Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 55, Issue 4, pp 1525–1535 | Cite as

Preparation of Pd/GO/ITO composite electrode and degradation of 2,4-chlorophene

  • Jian ZhangEmail author
  • Yuting Jiang
  • Jiaxin Zhang
  • Lanhe Zhang
  • Bing Wang
  • Zheng Li
  • Congze Liu
  • Haonan Wang
Composites & nanocomposites
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

2,4-Dichlorophenol (2,4-DCP) is a kind of toxic organic compound listed as a priority pollutant by the environmental protection agency, which will endanger the environment and human health. The accumulation of 2,4-DCP in the environment has become a serious problem today since 2,4-DCP is difficult to be degraded by traditional methods. In this study, a novel palladium/graphene oxide/indium tin oxide (Pd/GO/ITO) composite electrode was prepared by constant current electrodeposition method. And the surface morphology, crystal structure and surface element valence state of the electrode were observed and analyzed by SEM, XRD and XPS, respectively. Finally, by studying the influence of different conditions on the performance of the electrodes, the electrochemical degradation efficiency of the new electrodes on 2,4-DCP was investigated. It was found that the degradation of the Pd/GO/ITO electrodes on 2,4-DCP followed a quasi-first-order reaction under different conditions.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51178138), Jilin Province Education Department Project of China (JJKH20180453KJ).

References

  1. 1.
    Liu J, Zhang X, Li Y (2017) Photoconversion of chlorinated saline wastewater DBPs in receiving seawater is overall a detoxification process. Environ Sci Technol 51:58–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang J, Liu H, Wang B, Thabit M, Bai H (2015) Preparation of Pd/GO/Ti electrode and its electrochemical degradation for 2,4-dichlorophenol. Mater Des 86:664–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li J, Chen Y, Wu Q, Wu J, Xu Y (2019) Synthesis of sea-urchin-like Fe3O4/SnO2 heterostructures and its application for environmental remediation by removal of p-chlorophenol. J Mater Sci 54:1341–1350.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2899-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gao H-Y, Mao L, Shao B, Huang C-H, Zhu B-Z (2016) Why does 2,3,5,6-tetrachlorophenol generate the strongest intrinsic chemiluminescence among all nineteen chlorophenolic persistent organic pollutants during environmentally-friendly advanced oxidation process? Sci Rep 6:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nasser A, Mingelgrin U (2014) Birnessite-induced mechanochemical degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenol. Chemosphere 107:175–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xu C, Liu R, Chen L, Tang J (2016) Enhanced dechlorination of 2,4-dichlorophenol by recoverable Ni/Fe–Fe3O4 nanocomposites. J Environ Sci 48:92–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gan L, Li B, Guo M, Weng X, Wang T, Chen Z (2018) Mechanism for removing 2,4-dichlorophenol via adsorption and Fenton-like oxidation using iron-based nanoparticles. Chemosphere 206:168–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chang P-H, Chou T-H, Sahu RS, Shih Y-h (2019) Chemical reduction-aided zerovalent copper nanoparticles for 2,4-dichlorophenol removal. Appl Nanosci 9:387–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang Z, Bin P, Liu Y, Liu Y, Yang G, Lucia L (2017) Degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenol by melamine amine cellulose-immobilized lacasses. Tappi J 16:559–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ren H, Li Q, Zhan Y, Fang X, Yu D (2016) 2,4-Dichlorophenol hydroxylase for chlorophenol removal: substrate specificity and catalytic activity. Enzyme Microb Technol 82:74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang Y, Zhang C, An S, Fang X, Yu D (2018) Engineering substrate promiscuity in 2,4-dichlorophenol hydroxylase by in silico design. RSC Adv 8:21184–21190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yuan H, Yu H, Li X, Quan X (2014) Effective adsorption of 2,4-dichlorophenol on hydrogenated graphene: kinetics and isotherms. Chin Sci Bull 59:4752–4757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang H, Sun M, Song L, Guo J, Zhang L (2019) Fate of NaClO and membrane foulants during in situ cleaning of membrane bioreactors: combined effect on thermodynamic properties of sludge. Biochem Eng J 147:146–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen C, Wang Z, Wu K, Chong H, Xu Z, Ye H (2018) ITO–TiN–ITO sandwiches for near-infrared plasmonic materials. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:14886–14893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Toshimori Y, Umemoto K, Shirai Y, Shiono I, Zhang S, Nonaka S (2018) ITO/Ag alloy/ITO multilayer structure as an alternative to ITO for display electrodes. J Soc Inform Disp 26:610–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang M, Barnabe A, Thimont Y et al (2019) Optimized properties of innovative electrochromic device using ITO/Ag/ITO electrodes. Electrochim Acta 301:200–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huang S, Si Z, Li X, Zou J, Yao Y, Weng D (2016) A novel Au/r-GO/TNTs electrode for H2O2, O2− and nitrite detection. Sens Actuators B Chem 234:264–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhan S, Zhou F, Huang N, He Q, Zhu Y (2017) Deactivating harmful marine microorganisms through photoelectrocatalysis by GO/ZnWO4 electrodes. Chem Eng J 330:635–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Das TR, Sharma PK (2019) Sensitive and selective electrochemical detection of Cd2+ by using bimetal oxide decorated Graphene oxide (Bi2O3/Fe2O3@GO) electrode. Microchem J 147:1203–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rajput H, Sangal VK, Dhir A (2018) Synthesis of highly stable and efficient Ag loaded GO/TiO2 nanotube electrodes for the photoelectrocatalytic degradation of pentachlorophenol. J Electroanal Chem 814:118–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Al-Kandari H, Abdullah AM, Mohamed AM, Al-Kandari S (2016) Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of a phenolic compounds’ mixture using a highly efficient TiO2/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite. J Mater Sci 51:8331–8345.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0074-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lou Z, Zhou J, Sun M et al (2018) MnO2 enhances electrocatalytic hydrodechlorination by Pd/Ni foam electrodes and reduces Pd needs. Chem Eng J 352:549–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang J, Cao Z, Chi Y, Xie L, Lin L (2015) Preparation and electrocatalytic dechlorination performance of Pd/Ti electrode. Desalination Water Treat 54:2692–2699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nethravathi C, Viswanath B, Michael J, Rajamath M (2012) Hydrothermal synthesis of a monoclinic VO2 nanotube-graphene hybrid for use as cathode material in lithium ion batteries. Carbon 50:4839–4846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Plumley JB, Cook AW, Larsen CA et al (2018) Crystallization of electrically conductive visibly transparent ITO thin films by wavelength-range-specific pulsed Xe arc lamp annealing. J Mater Sci 53:12949–12960.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2534-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xia Y-p, Wang P-h, Shi S-w et al (2017) Effect of oxygen partial pressure and transparent substrates on the structural and optical properties of ZnO thin films and their performance in energy harvesters. Int J Miner Metall Mater 24:675–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Karuppuchamy S, Andou Y, Endo T (2013) Preparation of nanostructured TiO2 photoelectrode for flexible dye-sensitized solar cell applications. Appl Nanosci 3:291–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gong J, Li L, Xue S et al (2019) The preparation and photocatalytic performance research of CdSe and wool ball-like GO/CdSe microspheres. J Alloys Compd 779:962–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Al-Gaashani R, Najjar A, Zakaria Y, Mansour S, Atieh MA (2019) XPS and structural studies of high quality graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide prepared by different chemical oxidation methods. Ceram Int 45:14439–14448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhang L, Li Y, Guo H et al (2019) Decontamination of U(VI) on graphene oxide/Al2O3 composites investigated by XRD, FT-IR and XPS techniques. Environ Pollut 248:332–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Grabau M, Erhard J, Taccardi N et al (2017) Spectroscopic observation and molecular dynamics simulation of Ga surface segregation in liquid Pd–Ga alloys. Chem Eur J 23:17701–17706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ogawa S, Fujimoto T, Mizutani T et al (2014) XAFS and XPS study of hydro-/dehydrogenation reaction of Mg–Pd nanoparticles. Surf Interface Anal 46:1143–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Qin K, Mei F, Yuan T et al (2018) Effects of sintering processes on the element chemical states of In, Sn and O in ITO targets. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 29:7931–7940CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Chemistry EngineeringNortheast Electric Power UniversityJilinPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations