Advertisement

Fabrication of dispersive α-Co(OH)2 nanosheets on graphene nanoribbons for boosting their oxygen evolution performance

  • Jingyun Wang
  • Yipeng Bao
  • Cao Cui
  • Zhenyu Zhang
  • Shumin Li
  • Jiami Pan
  • Yingying Zhang
  • Gaomei Tu
  • Jin Wang
  • Zhengquan LiEmail author
Composites

Abstract

Nanostructured α-Co(OH)2 materials are promising noble-metal-free electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction (OER), but their performance is severally restrained by their poor conductivity. Combination of α-Co(OH)2 and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) can improve their conductivity, but it is difficult to build sufficient interface contact between them due to the mismatched hydrophobicity. Herein, we demonstrate a facile method to in situ grow α-Co(OH)2 nanosheets (NSs) on graphene nanoribbons (GNRs), an intriguing belt-like conductive material after oxidative unzipping of CNTs. Owing to the rich of functional groups, the GNRs can be utilized as substrate in solution to prepare dispersive α-Co(OH)2 nanosheets on their surface. The developed α-Co(OH)2 NSs are well contact with the conductive GNRs substrate and offer sufficient active surface area, showing obviously better OER performance than the α-Co(OH)2 and CNTs/Co(OH)2 prepared under the same condition. The composite electrocatalysts have been characterized by various apparatuses, and their OER activities are explored in detail.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge financial support from Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (Nos LR15B010001 and LGG19B010002) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No 21701143). Mr. Y. Bao also thanks for the financial support from Undergraduate Training Program for Innovation and Entrepreneurship of China (No 201810345015).

Supplementary material

10853_2019_3421_MOESM1_ESM.doc (3.7 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 3835 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Shi YM, Zhang B (2016) Recent advances in transition metal phosphide nanomaterials: synthesis and applications in hydrogen evolution reaction. Chem Soc Rev 45:1529–1541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang HB, Nai JW, Yu L, Lou XW (2017) Metal-organic-framework-based materials as platforms for renewable energy and environmental applications. Joule 1:77–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Montoya JH, Seitz LC, Chakthranont P, Vojvodic A, Jaramillo TF, Nørskov JK (2016) Materials for solar fuels and chemicals. Nat Mater 16:70–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McCrory CCL, Jung S, Ferrer IM, Chatman SM, Peters JC, Jaramillo TF (2015) Benchmarking hydrogen evolving reaction and oxygen evolving reaction electrocatalysts for solar water splitting devices. J Am Chem Soc 137:4347–4357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yan CZ, Wu HB, Xie Y, Lou XW (2014) Mixed transition-metal oxides: design, synthesis, and energy-related applications. Angew Chem Int Ed 53:1488–1504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yu YF, Shi YM, Zhang B (2018) Synergetic transformation of solid inorganic-organic hybrids into advanced nanomaterials for catalytic water splitting. Acc Chem Res 51:1711–1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhao SL, Wang Y, Dong JC, He CT, Yin HJ, An PF, Zhao K, Zhang XF, Gao C, Zhang LJ, Lv JW, Wang JX, Zhang JQ, Khattak AM, Khan NA, Wei ZX, Zhang J, Liu ZY (2016) Ultrathin metal-organic framework nanosheets for electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. Nat Energy 1:16184–16193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gerken JB, McAlpin JG, Chen JY, Rigsby ML, Casey WH, Britt RD, Stahl SS (2011) Electrochemical water oxidation with cobalt-based electrocatalysts from pH 0–14: the thermodynamic basis for catalyst structure, stability, and activity. J Am Chem Soc 133:14431–14442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zheng Y, Jiao Y, Zhu YH, Li LH, Han Y, Chen Y, Du AJ, Jaroniec M, Qiao SZ (2014) Hydrogen evolution by a metal-free electrocatalyst. Nat Commun 5:3783–3790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McCrory CCL, Jung S, Peters JC, Jaramillo TF (2013) Benchmarking heterogeneous electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. J Am Chem Soc 135:16977–16987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burke MS, Enman LJ, Batchellor AS, Zou SH, Boettcher SW (2015) Oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysis on transition metal oxides and (oxy)hydroxides: activity trends and design principles. Chem Mater 27:7549–7558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nong HN, Gan L, Willinger E, Teschner D, Strasser P (2014) IrOx core–shell nanocatalysts for cost-and energy-efficient electrochemical water splitting. Chem Sci 5:2955–2963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chang SH, Danilovic N, Chang KC, Subbaraman R, Paulikas AP, Fong DD, Highland MJ, Baldo PM, Stamenkovic VR, Freeland JW, Eastman JA, Markovic NM (2014) Functional links between stability and reactivity of strontium ruthenate single crystals during oxygen evolution. Nat Commun 5:4191–4199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nong HN, Oh HS, Reier T, Willinger E, Willinger MG, Petkov V, Teschner D, Strasser P (2015) Oxide-supported IrNiOx core–shell particles as efficient, cost-effective, and stable catalysts for electrochemical water splitting. Angew Chem Int Ed 54:2975–2979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhan Y, Du GJ, Yang SL, Xu CH, Lu MH, Liu ZL, Lee JY (2015) Development of cobalt hydroxide as a bifunctional catalyst for oxygen electrocatalysis in alkaline solution. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:12930–12936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu PF, Yang S, Zheng LR, Zhang B, Yang HG (2016) Electrochemical etching of acobalt hydroxide for improvement of oxygen evolution reaction. J Mater Chem A 4:9578–9584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang JY, Cui C, Lin RB, Xu CH, Wang J, Li ZQ (2018) Hybrid cobalt-based electrocatalysts with adjustable compositions for electrochemical water splitting derived from Co2+-loaded MIL-53(Fe) particles. Electrochim Acta 286:397–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu ZP, Ma RZ, Osada M, Takada K, Sasaki T (2005) Selective and controlled synthesis of α-and β-cobalt hydroxides in highly developed hexagonal platelets. J Am Chem Soc 127:13869–13874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lei W, Zhi HD, Zheng GW, Feng XZ, Jian J (2013) Layered α-Co(OH)2 nanocones as electrode materials for pseudocapacitors: understanding the effect of interlayer space on electrochemical activity. Adv Funct Mater 23:2758–2764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guo P, Wu J, Li XB, Luo J, Lau WM, Liu H, Sun XL, Liu LM (2018) A highly stable bifunctional catalyst based on 3D Co(OH)2@NCNTs@NF towards overall water-splitting. Nano Energy 47:96–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jagadale AD, Jamadade VS, Pusawale SN, Lokhande CD (2012) Effect of scan rate on the morphology of potentiodynamically deposited β-Co(OH)2 and corresponding supercapacitive performance. Electrochim Acta 78:92–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Xia XH, Tu JP, Zhang YQ, Mai YJ, Wang XL, Gu CD, Zhao XB (2011) Three-dimentional porous nano-Ni/Co(OH)2 nanoflake composite film: a pseudocapacitive material with superior performance. J Phys Chem C 115:22662–22668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang BX, Zhang JL, Tan XN, Tan DX, Shi JB, Zhang FY, Liu LF, Su ZZ, Han BX, Zheng LR, Zhang J (2018) One-step synthesis of ultrathin α-Co(OH)2 nanomeshes and their high electrocatalytic activity toward the oxygen evolution reaction. Chem Commun 54:4045–4048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wu D, Wei YC, Ren X, Ji XQ, Liu YW, Guo XD, Liu Z, Asiri AM, Wei Q, Sun XP (2018) Co(OH)2 nanoparticle-encapsulating conductive nanowires array: room-temperature electrochemical preparation for high-performance water oxidation electrocatalysis. Adv Mater 30:1705366–1705372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jiang YM, Li X, Wang TX, Wang CM (2016) Enhanced electrocatalytic oxygen evolution of α-Co(OH)2 nanosheets on carbon nanotube/polyimide films. Nanoscale 8:9667–9675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jiang DF, Chu ZY, Peng JM, Luo JY, Mao YY, Yang PQ, Jin WQ (2018) One-step synthesis of three-dimensional Co(OH)2/rGO nano-flowers as enzyme-mimic sensors for glucose detection. Electrochim Acta 270:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rahimi SA, Norouzi P, Ganjali MR (2018) One-step cathodic electrodeposition of a cobalt hydroxide–graphene nanocomposite and its use as a high performance supercapacitor electrode material. RSC Adv 8:26818–26827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liu PF, Li X, Yang S, Zu MY, Liu P, Zhang B, Zheng LR, Zhao H, Yang HG (2017) Ni2P(O)/Fe2P(O) interface can boost oxygen evolution electrocatalysis. ACS Energy Lett 2:2257–2263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cai JM, Ruffieux P, Jaafar R, Bieri M, Braun T, Blankenburg S, Muoth M, Seitsonen AP, Saleh M, Feng XL, Müllen K, Fasel R (2010) Atomically precise bottom-up fabrication of graphene nanoribbons. Nature 466:470–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yan QM, Huang B, Yu J, Zheng FW, Zang J, Wu J, Gu BL, Liu F, Duan WH (2007) Intrinsic current-voltage characteristics of graphene nanoribbon transistors and effect of edge doping. Nano Lett 7:1469–1473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Li PP, Zheng YP, Shi T, Wang YD, Li MZ, Chen C, Zhang JX (2016) A solvent-free graphene oxide nanoribbon colloid as filler phase for epoxy-matrix composites with enhanced mechanical, thermal and tribological performance. Carbon 96:40–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zehtab YA, Chizari K, Jalilov AS, Tour J, Sundararaj U (2015) Helical and dendritic unzipping of carbon nanotubes: a route to nitrogen-doped graphene nanoribbons. ACS Nano 9:5833–5845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    John R, Shinde DB, Liu L, Ding F, Xu Z, Vijayan C, Pillai VK, Pradeep T (2014) Sequential electrochemical unzipping of single-walled carbon nanotubes to graphene ribbons revealed by in situ raman spectroscopy and imaging. ACS Nano 8:234–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Higginbotham AL, Kosynkin DV, Alexander S, Zhengzong S, Tour JM (2010) Lower-defect graphene oxide nanoribbons from multiwalled carbon nanotubes. ACS Nano 4:2059–2069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dimiev AM, Khannanov A, Vakhitov I, Kiiamov A, Shukhina K, Tour JM (2018) Revisiting the mechanism of oxidative unzipping of multiwall carbon nanotubes to graphene nanoribbons. ACS Nano 12:3985–3993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fortunato GV, Lima FD, Maia G (2016) Oxygen-reduction reaction strongly electrocatalyzed by Pt electrodeposited onto graphene or graphene nanoribbons. J Power Sources 302:247–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Long JL, Xie XQ, Xu J, Gu Q, Chen LM, Wang XX (2012) Nitrogen-doped graphene nanosheets as metal-free catalysts for aerobic selective oxidation of benzylic alcohols. ACS Catal 2:622–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Xie H, Tang SC, Gong ZL, Vongehr S, Fang F, Li M, Meng XK (2014) 3D nitrogen-doped graphene/Co(OH)2-nanoplate composites for high-performance electrochemical pseudocapacitors. RSC Adv 4:61753–61758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Liu ZP, Ma RZ, Osada M, Takada K, Sasaki T (2005) Selective and controlled synthesis of α-and β-cobalt hydroxides in highly developed hexagonal platelets. J Am Chem Soc 127:13869–13874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yang ZB, Liu MK, Zhang C, Tjiu WW, Liu TX, Peng HS (2013) Carbon nanotubes bridged with graphene nanoribbons and their use in high-efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells. Angew Chem Int Ed 52:3996–3999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wu ZL, Li CK, Yu JG, Chen XQ (2017) MnO2/reduced graphene oxide nanoribbons: facile hydrothermal preparation and their application in amperometric detection of hydrogen peroxide. Sens Actuators, B 239:544–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Aghazadeh M, Shiri HM, Barmi AAM (2013) Uniform Co(OH)2 disc-like nanostructures prepared by low-temperature electrochemical rout as an electrode material for supercapacitors. Appl Surf Sci 273:237–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Chen S, Qiao SZ (2013) Hierarchically porous nitrogen-doped graphene-NiCo2O4 hybrid paper as an advanced electrocatalytic water-splitting material. ACS Nano 7:10190–10196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fan XB, Peng WC, Li Y, Li XY, Wang SL, Zhang GL, Zhang FB (2010) Deoxygenation of exfoliated graphite oxide under alkaline conditions: a green route to graphene preparation. Adv Mater 20:4490–4493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zhang LJ, Zheng R, Li S, Liu BK, Wang DJ, Wang LL, Xie TF (2014) Enhanced photocatalytic H2 generation on cadmium sulfide nanorods with cobalt hydroxide as cocatalyst and insights into their photogenerated charge transfer properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:13406–13412CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education for Advanced Catalysis MaterialsZhejiang Normal UniversityJinhuaPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations