Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 9, pp 6971–6981 | Cite as

Magnetically sensitive nanocomposites based on the conductive shear-stiffening gel

  • Xiwen Fan
  • Sheng Wang
  • Shuaishuai Zhang
  • Yu WangEmail author
  • Xinglong GongEmail author
Composites
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper a novel multi-functional composite with high electrical conductivity and excellent magnetic field sensitivity was fabricated by embedding carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and carbonyl iron powders (CIPs) into shear-stiffening gel (STG). Oscillatory shear test demonstrated its excellent rheological properties. When the mass fractions of CNTs and CIPs were 1 wt% and 50 wt%, the increase in storage modulus (G′) reached 585% under 100 Hz oscillatory shear and 428% under 1.2 T magnetic flux density with respect to its initial state. The resistivity of this CNT–CIP–STG composite achieved 25 Ω m and showed strong dependence on the magnetic field. When the external magnetic flux density was 873 mT, the normalized electrical resistance response reached up to − 40.5%. Linearly increasing and step magnetic field was employed to study the electrical and mechanical behaviors of this CNT–CIP–STG composite. The instantaneous response and time effect were discussed. Interestingly, oscillatory shear showed limited influence on the electrical conductivity but notable enhancement on the sensitivity to magnetic field. A mechanic–electric coupling mechanism was proposed to illustrate enhancement of shear thickening effect and sensibility to magnetic field.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial supports from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11572309), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB22040502), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WK2480000002, WK2090050045) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2018M632543) are gratefully acknowledged. This work is also supported by the Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology.

References

  1. 1.
    Xu CH, Wang Y, Wu J, Song S, Cao S, Xuan SH, Jiang WQ, Gong XL (2017) Anti-impact response of Kevlar sandwich structure with silly putty core. Compos Sci Technol 153:168–177Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    He QY, Gong XL, Xuan SH, Jiang WQ, Chen Q (2015) Shear thickening of suspensions of porous silica nanoparticles. J Mater Sci 50(18):6041–6049.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9151-5 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hogg PJ (2006) Perspectives-composites in armor. Science 314(5802):1100–1101Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liang J, Zhang XH (2015) Rheological properties of SP in shock transmission application. J Mater Civil Eng 27(9):04014250Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lin XG, Guo F, Du CB, Yu GJ (2018) The mechanical properties of a novel STMR damper based on magnetorheological silly putty. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2018:2681461Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang Y, Ding L, Zhao C, Wang S, Xuan S, Jiang H, Gong X (2018) A novel magnetorheological shear-stiffening elastomer with self-healing ability. Compos Sci Technol 168:303–311Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wagner HD, Lourie O, Zhou XF (1999) Macrofragmentation and microfragmentation phenomena in composite materials. Compos A 30(1):59–66Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhou W, Cui K, Tian N, Liu D, Liu Y, Meng L, Li X, He J, Li L, Li X, Tian F (2013) Disentanglement decelerating flow-induced nucleation. Polymer 54(2):942–947Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chattaraj S, Pant P, Nanavati H (2018) Inter-relationships between mechanical properties of glassy polymers from nanoindentation and uniaxial compression. Polymer 144:128–141Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cross R (2012) Elastic and viscous properties of silly putty. Am J Phys 80(10):870–875Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tian TF, Li WH, Ding J, Alici G, Du H (2012) Study of shear-stiffened elastomers. Smart Mater Struct 21(12):125009Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goertz MP, Zhu XY, Houston JE (2009) Temperature dependent relaxation of a “solid–liquid”. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 47(13):1285–1290Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Palmer RM, Green PC (2010) Energy absorbing material, U.S. Patent 7,794,827[P]Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alam R, Lightcap IV, Karwacki CJ, Kamat PV (2014) Sense and shoot: simultaneous detection and degradation of low-level contaminants using graphene-based smart material assembly. ACS Nano 8(7):7272–7278Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zambrzycki M, Fraczek-Szczypta A (2018) Conductive hybrid polymer composites based on recycled carbon fibres and carbon nanofillers. J Mater Sci 53(10):7403–7416.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2062-5 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee JS, Shin KY, Cheong OJ, Kim JH, Jang J (2015) Highly sensitive and multifunctional tactile sensor using free-standing ZnO/PVDF thin film with graphene electrodes for pressure and temperature monitoring. Sci Rep 5:7887Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    He S, Li H, Chen HL (2018) Preparation of light-sensitive polymer/graphene composite via molecular recognition by beta-cyclodextrin. J Mater Sci 53(20):14337–14349.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2639-z Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhou G, Wang W, Peng M (2018) Functionalized aramid nanofibers prepared by polymerization induced self-assembly for simultaneously reinforcing and toughening of epoxy and carbon fiber/epoxy multiscale composite. Compos Sci Technol 168:312–319Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boland CS, Khan U, Ryan G, Barwich S, Charifou R, Harvey A, Backes C, Li Z, Ferreira MS, Mobius ME, Young RJ, Coleman JN (2016) Sensitive electromechanical sensors using viscoelastic graphene–polymer nanocomposites. Science 354(6317):1257–1260Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Borin DY, Stepanov GV (2015) Elastomer with magneto- and electrorheological properties. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 26(14):1893–1898Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ge J, Yao HB, Wang X, Ye YD, Wang JL, Wu ZY, Liu JW, Fan FJ, Gao HL, Zhang CL, Yu SH (2013) Stretchable conductors based on silver nanowires: improved performance through a binary network design. Angew Chem Int Ed 52(6):1654–1659Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang S, Xuan SH, Jiang WQ, Jiang WF, Yan L, Mao Y, Liu M, Gong XL (2015) Rate-dependent and self-healing conductive shear stiffening nanocomposite: a novel safe-guarding material with force sensitivity. J Mater Chem A 3(39):19790–19799Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang S, Jiang WQ, Jiang WF, Ye F, Mao Y, Xuan SH, Gong XL (2014) Multifunctional polymer composite with excellent shear stiffening performance and magnetorheological effect. J Mater Chem C 2(34):7133–7140Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Golinelli N, Spaggiari A, Dragoni E (2017) Mechanical behaviour of magnetic silly putty: viscoelastic and magnetorheological properties. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 28(8):953–960Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim GM, Yang BJ, Cho KJ, Kim EM, Lee HK (2017) Influences of CNT dispersion and pore characteristics on the electrical performance of cementitious composites. Compos Struct 164:32–42Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liu Z, Pickeb SJ, Besseling NAM (2014) Polyborosiloxanes (PBSs), synthetic kinetics and characterization. Macromolecules 47:4531–4537Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gkikas G, Barkoula NM, Paipetis AS (2012) Effect of dispersion conditions on the thermo-mechanical and toughness properties of multi walled carbon nanotubes-reinforced epoxy. Composites B 43(6):2697–2705Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mittal G, Dhand V, Rhee KY, Park SJ, Lee WR (2015) A review on carbon nanotubes and graphene as fillers in reinforced polymer nanocomposites. J Ind Eng Chem 21:11–25Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Houston JE (2005) A local-probe analysis of the rheology of a “solid liquid”. J Polym Sci Pol Phys 43(21):2993–2999Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ma P-C, Siddiqui NA, Marom G, Kim J-K (2010) Dispersion and functionalization of carbon nanotubes for polymer-based nanocomposites: a review. Compos A 41(10):1345–1367Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tkalya EE, Ghislandi M, de With G, Koning CE (2012) The use of surfactants for dispersing carbon nanotubes and graphene to make conductive nanocomposites. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 17(4):225–231Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    An HN, Sun B, Picken SJ, Mendes E (2012) Long time response of soft magnetorheological gels. J Phys Chem B 116(15):4702–4711Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CAS Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and Design of Materials, Department of Modern Mechanics, CAS Center for Excellence in Complex System MechanicsUniversity of Science and Technology of China (USTC)HefeiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations