Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 55, Issue 13, pp 5431–5444 | Cite as

Thermodynamic analysis of phase diagram of H2O-DMF-PCL system: investigation on the influence of inorganic additives TiO2/MMT

  • S. Nivedita
  • Danish Ahamed
  • Shiny JosephEmail author
Composites & nanocomposites
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

Phase diagrams for H2O-DMF-PCL ternary system and with the presence of inorganic additives, H2O-DMF-PCL–(TiO2/MMT) quaternary system are studied using Flory–Huggins theory, which explains the thermodynamic behavior of polymeric membranes formed out of phase inversion process. The experimental binodal curves were plotted using cloud points obtained from the titration method. Also, the experimental spinodal curve was drawn using the compositions at the onset of phase separation in the titration method and found matching with the theoretical spinodal curve. The effect of variations in the interaction parameters on the location of the binodal curve is studied. The ternary interaction parameter was determined by fitting the binodal curve with the cloud point data for the ternary and quaternary system. The interaction of PCL-DMF-H2O is found to be consistent even in the presence of TiO2 or MMT. Also, the ternary and quaternary interaction parameters involving these additives were found to be negligible within the system. On the other hand, the presence of additives shifted the binodal curve toward the solvent-polymer axis manifesting the less requirement of non-solvent for phase separation. The critical point for the ternary system obtained in both experiment and theoretical calculation was at the polymer concentration of around 6 wt%. Membranes having composition above the critical point were synthesized using phase inversion technique, and their morphology was examined using SEM images.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors acknowledge National Institute of Technology Calicut for providing necessary funding for the successful completion of the project.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Zhang S, Liu Y, Li D, Wang Q, Ran F (2019) Water-soluble MOF nanoparticles modified polyethersulfone membrane for improving flux and molecular retention. Appl Surf Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144553 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mazinani S, Darvishmanesh S, Ehsanzadeh A, Van der Bruggen B (2017) Phase separation analysis of EXTEM/solvent/non-solvent systems and relation with membrane morphology. J Memb Sci 526:301–314.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    El-gendi A, Abdalla H, Ali S (2012) Construction of ternary phase diagram and membrane morphology evaluation for polyamide/formic acid/water system. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 6:62–68Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Young TH, Chuang WY (2002) Thermodynamic analysis on the cononsolvency of poly (vinyl alcohol) in water-DMSO mixtures through the ternary interaction parameter. J Memb Sci 210:349–359.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00413-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu L, Xiang H, Huang Z, Chen L, Yu J, Zhu J, Hu Z (2013) Calculation of the phase diagram of a btda-tdi/mdi co-polyimide/N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone/water system in the phase separation process. Text Res J.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517512456762 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kurada KV, De S (2017) Modeling of solution thermodynamics: a method for tuning the properties of blend polymeric membranes. J Memb Sci 540:485–495.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sadrzadeh M, Bhattacharjee S (2013) Rational design of phase inversion membranes by tailoring thermodynamics and kinetics of casting solution using polymer additives. J Memb Sci 441:31–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Panda SR, De S (2015) Preparation, characterization and antifouling properties of polyacrylonitrile/polyurethane blend membranes for water purification. RSC Adv 5:23599–23612.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra00736d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bakeri G, Ismail AF, Rahimnejad M, Matsuura T (2014) Analysis of polyetherimide/N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone/nonsolvent phase separation behavior. J Polym Res 21:386.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-014-0386-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ebrahimpour M, Safekordi AA, Nasab AH, Mousavi SM (2016) Phase separation analysis in the ternary system of poly (butylene succinate)/1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane/non-solvent in relation to membrane formation. Inter Bus Manag 10:5876–5884Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Idris A, Man Z, Maulud AS, Khan MS (2017) Effects of phase separation behavior on morphology and performance of polycarbonate membranes. Membranes (Basel).  https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes7020021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hak J, Ryul B, Won J, Chae H, Soo Y (2001) Phase behavior and mechanism of membrane formation for polyimide/DMSO/water system. J Memb Sci 187:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wei Y, Xu Z, Yang X, Liu H (2006) Mathematical calculation of binodal curves of a polymer/solvent/nonsolvent system in the phase inversion process. Desalination 192:91–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.07.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Altena FW, Smolders CA (1982) Calculation of liquid-liquid phase separation in a ternary system of a polymer in a mixture of a solvent and a nonsolvent. Macromolecules 15:1491–1497.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00234a008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Keshavarz L, Khansary MA, Shirazian S (2015) Phase diagram of ternary polymeric solutions containing nonsolvent/solvent/polymer: theoretical calculation and experimental validation. Polymer (Guildf) 73:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2015.07.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tan L, Pan D, Pan N (2008) Thermodynamic study of a water–dimethylformamide–polyacrylonitrile ternary system. Appl Polym Sci 110:3439–3447.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.28392 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gierszewska M, Ostrowska-Czubenko J (2016) Equilibrium swelling study of crosslinked chitosan membranes in water, buffer and salt solutions. Prog Chem Appl Chitin Its Deriv 21:55–62.  https://doi.org/10.15259/PCACD.21.05 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mohsenpour S, Safekordi A, Tavakolmoghadam M, Rekabdar F, Hemmati M (2016) Comparison of the membrane morphology based on the phase diagram using PVP as an organic additive and TiO2 as an inorganic additive. Polymer (Guildf) 97:559–568.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2016.05.069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang R, Schuman T, Vuppalapati RR, Chandrashekhara K (2014) Fabrication of bio-based epoxy-clay nanocomposites. Green Chem 16:1871–1882.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3gc41802b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bordes C, Fréville V, Ruffin E, Marote P, Gauvrit JY, Brianc S, Lantéri P (2010) Determination of poly (ε-caprolactone) solubility parameters: application to solvent substitution in a microencapsulation process. Int J Pharm 383:236–243.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.09.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brandrup J, Immergut EH (1999) E.A.G. E, Polymer Handbook, 4th edition edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aryanti PTP, Ariono D, Hakim AN, Wenten IG (2018) Flory–Huggins based model to determine thermodynamic property of polymeric membrane solution. J Phys Conf Ser.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1090/1/012074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Abdallah H, Amin A, El-Gendi A, El-Bayoumi M (2017) Quaternary polymeric thermodynamic system and membrane formation mathematical model. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 12:2177–2191Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kimmerle K, Strathmann H (1990) Analysis of the structure-determining process of phase inversion membranes. Desalination 79:283–302.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-9164(90)85012-Y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Boom RM, van den Boomgaard T, Smolders CA (1994) Mass transfer and thermodynamics during immersion precipitation for a two-polymer system. Evaluation with the system PES-PVP-NMP-water. J Memb Sci 90:231–249.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(94)80074-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bin Li H, Shi WY, Zhang YF, Liu DQ, Liu XF (2014) Effects of additives on the morphology and performance of PPTA/PVDF in situ blend UF membrane. Polymers (Basel) 6:1846–1861.  https://doi.org/10.3390/polym6061846 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Madaeni SS, Bakhtiari L (2012) Thermodynamic-based predictions of membrane morphology in water/dimethylsulfoxide/polyethersulfone systems. Polymer (Guildf) 53:4481–4488.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2012.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Barzin J, Sadatnia B (2007) Theoretical phase diagram calculation and membrane morphology evaluation for water/solvent/polyethersulfone systems. Polymer (Guildf) 48:1620–1631.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2007.01.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Munirasu S, Nunes SP (2014) Porous asymmetric SiO2-g-PMMA nanoparticles produced by phase inversion. J Mater Sci 49:7399–7407.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8434-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Machado PST, Habert AC, Borges CP (1999) Membrane formation mechanism based on precipitation kinetics and membrane morphology. J Memb Sci 155:171–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringNational Institute of Technology CalicutKozhikodeIndia

Personalised recommendations