Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics

, Volume 29, Issue 22, pp 19034–19042 | Cite as

Growth kinetics of bismuth nickel intermetallics

  • Roozbeh Sheikhi
  • Junghyun Cho
Article
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

Bismuth (Bi)-based systems are of great interest as it is considered to potentially replace high lead (Pb)-content solders used in high temperature electronics. In particular, molten Bi strongly reacts with Ni to form higher melting point intermetallic compounds (IMCs) via transient liquid phase (TLP), which can offer a joining method alternative to the traditional solder approach. A fundamental understanding of nucleation and growth of intermetallic phases is crucial to create a reliable joint. Two intermetallic phases form between Bi and Ni (Bi3Ni, BiNi). In this study, growth kinetics for Bi3Ni and BiNi was investigated, both of which show a parabolic growth behavior. Bi3Ni exhibits rapid growth and apparent activation energy of 65.5 kJ/mol at lower temperatures (from 160 to 240 °C) and of 132.9 kJ/mol at higher temperatures (> 240 °C), where the transition is likely due to a viscous-flow nature near melting temperature of Bi. On the other hand, BiNi grows at a later stage with a slower rate with the apparent activation energy of 125.6 kJ/mol (from 260 to 340 °C). In addition, based on the formation sequence and growth direction of these IMCs, interdiffusion coefficients for each of these IMCs were determined. Micro-hardness tests show that Bi3Ni is softer and more brittle than BiNi.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project was financially supported by Integrated Electronics Engineering Center (IEEC) of Binghamton University (State University of New York). In addition, we used the equipment facilities at Analytical and Diagnostics Laboratory (ADL) of Small Scale Systems Integration and Packaging (S3IP) Center for some of materials characterization data presented here. We also thank Liang Yin, David Shaddock, Kaustubh Nagarkar and Arun Gowda from GE for their support on this project. Furthermore, the assistance provided by Sandeep Mallampati, a former member of our group, is greatly appreciated.

References

  1. 1.
    Y. Li, C.P. Wong, Recent advances of conductive adhesives as a lead-free alternative in electronic packaging: materials, processing, reliability and applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Reports 51(1–3), 1–35 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Ma, J.C. Suhling, A review of mechanical properties of lead-free solders for electronic packaging. J. Mater. Sci. 44(5), 1141–1158 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Buttay, D. Planson, B. Allard, D. Gergogne, P. Bevilacqua, C. Joubert, M. Lazar, C. Martin, H. Morel, D. Tournier, C. Raynaud, State of the art of high temperature power electronics. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 176(4), 283–288 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P.G. Neudeck, R.S. Okojie, L.-Y. Chen, High-temperature electronics—a role for wide bandgap semiconductors? Proc. IEEE 90(6), 1065–1076 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. Chidambaram, J. Hattel, J. Hald, High-temperature lead-free solder alternatives. Microelectron. Eng. 88(6), 981–989 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Z. Zhang, G.-Q. Lu, Pressure-assisted low-temperature sintering of silver paste as an alternative die-attach solution to solder reflow. IEEE Trans. Electron. Packag. Manuf. 25(4), 279–283 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.F. Li, P.A. Agyakwa, C.M. Johnson, Interfacial reaction in Cu/Sn/Cu system during the transient liquid phase soldering process. Acta Mater. 59(3), 1198–1211 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Cho, R. Sheikhi, S. Mallampati, L. Yin, D. Shaddock, Bismuth-based transient liquid phase (TLP) bonding as high-temperature lead-free solder alternatives. in 2017 IEEE 67th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), 2017, pp. 1553–1559Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Cho, S. Mallampati, R. Tobias, H. Schoeller, L. Yin, D. Shaddock, Exploring bismuth as a new Pb-free alternative for high temperature electronics. in 2016 IEEE 66th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC) (2016), pp. 432–438Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Cho, S. Mallampati, H. Schoeller, L. Yin, D. Shaddock, Developments of Bi–Sb–Cu alloys as a high-temperature Pb-free solder. in 2015 IEEE 65th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC) (2015), pp. 1251–1256Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    H.-T. Lee, M.-H. Chen, H.-M. Jao, T.-L. Liao, Influence of interfacial intermetallic compound on fracture behavior of solder joints. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 358(1–2), 134–141 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. Prakash, T. Sritharan, Interface reaction between copper and molten tin–lead solders. Acta Mater., 49(13), 2481–2489 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    O.V. Duchenko, V.I. Dybkov, Determination of NiBi3 reaction-diffusion constants in Ni–Bi couples. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 14(24), 1725–1727 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    V.I. Dybkov, O.V. Duchenko, Growth kinetics of compound layers at the nickel-bismuth interface. J. Alloy. Comp. 234(2), 295–300 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M.S. Lee, C. Chen, C.R. Kao, Formation and absence of intermetallic compounds during solid-state reactions in the Ni–Bi system. Chem. Mater. 11, 292–297 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M.S. Lee, C.M. Liu, C.R. Kao, Interfacial reactions between Ni substrate and the component Bi in solders. J. Electron. Mater. 28(1), 57–62 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J.H.L. Luhua Xu, K.H. Pang, Prakash, T.H. Low, Isothermal and thermal cycling aging on IMC growth rate in lead-free and lead-based solder interface. IEEE Trans. Components Packag. Technol. 28(3), 408–414 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    C. Wagner, The evaluation of data obtained with diffusion couples of binary single-phase and multiphase systems. Acta Metall. 17(2), 99–107 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    S. Bader, W. Gust, H. Hieber, Rapid formation of intermetallic compounds interdiffusion in the CuSn and NiSn systems. Acta Metall. Mater. 43(1), 329–337 (1995)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. Vassilev, N. Milcheva, M.C. Record, R. Mancheva, Diffusion couple studies of the Ni–Bi–Sn system. J. Min. Metall. Sect. B 48(3), 347–357 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    H. Schoeller, J. Cho, Superplasticity from viscous flow in high Pb ternary alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 658, 210–220 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Paul, C. Ghosh, W.J. Boettinger, Diffusion parameters and growth mechanism of phases in the Cu–Sn system. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 42(4), 952–963 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    S.R. Cain, J.R. Wilcox, R. Venkatraman, A diffusional model for transient liquid phase bonding. Acta Mater. 45(2), 701–707 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    L. Pauling, Atomic radii and interatomic distances in metals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 69(3), 542–553 (1947)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Materials Science and Engineering ProgramBinghamton University (State University of New York)BinghamtonUSA

Personalised recommendations