Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 55, Issue 6, pp 2321–2332 | Cite as

Selective removal of CO from hydrocarbon-rich industrial off-gases over CeO2-supported metal oxides

  • Wenwen Yu
  • Qi Zhou
  • Hongkui Wang
  • Yanchun Liu
  • Wenling ChuEmail author
  • Rui CaiEmail author
  • Weishen Yang
Chemical routes to materials
  • 70 Downloads

Abstract

For the selective removal of CO in the off-gas streams from real-life chemical processes, the interfacial interaction between the support and the active metal oxides and the role of active oxygen species are two fascinating problems. Herein, a series of CeO2-supported metal oxide catalysts were synthesized by co-precipitation method and employed for the selective removal of CO from the off-gas stream of propane oxidation process. CuO/CeO2 catalyst exhibits full CO conversion and 100% selectivity for CO removal in off-gas stream within a rather wide temperature window of 140–190 °C, being relatively stable in 200-h long-term time-on-stream experiment. Raman spectra, H2-TPR, CO-TPD and XPS spectra studies revealed that the redox properties and the concentration of active oxygen species varied with supported metal oxide compositions, for which CuO/CeO2 catalyst exhibited the highest surface oxygen vacancy concentration, good low-temperature reduction behavior and the highest adsorption capacity of CO, thus resulting in advanced CO removal performance. This study presents a strategy to design a promising CeO2-supported catalyst for oxidation removal of CO from off-gas of alkane oxidation process.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the support of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21673227). And this work was also supported by the Dalian Science & Technology Innovation Fund (No. 2018J11CY015).

Author Contributions

Wenling Chu supervised the experiments and reviewed the manuscript. Rui Cai provided the idea of CO removal from off-gas of alkane oxidation and reviewed the manuscript. Wenwen Yu carried out most of the experiments, including the preparation of catalysts and CO removal reaciton. Qi Zhou carried out most of the experiment and characterization suggested by the reviewers. HongKui Wang set up the apparatus of CO removal reaction. Yanchun Liu helped the students to carried out the experiments and characterization. Weishen Yang is our group leader.

References

  1. 1.
    Heine C, Havecker M, Trunschke A et al (2015) The impact of steam on the electronic structure of the selective propane oxidation catalysts MoVTeNb oxide (orthorhombic M1 phase). Phys Chem Chem Phys 17:8983–8993Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stuyven B, Emmerich J, Eloy P et al (2014) Molybdenum-vanadium-antimony mixed oxide catalyst for isobutene partial oxidation synthesized using magneto hydrodynamic forces. Appl Catal A Gen 474:18–25Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dummer NF, Bartley JK, Hutchings GJ (2011) Vanadium phosphate materials as selective oxidation catalysts. Adv Catal 54:189–247Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alayoglu S, Nilekar AU, Mavrikakis M et al (2008) Ru–Pt core-shell nanoparticles for preferential oxidation of carbon monoxide in hydrogen. Nat Mater 7:333–338Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nilekar AU, Alayoglu S, Eichhorn B et al (2010) Preferential CO oxidation in hydrogen: reactivity of core-shell nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 132:7418–7428Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tueysuez H, Comotti M, Schuth F (2008) Ordered mesoporous of Co3O4 as highly active catalyst for low temperature CO-oxidation. Chem Commun 34:4022–4024Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Selvamani AK, Shanthi D, Santhanara C et al (2018) Effective removal of automobile exhausts over flower-like Ce1−xCuxO2 nanocatalysts exposed active 100 plane. J Rare Earths 36:603–612Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Okal J, Zawadzki M, Kraszkiewicz P et al (2018) Ru/CeO2 catalysts for combustion of mixture of light hydrocarbons: effect of preparation method and metal salt precursors. Appl Catal A Gen 549:161–169Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bera P, Gayen A, Hegde MS et al (2003) Promoting effect of CeO2 in combustion synthesized Pt/CeO2 catalyst for CO oxidation. J Phys Chem B 107:6122–6130Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nagai Y, Hirabayashi T, Dohmae K et al (2006) Sintering inhibition mechanism of platinum supported on ceria-based oxide and Pt-oxide-support interaction. J Catal 242:103–109Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oran U, Uner D (2004) Mechanisms of CO oxidation reaction and effect of chlorine ions on the CO oxidation reaction over Pt/CeO2 and Pt/CeO2/gamma-Al2O3 catalysts. Appl Catal B Environ 54:183–191Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oliviero L, Barbier J Jr., Labruquére S et al (1999) Role of the metal-support interface in the total oxidation of carboxylic acids over Ru/CeO2 catalysts. Catal Lett 60:15–19Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saqer SM, Kondarides DI, Verykios XE (2009) Catalytic activity of supported platinum and metal oxide catalysts for toluene oxidation. Top Catal 52:517–527Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu B, Li C, Zhang G et al (2018) Oxygen vacancy promoting dimethyl carbonate synthesis from CO2 and methanol over Zr-doped CeO2 nanorods. ACS Catal 8:10446–10456Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xu J, Lu G, Guo Y et al (2017) A highly effective catalyst of Co–CeO2 for the oxidation of diesel soot: the excellent NO oxidation activity and NOx storage capacity. Appl Catal A Gen 535:1–8Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Antonio CJ, Alicia C, Arturo Javier V et al (2015) Effect of Ce and Zr addition to Ni/SiO2 catalysts for hydrogen production through ethanol steam reforming. Catalysts 7:58–76Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Choi H, Kim J, Choung SJ et al (2017) Complete removal of carbon monoxide by functional nanoparticles for hydrogen fuel cell application. Chem Eng Sci 172:688–693Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang RG, Mutinda SI, Fang MH (2013) One-pot hydrothermal synthesis and high temperature thermal stability of CexZr1−xO2 nanocrystals. RSC Adv 3:19508–19514Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhou X, Ling J, Sun W et al (2017) Fabrication of homogeneously Cu2+/La3+-doped CeO2 nanosheets and their application in CO oxidation. J Mater Chem 5:9717–9722Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jiang J, Li L (2007) Synthesis of sphere-like Co3O4 nanocrystals via a simple polyol route. Mater Lett 61:4894–4896Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xu X, Li L, Huang J et al (2018) Engineering Ni3+ cations in NiO lattice at the atomic level by Li+ doping: the roles of Ni3+ and oxygen species for CO oxidation. ACS Catal 8:8033–8045Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Piumetti M, Bensaid S, Fino D et al (2016) Nanostructured ceria-zirconia catalysts for CO oxidation: study on surface properties and reactivity. Appl Catal B Environ 197:35–46Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li W, Hu Y, Jiang H et al (2019) Facile synthesis of multi-shelled hollow Cu–CeO2 microspheres with promoted catalytic performance for preferential oxidation of CO. Mater Chem Phys 226:158–168Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liyanage AD, Perera SD, Tan K et al (2014) Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic activity of Y-doped CeO2 nanorods. ACS Catal 4:577–584Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gao R, Zhang D, Maitarad P et al (2013) Morphology-dependent properties of MnOx/ZrO2 CeO2 nanostructures for the selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3. J Phys Chem C 117:10502–10511Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yen H, Seo Y, Kaliaguine S et al (2012) Tailored mesostructured copper/ceria catalysts with enhanced performance for preferential oxidation of CO at low temperature. Angew Chem Int Ed 51:12032–12035Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Luo M, Ma J, Lu J et al (2007) High-surface area CuO–CeO2 catalysts prepared by a surfactant-templated method for low-temperature CO oxidation. J Catal 246:52–59Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang X, Cheng X, Ma C et al (2018) Effects of the Fe/Ce ratio on the activity of CuO/CeO2–Fe2O3 catalysts for NO reduction by CO. Catal Sci Technol 8:3336–3345Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang F, Dai H, Deng J et al (2012) Manganese oxides with rod-, wire-, tube-, and flower-like morphologies: highly effective catalytst for the removal of toluene. Environ Sci Technol 46:4034–4041Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Deng J, Zhang L, Dai H et al (2010) Ultrasound-assisted nanocasting fabrication of ordered mesoporous MnO2 and Co3O4 with high surface areas and polycrystalline walls. J Phys Chem C 114:2694–2700Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schryer DR, Upchurch BT, Sidney BD et al (1991) A proposed mechanism for Pt/SnOx-catalyzed CO oxidation. J Catal 130:314–317Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wang F, Büchel R, Savitsky A et al (2016) In situ EPR study of the redox properties of CuO–CeO2 catalysts for preferential CO oxidation (PROX). ACS Catal 6:3520–3530Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Martinez-Arias A, Hungria AB, Munuera G et al (2006) Preferential oxidation of CO in rich H2 over CuO/CeO2: details of selectivity and deactivation under the reactant steam. Appl Catal B Environ 65:207–216Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yao S, Mudiyanselage K, Xu W et al (2014) Unraveling the dynamic nature of a CuO/CeO2 catalyst for CO oxidation in operando: a combined study of XANES (Fluorescence) and DRIFTS. ACS Catal 4:1650–1661Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhang X, Tian P, Tu W et al (2018) Tuning the dynamic interfacial structure of copper-ceria catalysts by indium oxide during CO oxidation. ACS Catal 8:5261–5275Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kocemba I, Rynkowski J, Gurgul J et al (2016) Nature of the active sites in CO oxidation on FeSiBEA zeolites. Appl Catal A Gen 519:16–26Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    He C, Yu Y, Yue L et al (2014) Low-temperature removal of toluene and propanal over highly active mesoporous CuCeOx catalysts synthesized via a simple self-precipitation protocol. Appl Catal B Environ 147:156–166Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bai B, Li J, Hao J (2015) 1D-MnO2, 2D-MnO2 and 3D-MnO2 for low-temperature oxidation of ethanol. Appl Catal B Environ 164:241–250Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jia A, Hu G, Meng L et al (2012) CO oxidation over CuO/Ce1−xCuxO2−δ catalysts: synergetic effects and kinetic study. J Catal 289:199–209Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Liu W, Sarofim AF, Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M (1994) Complete oxidation of carbon-monoxide and methane over metal-promoted fluorite oxide catalysts. Chem Eng Sci 49:4871–4888Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Neto RCR, Schmal M (2013) Synthesis of CeO2 and ZeZrO2 mixed oxide nanostructured catalysts for the iso-syntheses reaction. Appl Catal A Gen 450:131–142Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Fan J, Weng D, Wu X et al (2008) Modification of CeO2-ZrO2 mixed oxides by coprecipitated/impregnated Sr: effect on the microstructure and oxygen storage capacity. J Catal 258:177–186Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zheng Y, Li K, Wang H et al (2016) Structure dependence and reaction mechanism of CO oxidation: a model study on microporous CeO2 and CeO2–ZrO2 catalysts. J Catal 344:365–377Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Catalysis, Dalian Institute of Chemical PhysicsChinese Academy of ScienceDalian, LiaoningChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Mudanjiang Normal UniversityMudanjiangChina

Personalised recommendations