Impact of tunneling conductance on the performance of multi walled carbon nanotubes as VLSI interconnects for nano-scaled technology nodes

  • Prakhar Litoria
  • Karmjit Singh SandhaEmail author
  • Ankush Kansal


Multi walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) has received most of the attention for their unique characteristics as a possible alternative for copper as a VLSI interconnects for future integrated circuits. Multiple equivalent single-conductor circuit (ESC) models are reported in the literature for analysis of MWCNT as an interconnect, however most of them have neglected the impact of intershell tunneling conductance on the performance of MWCNT as interconnect. In this paper, a model is proposed for deriving equivalent impedance parameters by including tunneling conductance in order to study the impact of intershell tunneling conductance on the performance of MWCNT interconnect in terms of delay. Based on the derived equivalent impedance parameters, existing ESC model is modified. Further, the analytical and simulated results obtained from proposed model are compared with the results of existing models. It is revealed from the comparative analysis that the tunneling conductance has considerable impact on the impedance parameters and the propagation delay of an MWCNT bundle interconnect at variable interconnects length for nano-scaled technology nodes i.e. 32, 22 and 16 nm.


Propagation Delay Impedance Parameter Equivalent Resistance Mean Free Path Technology Node 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    B.Q. Wei, R. Vajtai, P.M. Ajayan, Reliability and current carrying capacity of carbon nanotubes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 79(8), 1172 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    P.L. McEuen, M.S. Fuhrer, H. Park, Single-walled carbon nanotube electronics. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 1(1), 78–85 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P.J. Burke, Luttinger liquid theory as a model of the gigahertz electrical properties of carbon nanotubes. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 1(3), 129–144 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y.-G. Yoon, P. Delaney, S.G. Louie, Quantum conductance of multiwall carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B 66(7), 073407 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Bourlon, C. Miko, L. Forro, D.C. Glattli, A. Bachtold, Determination of the intershell conductance in multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93(17), 176806 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. Hoenlein, F. Kreupl, G.S. Duesberg, A.P. Graham, M. Liebau, R.V. Seidel, E. Unger, Carbon nanotube applications in microelectronics. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol. 27(4), 629–634 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Naeemi, J.D. Meindl, Compact physical models for multiwall carbon-nanotube interconnects. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 27(5), 338–340 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Li, W.-Y. Yin, K. Banerjee, J.-F. Mao, Circuit modeling and performance analysis of multi-walled carbon nanotube interconnects. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 55(6), 1328–1337 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Maffucci, G. Miano, F. Villone, Performance comparison between metallic carbon nanotube and copper nano-interconnects. IEEE Trans. Adv. Packag. 31(4), 692–699 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. Srivastava, H. Li, F. Kreupl, K. Banerjee, On the applicability of single-walled carbon nanotubes as VLSI interconnects. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 8(4), 542–559 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M.S. Sarto, A. Tamburrano, Single-conductor transmission-line model of multiwall carbon nanotubes. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 9(1), 82–92 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    F. Liang, G. Wang, W. Ding, Estimation of time delay and repeater insertion in multiwall carbon nanotube interconnects. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 58(8), 2712–2720 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Tang, J. Lu, J. Mao, Study on equivalent single conductor model of multi-walled carbon nanotube interconnects, in 2012 Asia Pacific Microwave Conference Proceedings IEEE pp. 1247–1249 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. Forestiere, A. Maffucci, S.A. Maksimenko, G. Miano, G.Y. Slepyan, Transmission-line model for multiwall carbon nanotubes with intershell tunneling. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 11(3), 554–564 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Sahoo, H. Rahaman, Performance analysis of multiwalled carbon nanotube bundles, in Electronics and Nanotechnology (ELNANO) IEEE XXXIII International Scientific Conference IEEE pp. 200–204 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (2013) [Online].
  17. 17.
    K. Singh, B. Raj, Influence of temperature on MWCNT bundle, SWCNT bundle and copper interconnects for nanoscaled technology nodes. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 26(8), 6134–6142 (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Tang, J. Mao, Modeling and fast simulation of multiwalled carbon nanotube interconnects. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 57(2), 232–240 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. Singh, B. Raj, Performance and analysis of temperature dependent multi-walled carbon nanotubes as global interconnects at different technology nodes. J. Comput. Electron. 14(2), 469–476 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    K. Singh, B. Raj, Temperature-dependent modeling and performance evaluation of multi-walled CNT and single-walled CNT as global interconnects. J. Electron. Mater. 44(12), 4825–4835 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Predictive technology model (PTM). [Online].

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Prakhar Litoria
    • 1
  • Karmjit Singh Sandha
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ankush Kansal
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringThapar UniversityPatialaIndia

Personalised recommendations