows the data from magnetization as a function of temperature measurements in a high applied magnetic field, the low temperature contribution of the rare earth moments can be clearly seen. The different behavior observed for the three compounds indicates that they have different coupling strength and sign between the rare earth moments and the ordered 3d moments. From the high field data (µ0H = 1T) the magnetic entropy change can be estimated using the formula ΔS ≈ dM/dT × µ0H [53], which yielded—ΔS(T ≈ TC) ≈ 0.45, 0.30 and 0.55 J/kgK for Dy2NiMnO6, Dy2CoMnO6 and Gd2CoMnO6 respectively, in agreement with the results of recent studies [11, 17, 31, 32, 35]. As seen from the insets of Fig. 8, the entropy change at low temperatures is much larger than that around TC, reflecting the contribution of the 4f moments of Dy and Gd to the magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of the systems [12, 17]. Data for measurements of the magnetization as a function of applied magnetic field for two temperatures (10 and 70 K) are presented in Fig. 9. The curves at 70 K all exhibits characteristic ferrimagnetic behavior, with a linear increase of the magnetization at higher fields where the spontaneous magnetization has been aligned with the applied field. The data at 10 K shows that none of the compounds saturate at an applied field of 5 T. The coercivity of the three samples differ, with Dy2NiMnO6 having a small coercivity, while Dy2CoMnO6 and Gd2CoMnO6 has a moderate and a large coercivity, respectively. This is reflected in the difference between the ZFC and FC magnetization curves presented in Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Temperature dependence of the ZFC/FC magnetization for a Dy2NiMnO6, b Dy2CoMnO6, and c Gd2CoMnO6, recorded in H = 0.8 kA/m

Fig. 8

Temperature dependence of the FC magnetization for a Dy2NiMnO6, b Dy2CoMnO6, and c Gd2CoMnO6, recorded in H = 800 kA/m. The insets show the corresponding variation of the magnetic entropy change estimated from the temperature derivative of the magnetization data (plotted as –ΔS)

Fig. 9

Magnetization versus magnetic field, M(H), curves recorded at T = 10 K and 70 K for a Dy2NiMnO6, b Dy2CoMnO6, and c Gd2CoMnO6

4 Discussion

The structural and magnetic properties of the perovskite R2CoMnO6 are strongly influenced by the synthesis method as well as by doping [4, 8, 10, 54, 55, 56]. In fact, the perfectly ordered double perovskite is difficult to obtain due to the ease at which formation of anti-site disorder occurs. The distribution of CoO6 and MnO6 octahedra is influenced by the annealing process and atmosphere [54, 55, 56, 57]. Very often, the monoclinic structure is easier to form by slow-cooling while orthorhombic structure will appear under quenched conditions [2, 47, 57].

Neighbor pairs of Co and Mn atoms turn into Co2+ and Mn4+ in the case of structural order at B-sublattice, whereas the fraction of Co3+/ Mn3+ (high spin) in R2CoMnO6 increases as the disorder of Co and Mn ions is enhanced [58]. Factors influencing the extent of cation order in double perovskites are charge differences between the B-cations, their differences in ionic radii, the polarization of certain cations and synthetic conditions [59].

Because the symmetry of the crystal structure of R2CoMnO6 was a matter of discussion in several works [2, 4, 8], an important part of the motivation for this research was to clarify the possibility of B-site ordering. The difference in charge between and B″ cations is the most important factor influencing cation ordering [59]. If the difference in assigned oxidation state is two or less, several ordering arrangements are possible, dominated by completely disordered and partially ordered arrangements. If the difference is greater than two, highly ordered compounds are generally observed. The second most influential factor is the cation size difference of the B-cations [59]. In general, larger differences in ionic radii of B-site cations correlate to higher degrees of cation ordering.

For the investigated perovskites there are two space groups that correspond to the a+bb tilt system: orthorhombic Pnma and monoclinic P21/n. Pnma is assigned to disordered and simple perovskites, whereas P21/n is assigned to compounds with partial or complete rock-salt order of the B-site cations. The diffraction patterns for compounds crystallizing in these space groups are very similar. In principle the monoclinic distortion would be detectable either through splitting of peaks as β angle is not 90°, or by the observation of additional diffraction peaks. Peaks with 0kl indices are observed in P21/n, but their appearance in Pnma is limited by the k + l = 2n reflection condition. For example, the (011) reflection is indicative of cation ordering and will not be observed if the compound has Pnma symmetry. The XRPD patterns for all compounds examined here were without any (011) reflections (see insets in Fig. 1), and thus the Pnma symmetry was used to refine each data set. The final fits after Rietveld refinement are shown in Fig. 1. The quality of refinements in space group P21/n were not significantly better than that of refinements in the disordered orthorhombic model and the deviation of the refined value of β from 90° was not significant (in the frame of standard deviation). However, since the potential ordering is between Co (Ni) and Mn cations differing by only 2 (or 3) electrons, the amplitude of an ordering peak in XRPD pattern is expected to be very weak.

These materials have been investigated previously but the reported structural models show discrepancies e.g. in the B–O bond distances derived from different diffraction techniques [1, 2, 4]. It has often been possible to only obtain accurate positions for the rare earth ions which could be due to both the low scattering power of oxygen compared to the lanthanide and the inability of the XRPD technique to distinguish between the two different B ions due to their similar scattering factors.

The M vs. H curves measured at 70 K show ferrimagnetic behavior with rather weak net moments and characteristic linear increase of the magnetization at higher fields for all samples. The ferrimagnetic transition temperature does not vary monotonously with the B–O–B bond angles nor B–O bond lengths. However, Tc decreases nearly linearly as the orthorhombic distortion (a − c)/(a + c) increases, as illustrated in Fig. 10. The M vs. H curves at 10 K reflect the combined effect of the ferrimagnetically ordered 3d moments and the alignment of the 4f moments. The nonlinear behavior at all field strengths indicates significant coupling to the 3d system in all three systems. The measured coercive fields extracted from Fig. 9 are 40 mT (DNMO), 160 mT (DCMO) and 340 mT (GCMO) at T = 5 K (6, 77, and 160 mT, respectively, at 70 K). The different coercive fields of the three compounds are directly reflected in the low field M vs. T experiments, where the two Co based samples have coercivities much larger than 800 A/m (1 mT) already just below TC as is reflected in the behavior of the gap between the ZFC and FC curves and the peaked ZFC curve at TC. The difference in coercivity between the Ni and the Co containing compounds relates directly to the much lower single ion anisotropy of the Ni compared to the Co ions.

Fig. 10

Variation of TC with the orthorhombic distortion (a − c)/(a + c) calculated from the low-temperature XRPD data (T = 16 K) refined in the Pnma setting

The temperature dependence of the magnetic entropy ΔS derived from the high field (1 T) M vs. T curves is plotted in the insets of Fig. 8 for all samples. The values of ΔS near TC are of similar magnitude for all three samples and quite modest due to the compensated low value of the spontaneous magnetization of ferrimagnets and the second order nature of the transition. The alignment of the large 4f moments introduces substantial and complex magnetocaloric effects at low temperatures reflecting the different strength and sign of the coupling between the ordered 3d atoms and the large paramagnetic 4f moments in the three compounds.

5 Conclusions

The structural and magnetic properties of the ferrimagnetic double perovskites Dy2CoMnO6, Dy2NiMnO6 and Gd2CoMnO6 have been investigated. The crystal structure of the compounds was investigated as a function of temperature (16–1100 K). The materials adopt an orthorhombic structure with disordered Co(Ni)/Mn cations. The analysis of XRPD data shows that a clear change, although small, occurs in the BO6 octahedron near TC as evidenced by the B–O–B bond angles and B–O bond lengths. TC was found to monotonously depend on the orthorhombic distortion of the compounds. The magnetic entropy changes were estimated from the temperature-dependent magnetization measurements for comparison of the magnetocaloric properties to those from literature. Contributions both from the ferrimagnetic transition and the 4f or 4f/3d magnetic moment interplay can be observed.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support for this work from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Grant 15-03-01676) and the Swedish Research Council is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Hossain, P. Bandyopadhyay, S. Roy, An overview of double perovskites A2BʹB″O6 with small ions at A site: synthesis, structure and magnetic properties. J. Alloy. Compd. 740, 414–427 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Vasala, M. Karppinen, A2BʹB″O6 perovskites: a review. Prog. Solid State Chem. 43, 1–36 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y. Shimakawa, M. Azuma, N. Ichikawa, Multiferroic compounds with double-Perovskite structures. Materials 4, 153–168 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.K. Kundu, Magnetic Perovskites: Synthesis, Structure and Physical Properties, (Springer, New York, 2016), p. 167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R.N. Mahato, K. Sethupathi, V. Sankaranarayanan, Colossal magnetoresistance in the double perovskite oxide La2CoMnO6. J. Appl. Phys. 107, 09D714–09D713 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. Choudhury, P. Mandal, R. Mathieu, A. Hazarika, S. Rajan, A. Sundaresan, U.V. Waghmare, R. Knut, O. Karis, P. Nordblad, D.D. Sarma, Near-room-temperature colossal magnetodielectricity and multiglass properties in partially disordered La2NiMnO6. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 127201 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M.B. Jungfleisch, W. Zhang, A. Hoffmann, Perspectives of antiferromagnetic spintronics. Phys. Lett. A 382, 865–871 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. Xu, M. Meier, P. Das, M. Koblischka, U. Hartmann, Perovskite manganites: potential materials for magnetic cooling at or near room temperature. Cryst. Eng. 5, 383–389 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. Mañosa, A. Planesa, M. Acet, Advanced materials for solid-state refrigeration. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 4925–4936 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K.A. Gschneidner Jr., V.K. Pecharsky, A.O. Tsoko, Recent developments in magnetocaloric materials. Rep. Prog. Phys. 68, 1479–1539 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Krishna Murthy, K.D. Chandrasekhar, S. Mahana, D. Topwal, A. Venimadhav, Giant magnetocaloric effect in Gd2NiMnO6 and Gd2CoMnO6 ferromagnetic insulators, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 48, 355001 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Krishna Murthy, A. Venimadhav, 4f-3d exchange coupling induced exchange bias and field induced Hopkinson peak effects in Gd2CoMnO6. J. Alloy. Compd. 719, 341–346 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    L.S. Xu, L.L. Chen, J.Y. Fan, K. Bärner, L. Zhang, Y. Zhu, L. Pi, Y.H. Zhang, D.N. Shi, Room-temperature large magnetocaloric effect and critical behavior in La0.6Dy0.1Sr0.3MnO3. Ceram. Int. 42, 8234–8239 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    V. Franco, J.S. Blázquez, B. Ingale, A. Conde, The magnetocaloric effect and magnetic refrigeration near room temperature: materials and models. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 42, 305–342 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M.-H. Phan, S.-C. Yu, Review of the magnetocaloric effect in manganite materials. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 308, 325–340 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    N.S. Rogado, J. Li, A.W. Sleight, M.A. Subramanian, Magnetocapacitance and magnetoresistance near room temperature in a ferromagnetic semiconductor: La2NiMnO6. Adv. Mater. 17, 2225–2227 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J.Y. Moon, M.K. Kim, Y.J. Choi, N. Lee, Giant anisotropic magnetocaloric effect in double-perovskite Gd2CoMnO6 single crystals. Scientific Reports 7, 16099 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Z.B. Guo, Y.W. Du, J.S. Zhu, H. Huang, W.P. Ding, D. Feng, Large magnetic entropy change in perovskite-type manganese oxides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1142–1145 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    W. Zhong, C.T. Au, Y.W. Du, Review of magnetocaloric effect in perovskite-type oxides. Chin. Phys. B 22, 057501–057511 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Z.B. Guo, J.R. Zhang, H. Huang, W.P. Ding, Y.W. Du, Large magnetic entropy change in La0.75Ca0.25MnO3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 904–905 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    T. Raoufi, M.H. Ehsani, D.S. Khoshnoud, Magnetocaloric properties of La0.6Sr0.4MnO3 prepared by solid state reaction method. J. Alloy. Compd. 689, 865–873 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    M.S. Anwar, F. Ahmed, B.H. Koo, Structural distortion effect on the magnetization and magnetocaloric effect in Pr modified La0.65Sr0.35MnO3 manganite. J. Alloy. Compd. 617, 893–898 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. Khlifi, E. Dhahri, E.K. Hlil, Magnetic, magnetocaloric, magnetotransport and magnetoresistance properties of calcium deficient manganites La0.8Ca0.2–xxMnO3 post-annealed at 800 °C. J. Alloy. Compd. 587, 771–777 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    N. Chau, P.Q. Niem, H.N. Nhat, N.H. Luong, N.D. Tho, Influence of Cu substitution for Mn on the structure, magnetic, magnetocaloric and magnetoresistance properties of La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 perovskites. Physica B 327, 214–2178 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    T. Tang, K.M. Gu, Q.Q. Cao, D.H. Wang, S.Y. Zhang, Y.W. Du, Magnetocaloric properties of Ag-substituted perovskite-type manganites. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 222, 110–114 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    P.L.C. Filho, P. Barrozo, D.A. Landinez-Tellez, R.F. Jardim, W.M. Azevedo, J. Albino Aguiar, structural and magnetic properties of Ln2CoMnO6 (Ln = Dy and La) produced by combustion synthesis. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 26, 2521–2524 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    R.X. Silva, H. Reichlova, X. Marti, D.A.B. Barbosa, M.W. Lufaso, B.S. Araujo, A.P. Ayala, C. W. A. Paschoal spin-phonon coupling in Gd(Co1/2Mn1/2)O3 perovskite. J. Appl. Phys. 114, 194102 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    M.K. Kim, J.Y. Moon, H.Y. Choi, S.H. Oh, N. Lee, Y.J. Choi, Investigation of the magnetic properties in double perovskite R2CoMnO6 single crystals (R = rare earth: La to Lu), J. Phys. Condens. Matter 27, 426002 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    A. Orayech, I. Urcelay-Olabarria, G.A. López, O. Fabelo, A. Faik, J.M. Igartua, Synthesis, structural, magnetic and phase transition studies of the ferromagnetic La2CoMnO6 double perovskite by symmetry-adapted modes. Dalton Trans. 44, 13867–13880 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    K. Mc Bride, N. Partridge, S. Bennington-Gray, S. Felton, L. Stella, D. Poulid, Synthesis, characterisation and study of magnetocaloric effects (enhanced and reduced) in manganate perovskites. Mater. Res. Bull. 88, 69–77 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    A.L. Li, L.G. Wang, X.X. Li, C.M. Zhu, R. Zhang, H.W. Wang, S.L. Yuan, Magnetic field-induced metamagnetism and magnetocaloric effect in double perovskites Re2CoMnO6 (Re = Sm, Dy). Mater. Chem. Phys. 202, 76–81 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    L. Su, X.-Q. Zhang, Q.-Y. Dong, Y.-J. Ke, K.-Y. Hou, C.-S. Liu, Z.-H. Cheng, Magnetocaloric effect and critical behaviors of R2NiMnO6 (R = Eu and Dy) double perovskite oxides. J. Alloys Compd. 746, 594–600 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    T. Chakraborty, H. Nhalil, R. Yadav, A.A. Wagh, S. Elizabeth, Magnetocaloric properties of R2NiMnO6 (R = Pr, Nd, Tb, Ho, and Y) double perovskite family. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 428, 59–63 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    M. Retuerto, Á Muñoz, M.J. Martínez-Lope, J.A. Alonso, F.J. Mompeán, M.T. Fernández-Díaz, J. Sánchez-Benítez, magnetic interactions in the double perovskites R2NiMnO6 (R = Tb, Ho, Er, Tm) investigated by neutron diffraction. Inorg. Chem. 54, 10890–10900 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Y. Jia, Q. Wang, Y. Qi, L. Li, Multiple magnetic phase transitions and magnetocaloric effect in double perovskites R2NiMnO6 (R = Dy, Ho, and Er. J. Alloys Compd. 726, 1132–1137 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    A. Ganeshraj, R. Pradheesh, P.N. Santhosh, Structural, magnetic, transport and magnetocaloric properties of metamagnetic DyMn0.5Co0.5O3. J. Appl. Phys. 111, 07A914 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    K. Asai, K. Fujiyoshi, N. Nishimori, Y. Satoh, Y. Kobayashi, M. Mizoguchi, Magnetic properties of REMe0.5Mn0.5O3 (RE = Rare Earth Element, Me = Ni, Co). J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67, 4218–4226 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    S. Chanda, S. Saha, A. Dutta, T.P. Sinha, Structural and transport properties of double perovskite Dy2NiMnO6. Mater. Res. Bull. 62, 153–160 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    H.Y. Zhou, X. M. Chen Structural distortions, orbital ordering and physical properties of double perovskite R2CoMnO6 calculated by first-principles. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 145701–145708 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    I.O. Troyanchuk, A.P. Sazonov, H. Szymczak, D.M. Többens, H. Gamari-Seale, Phase separation in La2–xAxCoMnO6 (A = Ca and Sr) perovskites. J. Exp. Theo. Phys. 99, 2363–2369 (2004)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    M.G. Masud, K. Dey, A. Ghosh, S. Majumdar, S. Giri, Occurrence of magnetoelectric effect correlated to the Dy order in Dy2NiMnO6 double perovskite. J. Appl. Phys. 118, 064104 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Y. Jia, Q. Wang, P. Wang, L. Li, Structural, magnetic and magnetocaloric properties in R 2CoMnO6 (R = Dy, Ho, and Er). Ceram. Int. 43, 15856–15861 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    I. Rodriguez-Carvajal, Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction. Physica B. 192, 55–69 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    M.P. Seah, Summary of ISO/TC 201 Standard: VII ISO 15472:2001—surface chemical analysis—X-ray photoelectron spectrometers—calibration of energy scales. Surf. Interface Anal. 31, 721–723 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    P.E. Larson, M.A. Kelly, Surface charge neutralization of insulating samples in X-ray photoemission spectroscopy. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16, 3483–3489 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    M.W. Lufaso, P.W. Barnes, P.M. Woodward, Structure prediction of ordered and disordered multiple octahedral cation perovskites using SPuDS. Acta Cryst. B 62, 397–410 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    G. King, P.M. Woodward, Cation ordering in perovskites. J. Mater. Chem. 20, 5785–5796 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    I.B. Goodenough, An interpretation of the magnetic properties of the perovskite—type mixed crystal La1–xSrxCoO3–x. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 6, 287–297 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    J. Kanamori, Superexchange interaction and symmetry properties of electron orbitals. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 10, 87–98 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    I.D. Brown, VALENCE: a program for calculating bond valences. J. Appl. Cryst. 29, 479–480 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    I.C. Biesinger, B.P. Payne, A.P. Grosvenor, L.W.M. Lau, A.R. Gerson, R. St. C. Smart, Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni. Appl. Surf. Sci. 257, 2717–2730 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    R.J. Booth, R. Fillman, H. Whitaker, A. Nag, R.M. Tiwari, K. Ramanujachary, J. Gopalakrishnan, S.E. Lofland, An investigation of structural, magnetic and dielectric properties of R2NiMnO6 (R = rare earth, Y). Mater. Res. Bull. 44, 1559 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    M. Hudl, R. Mathieu, P. Nordblad, S.A. Ivanov, G.V. Bazuev, P. Lazor, Investigation of the magnetic phase transition and magnetocaloric properties of the Mn2FeSbO6 ilmenite. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 331, 193–197 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    X. Bohigas, J. Tejada, E. del Barco, X.X. Zhang, M. Sales tunable magnetocaloric effect in ceramic perovskites. Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 390–392 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    R. Galceran, C. Frontera, L. Balcells, J. Cisneros-Fernández, L. López-Mir, J. Roqueta, J. Santiso, N. Bagués, B. Bozzo, A. Pomar, F. Sandiumenge, B. Martínez, Engineering the microstructure and magnetism of La2CoMnO6–δ thin films by tailoring oxygen stoichiometry. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 242401–242404 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    L.Y. Wang, Q. Li, Y.Y. Gong, D.H. Wang, Q.Q. Cao, Y.W. Du, The positive and negative magnetodielectric effects in double perovskite Pr2CoMnO6. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 97, 2024–2026 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    A.J. Barón-González, C. Frontera, J.L. García-Muñoz, B. Rivas-Murias, J. Blasco, Effect of cation disorder on structural, magnetic and dielectric properties of La2MnCoO6 double perovskite. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 23, 496003–496014 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    A.N. Sayed, S.N. Achary, S.K. Deshpande, B. Rajeswari, R.M. Kadam, S. Dwebedi, A.K. Nigam, A. K. Tyagi, Role of annealing atmosphere on structure, dielectric and magnetic properties of La2CoMnO6 and La2MgMnO6, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 640, 1907–1921 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    I.T. Anderson, K.B. Greenwood, G.A. Taylor, K.R. Poeppelmeier, B-cation arrangements in double perovskites. Prog. Solid State Chem. 22, 3197–3233 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center of Materials ScienceKarpov Institute of Physical ChemistryMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Department of Engineering SciencesUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  3. 3.Department of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringChalmers University of TechnologyGothenburgSweden
  4. 4.Department of Chemistry - Ångström LaboratoryUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  5. 5.Institute of Solid State ChemistryUral Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesEkaterinburgRussia

Personalised recommendations