Advertisement

Biomimetically-inspired photonic nanomaterials

  • Gregory J. ParkerEmail author
Article

Abstract

Nature has been kind enough to provide us with a 3-billion year old portfolio of an on-going experiment with living systems. There are well-optimised engineering solutions to mechanical, aerodynamic, hydrodynamic and optical problems all to be found in the living world Bar-Cohen (Bioinspir Biomim 1:P1–P12, 2006), Bhusan (Phil Trans Roy Soc A 367: 1445–1486, 2009). However, Nature is severely limited in the materials that are at its disposal so that as engineers we can improve on Nature’s solutions to particular problems by taking Nature’s design template as a starting point and then incorporating our own more appropriate materials, or metamaterials into that template design. We can also use Nature’s solutions as a starting point in our own “evolutionary algorithms” by taking Nature’s 3-billion year old solution as our initial starting point and then extrapolating that solution to (effectively) thousands of billions of years into the future using digital computers. This review article will consider just one particular application area of biomimetics—photonic nanomaterials Vukusic (Natural Photonics. Physics World pp. 35–39, 2004).

Keywords

Photonic Crystal Structural Colour Butterfly Wing Refractive Index Contrast Wing Scale 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Prof. Peter Dobson of Oxford University for supplying details of, and paper references for, biological material exhibiting optical gain, and Prof. Simon Cox (University of Southampton) for information and diagrams regarding the evolutionary design of optical nanostructures. I would also like to thank Prof. Andrew Parker (Natural History Museum), Dr. Pete Vukusic (University of Exeter) and Dr. Stuart Boden with Prof. Darren Bagnall (University of Southampton) for kind permission to use their hard-won microscopy images and for many useful discussions. Thanks also to Dr. Tamara M. Frank for permission to use her outstanding image of the amazing Brownsnout Spookfish. I would also like to acknowledge the financial support of the EPSRC in a series of photonic crystal related grants which provided the base material for much of this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Y. Bar-Cohen, Biomimetics–using nature to inspire human innovation. Bioinspir. Biomim. 1, P1–P12 (2006)CrossRefADSPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. Bhusan, Biomimetics: lessons from nature–an overview. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 367, 1445–1486 (2009)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Vukusic, Natural photonics. Physics World pp. 35–39 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Darwin, The origin of species and the voyage of the Beagle. Everyman’s Library ISBN: 1-85715-258-1 (UK) (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    O.H. Schmitt, Some interesting and useful biomimetic transforms. Proc. 3rd Int. Biophysics Congress (Boston, MA, 29 Aug. To 3 Sept. 1969). P297 (1969)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M.D.B. Charlton, S.W. Roberts, G.J. Parker, Guided mode analysis, and fabrication of a 2-dimensional visible photonic band structure confined within a planar semiconductor waveguide. Mater. Sci. Eng. B49, 155–165 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D.M. Tom, G.J. Lee, M.E. Parker, S.J. Zoorob, M.D. Cox, B. Charlton, Design and simulation of highly symmetric photonic quasi-crystals. Nanotechnology 16, 2703–2706 (2005)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M.E. Zoorob, M.D.B. Charlton, G.J. Parker, J.J. Baumberg, M.C. Netti, Complete photonic bandgaps in 12-fold symmetric quasicrystals. Nature 404, 740–743 (2000)CrossRefADSPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G.J. Parker et al., Highly engineered mesoporous structures for optical processing. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 364(1838), 189–199 (2006)CrossRefADSPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Senechal, Quasicrystals and geometry (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), ISBN 0521575419. P. 220, 243Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.A. Adam, Mathematics in nature (Princeton University Press, 2003). ISBN 0691127964. p. 220Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    F.R. Yeats, A growth-controlled model of the shape of a sunflower head. Math. Biosci. 187, 205–221 (2004)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M.E. Pollard, G.J. Parker, Low-contrast bandgaps of a planar parabolic spiral lattice. Opt. Lett. 34(18), 2805–2807 (2009)CrossRefADSPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Agrawal, N. Kejalakshmy, J. Chen, B.M.A. Rahman, K.T.V. Grattan, Golden spiral photonic crystal fiber: polarisation and dispersion properties. Opt. Lett. 33(22), 2716–2718 (2008)CrossRefADSPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. Kinoshita, Structural colours in the realm of nature (World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, 2008)ISBN-139789812707833 ISBN-109812707832Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A.R. Parker, 515 million years of structural colour. J. Opt. A Pure Appl. Opt. 2, R15–R28 (2000)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A.R. Parker, A geological history of reflecting optics. J. R. Soc. Interface. 2, 1–17 (2005)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. Vukusic, J.R. Sambles, C.R. Lawrence, Structural colour: colour mixing in the wing scales of a butterfly. Nature 404, 457 (2000)CrossRefADSPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    P. Vukusic, J.R. Sambles, C.R. Lawrence, R.J. Wootton, Quantified interference and diffraction in single Morpho butterfly scales. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 266, 1403–1411 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. Parker, M. Charlton, Photonic crystals. Physics World pp. 29–34 (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J.D. Joannopoulos, R.D. Meade, J.N. Winn Photonic crystals: molding the flow of light. (Princeton University Press, 1995) ISBN: 0691037442Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    P. Vukusic, J.R. Sambles, Photonic structures in biology. Nature 424, 852–855 (2003)CrossRefADSPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
    Morphotex fibres by Teijin Fibers Limited. http://www.asknature.org/product/4c0e62f66bcccabf55a1f189da30acb3
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
    mirasol™ display technology by Qualcomm. http://www.asknature.org/product/af429a05af212ee9fc74977247408bf5
  27. 27.
    P. Vukusic, J.R. Sambles, C.R. Lawrence, Structurally assisted blackness in butterfly scales. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B (Suppl.), (2004) 03BL0275.S1-S3Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Epson develops long-life OLED display system capable of reproducing “the ultimate black”. http://www.physorg.com/news111673832.html
  29. 29.
    New material pushes the boundary of blackness. http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1555030620080115
  30. 30.
    Scientists make blackest material ever. http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/03/ultrablack/
  31. 31.
    P. Vukusic, B. Hallam, J. Noyes, Brilliant whiteness in ultrathin beetle scales. Science 315, 348–349 (2007)CrossRefADSPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    B.T. Hallam, A.G. Hiorns, P. Vukusic, Developing optical efficiency through optimized coating structure: biomimetic inspiration from white beetles. Appl. Opt. 48(17), 3243–3249 (2009)CrossRefADSPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    J. Yip, S.-P. Ng, K.-H. Wong, Brilliant whiteness surfaces from electrospun nanofiber webs. Textile Res. J. 79(9), 771–779 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    R. Dawkins, The blind watchmaker (Penguin Books 2000) ISBN: 0140291229Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Private Communication with S.J.Cox, 2003Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    P. Vukusic, I. Hooper, Directionally controlled fluorescence emission in butterflies. Science 310, 1151 (2005)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    T. Eisner et al., Chemical defense of a primitive Australian bombardier beetle (Carabidae): Mystropomus regularis. Chemoecology 2, 29–34 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    D.-E. Nilsson, S. Pelger, A pessimistic estimate of the time required for an eye to evolve. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 256, 53–58 (1994)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    P.J. Herring, Reflective systems in aquatic animals. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 109A, 523–546 (1994)ADSGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    K.-h. Li, Laser like effect in biomolecules. Phys. Lett. 114A(7), 405–409 (1986)ADSGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    S. Ruhman et al., Following evolution of bacteriorhodopsin in its teactive excited Xtate via stimulated emission pumping. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 8854–8858 (2002)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    H.-J. Wagner, R.H. Douglas, T.M. Frank, N.W. Roberts, J.C. Partridge, A novel vertebrate eye using both refractive and reflective optics. Curr. Biol. 19, 108–114 (2009)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    A. Parker, Biomimetics: design by nature (National Geographic magazine, April 2008) pp. 68–91Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    The Exterior Coating with Lotus-Effect ® http://www.stocorp.com/allweb.nsf/lotusanpage
  45. 45.
    D.X. Hammer et al., Infrared spectral sensitivity of Melanophila acuminata. J. Insect Physiol. 47, 1441–1450 (2001)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electronics & Computer ScienceThe University of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations