The relation between valency, axial ratio, Young’s modulus and resistivity of rapidly solidified tin-based eutectic alloys

Article

Abstract

Eutectic alloys of Sn with Cu, Cd, Al, Pb and Sb (peritectic) were produced by the melt-spinning technique. These alloying elements were chosen according to their valencies +1, +2, +3, +4 and +5 respectively. X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) was carried out. Young’s modulus and resistivity were measured. It was found that, alloying Sn with low valency metals such as Cu and Cd increases the axial ratio and alloying Sn with high valency metals such as Pb, Sb and Bi decreases the axial ratio. Also Young’s modulus was found to increase by increasing the axial ratio and decreases by decreasing it. On the contrary the resistivity decreases by increasing the axial ratio.

Keywords

Electronic Material Diffraction Analysis Eutectic Alloy Axial Ratio High Valency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. Kamal, A. B. EL-Bediwi and T. E-Ashram, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electr. 15 (2004) 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. V. Raynor and J. A. Lee, Acta Met. 2 (1954) 616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. H. Kane, B. C. Giessen and N. J. Grant, Acta Met. 14 (1966) 605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. J. Smithells and E. A. Brandes, in “Metals Reference Book”, 5 ed. (Butterworth and Co.(Publishers) Ltd., U.K., 1976), p. 940.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. C. Anderson, K. D. Leaver, R. D. Rawlings and J. M. Alexander, in “Materials Science”, 3 ed. (Van Nostrand Reinhold (UK) Co. Ltd. 1985), p. 248&504.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. Hayden, W. G. Moffat and J. Wulff, in “Mechanical Behavior”, 3 ed. (Wiley Eastern private limited, New Delhi, 1974) p. 36.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y. A. Geller and A. G. Rakhshtadt, “Science of Materials”, (Mir Publishers, Moscow, 1977) p. 138.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Schreiber, O. L. Anderson and N. Soga, in “Elastic Constants, and their Measurements” (McGraw Hill book Company, 1973) p. 82.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Selected Powder Diffraction Data for Education & Training, Search Manual and Data Cards, JCPDS, International Center For Diffraction Data, Editor-in-Chief, William Frank McClune, 1601 Park Lan, Swarthmore, PA 19081–2389, JCPDS, 1988 printed in U.S.A.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Schubert, U. Roseler, W. Mahler, E. Doerre and W. Schuett, Z. Metallk 45 (1954) 643.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. R. Frear, S. N. Burchett, H. S. Morgan and J. H. Lau, (eds.), “The Mechanics of Solder Alloy Interconnects”, (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1994) p. 60.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. H. Cottrell, in “Theoretical Structure Metallurgy” (The Camelt press Ltd. 1964) p. 77.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Physics Department, Faculty of EducationSuez Canal UniversityPort Said

Personalised recommendations