Skip to main content
Log in

Probability densities of disorientation angles among randomly oriented grains in tricrystals

  • Metals & corrosion
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Orientation relationships of grains in tricrystals are discussed. Disorientation angles among grains are evaluated and a constrained condition of these around a triple junction is shown. Probability densities of the disorientation angles are obtained for randomly oriented grains by numerical calculations. A disorientation-angle diagram for tricrystal is proposed to characterize the orientation relationships of grains around the triple junctions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mackenzie JK, Thomson MJ (1957) Some statistics associated with the random disorientation of cubes. Biometrika 44:205–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mackenzie JK (1958) Second paper on statistics associated with the random disorientation of cubes. Biometrika 45:229–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Handscomb DC (1958) On the random disorientation of two cubes. Can J Mat 10:85–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Field DP, Sanchez JE, Besser PR, Dingley DJ (1997) Analysis of grain-boundary structure in Al-Cu interconnects. J Appl Phys 82:2383–2392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. West DA, Adams BL (1997) Analysis of orientation clustering in a directionally solidified nickel-based ingot. Metall Mater Trans A 28:229–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Randle V, Davies H, Cross I (2001) Grain boundary misorientation distributions. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 5:3–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Humphreys FJ (2001) Review: grain and subgrain characterisation by electron backscatter diffraction. J Mat Sci 36:3833–3854

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Randle V (1994) Grain assemblage in polycrystals. Acta Metall Mat 42:1769–1784

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. King AH (2010) Triple lines in materials science and engineering. Scripta Mater 62:889–893

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Okada T, Onaka S, Hashimoto S, Miura S (1989) Suppression of grain-boundary sliding by a boundary node in Cu-9at.%Al tricrystals. Scripta Metall 23:49–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Onaka S, Tajima F, Hashimoto S, Miura S (1995) Retardation of intergranular fracture at intermediate temperatures by a boundary node in a Cu-9at.%Al alloy tricrystal. Acta Metall Mater 43:307–311

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Okada T, Hisazawa H, Iwasaki A, Amimoto S, Miyaji J, Shisawa S, Ueki T (2019) Grain-boundary sliding and its accommodation at triple junctions in aluminum and copper tricrystals. Mater Trans 60:86–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Okada T, Hisazawa H, Iwasaki A, Kawaguchi K, Morimoto H, Nakano K, Ueki T, Tomita T (2021) Creep fracture of aluminum and copper tricrystals having < 110 >-Tilt Σ 3, 3, 9 grain boundaries. Mater Trans 62:239–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Frary M, Schuh CA (2003) Combination rule for deviant CSL Grain boundaries at triple junctions. Acta Mater 51:3731–3743

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Priester L (2013) Grain Boundaries, From Theory to Engineering. Springer Series in Materials Science 172, ISBN 978–94–007–4969–6 (eBook) 398–402

  16. Onaka S (2020) Arrangements of three to six cubes with maximum disorientation angles. Phil Mag 86:1703–1715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Frary M, Schuh CA (2004) Percolation and statistical properties of low- and high-angle interface networks in polycrystalline ensembles. Phys Rev B 69:134115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Morawiec A (2004) Orientations and rotations. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Hayashi K, Osada M, Kurosu Y, Onaka S (2016) Log Angles: characteristic angles of crystal orientation given by the logarithm of rotation matrix. Mater Trans 57:507–512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 19K04985.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susumu Onaka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Handling Editor: N. Ravishankar.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

A grain orientation can be describe by using a rotation matrix \({\varvec{T}}\) with respect to a reference coordinate system. This \({\varvec{T}}\) is a 3 × 3 orthogonal matrix whose determinant is 1. Any orientation is expressed by a product of appropriate three rotation matrices which cause rotations around the coordinate axes. Three rotation angles around the coordinate axes are called the Euler angles. The rotation matrix \({\varvec{T}}\) with the three the Euler angles \(0\le {\theta }_{\text{e}}\le \pi\), \(0\le {\phi }_{\text{e}}<2\pi\) and \(0\le {\psi }_{\text{e}}<2\pi\) given by the following equation is an example of the rotation matrix giving any orientation:

$${\varvec{T}}=\left(\begin{array}{ccc}\mathrm{cos}{\phi }_{\text{e}}& -\mathrm{sin}{\phi }_{\text{e}}& 0\\ \mathrm{sin}{\phi }_{\text{e}}& \mathrm{cos}{\phi }_{\text{e}}& 0\\ 0& 0& 1\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{ccc}1& 0& 0\\ 0& \mathrm{cos}{\theta }_{\text{e}}& -\mathrm{sin}{\theta }_{\text{e}}\\ 0& \mathrm{sin}{\theta }_{\text{e}}& \mathrm{cos}{\theta }_{\text{e}}\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{ccc}\mathrm{cos}{\psi }_{\text{e}}& -\mathrm{sin}{\psi }_{\text{e}}& 0\\ \mathrm{sin}{\psi }_{\text{e}}& \mathrm{cos}{\psi }_{\text{e}}& 0\\ 0& 0& 1\end{array}\right).$$
(11)

Describing the Euler angles \({\theta }_{\text{e}}\), \({\phi }_{\text{e}}\) and \({\psi }_{\text{e}}\) as a function of random numbers appropriately, we can obtain \({\varvec{T}}\) giving random orientations. When \({M}_{i}\left(i=\mathrm{1,2} or 3\right)\) are random numbers in the range of 0 to 1 with uniform distribution over that range, Eq. (11) with the Euler angles given by

$${\theta }_{\text{e}}={\mathrm{cos}}^{-1}\left(2{M}_{1}-1\right),$$
(12a)
$${\phi }_{\text{e}}=2{M}_{2}\pi$$
(12b)

and

$${\psi }_{\text{e}}=2{M}_{3}\pi$$
(12c)

can generate three dimensionally random orientations with uniform distribution. Note that \({\theta }_{\text{e}}\) is not proportional to \({M}_{1}\). The reason is that the probability density \(\rho \left({\theta }_{\text{e}}\right)\) of \({\theta }_{\text{e}}\) to generate the random orientations is proportional to \(\mathrm{sin}{\theta }_{\text{e}}\) [18]. The inverse cosine function in the right-hand-side of Eq. (12a) comes from \(d\mathrm{sin}{\theta }_{\text{e}}/d{\theta }_{\mathrm{e}}=\mathrm{cos}{\theta }_{\mathrm{e}}\).

To obtain the disorientation angle \(\theta\) between cubic grains, it is necessary to include the crystal symmetry. Here, we explain the procedure by considering two cubic Grains 1 and 2. When orientations of Grains 1 and 2 are given by the rotation matrices \({{\varvec{T}}}_{1}\) and \({{\varvec{T}}}_{2}\) with respect to a reference coordinate system, respectively, the rotation matrix \({{\varvec{R}}}_{12}\) from Grains 1 to 2 described by using the frame of Grain 1 is written as [19]

$${\varvec{R}}_{{{12}}} = {\varvec{T}}_{{1}}^{{\text{T}}} \,{\varvec{T}}_{{2}} ,$$
(13)

where \({{\varvec{T}}}_{1}^{\mathrm{T}}\) is the transpose of \({{\varvec{T}}}_{1}\). The cubic structure is invariant under 24 proper symmetrical rotations and these are (a) identity element or no rotation, (b) rotations of \(90^\circ\), \(180^\circ\) or \(270^\circ\) about the three < 100 > axes, (c) rotations of \(180^\circ\) about the six < 110 > axes and (d) rotations of \(120^\circ\) or \(240^\circ\) about the four < 111 > axes [2]. Writing \({{\varvec{S}}}_{\text{i}}\) (i = 1, 2, …, 24) as the matrix representations of these symmetrical rotations, the disorientation angle \({\theta }_{12}\) between Grains 1 and 2 is w

$${\theta }_{12}={\mathrm{cos}}^{-1}\left\{\left[\underset{i}{\mathrm{max}}{\text{Tr}}\left({{\varvec{R}}}_{12}\boldsymbol{ }{{\varvec{S}}}_{\text{i}}\right)-1\right]/2\right\},$$
(14)

where \({\text{Tr}}\left({{\varvec{R}}}_{12}\boldsymbol{ }{{\varvec{S}}}_{\text{i}}\right)\) is the trace of the matrix \({{\varvec{R}}}_{12}\boldsymbol{ }{{\varvec{S}}}_{\text{i}}\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoshimasu, F., Miyazawa, N., Nakada, N. et al. Probability densities of disorientation angles among randomly oriented grains in tricrystals. J Mater Sci 57, 3010–3017 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06729-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06729-w

Navigation