Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 13, pp 9933–9944 | Cite as

Microstructure and thermal/mechanical properties of hot-extruded aluminum/graphite composites with Al–Si alloy addition

  • Li-Fu Yi
  • Noriaki Yoshida
  • Takashi Yamamoto
  • Tetsuhiko Onda
  • Zhong-Chun ChenEmail author
Metals
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

Al/graphite composites with small amounts of Al–Si alloy were consolidated by spark plasma sintering and hot-extrusion processes. The effect of Al–Si alloy addition on densification behavior, microstructure, thermal conductivity (TC), coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE), and compressive strength has been systematically investigated. The results showed that the addition of Al–Si alloy resulted in improvements in relative density of the composites, interfacial bonding between Al and graphite, and orientation degree of graphite. The composites with Al–Si alloy showed improved TC and reduced CTE values in comparison with those without Al–Si alloy. For example, the 450 °C-extruded Al/60 vol% graphite/9 vol% Al–Si composite showed a maximum TC of 297 W m−1 K−1 and a minimum CTE of 7.95 ppm K−1. Moreover, the hot-extruded Al/graphite composites containing Al–Si alloy exhibited higher compressive strength compared to conventional squeeze-cast composites and hot-extruded composites without Al–Si alloy.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Light Metal Educational Foundation. The authors would like to thank T. Yoshioka and T. Harada of Shimane Institute for Industrial Technology, Prof. S. Morito of Shimane University, and T. Murata of Tottori Institute of Industrial Technology for their experimental supports and fruitful discussion.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Zweben C (1998) Advances in composite materials for thermal management in electronic applications. JOM 50:47–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Luedtke A (2004) Thermal management materials for high-performance applications. Adv Eng Mater 6:142–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mallik S, Ekere N, Best C, Bhatti R (2011) Investigation of thermal management materials for automotive electronic control units. Appl Therm Eng 31:355–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Qu XH, Zhang L, Wu M, Ren SB (2011) Review of metal matrix composites with high thermal conductivity for thermal management applications. Prog Nat Sci: Mater Int 21:189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mizuuchi K, Inoue K, Agari Y, Morisada Y, Sugioka M, Tanaka M, Takeuchi T, Tani JI, Kawahara M, Makino Y (2011) Processing of diamond particle dispersed aluminum matrix composites in continuous solid–liquid co-existent state by SPS and their thermal properties. Compos Part B: Eng 42:825–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu TT, He XB, Liu Q, Ren SB, Kang QP, Zhang L, Qu XH (2014) Effect of chromium carbide coating on thermal properties of short graphite fiber/Al composites. J Mater Sci 49:6705–6715.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8272-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li WJ, Liu Y, Wu GH (2015) Preparation of graphite flakes/Al with preferred orientation and high thermal conductivity by squeeze casting. Carbon 95:545–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhou C, Huang W, Chen Z, Ji G, Wang ML, Chen D, Wang HW (2015) In-plane thermal enhancement behaviors of Al matrix composites with oriented graphite flake alignment. Compos Part B 70:256–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Molina JM, Rodriguez-Guerrero A, Louis E, Rodriguez-Reinoso F, Narciso J (2017) Porosity effect on thermal properties of Al-12 wt% Si/graphite composites. Materials 10(2):177–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kurita H, Miyazaki T, Kawasaki A, Lu YF, Silvain JF (2015) Interfacial microstructure of graphite flake reinforced aluminum matrix composites fabricated via hot pressing. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 73:125–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chamroune N, Mereib D, Delange F, Caillault N, Lu YF, Grosseau-Poussard JL, Silvain JF (2018) Effect of flake powder metallurgy on thermal conductivity of graphite flakes reinforced aluminum matrix composites. J Mater Sci 53:8180–8192.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2139-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bauccio M (1994) ASM engineered materials reference book, 2nd edn. ASM International, Materials Park, pp 181–182Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yi LF, Yoshida N, Onda T, Chen ZC (2019) Effect of processing conditions on microstructure and thermal conductivity of hot-extruded aluminum/graphite composites. Mater Trans 60(1):136–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lotgering FK (1959) Topotactical reactions with ferrimagnetic oxides having hexagon crystal structures—I. J Inorg Chem 9:113–123Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim D (1992) Mechanical properties of pyrolytic graphite flakes. Carbon 30:729–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nan CW, Birringer R, Clarke DR, Gleiter H (1997) Effective thermal conductivity of particulate composites with interfacial thermal resistance. J Appl Phys 81(10):6692–6699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nan CW, Li XP, Birringer R (2000) Inverse problem for composites with imperfect interface: determination of interfacial thermal resistance, thermal conductivity of constituents, and microstructural parameters. J Am Ceram Soc 83(4):848–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Molina JM, Prieto R, Narciso J, Louis E (2009) The effect of porosity on the thermal conductivity of Al-12 wt% Si/SiC composites. Scr Mater 60(7):582–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Swartz ET, Pohl RO (1989) Thermal boundary resistance. Rev Mod Phys 61(3):605–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tan ZQ, Li ZQ, Xiong DB, Fan GL, Ji G, Zhang D (2014) A predictive model for interfacial thermal conductance in surface metallized diamond aluminum matrix composites. Mater Des 55:257–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dewar B, Nicholas M, Scott PM (1976) The solid phase bonding of copper, nickel and some of their alloys to diamonds. J Mater Sci 11(6):1083–1090.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00553116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schmidt AJ, Collins KC, Minnich AJ, Chen G (2010) Thermal conductance and phonon transmissivity of metal–graphite interfaces. J Appl Phys 107(10):104907.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3428464 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yuan GM, Li XK, Dong ZJ, Aidan W, Cui ZW, Ye C, Du HD, Kang FY (2012) Graphite blocks with preferred orientation and high thermal conductivity. Carbon 50(1):175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Murakami M, Nishiki N, Nakamura K, Ehara J, Okada H, Kouzaki T, Watanabe K, Hoshi T, Yoshimura S (1992) High quality and highly oriented graphite block from polycon-densation polymer films. Carbon 30(2):255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kerner EH (1956) The elastic and thermos-electric properties of composite media. Proc Phys Soc 69(8):808–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Graduate School of EngineeringTottori UniversityTottoriJapan

Personalised recommendations