Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 22, pp 14064–14073 | Cite as

Enhanced tribology, thermal and electrical properties of Al-CNT composite processed via spark plasma sintering for transmission conductor

  • C. O. UjahEmail author
  • A. P. I. Popoola
  • O. M. Popoola
  • V. S. Aigbodion
Electronic materials

Abstract

Studies show that monolithic Al lacks requisite properties required for industrial applications. However, these properties can be enhanced by the addition of high-performing reinforcement such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs). Here, Al is reinforced with CNTs and consolidated via spark plasma sintering, with the aims of improving its tribology, thermal and electrical properties. The tribological test was conducted on a ball-on-disc tribometer. The thermal test was done with the thermogravimetric analyzer and laser flasher apparatus; the electrical conductivity test was carried out with four-point probe meter. Results obtained showed that 4 wt% of CNTs improved the COF of Al alloy by 52% and wear volume by 23%. It also improved the thermal conductivity by 35%. The electrical result showed a marginal improvement of 2% with Al-8CNTs. Therefore, the improvements in tribology and thermal properties without compromising electrical conductivity show that Al-CNTs are a robust material for industrial application especially in high-transmission conductor.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to appreciate the financial support of the following: CEEP and TUT, Pretoria, South Africa. Also, BIUST Botswana is appreciated for assisting with their tribometer.

Funding

The funding was provided by Tshwane University of Technology (Grand No. 2018 internal bursary award).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Surappa MK (2003) Aluminium matrix composites: challenges and opportunities. Sadhana 28(1):319–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gupta M, Surappa MK, Qin S (1979) Effect of interfacial characteristics on the failure-mechanism mode of a SiC reinforced A1 based metal-matrix composite. J Mater Process Technol 67(1–3):94–99Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hassan AM, Alrashdan A, Hayajneh MT, Mayyas AT (2009) Prediction of density, porosity and hardness in aluminium–copper-based composite materials using artificial neural network. J Mater Process Technol 209(2):894–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Iijima S (1991) Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354:56–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mohan Krishna SA, Shridhar TN, Krishnamurthy L (2015) Experimental investigations on thermal analysis and thermal characterization of Al 6061-Sic-Gr hybrid metal matrix composites. Int J Mater Sci 5(2):54–66.  https://doi.org/10.12783/ijmsci.2015.0502.04 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Every AG, Tzou Y, Hasselman DPH, Raj R (1992) The effect of particle size on the thermal conductivity of ZnS/diamond composites. Acta Metall Mater 40(1):123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Devpura A, Phelan PE, Prasher RS (2001) Size effects on the thermal conductivity of polymers laden with highly conductive filler particles. Microsc Thermophys Eng 5:177–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Swartz ET, Pohl RO (1989) Thermal boundary resistance. Rev Mod Phys 61(3):605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pietrak K, Wisniewski TS (2015) A review of models for effective thermal conductivity of composite materials. J Power Technol 95(1):14–24Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bedir F (2007) Characteristic properties of Al–Cu–SiCp and Al–Cu–B4Cp composites produced by hot pressing method under nitrogen atmosphere. Mater Des 28(4):1238–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Archard JF (1953) Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J Appl Phys 24(8):981–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Selvakumar N, Gangatharan K (2016) Electrical resistivity, tribological behaviour of multi walled carbon nanotubes and nano boron carbide particles reinforced copper hybrid composites for pantograph application. Adv Mater Sci Eng. Article ID 3432979, 18 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3432979
  13. 13.
    Ujah CO, Popoola API, Popoola OM, Aigbodion VS (2018) Optimisation of spark plasma sintering parameters of Al-CNTs-Nb nano-composite using taguchi design of experiment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2705-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xie G, Ohashi O, Song M, Furuya K, Noda T (2003) Behaviour of oxide film at the interface between particles in sintered Al powders by pulsed electric-current sintering. J Metall Mater Transf A 34A:699–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guo B, Song M, Yi J, Ni S, Shen T, Du Y (2017) Improving the mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes reinforced pure aluminium matrix composites by achieving non-equilibrium interface. J Mater Des 120:56–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    El Abou Bakr S, Kamel BM, Khattab A, Osman TA, Azzam B, Zaki M (2018) Improved mechanical and tribological properties of A356 reinforced by MWCNTs. Fuller Nanotubes Carbon Nanostruct 26(4):185–194.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1536383X.2017.1415888 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang YQ, Afsar AM, Jang JH, Han KS, Song JI (2010) Room temperature dry and lubricant wear behaviors of Al2O3f/SiCp/Al hybrid metal matrix composites. Wear 268:863–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yilmaz SO (2007) Comparison on abrasive wear of SiCrFe, CrFeC and Al2O3 reinforced Al2024 MMCs. Tribol Int 40:441–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Quintelier J, De Baets P, Samyna P, Van Hemelrijck D (2006) On the SEM features of glass–polyester composite system subjected to dry sliding wear. Wear 261:703–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baudouly B, Four A (2014) Low temperature thermal conductivity of aluminium alloy 5056. Cryogenics 60:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ramırez AM, Espinoza FJB, Yanez-Limon JM, Vorobiev YV, Gonzalez-Hernandez J (1999) Effects of porosity on the thermal properties of a 380-aluminum alloy. J Mater Res 14:10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ujah CO, Popoola API, Popoola OM, Aigbodion VS (2018) Electrical conductivity, mechanical strength and corrosion characteristics of spark plasma sintered Al-Nb nanocomposite. Int J Adv Manuf Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-3128. ISSN: 0268-3768
  23. 23.
    Sharma M, Pal H, Sharma V (2014) Electrical conductivity and thermal expansion measurement of nanocrystalline aluminium reinforced with functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes. Int J ChemTech Res CODEN (USA): IJCRGG 6(3):2057–2059. ISSN: 0974-4290Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guillon O, Gonzalez-Julian J, Dargatz B, Kessel T, Schierning G, Rathel J, Herrmann M (2014) Field-assisted sintering technology/spark plasma sintering: mechanisms, materials, and technology developments. Adv Eng Mater 16:830–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical, Metallurgical and Materials EngineeringTshwane University of TechnologyPretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Electrical EngineeringTshwane University of TechnologyPretoriaSouth Africa
  3. 3.Department of Metallurgical and Materials EngineeringUniversity of NigeriaNsukkaNigeria

Personalised recommendations