Structural transition of ZnO thin films produced by RF magnetron sputtering at low temperatures
- 352 Downloads
- 3 Citations
Abstract
Zinc oxide (ZnO) thin films were prepared using reactive radio-frequency magnetron sputtering of a pure metallic zinc target onto glass substrates. The evolution of the surface morphology and the optical properties of the films were studied as a function of the substrate temperature, which was varied from 50 to 250 °C. The surface topography of the samples was examined using atomic force microscopy (AFM), and their optical properties were studied via transmittance measurements in the UV–Vis–NIR region. DRX and AFM analyses showed that the surface morphology undergoes a structural transition at substrate temperatures of around 150 °C. Actually, at 50 °C the formation of small grains was observed while at 250 °C the grains observed were larger and had more irregular shapes. The optical gap remained constant at ~3.3 eV for all films. In the visible region, the average optical transmittance was 80 %. From these results, one can conclude that the morphological properties of the ZnO thin films were more greatly affected by the substrate temperature, due to mis-orientation of polycrystalline grains, than were the optical properties.
Keywords
Substrate Temperature Rutherford Backscatter Spectroscopy Increase Substrate Temperature Zinc Oxide Thin Film Show Scanning Electron MicrographsNotes
Acknowledgments
The financial support of the Brazilian agencies FAPESP (Proc. 2008/53311-5) and CNPq is gratefully acknowledged.
References
- 1.K. Ellmer, in Handbook of Transparent Conductors, ed. by D.S. Ginley, H. Hosono, D.C. Painechap. Transparent conductive zinc oxide and its derivatives, 1st edn (Springer, Berlin, 2011)Google Scholar
- 2.M. Yuste, R. Escobar Galindo, I. Caretti, R. Torres, O. Sanchez, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 45, 025303 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.S. Youssef, P. Combette, J. Podlecki, R.Al Asmar, A.S. Foucaran, Cryst. Growth Des. 9, 1088–1094 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.T. Kuchiyama, K. Yamamoto, S. Hasegawa, H. Asahi, Appl. Surf. Sci. 258, 1488–1490 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Y.H. Jo, B.C. Mohanty, Y.S. Cho, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 92, 665–670 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.E. Vasco, C. Zaldo, L. Vázquez, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 13, L663–L672 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.W. Mtangi, F.D. Auret, P.J. Janse van Rensburg, S.M.M. Coelho, M.J. Legodi, J.M. Nel, W.E. Meyer, A. Chawanda, J. Appl. Phys. 110, 094504 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Y.-S. Choi, D.-K. Hwang, B.-J. Kwon, J.-W. Kang, Y.-H. Cho, S.-J. Park, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 50, 105502 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.E. Sonmez, S. Aydin, M. Yilmaz, M.T. Yurtcan, T. Karacali, M. Ertugrul, J. Nanomater. 2012, 05 (2011)Google Scholar
- 10.R. Ondo-Ndong, G. Ferblantier, M. Al Kalfioui, A. Boyer, A. Foucaran, J. Cryst. Growth 255, 130–135 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.S. Singh, R.S. Srinivasa, S.S. Major, Thin Solid Films 515, 8718–8722 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.H.F. Liu, S.J. Chua, G.X. Hu, H. Gong, N. Xiang, J. Appl. Phys. 102, 083529 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.C.-A. Tseng, J.-C. Lin, Y.-F. Chang, S.-D. Chyou, K.-C. Peng, Appl. Surf. Sci. 258, 5996–6002 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.S.-S. Lin, J.-L. Huang, D.-F. Lii, Surf. Coat. Technol. 176, 173–181 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.K. Koski, J. Hölsä, P. Juliet, Thin Solid Films 339, 240 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Y. Kajikawa, J. Cryst. Growth 289, 387–394 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.R. Álvarez, A. Palmero, L.O. Prieto-López, F. Yubero, J. Cotrino, W. de la Cruz, H. Rudolph, F.H.P.M. Habraken, A.R. Gonzalez-Elipe, J. Appl. Phys. 107, 054311 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.F. Paraguay, W. Estrada, D.R. Acosta, E. Andrade, M. Miki-Yoshida, Thin Solid Films 350, 192–202 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.S.-S. Lin, J.L. Huang, Surf. Coat. Technol. 185, 222–227 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar