Room temperature magnetism in Ni-doped CdSe nanoparticles

  • Sunil Kumar
  • Sanjeev Kumar
  • N. K. Verma
  • S. K. Chakarvarti


Room temperature ferro-magnetism in Ni-doped CdSe nanoparticles (NPs) synthesized by a wet chemical precipitation method is reported. Transmission electron microscopy shows that the average particle size of Ni-doped CdSe NPs is about 8 nm. X-ray diffraction shows the zinc blende (cubic) structure of Cd1-xNixSe NPs. Superconducting quantum interference device was utilized to study the magnetic behavior of NPs. Magnetic studies revealed that pure CdSe NPs exhibit diamagnetic behavior at 300 K, whereas 5% Ni doped CdSe NPs shows the mixture of paramagnetic and ferromagnetic behavior.


  1. 1.
    M.S. Seehra, P. Dutta, S. Neeleshwar, Y.Y. Chen, C.L. Chen, S.W. Chou, C.C. Chen, C.L. Dong, C.L. Chang, Adv. Mater. 20, 1656–1660 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Ohno, Science 281, 951–956 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Dietl, H. Ohno, F. Matsukura, J. Cibert, D. Ferrand, Science 287, 1019–1022 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Erwin Steven, L. Zu, M.I. Haftel, A.L. Efros, T.A. Kennedy, D.J. Norris, Nature 436, 91–94 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Sundaresan, C.N.R. Rao, Nano Today 4, 96–106 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S.B. Singh, M.V. Limaye, S.K. Date, S.K. Kulkarni, Chem. Phys. Lett. 464, 208–210 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.B. Singh, M.V. Limaye, S.K. Date, S. Gokhale, S.K. Kulkarni, Phys. Rev. B 80, 235421–235428 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.W. Mulenberg, J.R.I. Lee, S.K. MvCall, K.M. Hanif, D. Haskel, J.C. Lang, L.J. Terminello, T. van Buuren, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 6888–6889 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D.A. Schwartz, N.S. Norberg, Q.P. Nguyen, J.M. Parker, D.R. Gamelin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 13205–13218 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    N.S. Norberg, K.R. Kittilstved, J.E. Amonette, R.K. Kukkadapu, D.A. Schwartz, D.R. Gamelin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 9387–9398 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    C.C. Chen, Y.J. Hsu, Y.F. Lin, S.Y. Lu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112, 17964–17968 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A.L. Patterson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 978 (1939)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P.V. Radovanovic, D.R. Gamelin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 157202–157204 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    I.S. Elfimov, S. Yunoki, G.A. Sawatzky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 216403–216406 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Osario Guillen, S. Lany, S. Barabash, A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 107203–107206 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Zhang, S.B. Ogale, W. Yu, X. Gao, T. Liu, S. Ghosh, G.P. Das, A.T.S. Wee, R.L. Greene, T. Venkatesan, Adv. Mater. 21, 2282–2287 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sunil Kumar
    • 1
  • Sanjeev Kumar
    • 2
  • N. K. Verma
    • 1
  • S. K. Chakarvarti
    • 3
  1. 1.Nano Research Lab, School of Physics and Materials ScienceThapar UniversityPatialaIndia
  2. 2.University College of EngineeringPunjabi UniversityPatialaIndia
  3. 3.National Institute of TechnologyKurukshetraIndia

Personalised recommendations