Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 55, Issue 7, pp 2846–2859 | Cite as

Development of superhydrophobic, self-cleaning, and flame-resistant DLC/TiO2 melamine sponge for application in oil–water separation

  • Roberta G. ToroEmail author
  • Pietro Calandra
  • Fulvio Federici
  • Tilde de Caro
  • Alessio Mezzi
  • Barbara Cortese
  • Anna Lucia Pellegrino
  • Graziella Malandrino
  • Daniela Caschera
Composites & nanocomposites
  • 47 Downloads

Abstract

Increasing awareness of environmental concerns has strongly pushed the scientific community towards the search for new solutions for efficient removal of oils and organic solvents from water. Here, we report the preparation of multifunctional TiO2-coated melamine-formaldehyde (MF) sponges as absorbent material for oils and organic solvents in water. TiO2-coated MF sponges were fabricated through an environmentally friendly approach, consisting in a simple immersion of the sponge into an oleic acid-capped TiO2 nanoparticles dispersion. The adhesion of TiOle coating to the sponge was then improved by the deposition of a low surface energy diamond-like carbon (DLC) thin layer. Our results highlighted that the modified MF sponges possess superhydrophobic and oleophilic behaviour, inertness to corrosive environment, good durability and reusability. Furthermore, the superhydrophobic DLC/TiO2@sponges showed (1) novel self-cleaning properties towards an absorbed commercial organic dye (IR-270BKA, chosen as representative) under visible light irradiation and (2) enhanced flame-retardant behaviour respect to the pristine MF sponge. These findings point out an important added value of DLC/TiOle@sponges making them promising candidates for wastewater treatments.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Patrizia Cafarelli for BET measurements and Dr Bruno Brunetti for TG measurements. The activities have been partially performed in the framework of the Joint Bilateral Agreement CNR/NRC (Egypt), Biennial Programme 2018–2019, for the Project “Improvement of mechanical and harrier properties of biopolymer nano-composites for packaging applications”.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10853_2019_4211_MOESM1_ESM.docx (400 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 400 kb)
10853_2019_4211_MOESM2_ESM.mpg (2.7 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (MPG 2716 kb)
10853_2019_4211_MOESM3_ESM.mpg (3.7 mb)
Supplementary material 3 (MPG 3762 kb)
10853_2019_4211_MOESM4_ESM.mpg (4.6 mb)
Supplementary material 4 (MPG 4675 kb)
10853_2019_4211_MOESM5_ESM.mpg (3.7 mb)
Supplementary material 5 (MPG 3782 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Zhang J, Wu L, Zhang Y, Wang A (2015) Mussel and fish scale-inspired underwater superoleophobic kapok membranes for continuous and simultaneous removal of insoluble oils and soluble dyes in water. J Mater Chem A 3:18475–18482Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yang Y, Liu Z, Huang J, Wang C (2015) Multifuctional, robust sponges by a simple adsorption combustion method. J Mater Chem A 3:5875–5881Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yang Y, Deng Y, Tong Z, Wang C (2014) Multifunctional foam derived from poly(melamine formaldehyde) as recyclable oil absorbent. J Mater Chem A 2:9994–9999Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zang L, Bu Z, Sun L, Zhang Y (2016) Hollow carbon fiber sponges from crude catkins: an ultralow cost absorbent for oils and organic solvents. RSC Adv 6:48715–48719Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stolz A, Le Floch S, Reinert L, Ramos SMM, Tuaillon-Combes J, Soneda Y, Chaudet P, Baillis D, Blanchard N, Duclaux L, San-Miguel A (2016) Melamine-derived carbon sponges for oil water separation. Carbon 107:198–208Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cortese B, Piliego C, Viola I, D’Amone S, Cingolani R, Gigli G (2009) Engineering transfer of micro- and nanometer-scale features by surface energy modification. Langmuir 25:8377–8382Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pham VH, Dickerson JH (2014) SuperhydrophobicSilanized melamine sponge as high efficiency oil absorbent materials. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:14181–14188Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saha P, Dashairya L (2018) Reducedgraphene oxide modified melamine formaldehyde (rGO@MF) superhydrophobic sponge for efficient oil–water separation. J Porous Mater 25:1475–1488Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhou S, Hao G, Zhou X, Jiang W, Wang T, Zhang N, Yu L (2016) One-pot synthesis of robust superhydrophobic, functionalized graphene/polyurethane sponge for effective continuousoilwaterseparation. Chem Eng J 302:155–162Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu C, Yang J, Tang YC, Yin LT, Tang H, Li CS (2015) Versatile fabrication of the magnetic polymer-based graphene foam and applications for oil–water separation. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Aspects 468:10–16Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ruan C, Li KAX, Lu L (2014) A superhydrophobic sponge with excellent absorbency and flame retardancy. Angew Chemie 53:5556–5560Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yuan J, Liu X, Akbulut O, Hu J, Suib SL, Kong J, Stellacci F (2008) Superwetting nanowire membranes for selective absorption. Nat Nanotechnol 3:332–336Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Caschera D, Federici F, de Caro T, Cortese B, Calandra P, Lo Nigro R, Toro RG (2018) Fabrication of Eu-TiO2 NCs functionalized cotton textile as a multifunctional photocatalyst for dye pollutants degradation. Appl Surf Sci 42:781–791Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Caschera D, Cortese B, Mezzi A, Brucale M, Ingo GM, Gigli G, Padeletti G (2013) UltraHydrophobic/superhydrophilic modified cotton textiles through functionalized diamond-like carbon coatings for self-cleaning applications. Langmuir 29:2775–2783Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cortese B, Caschera D, Federici F, Ingo GM, Gigli G (2014) Superhydrophobic fabrics for oil–water separation through a diamond like carbon (DLC) coating. J Mater Chem A 2:6781–6789Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Melicchio A, Liguori PF, Russo B, Golemme G (2016) Strategy for the enhancement of H2 uptake in porous materials containing TiO2. Int J Hydrogen Energy 41:5733–5740Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lakhera SK, Hafeez HY, Veluswamy P, Ganesh V, Khan A, Ikeda H, Neppolian B (2018) Enhanced photocatalytic degradation and hydrogen production activity of in situ grown TiO2 coupled NiTiO3 nanocomposites. Appl Surf Sci 449:790–798Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Calandra P, Ruggirello A, Pistone A, TurcoLiveri V (2010) Structural and optical properties of novel surfactant coated tio2-ag based nanoparticles. J Clust Sci 21:767–778Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fazio E, Calandra P, TurcoLiveri V, Santo N, Trusso S (2011) Synthesis and physico-chemical characterization of Au/TiO2 nanostructures formed by novel “cold” and “hot” nanosoldering of Au and TiO2 nanoparticles dispersed in water. Coll Surf A 392:171–177Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cozzoli PD, Kornowski A, Weller H (2003) Low-temperature synthesis of soluble and processable organic-capped anatase TiO2 nanorods. J Am Chem Soc 125:14539–14548Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Toro RG, Caschera D, Palama IE, D’Amone S, Biasucci M, Federici F, Gigli G, Cortese B (2015) Unconventional tailorable patterning by solvent-assisted surface-tension-driven lithography. J Coll Interf Sci 446:44–52Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Caschera D, Cossari P, Federici F, Kaciulis S, Mezzi A, Padeletti G, Trucchi D (2011) Influence of PE-CVD parameters on the properties of diamond-like carbon films. Thin Solid Films 519:4087–4091Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Toro RG, Calandra P, Cortese B, de Caro T, Brucale M, Mezzi A, Federici F, Caschera D (2017) Argon and hydrogen plasma influence on the protective properties of diamond-like carbon films as barrier coating. Surf Interfaces 6:60–71Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Caschera D, Mezzi A, Cerri L, De Caro T, Riccucci C, Biasiucci M, Ingo GM, Padeletti G, Gigli G, Cortese B (2014) Effects of plasma treatments for improving extreme wettability of cotton fabrics. Cellulose 21:741–756Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Faraldi F, Angelini E, Riccucci C, Mezzi A, Caschera D, Grassini S (2014) Innovative diamond-like carbon coatings for the conservation of bronzes. Surf Interface Anal 46:764–777Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Faraldi F, Cortese B, Caschera D, Di Carlo G, Riccucci C, De Caro T, Ingo G (2017) Smart conservation methodology for the preservation of copper-based objects against the hazardous corrosion. Thin Solid Films 622:130–135Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gaan S, Sun G (2007) Effect of phosphorus flame retardants on thermo-oxidative decomposition of cotton. Polym Degrad Stabil 92:968–974Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Faraldi F, Angelini E, Caschera D, Mezzi A, Riccucci C, De Caro T (2014) Diamond-like carbon coatings for the protection of metallic artefacts: effect on the aesthetic appearance. Appl Phys A 114:663–671Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Casiraghi C, Ferrari AC, Robertson J (2005) Raman spectroscopy of hydrogenated amorphous carbons. Phy Rev B 72:085401(1)–085401(14)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ohsaka T, Izumi F, Fujiki Y (1978) Raman spectrum of anatase, TiO2. J. RamanSpectrosc 7:321–324Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Catalano MR, Lo Nigro R, Toro RG, Giddio C, Malandrino G, Raineri V, Fragalà IL (2010) Metal-organic chemical vapour deposition of Nd2/3 Cu3Ti4O12 films. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 8:012019(1)–012019(4)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Barthlott W, Neinhuis C (1997) Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta 202:1–8Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Quéré D (2002) Fakir, droplets. Nat Maters 1:14–15Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lim Y, Chul Cha M, Chang JY (2015) Compressible and monolithic microporous polymer sponges prepared via one-pot synthesis. Sci Rep 5:15957(1)–15957(11)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shuai Q, Yang X, Luo Y, Tang H, Luo X, Tan Y, Ma M (2015) A superhydrophobic poly(dimethylsiloxane)-TiO2 coated polyurethane sponge for selective absorption of oil from water. Mater Chem Phys 162:94–99Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gao X, Wang X, Ouyang X, Wen C (2016) Flexible superhydrophobic and superoleophilic MoS2 sponge for highly efficient oil–water separation. Sci Rep 6:27207(1)–27207(8)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wan Z, Liu Y, Chen S, Song K, Yu P, Zhao N, Ouyang X, Wang X (2018) Facile fabrication of a highly durable and flexible MoS2@RTV sponge for efficient oil–water separation. Coll Surf A 546:237–243Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wu D, Yu Z, Wu W, Fang L, Zhu H (2014) Continuous oil–water separation with surface modified sponge for cleanup of oil spills. RSC Adv 4:53514–53519Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kim DH, Jung MC, Cho S-H, Kim SH, Kim H-Y, Lee HJ, Oh KH, Moon M-W (2015) UV-responsive nano-sponge for oil absorption and desorption. Sci Rep 5:12908(1)–12908(12)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wu D, Wu W, Yu Z, Zhang C, Zhu H (2014) Facile preparation and characterization of modified polyurethane sponge for oil absorption. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:20139–20144Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cho E-C, Chang-Jia C-W, Hsiao Y-S, Lee K-C, Huang J-H (2016) Interfacial engineering of melamine sponges using hydrophobic TiO2 nanoparticles for effective oil/water separation. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 67:476–483Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Thi Tran V-H, Lee B-K (2017) Novel fabrication of a robust superhydrophobic PU@ZnO@Fe3O4@SA sponge and its application in oil–water separations. Sci Rep 7:17520(1)–17520(12)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhu Q, Pan Q (2014) Mussel-inspired direct immobilization of nanoparticles and application for oil–water separation. ACS Nano 8:1402–1409Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wu L, Li L, Li B, Zhang J, Wang A (2015) Magnetic, durable, and superhydrophobic polyurethane@Fe3O4@SiO2@fluoropolymer sponges for selective oil absorption and oil/water separation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:4936–4946Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zhu Q, Pan Q, Liu F (2011) Facile removal and collection of oils from water surfaces through superhydrophobic and superoleophilic sponges. J phys Chem C 115:17464–17470Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zhang W, Zhai X, Xiang T, Zhou M, Zang D, Gao Z, Wang C (2017) Superhydrophobic melamine sponge with excellent surface selectivity and fire retardancy for oil absorption. J Mater Sci 53:73–85.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0235-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    ASTM Test Method D1533Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ganesh R, Boadrmann GD, Michelssen D (1994) Fate of azo dyes in sludges. Water Res 28:1367–1376Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zhu C, Wang L, Kong L, Yang X, Wang L, Zheng S, Chen F, MaiZhi F, Zong H (2000) Photocatalytic degradation of AZO dyes by supported TiO2 + UV in aqueous solution. Chemosphere 41:303–309Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Khataee AR, Kasiri MB (2010) Photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes in the presence of nanostructured titanium dioxide: influence of the chemical structure of dyes. J Mol Cat A 328:8–26Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Neppolian B, Choi HC, Sakthivel S, Arabindoo B, Murugesan V (2002) Solar/UV-induced photocatalytic degradation of three commercial textile dyes. J Hazard Mater 89:303–317Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Neppolian B, Choi HC, Sakthivel S, Arabindoo B, Murugesan V (2002) Solar light induced and TiO2 assisted degradation of textile dye reactive blue 4. Chemosphere 46:1173–1181Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Caschera D, Toro RG, Federici F, Riccucci C, Ingo GM, Gigli G, Cortese B (2015) Flame retardant properties of plasma pre-treated/diamond-like carbon (DLC) coated cotton fabrics. Cellulose 22:2797–2809Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CNR-ISMN, Area della Ricerca Roma 1Monterotondo Scalo, RomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of Physics, CNR-Nanotec, Istituto di NanotecnologiaUniversity SapienzaRomeItaly
  3. 3.Dipartimento di Scienze ChimicheUniversità di Catania and INSTM UdR di CataniaCataniaItaly

Personalised recommendations