Advertisement

Fabrication the hybrization of ZnO nanorods–Graphene nanoslices and their electrochemical properties to Levodopa in the presence of uric acid

  • Jianjiao Zhang
  • Qizhao Wang
  • Zhijie Sun
  • Bateer Buhe
  • Xinhao He
Article
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, graphene foam and ZnO nanorods were prepared by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and hydrothermal processes, respectively. The hybrids of graphene nanoslices and ZnO nanorods were then fabricated by ultrasonic process. The as-prepared hybrids were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Raman spectroscopy. The hybrids possess a slice-like structure with a smooth surface and rod structure, and the lengths of graphene nanoslices are about 3–4 µm. XRD results demonstrated the products are pure without impurities. Raman spectra showed that graphene has a few layers and defect free. The electrical performances of hybrids/ITO electrodes were investigated by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV). The sensitivities of the electrode for LD detection are 0.19 and 0.20 µA µM−1 under the interruption of with UA and without UA. The results show that the electrode has good selectivity, reproducibility and stability which would be potential for use in future clinical research.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Doctoral Scientific Research Fund of Heilongjiang Institute of Technology (2014BJ14) and the Student innovation and entrepreneurship training program of Heilongjiang Province (201611802114).

References

  1. 1.
    W.C. Koller, M.G. Rueda, Mechanism of action of dopaminergic agents in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 50(6), S11–S14 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Katzenschlager, A.J. Lees, Treatment of Parkinson’s disease: levodopa as the first choice. J Neurol 249(Suppl 2), ii19–ii24 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S.P. Khor, A. Hsu, The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Curr Clin Pharmacol 2(3), 234–243 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.A. Hawkins, A. Mokashi, I.A. Simpson, An active transport system in the blood–brain barrier may reduce levodopa availability. Exp. Neurol. 195(1), 267–271 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E.J. Greenhow, L.E. Spencer, Ionic polymerisation as a means of end-point indication in non-aqueous thermometric titrimetry. Part IV. The Determination of catecholamines. Analyst 98(1168), 485–492 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Coello, S. Maspoch, N. Villegas, Simultaneous kinetic-spectrophotometric determination of levodopa and benserazide by Bi- and three-way partial least squares calibration. Talanta 53(3), 627–637 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Karimi, J.L. Carl, S. Loftin et al., Modified high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection method for plasma measurement of levodopa, 3-O-methyldopa, dopamine, carbidopa and 3,4-dihydroxyphenyl acetic acid. J. Chromatogr. B, 836(1–2), 120–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Wang, Y. Zhou, J. Liang et al., Determination of levodopa and benserazide hydrochloride in pharmaceutical formulations by CZE with amperometric detection. Chromatographia 61(5–6), 265–270 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N.F. Atta, A. Galal, S.M. Azab, Electrochemical determination of neurotransmitters using gold nanoparticles on nafion/carbon paste modified electrode. J. Electrochem. Soc. 159(10), H765–H771 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. Molaakbari, A. Mostafavi, H. Beitollahi et al., Synthesis of ZnO nanorods and their application in the construction of a nanostructure-based electrochemical sensor for determination of levodopa in the presence of carbidopa. Analyst 139(17), 4356–4364 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. Sumathi, P. Muthukumaran, S. Radhakrishnan et al., Controlled growth of single-crystalline nanostructured dendrites of α-Fe2O3 blended with MWCNT: a systematic investigation of highly selective determination of L-Dopa. RSC Adv. 4(44), 23050–23057 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M.J. Cherukara, K. Sasikumar, W. Cha et al., Ultra-fast three-dimensional X-ray imaging of deformation modes in ZnO nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 17, 1102–1108 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    N. Lu, H. Guo, W. Hu et al., Effects of line defects on the electronic properties of ZnO nanoribbons and sheets. J. Mater. Chem. C 5(12), 3121–3129 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Fioravanti, A. Bonanno, M. Mazzocchi et al., Enhanced gas sensing properties of different ZnO 3D hierarchical structures. In Advances in Science and Technology. Trans Tech Publications 99, 48–53 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. Sathe, M.T.Z. Myint, S. Dobretsov et al., Removal and regrowth inhibition of microalgae using visible light photocatalysis with ZnO nanorods: a green technology. Sep. Purif. Technol. 162, 61–67 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    F. Xu, L. Sun, Solution-derived ZnO nanostructures for photoanodes of dye-sensitized solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 4(3), 818–841 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Yi, J.M. Lee, W.I. Park, Vertically aligned ZnO nanorods and graphene hybrid architectures for high-sensitive flexible gas sensors. Sens. Actuators B 155(1), 264–269 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Lim, D.S. Um, M. Ha, Q. Zhang, Y. Lee, Y. Lin, H. Ko, Broadband omnidirectional light detection in flexible and hierarchical ZnO/Si heterojunction photodiodes. Nano Res. 10, 22–36 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J.E. Jaffe, J.A. Snyder, Z. Lin et al., LDA and GGA calculations for high-pressure phase transitions in ZnO and MgO. Phys. Rev. B 62(3), 1660 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Shekhawat, R.O. Ritchie, Toughness and strength of nanocrystalline graphene. Nat. Commun. 7, 10546 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Y. Zhang, S. Gong, Q. Zhang et al., Graphene-based artificial nacre nanocomposites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45(9), 2378–2395 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Y. Li, J. Wang, X. Tian et al., Carbon doped molybdenum disulfide nanosheets stabilized on graphene for the hydrogen evolution reaction with high electrocatalytic ability. Nanoscale 8(3), 1676–1683 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    C.S. Boland, S. Barwich, U. Khan et al., High stiffness nano-composite fibres from polyvinylalcohol filled with graphene and boron nitride. Carbon 99, 280–288 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ü Özgür, Y.I. Alivov, C. Liu et al., A comprehensive review of ZnO materials and devices. J. Appl. Phys. 98(4), 11 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    T.Y. Perry, S. Shreyas, C. Manish et al., Design, synthesis, and characterization of graphene–nanoparticle hybrid materials for bioapplications. Chem. Rev. 115(7), 2483–2531 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    D.P. Dubal, H. Rudolf, G. Pedro, Development of hybrid materials based on sponge supported reduced graphene oxide and transition metal hydroxides for hybrid energy storage devices. Sci. Rep. 4(1), 7349–7349 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    F. Wang, K. Zhang, Reduced graphene oxide–TiO2 nanocomposite with high photocatalystic activity for the degradation of rhodamine B. J. Mol. Catal. A 345(1–2), 101–107 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    H. Wang, Y. Yang, Y. Liang et al., Graphene-wrapped sulfur particles as a rechargeable lithium–sulfur battery cathode material with high capacity and cycling stability. Nano Lett. 11(7), 2644–2647 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    M. Shankla, A. Aksimentiev, Modulation of molecular flux using a graphene nanopore capacitor. J. Phys. Chem. B 121, 3724–3733 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    V. Georgakilas, J.N. Tiwari, K.C. Kemp et al., Noncovalent functionalization of graphene and graphene oxide for energy materials, biosensing, catalytic, and biomedical applications. Chem Rev 116(9), 5464–5519 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Q. Wang, H. Yue, J. Zhang et al., Electrochemical determination of uric acid in the presence of ascorbic acid by hybrid of ZnO nanorods and graphene nanosheets. Ionics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-017-2379-0 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    C.L. Sun, H.H. Lee, J.M. Yang et al., The simultaneous electrochemical detection of ascorbic acid, dopamine, and uric acid using graphene/size-selected Pt nanocomposites. Biosens. Bioelectron. 26(8), 3450–3455 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    S. Hou, M.L. Kasner, S. Su et al., Highly sensitive and selective dopamine biosensor fabricated with silanized graphene. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 14915–14921 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    A. Afkhami, F. Kafrashi, T. Madrakian, Electrochemical determination of levodopa in the presence of ascorbic acid by polyglycine/ZnO nanoparticles/multi-walled carbon nanotubes-modified carbon paste electrode. Ionics 21(10), 2937–2947 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    M. Arvand, N.A. Ghodsi, Voltammetric sensor based on graphene-modified electrode for the determination of trace amounts of L-Dopa in mouse brain extract and pharmaceuticals. J. Solid State Electrochem. 17(3), 775–784 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    M. Arvand, N. Ghodsi, Electrospun TiO2 nanofiber/graphite oxide modified electrode for electrochemical detection of L-Dopa in human cerebrospinal fluid. Sens. Actuators B 204(12), 393–401 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    P. Kanchana, S. Radhakrishnan, M. Navaneethan et al., Electrochemical sensor based on Fe doped hydroxyapatite-carbon nanotubes composite for L-Dopa detection in the presence of uric acid. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 16, 6185–6192 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    M.A. Sheikh-Mohseni, S. Pirsa, Nanostructured conducting polymer/copper oxide as a modifier for fabrication of L-Dopa and uric acid electrochemical sensor. Electroanalysis 28, 1–7 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Materials and Chemical EngineeringHeilongjiang Institute of TechnologyHarbinPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Center for Biomedical Materials and EngineeringHarbin Engineering UniversityHarbinPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.School of Materials Science and EngineeringHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations