Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 55, Issue 11, pp 4780–4791 | Cite as

Hierarchically porous carbon with pentagon defects as highly efficient catalyst for oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution reactions

  • Zhaowei Zeng
  • Lei Yi
  • Jianwei He
  • Qian Hu
  • Yucong Liao
  • Yadong WangEmail author
  • Wenbin LuoEmail author
  • Mu Pan
Energy materials
  • 105 Downloads

Abstract

Highly dispersed electrocatalysts and single-atom catalysts receive extensive attention in the field of multiple reactions involving water spitting, oxygen reduction, and CO2 reduction. Herein, we develop a Fe/N co-doped hierarchically structured porous carbon (Fe/N/C-DT) by the dual-templating approach, involving the incorporation of ferrocenecarboxaldehyde (Fc–CHO) into the polyimide, followed by carbonization at 900 °C and etching. A steric hindrance offered by the ferrocene and the porosity of the obtained nanostructure prevent the aggregation of Fe atoms, resulting in the maximization of catalytic efficiency of iron-based sites. FeCl2/N/C-DT and FeSO4/N/C-DT using FeCl2 and FeSO4 as iron sources, respectively, are prepared for comparison, to further confirm the potential positive effect of Fc–CHO and explore the synergistic effect of the pentagon defects and Fe–N4 on the catalytic performance in oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). The prepared Fe/N/C-DT exhibits outstanding electrochemical activity toward ORR (E1/2 = 0.902 V vs RHE) and impressive OER activity (Ej=10 = 1.66 V) in alkaline conditions. The rechargeable Zn–air battery using Fe/N/C-DT as a cathode catalyst shows a peak power density of 220 mW cm−2 and a high open–circuit voltage of 1.451 V in the all-solid-state Zn–air battery.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundations of China (No. 21473128) for financial assistance.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10853_2019_4327_MOESM1_ESM.docx (9 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 9214 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Seh ZW, Kibsgaard J, Dickens CF, Chorkendorff IB, Nørskov JK, Jaramillo TF (2017) Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: insights into materials design. Science 355:eaad4998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nørskov JK, Rossmeisl J, Logadottir A, Lindqvist LR, Kitchin JR, Bligaard T, Jonsson H (2004) Origin of the overpotential for oxygen reduction at a fuel-cell cathode. J Phys Chem B 108:17886–17892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen YN, Guo Y, Cui H, Xie Z, Zhang X, Wei J, Zhou Z (2018) Bifunctional electrocatalysts of MOF-derived Co–N/C on bamboo-like MnO nanowires for high-performance liquid-and solid-state Zn–air batteries. J Mater Chem A 6:9716–9722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang R, He S, Lu Y, Chen W (2015) Fe Co, N-functionalized carbon nanotubes in situ grown on 3D porous N-doped carbon foams as a noble metal-free catalyst for oxygen reduction. J Mater Chem A 3:3559–3567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yi JD, Xu R, Wu Q, Zhang T, Zang KT, Luo J, Liang YL, Huang YB, Cao R (2018) Atomically dispersed iron–nitrogen active sites within porphyrinic triazine-based frameworks for oxygen reduction reaction in both alkaline and acidic media. ACS Energy Lett 3:883–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jiang WJ, Gu L, Li L, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Zhang LJ, Wang JQ, Hu JS, Wei Z, Wan LJ (2016) Understanding the high activity of Fe–N–C electrocatalysts in oxygen reduction: Fe/Fe3C nanoparticles boost the activity of Fe–Nx. J Am Chem Soc 138(10):3570–3578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hadidi L, Davari E, Ivey DG, Veinot JG (2017) Microwave-assisted synthesis and prototype oxygen reduction electrocatalyst application of N-doped carbon-coated Fe3O4 nanorods. Nanotechnology 28:095707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zitolo A, Goellner V, Armel V, Sougrati MT, Mineva T, Stievano L, Fonda E, Jaouen F (2015) Identification of catalytic sites for oxygen reduction in iron-and nitrogen-doped graphene materials. Nat Mater 14:937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li J, Ghoshal S, Liang W, Sougrati MT, Jaouen F, Halevi B, McKinney S, McCool G, Ma C, Yuan X, Ma ZF (2016) Structural and mechanistic basis for the high activity of Fe–N–C catalysts toward oxygen reduction. Energ Environ Sci 9:2418–2432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Su J, Ge R, Dong Y, Hao F, Chen L (2018) Recent progress in single-atom electrocatalysts: concept, synthesis, and applications in clean energy conversion. J Mater Chem A 6:14025–14042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mun Y, Kim MJ, Park SA, Lee E, Ye Y, Lee S, Kim YT, Kim S, Kim OH, Cho YH, Sung YE (2018) Soft-template synthesis of mesoporous non-precious metal catalyst with Fe–Nx/C active sites for oxygen reduction reaction in fuel cells. Appl catal B-Environ 222:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang Z, Sun J, Wang F, Dai L (2018) Efficient oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalysts based on single iron atoms dispersed on a hierarchically structured porous carbon framework. Angew Chem Int Edit 57:9038–9043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chung HT, Cullen DA, Higgins D, Sneed BT, Holby EF, More KL, Zelenay P (2017) Direct atomic-level insight into the active sites of a high-performance PGM-free ORR catalyst. Science 357:479–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hou J, Cao C, Idrees F, Ma X (2015) Hierarchical porous nitrogen-doped carbon nanosheets derived from silk for ultrahigh-capacity battery anodes and supercapacitors. ACS Nano 9:2556–2564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang C, Kong R, Wang X, Xu Y, Wang F, Ren W, Wang Y, Su F, Jiang JX (2017) Porous carbons derived from hypercrosslinked porous polymers for gas adsorption and energy storage. Carbon 114:608–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rehman S, Guo S, Hou Y (2016) Rational design of Si/SiO2@ hierarchical porous carbon spheres as efficient polysulfide reservoirs for high-performance Li–S battery. Adv Mater 28:3167–3172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peng Y, Lu B, Chen S (2018) Carbon-supported single atom catalysts for electrochemical energy conversion and storage. Adv Mater 30:1801995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jackson C, Smith GT, Inwood DW, Leach AS, Whalley PS, Callisti M, Polcar T, Russell AE, Levecque P, Kramer D (2017) Electronic metal-support interaction enhanced oxygen reduction activity and stability of boron carbide supported platinum. Nat Commun 8:15802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen HK (2001) Kinetic study on the carbothermic reduction of zinc oxide. Scand J Metall 30:292–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Proietti E, Jaouen F, Lefèvre M, Larouche N, Tian J, Herranz J, Dodelet JP (2011) Iron-based cathode catalyst with enhanced power density in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Nat Commun 2:416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shui J, Chen C, Grabstanowicz L, Zhao D, Liu DJ (2015) Highly efficient nonprecious metal catalyst prepared with metal–organic framework in a continuous carbon nanofibrous network. P Natl Acad Sci 112:10629–10634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang C, Chen W, Xia K, Xie N, Wang H, Zhang Y (2019) Silk-derived 2D porous carbon nanosheets with atomically-dispersed Fe–Nx–C sites for highly efficient oxygen reaction catalysts. Small 15:1804966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Razmjooei F, Singh KP, Bae EJ, Yu JS (2015) A new class of electroactive Fe-and P-functionalized graphene for oxygen reduction. J Mater Chem A. 3:11031–11039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Du C, Liu X, Ye G, Gao X, Zhuang Z, Li P, Xiang D, Li X, Clayborne AZ, Zhou X, Chen W (2019) Balancing the micro- mesoporosity for activity maximization of N-doped carbonaceous electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. Chemsuschem 12:1017–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang J, Zhao Z, Xia Z, Dai L (2015) A metal-free bifunctional electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution reactions. Nat Nanotechnol 10:444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhang R, Zhang C, Chen W (2016) FeP embedded in N, P dual-doped porous carbon nanosheets: an efficient and durable bifunctional catalyst for oxygen reduction and evolution reactions. J Mater Chem A 4:18723–18729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang YC, Lai YJ, Song L, Zhou ZY, Liu JG, Wang Q, Yang XD, Chen C, Shi W, Zheng YP, Rauf M (2015) S-doping of an Fe/N/C ORR catalyst for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells with high power density. Angew Chem Int Edit 54:9907–9910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhu J, Huang Y, Mei W, Zhao C, Zhang C, Zhang J, Amiinu IS, Mu S (2019) Effects of intrinsic pentagon defects on electrochemical reactivity of carbon nanomaterials. Angew Chem 131:3899–38904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Astruc D (2017) Why is ferrocene so exceptional? Eur J Inorg Chem 2017(1):6–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gu J, Du Z, Zhang C, Yang S (2016) Pyridinic nitrogen-enriched carbon nanogears with thin teeth for superior lithium storage. Adv Energy Mater 6:1600917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhou B, Liu L, Cai P, Zeng G, Li X, Wen Z, Chen L (2017) Ferrocene-based porous organic polymer derived high-performance electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction. J Mater Chem A 5:22163–22169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jin H, Zhou H, Li W, Wang Z, Yang J, Xiong Y, He D, Chen L, Mu S (2018) In situ derived Fe/N/S-codoped carbon nanotubes from ZIF-8 crystals as efficient electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction and zinc–air batteries. J Mater Chem A. 6:20093–20099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liu Y, Huang B, Zhang X, Huang X, Xie Z (2019) In-situ fabrication of nitrogen-doped carbon nanosheets containing highly dispersed single iron atoms for oxygen reduction reaction. J Power Sources 412:125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jaroniec M, Solovyov LA (2006) Improvement of the Kruk–Jaroniec–Sayari method for pore size analysis of ordered silicas with cylindrical mesopores. Langmuir 22:6757–6760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Guo D, Shibuya R, Akiba C, Saji S, Kondo T, Nakamura J (2016) Active sites of nitrogen-doped carbon materials for oxygen reduction reaction clarified using model catalysts. Science 351:361–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Xiang D, Bo X, Gao X, Zhang C, Du C, Zheng F, Zhuang Z, Li P, Zhu L, Chen W (2019) Novel one-step synthesis of core@ shell iron–nickel alloy nanoparticles coated by carbon layers for efficient oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysis. J Power Sources 438:226988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lee CH, Lee J, Yeo S, Lee SH, Kim T, Cha HG, Eun Y, Park HJ, Kim SM, Lee KH (2017) Evolution of implanted Fe ions in SiO2/Si wafer into uniformly sized catalyst particles for carbon nanotube forest growth. Carbon 123:122–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Li W, Liang C, Qiu J, Zhou W, Han H, Wei Z, Sun G, Xin Q (2002) Carbon nanotubes as support for cathode catalyst of a direct methanol fuel cell. Carbon 40:787–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cao R, Thapa R, Kim H, Xu X, Kim MG, Li Q, Park N, Liu M, Cho J (2013) Promotion of oxygen reduction by a bio-inspired tethered iron phthalocyanine carbon nanotube-based catalyst. Nat Commun 4:2076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Szakacs CE, Lefèvre M, Kramm UI, Dodelet JP, Vidal F (2014) A density functional theory study of catalytic sites for oxygen reduction in Fe/N/C catalysts used in H2/O2 fuel cells. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:13654–13661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wang XR, Liu JY, Liu ZW, Wang WC, Luo J, Han XP, Du XW, Qiao SZ, Yang J (2018) Identifying the key role of pyridinic-N–Co bonding in synergistic electrocatalysis for reversible ORR/OER. Adv Mater 30:1800005CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and ProcessingWuhan University of TechnologyWuhanChina
  2. 2.College of Materials Science and EngineeringChangsha University of Science and TechnologyChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations