Advertisement

Nanocatalyst-induced hydroxyl radical (·OH) slurry for tungsten CMP for next-generation semiconductor processing

  • Maneesh Kumar Poddar
  • Heon-Yul Ryu
  • Nagendra Prasad Yerriboina
  • Yeon-Ah Jeong
  • Jung-Hwan Lee
  • Tae-Gon Kim
  • Jae-Hyun Kim
  • Jong-Dai Park
  • Min-Gun Lee
  • Chang-Yong Park
  • Seong-Jun Han
  • Jae-Gon Choi
  • Jin-Goo ParkEmail author
Electronic materials
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

Chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) is one of the important steps that involves during fabrication of semiconductor devices. This research highlights the importance of tungsten (W) polishing slurries consisting of a novel nonionic, heat-activated FeSi nanocatalyst on the performance of W chemical mechanical polishing. The results obtained from the polishing data showed a higher W removal rate of 5910 Å/min with a slurry consisting of FeSi nanocatalyst at a polishing temperature of 80 °C. The increase in W polishing rate using FeSi slurry was explained on the basis of formation of a thicker oxide layer (WO3) due to the interaction between the W surface and hydroxyl radicals (·OH) generated via the reaction between FeSi and hydrogen peroxide at 80 °C. Higher ·OH generation and increase in oxygen depth profile of W film were confirmed by UV–Vis spectrometer and AES analysis, respectively. Compared to Fe(NO3)3 catalyst, the slurry with FeSi showed a higher static etch rate at 80 °C. Potentiodynamic polarization results obtained using FeSi slurry showed thicker WO3 passivation layer as compared to the slurry with Fe(NO3)3. The increase in the polishing rate of W CMP using slurry with FeSi nanocatalyst can be essentially attributed to the generation of much stronger oxidant ·OH due to its increased catalytic effect at a high polishing temperature of 80 °C.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Lim G, Lee JH, Kim J, Lee HW, Hyun SH (2004) Effects of oxidants on the removal of tungsten in CMP process. Wear 257:863–868.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2004.02.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    van Kranenburg H, van Corbach HD, Woerlee PH, Lohmeier M (1997) W-CMP for sub-micron inverse metallisation. Microelectron Eng 33:241–248.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9317(96)00050-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chathapuram VS, Du T, Sundaram KB, Desai V (2003) Role of oxidizer in the chemical mechanical planarization of the Ti/TiN barrier layer. Microelectron Eng 65:478–488.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9317(03)00177-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Seo YA, Kim NH, Lee WS (2006) Chemical mechanical polishing and electrochemical characteristics of tungsten using mixed oxidizers with hydrogen peroxide and ferric nitrate. Mater Lett 60:1192–1197.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2005.10.113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oliver MR (2004) Chemical–mechanical planarization of semiconductor materials. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tamboli D, Seal S, Desai V, Maury A (1999) Studies on passivation behavior of tungsten in application to chemical mechanical polishing. J Vac Sci Technol A 17:1168–1173.  https://doi.org/10.1116/1.581790 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paul E (2001) Application of a CMP model to tungsten. J Electrochem Soc 148:359–363.  https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1372223 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Steigerwlald JM, Murarka SP, Gutmann RJ (1997) Chemical mechanical planarization of microelectronic materials. Wiley, New York, p 185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kang YJ, Prasad YN, Kim IK, Jung SJ, Park JG (2010) Synthesis of Fe metal precipitated colloidal silica and its application to W chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) slurry. J Colloid Sci Interfaces 349:402–407.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2010.04.083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li Y (2007) Microelectronic applications of chemical mechanical planarization. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bielmann M, Mahajan U, Singh RK, Shah DO, Palla BJ (1999) Enhanced tungsten chemical mechanical polishing using stable alumina slurries. Electrochem Solids State 2:148–150.  https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1390765 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kaufman FB, Thompson DB, Broadie RE, Jaso MA, Gutherie WL, Pearson DJ, Small MB (1991) Chemical–mechanical polishing for fabricating patterned W metal features as chip interconnects. J Electrochem Soc 138:3460–3465.  https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2085434 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang L, Raghavan S, Meikle S, Hudson G (1999) Inhibition of alumina deposition during tungsten chemical mechanical planarization through the use of citric acid. J Electrochem Sci 146:1442–1447.  https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1391783 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Coetsier CM, Testa F, Carretier E, Ennahali M, Laborie B, Mouton-Arnaud C, Fluchere O, Moulin P (2011) Static dissolution rate of tungsten film versus chemical adjustments of a reused slurry for chemical mechanical polishing. Appl Surf Sci 257:6163–6170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.02.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Seo J, Kim JH, Lee M, You K, Moon J, Lee DH, Paik U (2017) Multi-objective optimization of tungsten CMP slurry for advanced semiconductor manufacturing using a response surface methodology. Mater Des 117:131–138.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Seo YA, Lee WS (2005) Effects of different oxidizers on the W-CMP performance. Mater Sci Eng 118:281–284.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2004.12.064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lim JH, Park JH, Park JG (2013) Effect of iron(III) nitrate concentration on tungsten chemical–mechanical– planarization performance. Appl Surf Sci 282:512–517.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Park JD, Kim SY, Lee DH, Jun PK, Yi HJ, Lee YK, Chae SK (2009) Nonoxidative aqueous cleaning solutions for tungsten layers. J Electrochem Soc 156:H172–H175.  https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3054443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Park JD, Lim H, Choi M, Kong G, Kim H, Park J (2011) U.S. Patent 7887715B1Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hariharaputhiran M, Zhang J, Ramarajan S, Keleher JJ, Li Y, Babu SV (2000) Hydroxyl radical formation in H2O2-amino acid mixtures and chemical mechanical polishing of copper. J Electrochem Sci 147:3820–3826.  https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1393979 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kwon BG, Ryu S, Yoon J (2009) Determination of hydroxyl radical rate constants in a continuous flow system using competition kinetics. J Ind Eng Chem 15:809–812.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2009.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Baer DR, Engelhard MH, Lea S, Nachimuthu P, Droubay T, Kim JJ, Lee B, Mathews C, Opila RL, Saraf LV, Stickle WF, Wallace R, Wright BS (2010) Comparison of the sputter rates of oxide films relative to the sputter rate of SiO2. J Vac Sci Technol A 28:1060–1072.  https://doi.org/10.1116/1.3456123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stojadinovic J, Bouvet D, Declercq M, Mischler S (2009) Effect of electrode potential on the tribocorrosion of tungsten. Tribol Int 42:575–583.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2008.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jeong YA, Poddar MK, Ryu HY, Yerriboina NP, Park JG et al (2019) Investigation of particle agglomeration with in situ generation of oxygen bubble during the tungsten chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) process. Microelectron Eng 218:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2019.111133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gligorovski S, Strekowski R, Barbati S, Vione D (2015) Environmental implications of hydroxyl radicals (·OH). Chem Rev 115:13051–13092.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500310b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sugawara H, Toma Y, Takabe T, Yokoi K (1988) U.S. Pat. 4,756,845Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kissa E, Dohner JM, Gilbson WR, Strickman D (1991) Kinetics of staining and bleaching. J Am Oil Chem Soc 68:532–538.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663830 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bishop DF, Stern G, Fleischman M, Marshall LS (1968) Hydrogen peroxide catalytic oxidation of refractory organics in municipal waste waters. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev 7:110–117.  https://doi.org/10.1021/i260025a022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yang W, Zhao G, Zhang M, Congleton J (1992) An AES investigation of the surface films formed on stress corrosion test specimens of type 304 stainless steel in high temperature water. Corros Sci 33:89–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938X(92)90019-Y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stein DJ, Hetherington D, Guilinger T, Cecchi JL (1998) In situ electrochemical investigation of tungsten electrochemical behavior during chemical mechanical polishing. J Electrochem Sci 145:3190–3196.  https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1838785 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and Chemical EngineeringHanyang University ERICAAnsanRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Chemical EngineeringNational Institute of Technology Karnataka, SurathkalMangaloreIndia
  3. 3.Department of Bio-Nano Technology, EngineeringHanyang University ERICAAnsanRepublic of Korea
  4. 4.Department of Smart Convergence EngineeringHanyang University ERICAAnsanRepublic of Korea
  5. 5.Dongjin Semichem Co. Ltd.Hwaseong-siRepublic of Korea
  6. 6.SK HynixIcheonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations