Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 55, Issue 10, pp 4504–4523 | Cite as

Maturation process of natural resins recorded in their thermal properties

  • Joanna PagaczEmail author
  • Beata Naglik
  • Paweł Stach
  • Przemysław Drzewicz
  • Lucyna Natkaniec-Nowak
Polymers & biopolymers
  • 91 Downloads

Abstract

The geothermal history of natural resins from different geographical locations was studied in terms of their age assessment and structure–properties relations. Thermal properties of resin samples were analyzed by thermogravimetry (TG) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), whereas infrared spectroscopy was used for analysis of the resins structure. Relative dependence between thermal parameters and degree of resin maturity was found. Glass transition process and thermal events during heating of raw materials were investigated by advanced stochastic-modulated DSC method, known as TOPEM®, that allowed to determine the “true” glass transition temperature in the first heating scan. It was observed that TG method is insufficient for the resin age assessment, although it was found that there is a certain correlation between the glass transition temperature, estimated by TOPEM® DSC, and resin age. The natural resins proved to be reactive and sensitive material under elevated temperatures up to 200 °C. Subsequent processes of evaporation, relaxation and curing without significant mass loss related to degradation were observed during heating of resin samples. The aging rate in natural resins has been assessed using the intensity of 1730 cm−1 and 1646 cm−1 band after deconvolution of IR spectra. It may be assumed that younger resins are characterized by relatively higher reactivity (higher number of C=C bonds) and lower oxidation level.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Research Grant No. 61.9012.1908.00.0 from AGH University of Science and Technology and the research Grant No. 61.9012.1908 from Polish Geological Institute-National Research Institute. Authors would also like to thank Dr. Daniel Fragiadakis, Naval Research Laboratory, USA, who develops and maintains the software Grafity (distributed free of charge at grafitylabs.com), which was used for our data analysis. Authors thanks Polymer Materials Laboratory from ŁUKASIEWICZ—Polish Center for Technology Development—for kind use of thermo-analytical equipment. Special thanks are directed to Anselm Krumbiegel for providing the resin samples that were collected by his father.

Author contributions

JP designed the experiments, prepared figures, interpreted the data and was responsible for original draft and final version preparation. BN, LN-N, PD and PS provided samples for analysis with their geological description and were responsible for review and editing the paper.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10853_2019_4302_MOESM1_ESM.doc (376 kb)
Fig. S1. IR spectra of selected natural resins after normalization and deconvolution (spectral range of 1900–1500 cm−1 at room temperature): a RU/S/3 and DE/B/28, b PL/GD/1 with ID/SJ/7 (DOC 376 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Ragazzi E, Roghi G, Giaretta A, Gianolla P (2003) Classification of amber based on thermal analysis. Thermochim Acta 404:43–54Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schmidt AR, Perrichot V, Svojtka M et al (2010) Cretaceous African life captured in amber. PNAS 107(16):7329–7334Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roghi G, Ragazzi E, Gianolla P (2006) Triassic amber of the southern Alps (Italy). Palaios 21:143–154Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ragazzi E, Schmidt AR (2011) Amber. In: Reitner J, Thiel V (eds) Encyclopedia of geobiology. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 24–36Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anderson K, Crelling JC (1996) Amber, resinite, and fossil resins, ACS symposium series. ACS, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anderson KB, Winans RE, Botto RE (1992) The nature and fate of natural resins in the geosphere—II. Identification, classification and nomenclature of resinites. Org Geochem 18(6):829–841Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anderson KB, Botto RE (1993) The nature and fate of natural resins in the geosphere—III., Org Geochem 20(7):1027–1038Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anderson KB (1994) The nature and fate of natural resins in the geosphere—IV. Middle and upper cretaceous amber from the Taimyr Peninsula, Syberia—evidence for a new form of polylabdanoid of resinite and revision of the classification of Class I resinites. Org Geochem 21(2):209–212Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wolfe AP, McKellar RC, Tappert R, Sodhi RNS, Muehlenbachs K (2016) Bitterfeld amber is not Baltic amber: three geochemical tests and further constraints on the botanical affinities of succinate. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 225:21–32Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nissenbaum A, Yaker D (1995) Stable isotope composition of amber. In: Anderson KB, Crelling JC (eds) Amber, resinite, and fossil resins. ACS, Washington, pp 32–42Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vávra N (2009) The chemistry of amber—facts, findings and opinions. Ann Naturhist Mus Wien 111(A):445–474Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhao J, McKenna GB (2014) The apparent activation energy and dynamic fragility of ancient Ambers. Polymer 55:2246–2253Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhao J, Ragazzi E, McKenna GB (2013) Something about amber: fictive temperature and glass transition temperature of extremely old glasses from copal to Triassic amber. Polymer 54:7041–7047Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jablonski P, Golloch A, Borchard W (1999) DSC-Measurements of amber and resin samples. Thermochim Acta 333:87–93Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anderson KB (1995) New evidence concerning the structure, composition and maturation of Class I (polylabdanoid) resinites. In: Anderson K, Crelling JC (eds) Amber, resinite and fossil resins, vol 617. American Chemical Society. Washington, DC, pp 105–129Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Remm KY (1976) Late Cretaceous biting midges (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae) from fossil resins of the Khatanga Depression. Paleontol J 3:344–351Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Poinar GO (1992) Life in amber. Stanford University Press, Stanford, p 368Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Azar D, Adaymeh C, Jreich N (2007) Paleopsychoda zherikhini, a new Cretaceous species of moth flies from Taimyr amber (Diptera: Psychodidae: Psychodinae). Afr Invertebr 48(1):163–168Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bogdasarow MA (2010) Amber and others fossil resins of Eurasia. BrSU A.S. Pushkin, Brest, p 263Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bechtel A, Chekryzhov IY, Nechaev VP, Kononov VV (2016) Hydrocarbon composition of Russian amber from the Voznovo lignite deposit and Sakhalin Island. Int J Coal Geol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2016.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wolfe AP, Tappert R, Muehlenbachs K, Boudreau M, McKellar RC, Basinger JF, Garrett A (2009) A new proposal concerning the botanical origin of Baltic amber. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol 276:3403–3412Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wimmer R, Rascher J, Krumbiegel G, Rappsilber I, Standke G (2009) Bitterfelder Bernstein-ein fossiles Harz und seine geologische Bedeutung. Geofokus (Geowiss.Mitt.) 38:6–15Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fuhrmann R (2008) Der Bitterfelder Bernstein—seine Herkunft und Genese. Mauritiana (Altenburg) 20:207–228Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Weitschat W (2008) Bitterfelder und Baltischer Bernstein aus Paläoklimatischer und Paläontologischer Sicht. In: Rascher J, Wimmer R, Krumbiegel G, Schmiedel S (eds) Bitterfelder Bernstein versus Baltischer Bernstein: Hypothesen, Fakten, Fragen. II. Bitterfelder BernsteinkolloquiumExkursionsführer der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften 236. Mecke Druck und Verlag, Duderstadt, pp 88–97Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yamamoto S, Otto A, Krumbiegel G, Simoneit BRT (2006) The natural product biomarkers in succinite, glessite and stantienite ambers from Bitterfeld, Germany. Rev Paleobot Palyno 140(1–2):27–49Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lambert JB, Levy AJ, Santiago-Blay JA, Wu Y (2013) Nuclear magnetic resonance characterization of Indonesian amber. Life Excit Biol 1:136–155Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brackman W, Spaargaren K, Van Dongen JPCM, Couperus PA, Bakker F (1984) Origin and structure of the fossil resin from an Indonesian Miocene coal. Geochim Cosmochim Ac 48:2483–2487Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Adiwidjaja P, Decoster GL (1973) Pre-tertiary paleotopography and related sedimentation in South Sumatra. Indonesian Petroleum Association Sec Ann Convent Proc, pp 89–103Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kosmowska-Ceranowicz B, Sachanbiński M, Łydżba-Kopczyńska B (2017) Analytical characterization of “Indonesian amber” deposits: evidence of formation from volcanic activity. Baltica 30:55–60Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Langenheim JH (2003) Plant resins. Chemistry, evolution, ecology, and ethnobotany. Cambridge, Portland, p 586Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Iturralde-Vinent MA (2001) Geology of the amber-bearing deposits of the Greater Antilles. Caribb J Sci 37:141–167Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    DuBois MB, LaPolla JS (1999) A preliminary review of Colombian ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) preserved in copal. Entomol News 110:162–172Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schawe JEK, Heter T, Hertz C, Alig I, Lellinger D (2006) Stochastic temperature modulation: a new technique in temperature-modulated DSC. Thermochim Acta 446:147–155Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pagacz J, Naglik B, Stach P, Natkaniec-Nowak L, Drzewicz P (2019) Preliminary thermal characterization of natural resins from different botanical sources and geological environments. J Therm Anal Calorim.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08157-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Naglik B, Kosmowska-Ceranowicz B, Natkaniec-Nowak L, Drzewicz P, Dumańska-Słowik M et al (2018) Fossilization History of Fossil Resin from Jambi Province (Sumatra, Indonesia) Based on Physico-Chemical Studies. Minerals.  https://doi.org/10.3390/min8030095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Winkler W, Kirchner ECh, Asenbaum A, Musso M (2001) A Raman spectroscopic approach to the maturation process of fossil resins. J Raman Spectrosc 32:59–63Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cebulak S, Matuszewska A, Langier-Kuźniarowa A (2003) Diversification of natural resins of various origin. Oxyreactive thermal analysis and infrared spectroscopy. J Thermal Anal Calorim 71:905–914Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hobel S et al (1969) Chapter 2. Heat of polymerization. J Macromol Sci Part C 3(2):339–356.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15583726908545927 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Montoro ÓR, Lobato Á, Baonza VG, Taravillo M (2018) Infrared spectroscopic study of the formation of fossil resin analogs with temperature using trans-communic acid as precursor. Microchem J 141:294–300Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cheng S, Friedman V, McKenna GB (2019) A calorimetry investigation of glass temperature and fragility of ancient ambers from Texas and Canada. J Non-Cryst Solid 521:119549Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kosmowska-Ceranowicz B, Wagner-Wysiecka E, Całka S (2012) Diagnostyczne pasma IRS po modyfikacji bursztynu. Pr Muz Ziemi 50:87–95Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Khanjian H, Schilling M, Maish J (2013) FTIR and Py-GC/MS investigation of archaeological amber objects from the J. Paul Getty Mus e-PS 10:66–70Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shashoua Y, Lund Degn Berthelsen M-B, Nielsen OF (2006) Raman and ATR-FTIR spectroscopies applied to the conservation of archaeological Baltic amber. J Raman Spectrosc 37:1221–1227Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Brody RH, Edwards HGM, Pollard AM (2001) A study of amber and copal samples using FT-Raman spectroscopy. Spectrochim Acta A 57:1325–1338Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Martín-Ramos P, Fernández-Coppel IA, Ruíz-Potosme NM, Martín-Gil J (2018) Potential of ATR-FTIR spectroscopy for the classification of natural resins. BEMS Rep 4(1):3–6.  https://doi.org/10.5530/bems.4.1.2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Derrick M (1989) Fourier transform infrared spectral analysis of natural resins used in furniture finishes. J Am Inst Conserv 28(1):43–56Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wagner-Wysiecka E, Szwedo J, Sontag E, Sobecka A, Czebreszuk J, Cwaliński M (eds) (2018) International symposium amber. Science and art. Gdańsk International Fair Co. (MTG SA), Gdańsk, p 127Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tumiłowicz P, Synoradzki L, Sobiecka A, Arct J, Pytkowska K, Safarzyński S (2016) Bioactivity of Baltic amber—fossil resin. Polimery.  https://doi.org/10.14314/polimery.2016.347 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Vávra N (2009) Amber, fossil resins, and copal—contributions to the terminology of fossil plant resins. Denisia 86:213–222Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kosmowska-Ceranowicz B, Krumbiegel G, Vávra N (1993) Glessit, ein tertiäres Harz von Angiospermen der Familie Burseraceae. Neues Jb Geol Paläontol Abh 187:299–324Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    McCoy VE, Boom A, Solórzano Kraemer MM, Gabbott SE (2017) The chemistry of American and African amber, copal, and resin from the genus Hymenaea. Org Geochem 113:43–54Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ŁUKASIEWICZ – Institute of Ceramics and Building Materials, Ceramic and Concrete Division in WarsawWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Polish Geological Institute – National Research InstituteSosnowiecPoland
  3. 3.The Faculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environmental Protection, The Department of Mineralogy, Petrography and GeochemistryAGH University of Science and TechnologyKrakówPoland
  4. 4.The Polish Geological Institute – National Research InstituteWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations