Advertisement

In situ synthesized hydro-lipophilic nano and micro fibrous bacterial cellulose: polystyrene composites for tissue scaffolds

Abstract

3D networks of fibrous materials are preferred for cell growth and proliferation as they mimic the extracellular matrix. Moreover, materials with the multi-dimensional fibers, that is, a combination of nano- and microfibers, are preferred as they would benefit from the high surface area offered by nanofibers and structural integrity imparted by the microfibers. This paper presents a unique and facile way of making such fiber-on-fiber composites from bacterial cellulose nanofibers and polystyrene (PS) microfibers. These composites are unique as the PS microfibers are lipophilic, while the cellulose nanofibers are hydrophilic. This not only enables cell attachment but also ensures nutrition supply. Two types of composites were obtained in this work—interpenetrated and layered—by in situ growth of bacterial cellulose into compressed and uncompressed nonwoven PS fabrics, respectively. The layered composite showed two times the cell growth exhibited by the control, while the interpenetrated composite offered a fourfold cell growth, after 24 h. Later (at 48 h), the interpenetrated composites show a decline in cell growth, while the layered composite showed an increase. The role of hydrophilic cellulose fibers in nutrition supply, lipophilic PS in cell attachment, optimal pore size in cell trapping and surface area in enhanced growth is discussed, in addition to the role of the composite morphology (layered or interpenetrated) in cell growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

References

  1. 1

    Liu L, Kamei K, Yoshioka M, Nakajima M, Li J (2017) Biomaterials nano-on-micro fibrous extracellular matrices for scalable expansion of human ES/iPS cells. Biomaterials 124:47–54

  2. 2

    Horst M, Madduri S, Milleret V, Sulser T, Gobet R, Eberli D (2013) A bilayered hybrid microfibrous PLGA-acellular matrix scaffold for hollow organ tissue engineering. Biomaterials 34(5):1537–1545

  3. 3

    Murphy CM, Haugh MG, O’Brien FJ (2010) The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 31(3):461–466

  4. 4

    Loh QL, Choong C (2013) Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 19(6):485–502

  5. 5

    Ortega Z, Alemán ME, Donate R (2018) Nanofibers and microfibers for osteochondral tissue engineering. Adv Exp Med Biol 1058:97–123

  6. 6

    Naghieh S, Badrossamay M, Foroozmehr E, Kharaziha M (2017) Combination of PLA micro-fibers and PCL-gelatin nano-fibers for development of bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Int J Swarm Intell Evol Comput 6(1):1–4

  7. 7

    Wunner FM, Florczak S, Mieszczanek P, Bas O, De-Juan-Pardo EM, Hutmacher DW (2017) 5.13 electrospinning with polymer melts—state of the art and future perspectives, vol 5. Elsevier Ltd., Amsterdam

  8. 8

    Kostakova E, Seps M, Pokorny P, Lukas D (2014) Study of polycaprolactone wet electrospinning process. Express Polym Lett 8(8):554–564

  9. 9

    Murakami WK, Machmudah S, Sasaki M, Goto M (2012) A dry process for polymer nano-microfibers prepared by electrospinning under pressurized CO2. Jpn J Appl Phys 51(8):1–6

  10. 10

    Ellison CJ, Phatak A, Giles DW, Macosko CW, Bates FS (2007) Melt blown nanofibers: fiber diameter distributions and onset of fiber breakup. Polymer (Guildf) 48(11):3306–3316

  11. 11

    Edmondson D, Cooper A, Jana S, Wood D, Zhang M (2012) Centrifugal electrospinning of highly aligned polymer nanofibers over a large area. J Mater Chem 22(35):18646–18652

  12. 12

    Jin S, Hyun D, Ho W, Min B (2010) Fabrication and characterization of 3-dimensional PLGA nanofiber/microfiber composite scaffolds. Polym (Guildf) 51(6):1320–1327

  13. 13

    Háková M et al (2018) A comparison study of nanofiber, microfiber, and new composite nano/microfiber polymers used as sorbents for on-line solid phase extraction in chromatography system. Anal Chim Acta 1023(April):44–52

  14. 14

    Chocholou L, Satínský D, Solich P (2018) A comparison study of nano fiber, micro fiber, and new composite nano/micro fiber polymers used as sorbents for on-line solid phase extraction in chromatography system. Anal Chim Acta 1023:44–52

  15. 15

    Ferrari M, Cirisano F (2019) Mammalian cell behavior on hydrophobic substrates: influence of surface properties. Coll Interfaces 3(2):48

  16. 16

    Ma PX (2004) Scaffolds for tissue fabrication. Mater Today 7(5):30–40

  17. 17

    Leong MF, Lu HF, Lim TC, Du C, Ma NKL, Wan ACA (2016) Electrospun polystyrene scaffolds as a synthetic substrate for xeno-free expansion and differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Acta Biomater 46:266–277

  18. 18

    Terranova L, Mallet R, Perrot R, Chappard D (2015) Polystyrene scaffolds based on microfibers as a bone substitute; development and in vitro study. Acta Biomater 29:380–388

  19. 19

    Serafim A, Mallet R, Pascaretti-grizon F, Stancu I, Chappard D (2014) Osteoblast-like cell behavior on porous scaffolds based on poly (styrene) fibers. vol 2014

  20. 20

    Svensson A, Nicklasson E, Harrah T, Panilaitis B, Kaplan DL (2005) Bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage. Biomaterials 26:419–431

  21. 21

    Zaborowska M, Bodin A, Bäckdahl H, Popp J, Goldstein A, Gatenholm P (2010) Acta biomaterialia microporous bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater 6(7):2540–2547

  22. 22

    Gutiérrez-hernández JM et al (2017) In vitro evaluation of osteoblastic cells on bacterial cellulose modi filed with multi-walled carbon nanotubes as scaffold for bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng, C 75:445–453

  23. 23

    Yadav S, Mattaparthi S, Sreenivasulu K, Khandelwal M, Majumdar S, Sharma CS (2019) Recycling of thermoplastic polystyrene waste using citrus peel extract for oil spill remediation. J Appl Polym Sci 47886:1–8

  24. 24

    Gea S et al (2011) Investigation into the structural, morphological, mechanical and thermal behaviour of bacterial cellulose after a two-step purification process. Bioresour Technol 102(19):9105–9110

  25. 25

    Yoon SH, Jin HJ, Kook MC, Pyun YR (2006) Electrically conductive bacterial cellulose by incorporation of carbon nanotubes. Biomacromol 7(4):1280–1284

  26. 26

    Heßler N, Klemm D (2009) Alteration of bacterial nanocellulose structure by in situ modification using polyethylene glycol and carbohydrate additives. Cellulose 16(5):899–910

  27. 27

    Illa MP, Sharma CS, Khandelwal M (2019) Tuning the physiochemical properties of bacterial cellulose: effect of drying conditions. J Mater Sci 54(18):12024–12035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03737-9

  28. 28

    Surma-Ślusarska B, Presler S, Danielewicz D (2008) Characteristics of bacterial cellulose obtained from acetobacter Xylinum culture for application in papermaking. Fibres Text East Eur 16(4):108–111

  29. 29

    Auta R, Adamus G, Kwiecien M, Radecka I, Hooley P (2017) Production and characterization of bacterial cellulose before and after enzymatic hydrolysis. Afr J Biotechnol 16(10):470–482

  30. 30

    León-Bermúdez AY, Salazar R (2008) Synthesis and characterization of the polystyrene - Asphaltene graft copolymer by FT-IR spectroscopy. CTyF Ciencia Technol Futur 3(4):157–167

  31. 31

    Jang BN, Wilkie CA (2005) The thermal degradation of polystyrene nanocomposite. Polym (Guildf) 46(9):2933–2942

  32. 32

    Kaniappan K, Latha S (2011) Certain investigations on the formulation and characterization of polystyrene/poly (methyl methacrylate) blends. Int J ChemTech Res 3(2):708–715

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Chandra S. Sharma and his laboratory for providing PS fabric.

Author information

Correspondence to Mudrika Khandelwal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anju, P.V., Khandelwal, M., Subahan, M.P. et al. In situ synthesized hydro-lipophilic nano and micro fibrous bacterial cellulose: polystyrene composites for tissue scaffolds. J Mater Sci (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04344-9

Download citation