Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 55, Issue 10, pp 4420–4436 | Cite as

Effect of hydration on mechanical characteristics of pangolin scales

  • Teng Zhou
  • Zhen-bing CaiEmail author
  • Zheng-yang Li
  • Wen YueEmail author
  • Wei Li
  • Jing Zheng
Materials for life sciences
  • 138 Downloads

Abstract

As a typical keratinous material, the mechanical properties of pangolin scales are affected by hydration. Clarifying the mechanism of influence of hydration on dynamic response of materials may provide valuable inspiration for bio-inspired design. In this study, mechanical properties and impact wear behaviors of pangolin scales from different hydrated levels were investigated on a low-velocity impact wear tester. The dynamic response and damage behavior of these pangolin scales were systematically analyzed. Results showed that the energy absorption and impact contact force were considerably distinct with different hydrated levels. The maximum values of the impact contact force are similar to each other in various impact cycles. However, the damage extent of scales was not the same in varied impact cycles. Impact worn scars size of scales increased as the impact cycles increased. Under varied hydrated levels, energy absorption initially decreased and then increased with the increase in moisture content. Specifically, for a hydrated level of 10.5%, the energy absorption had the lowest rate, down to 26.6%, and the impact force decreased. Finally, the mechanisms and factors affecting the dynamic response and impact wear of scales were investigated. This study promoted a bio-inspired design for improving impact wear resistance properties.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Young Scientific Innovation Team of Science and Technology of Sichuan (No. 2017TD0017), Sichuan province University Scientific Research Innovation Team Project (No. 18TD0005), and Fundamental Research Funds for the central Universities (2018GF01).

Author contributions

ZBC and WY conceived the project. TZ, ZBC, and WY designed and performed the experiments. TZ, WL, and JZ performed sample characterization and data analysis. TZ prepared all the figures and wrote the main manuscript text. All authors contributed to the discussion of the data and reviewed the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Alibardi L, Toni M (2006) Cytochemical, biochemical and molecular aspects of the process of keratinization in the epidermis of reptilian scales. Prog Histochem Cytochem 40:73–134Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Toni M, Dalla VL, Alibardi L (2007) Hard (beta-) keratins in the epidermis of reptiles: composition, sequence, and molecular organization. J Proteome Res 6:3377–3392Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Currey JD (2010) Mechanical properties and adaptations of some less familiar bony tissues. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 3:357–372Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chintapalli RK, Mirkhalaf M, Dastjerdi AK, Barthelat F (2014) Fabrication, testing and modeling of a new flexible armor inspired from natural fish scales and osteoderms. Bioinspiration Biomim 9(3):036005Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen PY, McKittrick J, Meyers MA (2012) Biological materials: functional adaptations and bioinspired designs. Prog Mater Sci 57:1492–1704Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Meyers MA, McKittrick J, Chen PY (2013) Structural biological materials: critical mechanics-materials connections. Science 339:773–779Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Taylor JRA, Patek SN (2010) Ritualized fighting and biological armor: the impact mechanics of the mantis shrimp’s telson. J Exp Biol 213:3496–3504Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang HY, Wang Y, Vasilescu S, Gu ZB, Sun T (2017) Bio-inspired enhancement of friction and adhesion at the polydimethylsiloxane-intestine interface and biocompatibility characterization. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 74:246–252Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liang Y, Zhao J, Wang L, Li FM (2008) The relationship between mechanical properties and crossed-lamellar structure of mollusk shells. Mater Sci Eng, A 483:309–312Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Achrai B, Wagner HD (2017) The turtle carapace as an optimized multi-scale biological composite armor—a review. J Mech Behav Biomed 73:50–67Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yang W et al (2013) Natural flexible dermal armor. Adv Mater 25:31–48Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weaver JC, Milliron GW, Miserez A, Evans-Lutterodt K, Herrera S, Gallana I et al (2012) The stomatopod dactyl club: a formidable damage-tolerant biological hammer. Science 336(6086):1275–1280Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Achrai B, Baron B, Wagner HD (2015) Biological armors under impact—effect of keratin coating, and synthetic bio-inspired analogues. Bioinspiration Biomim 10(1):016009Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yaraghi NA, Trikanad AA, Restrepo D, Huang W, Rivera J, Herrera S, Zhernenkov M, Parkinson DY, Caldwell RL, Zavattieri PD, Kisailus D (2019) The stomatopod telson: convergent evolution in the development of a biological shield. Adv Funct Mater 29(34):1902238Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mckittrick J, Chen PY, Bodde SG, Yang W, Novitskaya EE, Meyers MA (2012) The structure, functions, and mechanical properties of keratin. JOM 64(4):449–468Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Herrmann H, Aebi U (2004) Intermediate filaments: molecular structure, assembly mechanism, and integration into functionally distinct intracellular scaffolds. Annu Rev Biochem 73(1):749–789Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wortmann F (2009) The structure and properties of wool and hair fibres. Handb Text Fibre Struct 2:108–145Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huang W, Yaraghi NA, Yang W, Velazquez-Olivera A, Li Z, Ritchie RO, Kisailus D, Stover SM, McKittrick J (2019) A natural energy absorbent polymer composite: the equine hoof wall. Acta Biomater 90:267–277Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fraser RDB, Macrae TP, Rogers GEA (1973) Keratin—their composition, structure and biosynthesis. Q Rev Biol 48:378–379Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Feughelman M, Robinson MS (1967) The relationship between some mechanical properties of single wool fibers and relative humidity. Text Res J 37(6):441–446Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang DS et al (2007) A method for characterizing the mechanical behaviour of hoof horn. J Mater Sci 42:1108–1115.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0614-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Spearman RIC (1967) On the nature of the horny scales of the pangolin. J Linn Soc (Zool) 46:267–273Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tong J, Ma YH, Ren LQ, Li JQ (2000) Tribological characteristics of pangolin scales in dry sliding. J Mater Sci Lett 19:569–572Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tong J et al (2007) Two-body abrasive wear of the surfaces of pangolin scales. J Bionic Eng 4:77–84Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liu ZQ, Jiao D, Weng ZY, Zhang ZF (2015) Structure and mechanical behaviors of protective armored pangolin scales and effects of hydration and orientation. J Mech Behav Biomed 56:165–174Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liu ZQ, Jiao D, Weng ZY, Zhang ZF (2015) Water-assisted self-healing and property recovery in a natural dermal armor of pangolin scales. J Mech Behav Biomed 56:14–22Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang B, Yang W, Sherman VR et al (2016) Pangolin armor: overlapping, structure, and mechanical properties of the keratinous scales. Acta Biomater 41:60–74Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Christiansen P, Wroe S (2007) Bite forces and evolutionary adaptations to feeding ecology in carnivores. Ecology 88(2):347–358Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yu B, Yi W, Zhao H (2017) Experimental study on the maximum impact force by rock fall. Landslides 10:1–10Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sun N, Shan H, Zhou H, Chen D, Li X, Xia W et al (2012) Friction and wear behaviors of compacted graphite iron with different biomimetic units fabricated by laser cladding. Appl Surf Sci 258(19):7699–7706Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Barth A (2002) What vibrations tell us about proteins. Q Rev Biophys 35(4):369–430Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Spearman RIC (1966) The keratinization of epidermal scales, feathers and hairs. Biol Rev 41(1):59–95Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hiew SH, Guerette PA, Zvarec OJ et al (2016) Modular peptides from the thermoplastic squid sucker ring teeth form amyloid-like cross-β, supramolecular networks. Acta Biomater 46:41–54Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lewis DM, Rippon JA (2013) The coloration of wool and other keratin fibres (Lewis/The Coloration). In: Millington KR (ed) Bleaching and whitening of wool: photostability of whites. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 131–155.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118625118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kong J, Yu S (2007) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic analysis of protein secondary structures. Acta Biochem Biophem Sin 39(8):549–559Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tong J, Ren LQ, Chen BC (1995) Chemical constitution and abrasive wear behaviour of pangolin scales. J Mater Sci Lett 14(20):1468–1470Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ping ZH, Nguyen QT, Chen SM, Zhou JQ, Ding YD (2001) States of water in different hydrophilic polymers-DSC and FTIR studies. Polymer 42:8461–8467Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhang X, Cai ZB, Li W et al (2017) Understanding hydration effects on mechanical and impacting properties of turtle shell. J Mech Behav Biomed 78:116–123Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Xiao X, Zhou H, Qian K (2017) Mechanism study of biopolymer hair as a coupled thermo-water responsive smart material. Smart Mater Struct 26(3):035023Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Busson B, Briki F, Doucet J (1999) Side-chains configurations in coiled coils revealed by the 515-Å meridional reflection on hard α-keratin X-ray diffraction patterns. J Struct Biol 125(1):1–10Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kasapi MA, Gosline JM (1996) Strain-rate-dependent mechanical properties of the equine hoof wall. J Exp Biol 199(Pt 5):1133–1146Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wortmann FJ, Zahn H (1994) The stress/strain curve of alpha-keratin fibers and the structure of the intermediate filament. Text Res J 64(12):737–743Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Taylor AM, Bonser RHC, Farrent JW (2004) The influence of hydration on the tensile and compressive properties of avian keratinous tissues. J Mater Sci 39(3):939–942.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000012925.92504.08 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Farran L, Ennos AR, Eichhorn SJ (2008) The effect of humidity on the fracture properties of human fingernails. J Exp Biol 211(23):3677–3681Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tombolato L, Novitskaya EE, Chen PY et al (2010) Microstructure, elastic properties and deformation mechanisms of horn keratin. Acta Biomater 6(2):319–330Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Feughelman M (ed) (1997) Mechanical properties and structure of alpha-keratin fibers, wool, human hair and related fibers. UNSW Press, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Liu ZQ, Jiao D, Meyers MA, Zhang ZF (2015) Structure and mechanical properties of naturally occurring lightweight foam-filled cylinder—the peacock’s tail coverts shaft and its components. Acta Biomater 17:137–151Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wang B, Yang W, Mckittrick J et al (2015) Keratin: structure, mechanical properties, occurrence in biological organisms, and efforts at bioinspiration. Prog Mater Sci 76:229–318Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bertram JEA, Gosline JM (1987) Functional design of horse hoof keratin: the modulation of mechanical properties through hydration effects. J Exp Biol 130(130):121–136Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Fraser RD, Macrae TP (1980) Molecular structure and mechanical properties of keratins. Symp Soc Exp Biol 34(34):211–246Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Li B et al (2010) Experimental study on the mechanical properties of the horn sheaths from cattle. J Exp Biol 213:479–486Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tribology Research Institute, Key Lab of Advanced Technologies of MaterialsSouthwest Jiaotong UniversityChengduPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of Engineering and TechnologyChina University of Geosciences (Beijing)BeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations