Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 55, Issue 4, pp 1536–1552 | Cite as

Preparation and characterization of superhydrophobic melamine and melamine-derived carbon sponges modified with reduced graphene oxide–TiO2 nanocomposite as oil absorbent materials

  • Najibeh Sadat Mirhosseinian
  • Mansoor AnbiaEmail author
  • Samira Salehi
Composites & nanocomposites
  • 138 Downloads

Abstract

The spillage of oil and hydrophobic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) has become a global challenge that removing them from the environment is essential to the health of living organisms. The superhydrophobic sponges are considered as an excellent absorbent to clean up oil/solvent spills due to high absorption capacity and elasticity. The most important challenges in creating superhydrophobic sponges are to increase absorption capacity, selectivity, and thermal stability by developing the surface area, water contact angle, and coated materials, respectively. In this study, in order to enhance surface area, reduced graphene oxide–titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanocomposite was applied on a substrate of raw and carbonized melamine sponge by a simple dip coating method. The results show that better bonding of synthesized nanocomposite to carbonized sponge fibers leads to a greater increase in surface area than modified raw sponge. Besides, hydrophilicity property of raw sponge varies to superhydrophobicity after modification to the contact angle of 161.5° and 165.1° for raw and carbonized sponge, respectively. Modified sponges with high thermal stability reduce the risk of fire. The maximum oil/organic solvents absorption capacity for modified melamine sponge was reported 169 times of its weight, which is increased for carbonized sponge due to higher porous volume and lower density. They also demonstrated good recycle ability after 15 times, repeating the absorption–squeezing process. These outstanding features make them an exceptional candidate absorber for various oils and hydrophobic VOCs.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Research Council of Iran University of Science and Technology (Tehran) for financial support to this study.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MPG 8176 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MPG 12346 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (MPG 9818 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (MPG 11010 kb)

Supplementary material 5 (MPG 13138 kb)

10853_2019_4110_MOESM6_ESM.mpeg (14.7 mb)
Supplementary material 6 (MPEG 15066 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Ruan C, Ai K, Li X, Lu LA (2014) A superhydrophobic sponge with excellent absorbency and flame retardancy. Angew Chem Int Ed 126:5662–5666Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pham VH, Dickerson JH (2014) Superhydrophobic silanized melamine sponges as high efficiency oil absorbent materials. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:14181–14188Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang CF, Lin SJ (2013) Robust superhydrophobic/superoleophilic sponge for effective continuous absorption and expulsion of oil pollutants from water. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:8861–8864Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Allan SE, Smith BW, Anderson KA (2012) Impact of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill on bioavailable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Gulf of Mexico coastal waters. Environ Sci Technol 46:2033–2039Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zahed MA, Aziz HA, Isa MH, Mohajeri L, Mohajeri S (2010) Optimal conditions for bioremediation of oily seawater. Bioresour Technol 101:9455–9460Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Atlas RM (1995) Petroleum biodegradation and oil spill bioremediation. Mar Pollut Bull 31:178–182Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mullin JV, Champ MA (2003) Introduction/overview to in situ burning of oil spills. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Broje V, Keller AA (2007) Effect of operational parameters on the recovery rate of an oleophilic drum skimmer. J Hazard Mater 148:136–143Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chapman H, Purnell K, Law RJ, Kirby MF (2007) The use of chemical dispersants to combat oil spills at sea: a review of practice and research needs in Europe. Mar Pollut Bull 54:827–838Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lv X, Tian D, Peng Y, Li J, Jiang G (2019) Superhydrophobic magnetic reduced graphene oxide-decorated foam for efficient and repeatable oil-water separation. Appl Surf Sci 466:937–945Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Salehi S, Anbia M (2017) High CO2 adsorption capacity and CO2/CH4 selectivity by nanocomposites of MOF-199. Energy Fuels 31:5376–5384Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tornero V, Hanke G (2016) Chemical contaminants entering the marine environment from sea-based sources: a review with a focus on European seas. Mar Pollut Bull 112:17–38Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mustafa Salih Y, Rahim Karim A, Khorshid I (2018) Estimation the time of spill crude oil in deep soil by the detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). J Pet Sci Technol 36:497–1502Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huang B, Lei C, Wei C, Zeng G (2014) Chlorinated volatile organic compounds (Cl-VOCs) in environment—sources, potential human health impacts, and current remediation technologies. Environ Int 71:118–138Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang X, Gao B, Creamer AE, Cao C, Li Y (2017) Adsorption of VOCs onto engineered carbon materials: a review. J Hazard Mater 338:102–123Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Poddar TK, Majumdar S, Sirkar KK (1996) Membrane-based absorption of VOCs from a gas stream. AlChE J 42:3267–3282Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Daniel C, Antico P, Yamaguchi H, Kogure M, Guerra G (2016) Microporous-crystalline microfibers by eco-friendly guests: an efficient tool for sorption of volatile organic pollutants. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 232:205–210Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lalanne F, Malhautier L, Roux JC, Fanlo JL (2008) Absorption of a mixture of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in aqueous solutions of soluble cutting oil. Bioresour Technol 99:1699–1707Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zou L, Luo Y, Hooper M, Hu E (2006) Removal of VOCs by photocatalysis process using adsorption enhanced TiO2–SiO2 catalyst. Chem Eng Process 45:959–964Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Heymes F, Manno-Demoustier P, Charbit F, Fanlo JL, Moulin P (2006) A new efficient absorption liquid to treat exhaust air loaded with toluene. Chem Eng J 115:225–231Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cheng Y, He H, Yang C, Zeng G, Li X, Chen H, Yu G (2016) Challenges and solutions for biofiltration of hydrophobic volatile organic compounds. Biotechnol Adv 34:1091–1102Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Darracq G, Couvert A, Couriol C, Amrane A, Thomas D, Dumont E, Andres Y, Le Cloirec P (2010) Silicone oil: an effective absorbent for the removal of hydrophobic volatile organic compounds. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 85:309–313Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Uragami T, Matsuoka Y, Miyata T (2016) Permeation and separation characteristics in removal of dilute volatile organic compounds from aqueous solutions through copolymer membranes consisted of poly (styrene) and poly (dimethylsiloxane) containing a hydrophobic ionic liquid by pervaporation. J Memb Sci 506:109–118Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Anbia M, Salehi S (2012) Synthesis of polyelectrolyte-modified ordered nanoporous carbon for removal of aromatic organic acids from purified terephthalic acid wastewater. Chem Eng Res Des 90:975–983Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fan W, Liu X, Zhang Z, Zhang Q, Ma W, Tan D, Li A (2014) Conjugated microporous polymer nanotubes and hydrophobic sponges. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 196:335–340Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Deng CH, Gong JL, Zhang P, Zeng GM, Song B, Liu HY (2017) Preparation of melamine sponge decorated with silver nanoparticles-modified graphene for water disinfection. J Colloid Interface Sci 488:26–38Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Feng Y, Wang Y, Wang Y, Zhang XF, Yao J (2018) In-situ gelation of sodium alginate supported on melamine sponge for efficient removal of copper ions. J Colloid Interface Sci 512:7–13Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Huang J, Xu Y, Zhang X, Lei Z, Chen C, Deng Y, Wang C (2018) Polyethylenimine and dithiocarbamate decorated melamine sponges for fast copper (II) ions removal from aqueous solution. Appl Surf Sci 445:471–477Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chatzimitakos TG, Stalikas CD (2018) Melamine sponge decorated with copper sheets as a material with outstanding properties for microextraction of sulfonamides prior to their determination by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 1554:28–36Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stolz A, Le Floch S, Reinert L, Ramos SM et al (2016) Melamine-derived carbon sponges for oil-water separation. Carbon 107:198–208Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gao H, Sun P, Zhang Y, Zeng X, Wang D, Zhang Y, Wang W, Wu J (2018) A two-step hydrophobic fabrication of melamine sponge for oil absorption and oil/water separation. Surf Coat Technol 339:147–154Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fan W, Lai Q, Zhang Q, Wang Y (2011) Nanocomposites of TiO2 and reduced graphene oxide as efficient photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution. J Phys Chem C 115:10694–10701Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Darvishi M, Seyed-Yazdi J (2016) Characterization and comparison of photocatalytic activities of prepared TiO2/graphene nanocomposites using titanium butoxide and TiO2 via microwave irradiation method. Mater Res Express.  https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/3/8/085601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhou X, Zhang Z, Xu X, Men X, Zhu X (2013) Facile fabrication of superhydrophobic sponge with selective absorption and collection of oil from water. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:9411–9416Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Song S, Yang H, Su C, Jiang Z, Lu Z (2016) Ultrasonic-microwave assisted synthesis of stable reduced graphene oxide modified melamine foam with superhydrophobicity and high oil adsorption capacities. Chem Eng J 306:504–511Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Latthe SS, Imai H, Ganesan V, Rao AV (2010) Porous superhydrophobic silica films by sol–gel process. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 130:115–121Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Giffard K, Arurault L, Blanc C (2016) Dynamic measurements and wettability phenomena in mesoporous anodic films prepared on 1050 and 2024T3 aluminium alloys. Microporous Mesoporous Mat 235:32–41Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Drelich J (1997) The effect of drop (bubble) size on contact angle at solid surfaces. J Adhes 63:31–51Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Paulchamy B, Arthi G, Lignesh BD (2015) A simple approach to stepwise synthesis of graphene oxide nanomaterial. J Nanomed Nanotechnol.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7439.1000253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yang MQ, Zhang N, Xu YJ (2013) Synthesis of fullerene–, carbon nanotube–, and graphene–TiO2 nanocomposite photocatalysts for selective oxidation: a comparative study. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:1156–1164Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jafarpour M, Ghahramaninezhad M, Rezaeifard A (2014) characterization and catalytic activity of oleic acid-coated TiO2 nanoparticles carrying MoO2 (acac)2 in the oxidation of olefins and sulfides using economical peroxides. New J Chem 38:2917–2926Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Pinjari DV, Pandit AB (2011) Room temperature synthesis of crystalline CeO2 nanopowder: advantage of sonochemical method over conventional method. Ultrason Sonochem 18:1118–1123Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhu H, Chen D, An W, Li N, Xu Q, Li H, He J, Lu J (2015) A robust and cost-effective superhydrophobic graphene foam for efficient oil and organic solvent recovery. Small 11:5222–5229Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Liu T, Zhao G, Zhang W, Chi H, Hou C, Sun Y (2015) The preparation of superhydrophobic graphene/melamine composite sponge applied in treatment of oil pollution. J Porous Mater 22:1573–1580Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nguyen DD, Tai NH, Lee SB, Kuo WS (2012) Superhydrophobic and superoleophilic properties of graphene-based sponges fabricated using a facile dip coating method. Energy Environ Sci 5:7908–7912Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ge J, Shi LA, Wang YC, Zhao HY et al (2017) Joule-heated graphene-wrapped sponge enables fast clean-up of viscous crude-oil spill. Nat Nanotechnol 12:434–440Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Oribayo O, Feng X, Rempel GL, Pan Q (2017) Synthesis of lignin-based polyurethane/graphene oxide foam and its application as an absorbent for oil spill clean-ups and recovery. Chem Eng J 323:191–202Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Laboratory of Nanoporous Materials, Faculty of ChemistryIran University of Science and TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations