Advertisement

Composites of thiol-grafted PEDOT with N-doped graphene or graphitic carbon nitride as an electrochemical sensor for the detection of paracetamol

  • Yinqiang Yan
  • Ruxangul JamalEmail author
  • Zongna Yu
  • Ruanye Zhang
  • Wenli Zhang
  • Yi Ge
  • Yingcheng Liu
  • Tursun AbdiryimEmail author
Materials for life sciences
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

A novel electrochemical sensor with thiol-grafted PEDOT/N-doped graphene (N-Gr/PEDOT-MeSH) and thiol-grafted PEDOT/graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4/PEDOT-MeSH) composites was fabricated for the detection of paracetamol (PAR). The formation mechanism of the obtained structure was thoroughly studied. And from the electrochemical results, the synergistic effect between the PEDOT-MeSH and g-C3N4 or N-Gr improved the electron transfer and conductivity of the modified electrodes and enhanced the sensing responses toward the electrochemical oxidation of PAR. The calibration curve of N-Gr/PEDOT-MeSH and g-C3N4/PEDOT-MeSH composites exhibited the wider linear responses for PAR, ranging from 2 to 1680 µM and 0.4 to 1280 µM, and the detection limits (S/N = 3) were 1.42 µM and 1.0 µM, respectively. Furthermore, the obtained composites exhibited the excellent reproducibility, lower detection limit and good stability. And it was capable of detecting PAR in real samples with a satisfying result.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21564014, 21764014).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Supplementary material

10853_2020_4351_MOESM1_ESM.docx (288 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 285 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Pacifici GM, Allegaert K (2015) Clinical pharmacology of paracetamol in neonates: a review. Curr Ther Res 77:24–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.curtheres.2014.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chiumello D, Gotti M, Vergani G (2017) Paracetamol in fever in critically ill patients—an update. J Crit Care 38:245–252.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.10.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deng C, Deng Y, Wang B, Yang X (2002) Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry method for determination of phenylalanine and tyrosine in neonatal blood spots. J Chromatogr B 780(2):407–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Castillo-García ML, Aguilar-Caballos MP, Gómez-Hens A (2015) Determination of acetylsalicylic acid and its major metabolites in bovine urine using ultra performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr B 985:85–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.01.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Behera S (2012) UV–visible spectrophotometric method development and validation of assay of paracetamol tablet formulation. J Anal Bioanal Tech.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9872.1000151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luo J, Fan C, Wang X, Liu R, Liu X (2013) A novel electrochemical sensor for paracetamol based on molecularly imprinted polymeric micelles. Sens Actuators B Chem 188:909–916.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2013.07.088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Si W, Lei W, Han Z, Zhang Y, Hao Q, Xia M (2014) Electrochemical sensing of acetaminophen based on poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/graphene oxide composites. Sens Actuators B Chem 193:823–829.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2013.12.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bhat SA, Rather MA, Pandit SA, Ingole PP, Bhat MA (2016) Sensitive electrochemical sensing of acetaminophen and hydroquinone over single-pot synthesized stabilizer free Ag/Ag-oxide-graphene nanocomposites. J Electroanal Chem 783:280–287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.11.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zheng M, Gao F, Wang Q, Cai X, Jiang S, Huang L, Gao F (2013) Electrocatalytical oxidation and sensitive determination of acetaminophen on glassy carbon electrode modified with graphene–chitosan composite. Mater Sci Eng C 33(3):1514–1520.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2012.12.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yang H, Liu B, Ding Y, Li L, Ouyang X (2015) Fabrication of cuprous oxide nanoparticles-graphene nanocomposite for determination of acetaminophen. J Electroanal Chem 757:88–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2015.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kokulnathan T, Chen S-M (2019) Rational design for the synthesis of europium vanadate-encapsulated graphene oxide nanocomposite: an excellent and efficient catalyst for the electrochemical detection of clioquinol. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7(4):4136–4146.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05650 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Patra S, Roy E, Tiwari A, Madhuri R, Sharma PK (2017) 2-Dimensional graphene as a route for emergence of additional dimension nanomaterials. Biosens Bioelectron 89:8–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2016.02.067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Matsoso BJ, Mutuma BK, Billing C, Ranganathan K, Lerotholi T, Jones G, Coville NJ (2018) The effect of N-configurations on selective detection of dopamine in the presence of uric and ascorbic acids using surfactant-free N-graphene modified ITO electrodes. Electrochim Acta 286:29–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.08.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sheng Z-H, Shao L, Chen J-J, Bao W-J, Wang F-B, Xia X-H (2011) Catalyst-free synthesis of nitrogen-doped graphene via thermal annealing graphite oxide with melamine and its excellent electrocatalysis. ACS Nano 5(6):4350–4358.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn103584t CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang Y, Shao Y, Matson DW, Li J, Lin Y (2010) Nitrogen-doped graphene and its application in electrochemical biosensing. ACS Nano 4(4):1790–1798.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn100315s CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bundaleska N, Henriques J, Abrashev M, Botelho do Rego AM, Ferraria AM, Almeida A, Dias FM, Valcheva E, Arnaudov B, Upadhyay KK, Montemor MF, Tatarova E (2018) Large-scale synthesis of free-standing N-doped graphene using microwave plasma. Sci Rep 8(1):12595.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30870-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gu H, Zhou T, Shi G (2015) Synthesis of graphene supported graphene-like C3N4 metal-free layered nanosheets for enhanced electrochemical performance and their biosensing for biomolecules. Talanta 132:871–876.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2014.09.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang Y, Zhao S, Zhang Y, Chen W, Yuan S, Zhou Y, Huang Z (2019) Synthesis of graphitic carbon nitride with large specific surface area via copolymerizing with nucleobases for photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Appl Surf Sci 463:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.215 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huang J, Meng P, Liu X (2019) Porous nanostructure and enhanced charge transfer in graphitic carbon nitride fabricated by polyoxometalate oxidation etching. J Alloys Compd 805:654–662.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang J, Zhang G, Chen X, Lin S, Möhlmann L, Dołęga G, Lipner G, Antonietti M, Blechert S, Wang X (2012) Co-monomer control of carbon nitride semiconductors to optimize hydrogen evolution with visible light. Angew Chem Int Ed 51(13):3183–3187.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201106656 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu Y-N, Zhou X, Shen C-C, Zhao Z-W, Jiang Y-F, Ma L-B, Fang X-X, Akif Z, Cheag T-Y, Xu A-W (2018) Hydrogen-bonding-assisted charge transfer: significantly enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution over g-C3N4 anchored with ferrocene-based hole relay. Catal Sci Technol 8(11):2853–2859.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cy00488a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu Y-N, Shen C-C, Jiang N, Zhao Z-W, Zhou X, Zhao S-J, Xu A-W (2017) g-C3N4 hydrogen-bonding viologen for significantly enhanced visible-light photocatalytic H2 evolution. ACS Catal 7(12):8228–8234.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b03266 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Han Y, Ding B, Tong H, Zhang X (2011) Capacitance properties of graphite oxide/poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene) composites. J Appl Polym Sci 121(2):892–898.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.33610 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xu Y, Lei W, Su J, Hu J, Yu X, Zhou T, Yang Y, Mandler D, Hao Q (2018) A high-performance electrochemical sensor based on g-C3N4-E-PEDOT for the determination of acetaminophen. Electrochim Acta 259:994–1003.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sharma A, Kumar A, Khan R (2018) A highly sensitive amperometric immunosensor probe based on gold nanoparticle functionalized poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene) doped with graphene oxide for efficient detection of aflatoxin B 1. Synth Met 235:136–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2017.12.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Goda T, Toya M, Matsumoto A, Miyahara Y (2015) Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) bearing phosphorylcholine groups for metal-free, antibody-free, and low-impedance biosensors specific for C-reactive protein. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7(49):27440–27448.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b09325 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ma L, Jayachandran S, Li Z, Song Z, Wang W, Luo X (2019) Antifouling and conducting PEDOT derivative grafted with polyglycerol for highly sensitive electrochemical protein detection in complex biological media. J Electroanal Chem 840:272–278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li OL, Prabakar K, Kaneko A, Park H, Ishizaki T (2019) Exploration of Lewis basicity and oxygen reduction reaction activity in plasma-tailored nitrogen-doped carbon electrocatalysts. Catal Today 337:102–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2019.02.058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Martin DJ, Qiu K, Shevlin SA, Handoko AD, Chen X, Guo Z, Tang J (2014) Highly efficient photocatalytic H2 evolution from water using visible light and structure-controlled graphitic carbon nitride. Angew Chem 126(35):9394–9399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dong X-X, Li M-Y, Feng N-N, Sun Y-M, Yang C, Xu Z-L (2015) A nanoporous MgO based nonenzymatic electrochemical sensor for rapid screening of hydrogen peroxide in milk. RSC Advances 5(105):86485–86489.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra18560b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dhar S, Majumder T, Chakraborty P, Mondal SP (2018) DMSO modified PEDOT:PSS polymer/ZnO nanorods Schottky junction ultraviolet photodetector: photoresponse, external quantum efficiency, detectivity, and responsivity augmentation using N doped graphene quantum dots. Org Electron 53:101–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2017.11.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nie T, Zhang K, Xu J, Lu L, Bai L (2014) A facile one-pot strategy for the electrochemical synthesis of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/Zirconia nanocomposite as an effective sensing platform for vitamins B2, B6 and C. J Electroanal Chem 717–718:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2014.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Apperloo JJ, Janssen RAJ, Nielsen MM, Bechgaard K (2000) Doping in solution as an order-inducing tool prior to film formation of regio-irregular polyalkylthiophenes. Adv Mater 12(21):1594.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4095(200011)12:21%3c1594:aid-adma1594%3e3.0.co;2-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang Y, Pan Q, Chai G, Liang M, Dong G, Zhang Q, Qiu J (2013) Synthesis and luminescence mechanism of multicolor-emitting g-C3N4 nanopowders by low temperature thermal condensation of melamine. Sci Rep.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01943 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wei Y, Xu L, Tao Y, Yao C, Xue H, Kong Y (2016) Electrosorption of lead ions by nitrogen-doped graphene aerogels via one-pot hydrothermal route. Ind Eng Chem Res 55(7):1912–1920.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b04142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Li C, Xu J, Wu Y, Zhang Y, Zhang C, Lei W, Hao Q (2018) g-C3N4 nanofibers doped poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) modified electrode for simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid and acetaminophen. J Electroanal Chem 824:52–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.07.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wang D-G, Tan P, Wang H, Song M, Pan J, Kuang G-C (2018) BODIPY modified g-C3N4 as a highly efficient photocatalyst for degradation of Rhodamine B under visible light irradiation. J Solid State Chem 267:22–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2018.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Si W, Lei W, Zhang Y, Xia M, Wang F, Hao Q (2012) Electrodeposition of graphene oxide doped poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) film and its electrochemical sensing of catechol and hydroquinone. Electrochim Acta 85:295–301.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2012.08.099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jiang J, Ou-yang L, Zhu L, Zheng A, Zou J, Yi X, Tang H (2014) Dependence of electronic structure of g-C3N4 on the layer number of its nanosheets: a study by Raman spectroscopy coupled with first-principles calculations. Carbon 80:213–221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.08.059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Garreau S, Louarn G, Buisson JP, Froyer G, Lefrant S (1999) In situ spectroelectrochemical Raman studies of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDT). Macromolecules 32(20):6807–6812.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ma9905674 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chiu WW, Travaš-Sejdić J, Cooney RP, Bowmaker GA (2006) Studies of dopant effects in poly(3,4-ethylenedi-oxythiophene) using Raman spectroscopy. J Raman Spectrosc 37(12):1354–1361.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.1545 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nabilah Azman NH, Lim HN, Sulaiman Y (2016) Effect of electropolymerization potential on the preparation of PEDOT/graphene oxide hybrid material for supercapacitor application. Electrochim Acta 188:785–792.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.12.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhang J, Zhao XS (2012) Conducting polymers directly coated on reduced graphene oxide sheets as high-performance supercapacitor electrodes. J Phys Chem C 116(9):5420–5426.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp211474e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Shao Y, Zhang S, Engelhard MH, Li G, Shao G, Wang Y, Liu J, Aksay IA, Lin Y (2010) Nitrogen-doped graphene and its electrochemical applications. J Mater Chem 20(35):7491.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c0jm00782j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wang L, Yin F, Yao C (2014) N-doped graphene as a bifunctional electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution reactions in an alkaline electrolyte. Int J Hydrogen Energy 39(28):15913–15919.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.04.071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    She X, Liu L, Ji H, Mo Z, Li Y, Huang L, Du D, Xu H, Li H (2016) Template-free synthesis of 2D porous ultrathin nonmetal-doped g-C3N4 nanosheets with highly efficient photocatalytic H2 evolution from water under visible light. Appl Catal B 187:144–153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.12.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bose S, Kuila T, Uddin ME, Kim NH, Lau AKT, Lee JH (2010) In-situ synthesis and characterization of electrically conductive polypyrrole/graphene nanocomposites. Polymer 51(25):5921–5928.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2010.10.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Liu Z, Xu J, Yue R, Yang T, Gao L (2016) Facile one-pot synthesis of Au–PEDOT/rGO nanocomposite for highly sensitive detection of caffeic acid in red wine sample. Electrochim Acta 196:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.02.178 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Oh W-D, Lok L-W, Veksha A, Giannis A, Lim T-T (2018) Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of bisphenol A with Ag-decorated S-doped g-C3N4 under solar irradiation: Performance and mechanistic studies. Chem Eng J 333:739–749.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sahu V, Grover S, Tulachan B, Sharma M, Srivastava G, Roy M, Saxena M, Sethy N, Bhargava K, Philip D, Kim H, Singh G, Singh SK, Das M, Sharma RK (2015) Heavily nitrogen doped, graphene supercapacitor from silk cocoon. Electrochim Acta 160:244–253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Yan J, Wei T, Shao B, Fan Z, Qian W, Zhang M, Wei F (2010) Preparation of a graphene nanosheet/polyaniline composite with high specific capacitance. Carbon 48(2):487–493.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2009.09.066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Choi KS, Liu F, Choi JS, Seo TS (2010) Fabrication of free-standing multilayered graphene and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) composite films with enhanced conductive and mechanical properties. Langmuir 26(15):12902–12908.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la101698j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Li F, Chai J, Yang H, Han D, Niu L (2010) Synthesis of Pt/ionic liquid/graphene nanocomposite and its simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid and dopamine. Talanta 81(3):1063–1068.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2010.01.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Li X-B, Rahman MM, Xu G-R, Lee J-J (2015) Highly sensitive and selective detection of dopamine at poly(chromotrope 2B)-modified glassy carbon electrode in the presence of uric acid and ascorbic acid. Electrochim Acta 173:440–447.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.05.062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Tukimin N, Abdullah J, Sulaiman Y (2018) Electrodeposition of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/reduced graphene oxide/manganese dioxide for simultaneous detection of uric acid, dopamine and ascorbic acid. J Electroanal Chem 820:74–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.04.065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Gholizadeh A, Shahrokhian S, Irajizad A, Mohajerzadeh S, Vosoughi M, Darbari S, Koohsorkhi J, Mehran M (2012) Fabrication of sensitive glutamate biosensor based on vertically aligned CNT nanoelectrode array and investigating the effect of CNTs density on the electrode performance. Anal Chem 84(14):5932–5938.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac300463x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Liu L, Lv H, Wang C, Ao Z, Wang G (2016) Fabrication of the protonated graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets as enhanced electrochemical sensing platforms for hydrogen peroxide and paracetamol detection. Electrochim Acta 206:259–269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.04.123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Li T, Xu J, Zhao L, Shen S, Yuan M, Liu W, Tu Q, Yu R, Wang J (2016) Au nanoparticles/poly(caffeic acid) composite modified glassy carbon electrode for voltammetric determination of acetaminophen. Talanta 159:356–364.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2016.06.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Zhang Y, Liu X, Li L, Guo Z, Xue Z, Lu X (2016) An electrochemical paracetamol sensor based on layer-by-layer covalent attachment of MWCNTs and a G4.0 PAMAM modified GCE. Anal Methods 8(10):2218–2225.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ay03241e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Liu J, Xie Y, Wang K, Zeng Q, Liu R, Liu X (2017) A nanocomposite consisting of carbon nanotubes and gold nanoparticles in an amphiphilic copolymer for voltammetric determination of dopamine, paracetamol and uric acid. Microchim Acta 184(6):1739–1745.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-017-2185-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Liu R, Zeng X, Liu J, Luo J, Zheng Y, Liu X (2016) A glassy carbon electrode modified with an amphiphilic, electroactive and photosensitive polymer and with multi-walled carbon nanotubes for simultaneous determination of dopamine and paracetamol. Microchim Acta 183(5):1543–1551.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-016-1763-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Li M, Wang W, Chen Z, Song Z, Luo X (2018) Electrochemical determination of paracetamol based on Au@graphene core-shell nanoparticles doped conducting polymer PEDOT nanocomposite. Sens Actuators B Chem 260:778–785.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.01.093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Petroleum and Gas Fine Chemicals, Educational Ministry of China, School of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringXinjiang UniversityUrumqiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations